Biomedical subjects

David Fitchett

Publications and source records attributed to David Fitchett.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Comparison of effectiveness of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin to reduce silent and clinically apparent acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Electrocardiographic (ECG) estimates of myocardial infarct size based on the Selvester ECG score have been shown to predict mortality and left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This score has also been used to identify not clinically apparent AMI ("silent" AMI) and to determine treatment effect, suggesting it could serve as a clinical trial end point. The objective of this study was to compare the rate of silent AMI as measured by the Selvester QRS score in patients with a non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with enoxaparin versus intravenous unfractionated heparin who were participating in a continuous ECG monitoring substudy of the Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-wave Coronary Events study (ESSENCE) and INTegrelin and Enoxaparin Randomized Assessment of acute Coronary syndrome Treatment trial (INTERACT). Enoxaparin was associated with a 56% relative risk decrease in silent AMI at 96 hours compared with unfractionated heparin (2.7% vs 6.1% p = 0.03). Similarly, enoxaparin decreased Holter-detected myocardial ischemia compared with unfractionated heparin (18.7% vs 35.9%, p = 0.03). In conclusion, enoxaparin significantly decreased the composite of silent AMI or clinical AMI and death at 1 year (9.3% vs 21%, p = 0.0001).

Anticoagulants↗

PubMed2006

Prognostic significance of admission heart failure in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (from the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome Registries).

We evaluated the in-hospital and 1-year outcomes and predictors of admission heart failure in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACSs) without previous heart failure. We analyzed 4,825 patients with NSTE-ACS without a history of congestive heart failure who were included in the multicenter Canadian ACS Registries. Patients in Killip's class II/III on admission (n = 559, 11.6%) were compared with patients in Killip's class I. Patients with heart failure on admission were older (72 [64, 79] vs 64 [54, 73] years, p < 0.0001), with higher baseline creatinine levels (96 vs 88 mmol/dl, p <0.0001), more diabetes (32.2% vs 22.8%, p < 0.0001), hypertension (58% vs 52.4%, p = 0.014), previous myocardial infarction (MI; 38.9% vs 30.3%, p < 0.0001), previous stroke (13.5% vs 7.4%, p < 0.0001), and had more ST depression on admission (27.7% vs 17.3%, p < 0.0001). In-hospital treatment was similar except for a lower rate of aspirin therapy and fewer coronary interventions. Crude event rates were significantly higher in patients with heart failure (in-hospital death 3.6% vs 1.1%, p < 0.0001; death or MI 7.9% vs 4.7%, p = 0.0011; stroke 1.1% vs 0.4%, p = 0.03). One-year event rates were also higher in patients with heart failure (death 14.6% vs 4.4%, p < 0.0001; MI 9.3% vs 6.6%, p = 0.03; death or MI 21.5% vs 10.3%, p < 0.0001). Variables independently associated with heart failure were age (odds ratio 1.57, 95% confidence interval 1.43 to 1.73), diabetes mellitus (odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.24 to 1.89), admission ST depression (odds ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.90), previous MI, and baseline creatinine. Heart failure on admission was an independent predictor of in-hospital death, death or MI, and stroke and of 1-year death and death or MI. In conclusion, in patients with NSTE-ACS, heart failure on admission is associated with increased short- and long-term rates of death and MI.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Optimal care of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes patients: shared responsibilities between the cardiologist and diabetologist.

Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease are inextricably linked. Patients with type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of cardiovascular events and mortality. However, controlling blood glucose, which until recently had often been the focus of the diabetologist, is only one component of optimal cardiovascular risk reduction. Vascular protection of the patient with diabetes also includes management of hypertension and dyslipidaemia and lifestyle changes such as smoking cessation. Now both cardiologists and diabetologists need to optimise all components of vascular protection, including glycaemic control, in patients with diabetes. An elevated blood glucose is predictive of poor outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes, even if frank diabetes is not present. Early control of hyperglycaemia should be achieved: a strategy that results in improved outcomes. More than two-thirds of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have abnormal glucose regulation, which is a predictor of poor outcome. Therefore, the presence of diabetes (and/or glucose intolerance) should be routinely screened for in cardiac patients on admission to hospital. Early identification and treatment of CAD in patients with diabetes is important for optimal prevention of cardiovascular events. However, screening all diabetes patients for CAD is not feasible, and selection of patients for non-invasive cardiac testing remains a challenge for both the diabetologist and cardiologist. Optimal care of diabetic and cardiac patients requires a multidisciplinary team approach, with key roles for the cardiologist and diabetologist.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

PubMed2006

Treatment and one-year outcome of patients with renal dysfunction across the broad spectrum of acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the treatment and long-term outcome of patients with renal dysfunction across the broad spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in Canada. OBJECTIVES: To examine the treatment patterns and outcome of ACS patients with renal dysfunction. METHODS: In the prospective, multicentre, Canadian ACS Registry, 3510 patients hospitalized for ACS (including unstable angina, ST and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction) were categorized into four groups: normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CrCl] 90 mL/min or greater; n=1152), mild renal dysfunction (CrCl 60 mL/min to 89 mL/min; n=1253), moderate renal dysfunction (CrCl 30 mL/min to 59 mL/min; n=944) and severe renal dysfunction (CrCl less than 30 mL/min; n=161). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the independent prognostic value of renal dysfunction, and the association of various therapies with one-year survival. RESULTS: All-cause mortality at one year was 2.8%, 6.4%, 14.5% and 40.9% in patients with normal renal function, and mild, moderate and severe renal dysfunction, respectively (P for trend<0.001). After adjusting for other prognosticators, moderate (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.08 to 3.08) and severe (OR 6.29, 95% CI 3.37 to 11.77) renal dysfunction remained independent predictors of one-year death. Patients with renal dysfunction were less likely to receive fibrinolytic therapy, to undergo coronary angiography and revascularization in hospital, and to be treated with acetylsalicylic acid, beta-blockers and lipid-lowering therapy at discharge and at one-year follow-up. The association of in-hospital revascularization, and discharge use of acetylsalicylic acid and beta-blockers with better one-year survival was similar among patients with normal and impaired renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Renal dysfunction is prevalent and independently predicts higher mortality in patients with ACS. The current underutilization of effective therapies may contribute to the poor outcome. There remains an important opportunity to improve care in this high-risk population.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2006

Transfer for urgent percutaneous coronary intervention early after thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the TRANSFER-AMI pilot feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Most hospitals in Canada do not have percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) facilities and use thrombolysis as reperfusion therapy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Urgent PCI after thrombolysis may optimize reperfusion and prevent reinfarction and recurrent ischemia. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of transferring high-risk STEMI patients from community hospitals in Ontario to PCI centres for urgent PCI within 6 h of thrombolysis. METHODS: Patients with anterior or high-risk inferior STEMI received tenecteplase and were urgently transferred to PCI centres. PCI was performed if at least 70% stenosis was present in the infarct-related artery, regardless of flow, using coronary stents. Transfer of stable patients back to community hospitals was encouraged 24 h to 48 h after PCI. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were transferred and underwent PCI a median of 3.9 h (range 2.7 h to 6.4 h) after thrombolysis. No complications occurred during transfer. One death occurred that was related to failed reperfusion and cardiogenic shock. Minor access-site bleeding occurred in five patients. Fifteen patients were transferred back to their community hospitals within 24 h of PCI. There were no further deaths or reinfarctions at one-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of high-risk STEMI patients for urgent PCI within 6 h after thrombolysis appears feasible. The randomized trial phase of the Trial of Routine ANgioplasty and Stenting after Fibrinolysis to Enhance Reperfusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TRANSFER-AMI) will compare this strategy with standard treatment after thrombolysis.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

In-hospital revascularization and one-year outcome of acute coronary syndrome patients stratified by the GRACE risk score.

