PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David G Parr

Publications and source records attributed to David G Parr.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Inflammation in sputum relates to progression of disease in subjects with COPD: a prospective descriptive study.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation is considered to be of primary pathogenic importance in COPD but the evidence on which current understanding is based does not distinguish between cause and effect, and no single mechanism can account for the complex pathology. We performed a prospective longitudinal study of subjects with COPD that related markers of sputum inflammation at baseline to subsequent disease progression. METHODS: A cohort of 56 patients with chronic bronchitis was characterized in the stable state at baseline and after an interval of four years, using physiological measures and CT densitometry. Sputum markers of airway inflammation were quantified at baseline from spontaneously produced sputum in a sub-group (n = 38), and inflammation severity was related to subsequent disease progression. RESULTS: Physiological and CT measures indicated disease progression in the whole group. In the sub-group, sputum myeloperoxidase correlated with decline in FEV1 (rs = -0.344, p = 0.019, n = 37). LTB4 and albumin leakage correlated with TLCO decline (rs = -0.310, p = 0.033, rs = -0.401, p = 0.008, respectively, n = 35) and IL-8 correlated with progression of lung densitometric indices (rs = -0.464, p = 0.005, n = 38). CONCLUSION: The data support a principal causative role for neutrophilic inflammation in the pathogenesis of COPD and suggest that the measurement of sputum inflammatory markers may have a predictive role in clinical practice.

Aged↗

Variability in densitometric assessment of pulmonary emphysema with computed tomography.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to investigate whether computed tomography (CT) densitometry can be applied consistently in different centers; and to evaluate the reproducibility of densitometric quantification of emphysema by assessment of different sources of variation, ie, intersite, interscan and inter- and intraobserver variability, in comparison with intersubject variability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 5 different hospitals, 119 patients with emphysema were scanned using standardized protocols. In each site, an observer performed a quantitative densitometric analysis (including blood recalibration) on the corresponding patient group (n=23-25) and one observer analyzed the entire group of 119 patients. After several months, the latter observer analyzed all data for a second time. Subsequently, different sources of variation were assessed by variance component analysis with and without volume correction of the data. RESULTS: Inter- and intraobserver variability marginally contributes to the total variability (<0.001%). The interscan variability was 0.02% of the total variation after application of volume correction. The intersite variability was 48% as a result of one deviating CT scanner. Air recalibration normalized deviating air densities in CT scanners. Within sites, the intersubject variability ranged between 93% and 99% based on the analysis of 2 subsequent CT scans of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all variability in the density measurement of emphysema originates from differences between scanners and from differences in severity of emphysema between patients. Lung densitometry with multislice CT scanners is a highly reproducible measurement, especially if corrected for lung volume, because this reduces interscan variability.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Pattern of emphysema distribution in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency influences lung function impairment.

FEV(1) is fundamental to the diagnosis and staging of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In emphysema, airflow obstruction usually coexists with impairment of gas exchange, but discordance is not infrequent. We hypothesized that variations in the distribution of emphysema would be associated with functional differences and therefore account for discordant physiology. We used quantitative computed tomography to assess emphysema severity and distribution in 119 subjects with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency (PiZ phenotype) and grouped them according to distribution pattern. In the 102 subjects with emphysema, 65 had a predominantly basal pattern ("basal"), but 37 (36%) had greater involvement of the upper regions ("apical"). Subjects from each group were matched for total volume of emphysema and age, and matched pairs analysis was used to relate emphysema distribution to clinical phenotype. Basal distribution was associated with greater impairment of FEV(1) (mean difference, 9.9% predicted; 95% confidence interval, 3.8 to 16.0; p = 0.002) but less impairment of gas exchange (Pa(O(2)) mean difference, 0.5 kPa, 0.03 to 0.1; p = 0.016) and alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (mean difference, 0.7 kPa; 0.2 to 1.2; p = 0.007) than the apical distribution. Emphysema distribution correlated with physiologic discordance (r = -0.409, p < 0.001). The use of single physiologic parameters as a surrogate measure of emphysema severity may introduce systematic bias in the staging of subjects with emphysema.

Adult↗

Influence of calibration on densitometric studies of emphysema progression using computed tomography.

The fundamental importance of calibration for any measuring device is indisputable, but computed tomography (CT) calibration in longitudinal lung densitometry studies is largely unexplored. Although the validity of CT as a measure of emphysema has been confirmed in cross-sectional studies, there are limited data on long-term reproducibility, and this is critically important for validating its use as an outcome measure in therapeutic trials. A general understanding of the strengths and pitfalls of CT densitometry is critical for physicians reviewing the published literature using this methodology. In our study of 57 patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (phenotype PiZ), progression of voxel index determined from three successive annual scans acquired with a fully calibrated scanner was intimately associated with changes in CT air densitometry, sampled from patient images. Images were therefore reanalyzed, using a correction technique validated in phantom studies that adjusted for changes in measured air density, and the reliability of the voxel index as a measure of emphysema progression was improved. Comparison of adjusted voxel index thresholds indicated the optimum threshold was -950 Hounsfield units. Internal air calibration is therefore critical in longitudinal and multicenter lung densitometry studies of emphysema and incorporation of a correction factor is essential for quantitative image analysis.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