In the prospective, multicenter Canadian Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry, in-hospital revascularization was independently associated with better 1-year survival only among patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes stratified by the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score; similar benefits were not observed in the low- and intermediate-risk groups. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk score appears to be a useful risk stratification tool that identifies high-risk patients for whom more aggressive treatment is warranted.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Have angiotensin receptor blockers lived up to expectations?

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were introduced after clinical trials showed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) to have extensive clinical benefits in a wide range of diseases. Consequently, it has been more difficult for clinical trials to demonstrate similar, enhanced or additive benefits of ARBs. However, ARBs were introduced with the hypothesis that they were likely a more effective method of interrupting the renin-angiotensin system and would result in enhanced outcomes. Clinical trials in high-risk vascular patients (after myocardial infarction), patients with heart failure and patients with nephropathy show the benefits of ACE inhibition. ARBs likely have similar benefits as ACEIs when used after myocardial infarction, in patients with heart failure and for management of diabetic nephropathy. However, ARBs generally remain a second-line treatment because it has been more difficult to demonstrate that ARBs prevent acute vascular events, such as myocardial infarction, together with the greater clinical trial evidence for ACE inhibition. The primary application of ACEIs over ARBs is reflected in the Canadian clinical guidelines for the management of patients with diabetes, hypertension, heart failure and following myocardial infarction. Until the completion of clinical trials, such as the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET), that examine whether ARBs have vascular protective properties similar to ACEIs, it is unlikely that the clinical guidelines will change.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers↗

PubMed2005

Enoxaparin and percutaneous coronary intervention: a Canadian perspective.

BACKGROUND: The low molecular weight heparin enoxaparin is commonly used in the management of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). It is perceived that there is variable acceptance of the use of enoxaparin in patients with ACS in conjunction with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by Canadian interventional cardiologists, as well as diverse approaches to the procedural (ie, PCI) management of anticoagulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A survey assessing physician and centre demographics, as well as the opinion and approach to the use of enoxaparin in patients undergoing PCI, was developed. All 141 interventional cardiologists performing PCI in Canada were sent the survey, with a 52% response rate. The majority (64%) of respondents were comfortable performing PCI during enoxaparin treatment, but almost one-half (46.5%) stated a preference to have a point-of-care measurement of the anticoagulation level during the procedure. Various 'top-up' protocols are used across the country, including fixed-dose intravenous (IV) enoxaparin, weight-adjusted IV enoxaparin, fixed-dose IV unfractionated heparin, weight-adjusted IV unfractionated heparin and IV unfractionated heparin titrated to a target activated clotting time. Although the median time threshold for administering a 'top-up' dose of anticoagulation matched current recommendations, there was a wide variation ranging from 2 h to 10 h (median 8 h). CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of Canadian interventional cardiologists were comfortable performing PCI in patients treated with enoxaparin, the survey demonstrated various levels of confidence and a diverse range of 'top-up' anticoagulation procedures. Nationwide guidelines for the management of anticoagulation in patients with ACS undergoing PCI with enoxaparin should be developed from the best available clinical and research evidence to limit potential patient risk of inadequate or excessive anticoagulation. This is especially relevant in view of the association between switching among anticoagulant therapies and an increased bleeding risk in patients undergoing early cardiac catheterization and PCI that was found in the recently reported Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (SYNERGY) trial.

Angina, Unstable↗

PubMed2004

One-year outcome of patients after acute coronary syndromes (from the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry).

The objective of this study was to determine the management and outcome of less [corrected] selected patients with an acute coronary syndrome during hospitalization and up to 1 year after discharge. The Canadian Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry was a prospective observational study of patients admitted with suspected acute coronary syndromes. Data on demographic and clinical characteristics, in-hospital treatment, and outcomes were recorded. At 1 year, vital status, medication use, recurrent cardiac events, and procedures were determined by telephone contact. Of the 5,312 patients enrolled, 4,627 had a final diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, with Q-wave myocardial infarction in 27.7%, non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in 33.2%, and unstable angina pectoris in 39.1%. During hospitalization, coronary angiography and revascularization were performed in 39.6% and 20.3% of patients, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.4% overall. At discharge, 87.8%, 76.4%, 56.0%, and 54.8% of patients were prescribed aspirin, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and lipid-lowering agents, respectively. Unadjusted 1-year mortality rates for hospital survivors were 6.5%, 10%, and 5.4% for those with Q-wave myocardial infarction, non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, and unstable angina pectoris groups, respectively (p <0.0001). This difference in mortality rate remained significant after adjusting for other prognosticators, whereas the use of coronary angiography and revascularization after discharge was similar across patients. At 1 year, fewer patients were maintained on aspirin and beta blockers, whereas the use of lipid-lowering therapy increased (all p <0.0001). Despite similar rates of coronary angiography and revascularization after discharge, patients with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction had worse outcomes at 1 year. Moreover, there was a significant opportunity to enhance the discharge and long-term use of evidence-based secondary prevention therapies.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Use of time-dependent measures to estimate benefits of beta-blockers after myocardial infarction.

PURPOSE: To estimate the reduction in all-cause mortality conferred by beta-blockers in a population-based cohort of elderly survivors of myocardial infarction during the year following hospital discharge. METHODS: A dynamic retrospective cohort was assembled from persons aged 66 years and over surviving myocardial infarction in Quebec between 1990 and 1993. Information on hospitalizations was linked to medication and physician claims, demographic characteristics and vital status. Subjects prescribed beta-blockers at hospital discharge had fewer comorbid medical conditions, less pre-existing cardiovascular disease and less severe infarcts. To control for these differences, analyzes were restricted to subjects receiving at least one beta-blocker and mortality was compared between periods with and without beta-blocker exposure using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Among 14,547 survivors of myocardial infarction, 41% were dispensed at least one beta-blocker. Among those subjects, the risk of dying during periods of beta-blocker use was reduced 40% (hazard ratio = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.5, 0.7). CONCLUSION: Confounding by indication threatens the validity of observational studies of intended effects of medications. For elderly survivors of myocardial infarction, the estimated benefit of beta-blockers from observational studies is greater than the estimate from randomized trials. Greater benefits do not seem to be an artifact arising from systematically prescribing beta-blockers to subjects with better prognosis. Reducing confounding by indication can enhance the validity of observational studies of medications and widen research applications of administrative health databases. While the actual benefits of medications are never truly known these studies can provide a credible range that brackets the truth.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2004

Clinical trial--derived risk model may not generalize to real-world patients with acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Accurate risk stratification can guide clinical decision-making in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, the applicability of risk models to the general ACS population remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to validate and compare a modified international clinical trial and a registry-based risk model in a contemporary, less selected ACS population. METHODS: In the prospective, observational Canadian ACS Registry, 4627 patients with ACS were enrolled from 51 centers. Baseline patient data were recorded on standardized case report forms. We evaluated risk models derived from the Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy (PURSUIT) and the Global Registry of Acute Cardiac Events (GRACE) predicting in-hospital death among patients with non-ST-elevation ACS. Model discrimination was measured by the c-statistic, and calibration was assessed graphically and by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality rates were 2.4% overall and 1.5% among the patients with non-ST-elevation ACS (n = 2925; 63.2%) in our validation cohort. Both the in-hospital PURSUIT and GRACE risk models showed similar and good prognostic discrimination (c-statistics = 0.84 and 0.83, respectively; P = .69 for difference). The GRACE model also demonstrated good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .40). In contrast, calibration in the PURSUIT model was poor (Hosmer-Lemeshow P < .001), with consistent overestimation of risks. CONCLUSIONS: Both the PURSUIT and GRACE models demonstrated good discrimination for in-hospital mortality rates in the Canadian ACS Registry. However, the GRACE risk model, derived from a less selected population, provided superior calibration in risk assessment across the spectrum of ACS. Our findings underscore the potential importance of risk model validation in the general ACS population rather than a clinical trial population to establish its generalizability before integration into clinical practice.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Troponin is more useful than creatine kinase in predicting one-year mortality among acute coronary syndrome patients.

AIMS: To compare the long-term prognostic value of troponins (Tn) vs. conventional cardiac biomarker creatine kinase (CK) and CK-MB across the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the prospective, observational Canadian ACS Registry, 4627 patients with ACS were enrolled from 51 centres. The CK, CK-MB, Tn samples were analysed in each hospital clinical laboratory and the results related to the reference levels of the individual laboratories. The study cohort comprised 3138 (67.8%) patients who had both CK (or CK-MB) and Tn measurements during the first 24 h of hospitalisation. Vital status at one-year was determined by standardized telephone interview. 61.2% and 59.0% of patients had abnormal Tn and CK (or CK-MB) levels, respectively. Vital status at one-year was ascertained for 2950 patients (6% lost to follow-up). Among patients with normal CK (or CK-MB) levels, elevated Tn was associated with increased one-year mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.06; 95% CI 1.37-3.11; P=0.001). Similarly, among patients with abnormal CK (or CK-MB) levels, abnormal Tn predicted higher one-year mortality (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.14-2.93; P=0.01). In contrast, abnormal CK (or CK-MB) was not predictive of mortality after stratification by Tn status. In multivariable analysis controlling for other known prognosticators including creatinine, abnormal Tn (adjusted OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.30-2.44; P<0.001) but not CK/CK-MB was independently associated with increased one-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated Tn was independently associated with worse outcome at one-year, while CK or CK-MB status did not provide incremental prognostic information. Our findings support the use of Tn in the risk stratification of unselected ACS patients.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Canadian Cardiovascular Society Consensus Conference 2002: Management of heart disease in the elderly patient.

Cardiovascular disease is a major health issue for the elderly patient. Many diagnostic, therapeutic and ethical issues are specific for the the older adult with heart disease. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society 2002 Consensus Conference provides recommendations for the most frequently encountered cardiac problems in the elderly patient. A common theme of the recommendations is the need to apply the best evidence based medicine together with an assessment of frailty, comorbidity and quality of life. A major goal of the conference was to identify treatments that are not optimally used in the older patient.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

More than just hype.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

PubMed2003

Randomized evaluation of the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes receiving the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide.

BACKGROUND: Current pharmacotherapeutic options for high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients include aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. A key issue of uncertainty is the safety and efficacy of combination glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor and low-molecular-weight heparin therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 746 patients with rest ischemic discomfort within 24 hours after the onset of symptoms and ST-segment deviation and/or elevation of serum cardiac markers to receive open-label enoxaparin (1 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily) or unfractionated heparin (70-U/kg bolus; 15 U x kg(-1) x h(-1) infusion, titrated to an activated partial thromboplastin time of 1.5 to 2 times control) for 48 hours. All patients received aspirin and eptifibatide (180- microg/kg bolus; 2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) infusion). Major non-coronary artery bypass surgery-related bleeding at 96 hours (primary safety outcome) was significantly lower among enoxaparin-treated patients than among heparin-treated patients (1.8% versus 4.6%, P=0.03). Minor bleeding was more frequent in the enoxaparin group (30.3% versus 20.8%, P=0.003). Patients in the enoxaparin group were less likely to experience ischemia as detected by continuous ECG evaluation (primary efficacy outcome) during the initial (14.3% versus 25.4%, P=0.0002) and subsequent (12.7% versus 25.9%, P<0.0001) 48-hour monitoring periods. Death or myocardial infarction at 30 days was significantly lower in the enoxaparin group (5% versus 9%, P=0.031). CONCLUSIONS: When aspirin and eptifibatide are used in high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients, enoxaparin improves outcomes (determined on the basis of better safety and efficacy) compared with currently recommended unfractionated heparin therapy and provides a useful novel alternative therapeutic strategy.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2003

Do glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors interact with assays for myocardial necrosis?

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether glycoprotein (GP) IIB/IIIA inhibitors interact with cardiac marker assays: total creatine kinase (CK), CK-MB, and troponin-I (TnI). DESIGN AND METHODS: Two blood samples were collected during coronary angiography or angioplasty and analyzed for cardiac markers: one after arterial sheath insertion and the second 10 mins later. In the first phase (n=101), heparin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were given between samples, in the second phase (n=45) only heparin was given, and in the third phase (n=54) neither drug was given. RESULTS: In each phase, there was a significant decline in total CK over the 10 min period. There were no consistent significant changes in CK-MB or TnI. CONCLUSIONS: Neither GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors nor i.v. heparin interact with cardiac marker assays. There is a small but significant decline in total CK levels within 10 mins of arterial puncture that is unrelated to administration of these drugs.

Abciximab↗

PubMed2002

The effect of physicians' training on prescribing beta-blockers for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in the elderly.

PURPOSE: The objective was to determine whether the year and medical school of graduation, the medical specialty and the sex of the treating physician was associated with prescribing beta-blockers after hospital discharge among survivors of myocardial infarction (MI), after adjusting for patient characteristics. METHODS: We carried out a dynamic retrospective cohort study using data from a longitudinal database that contained information on Quebec residents over the age of 65 years sent home from hospital after MI between 1990 and 1993. The outcome was a beta-blocker being dispensed after hospital discharge. Logistic regression was used to estimate the association between training characteristics and beta-blocker dispensation and clustering of patients within physicians was accounted for using Generalized Estimating Equations. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 14,334 MI survivors who were treated by 3209 physicians, yielding a mean of about 4.5 patients per physician [standard deviation (SD) = 8.2]. Beta-blockers were prescribed to approximately one-third of subjects. After adjusting for patients' demographic characteristics, comorbid medical conditions, and markers of MI severity, physicians who were more likely to prescribe a beta-blocker included cardiologists and the most recent graduates (graduating after 1989). Systematic differences were also observed between graduates of different medical schools. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for differences between patients', the sex of the physician was largely unrelated to prescribing beta-blockers for secondary prevention of MI. However, prescribing differed by training characteristics such as medical specialty and year and medical school of graduation.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2002

Development and prognosis of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era.

BACKGROUND: Data on non-Q myocardial infarctions (MI) are derived primarily from prethrombolytic era studies. Previous trials demonstrated different development rates and none reported on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Our goal was to determine the incidence and prognosis of non-Q-wave MI among patients with ST-segment elevation receiving thrombolysis. A retrospective analysis of 5 randomized controlled trials was made. The main outcome measures included rates of (1) transformation of ST-segment elevation to Q- and non-Q-wave MI and (2) inhospital and 1-year mortality and reinfarction among patients who subsequently develop a Q or non-Q MI postthrombolysis as compared to controls. RESULTS: Non-Q wave development was greater among patients receiving thrombolysis versus placebo/control (3.1% absolute difference, 95% CI 1.2%-5.0%). Among patients receiving thrombolysis, those who developed a non-Q MI experienced significantly lower inhospital and 1-year mortality (absolute differences -3.8% [95% CI -5.2% to -2.4%] and -6.4% [95% CI -9.9% to -3.0%], respectively) and reinfarction (absolute differences -2.9% [95% CI -4.3% to -1.6%] and -3.5% [95% CI -6.1% to -0.9%], respectively) rates, compared with those who evolved a Q MI. Inhospital and 1-year mortality was also significantly lower when compared to placebo/control patients who developed a non-Q MI (absolute differences 4.6% [95% CI -8.2% to -1.1%] and -7.5% [95% CI -12.5% to -2.5%], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving thrombolysis more often develop a non-Q-wave MI and have a better prognosis than either those who develop a Q MI postthrombolysis or a non-Q MI after standard medical therapy.

Electrocardiography↗