PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David Hailey

Publications and source records attributed to David Hailey.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Recommendations and supporting evidence in guidelines for referral of patients to sleep laboratories.

At the request of Canadian health ministries, we reviewed recommendations in guidelines prepared by professional bodies on the referral of individuals to sleep laboratories. Searching electronic databases and the Internet, we found 37 guidelines that covered 18 applications of sleep laboratory investigation including obstructive sleep apnea, other respiratory disorders, obstructive sleep apnea and other conditions in children, sudden infant death syndrome, treatment for snoring, insomnia, depression with insomnia, narcolepsy, restless legs syndrome/periodic limb movement disorder, parasomnias and circadian rhythm disorders. We identified recommendations on referral of patients for sleep studies and assessed the quality and relevance of evidence cited in support of these. Of 81 recommendations, 46 were supported by evidence from primary investigations. Only six cases cited evidence from well-conducted, prospective controlled studies. Evidence was highly relevant in 18 cases, of some relevance in 22 and of little or no relevance in six. No evidence was provided in support of 31 recommendations, and in four cases the guideline had identified an absence of available evidence. Although the publications from professional bodies that were reviewed contain much detailed information, evidence supporting many recommendations is limited. There is a need for further, good quality, studies of many sleep laboratory applications.

Adult↗

Managing external risks to health technology assessment programs.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a guide to identifying and managing risks for health technology assessment (HTA) programs and to obtain opinions on this topic from HTA agencies. METHODS: The risks and approaches to their management were compiled, drawing on experiences from HTA programs and the risk assessment literature. Opinion on this classification was obtained from members of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA). RESULTS: Twenty-one risks for HTA programs were identified under the categories Formulation of HTA Questions, Preparation of the HTA Product, Dissemination, and Contracting. For each risk area, potential consequences and suggested management approaches were outlined. Responses from ten HTA programs indicated substantial agreement regarding the risks that had been identified and on the importance of risk management for their own operations. CONCLUSIONS: Prudent management of HTA programs should take into account the risks related to external factors.

Health Policy↗

Survey on the involvement of consumers in health technology assessment programs.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to obtain information from members of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) on their involvement of consumers (patients, carers, and related organizations) in their programs. METHODS: A questionnaire for a survey was developed and sent to member agencies in October 2005. RESULTS: Of the thirty-seven agencies that provided responses, 57 percent involve consumers in some aspects of their HTA programs and 83 percent intend to involve consumers in the future. Summaries of HTA reports that are intended to be easily understood by consumers are prepared by 49 percent of the agencies, and 36 percent involve consumers in dissemination of HTA material. CONCLUSIONS: Most INAHTA members involve consumers in some aspects of their programs, although not always routinely. Involvement seems likely to increase in the future.

Community Participation↗

Quality and relevance of evidence in support of guideline recommendations for sleep laboratory investigations.

OBJECTIVES: As part of a review of guidelines for sleep laboratories, this study summarizes the quality and relevance of evidence cited in support of recommendations on investigations for individuals with sleep disorders. METHODS: Quality of evidence in support of each recommendation was rated as A (from well-conducted, prospective controlled studies), B (from controlled studies and case series, with minor shortcomings), or C (from case series or case series plus controlled studies with substantial limitations). Relevance of the cited evidence was also rated from A to C, in decreasing order of merit. RESULTS: Of eighty-one recommendations from thirty-seven guidelines, forty-six were supported by evidence from primary studies. Six recommendations were supported by category A evidence, fifteen by category B, and twenty-five recommendations by category C. The cited evidence was highly relevant to eighteen recommendations, of some relevance for twenty-two and of little or no relevance to six. Four recommendations were informed by an absence of available evidence. For the other thirty-one, no evidence was provided in support. CONCLUSIONS: The approach used provided a concise overview of recommendations and supporting evidence for decision-makers. Guidelines on the use of sleep laboratory investigations contain much detailed information, but evidence supporting several recommendations is of limited quality and relevance. Furthermore, good-quality studies of many sleep laboratory applications are needed to assist both health policy formulation and clinical practice.

Alberta↗

Mentoring a developing health technology assessment initiative in Romania: an example for countries with limited experience of assessing health technology.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assist and facilitate introduction and development of a health technology assessment (HTA) program in Romania. METHODS: Mentoring of an initiative group in Romania was provided by an HTA program in Canada. Mentoring activities included provision of HTA materials, participation in local seminars, facilitating contact with HTA and funding organizations, and in-house training of a professional from Romania. RESULTS: Since 1998, when the relationship was initiated, the Romanian group has been successful in developing an understanding of HTA and awareness of its utility among various decision-makers in the health system. Currently, although the need for HTA in Romania exists and interest in developing this activity has been officially expressed, HTA is still early in its development phase. The mentoring support helped to identify and define the need for HTA in Romania. Continuation of the existing relationship can be expected to strengthen the expertise in this country. However, while mentoring has been a valuable activity, it is not, by itself, sufficient to ensure development of an HTA program in Romania. The actions and decisions that could lead to implementing HTA in Romania depend on the local context. CONCLUSIONS: Mentoring services assisted the initiative group in promoting HTA in Romania. The implementation of HTA in Romania has not happened yet, and efforts need to continue to sustain the existing momentum. However, success in implementing an HTA program will depend on essential factors such as local political, economical, and educational support for this initiative and others like it.

Alberta↗

The need for cost-effectiveness studies in telemedicine.

Telemedicine has the potential substantially to improve the delivery of health care. However, cost-effectiveness studies are needed to help define the appropriate scope and application of telemedicine in different settings. Reports on the evaluation of telemedicine are dominated by technical and feasibility studies. Such studies may be very helpful for initial decision making. However, any cost information at this level tends to be very preliminary and often concerned with making a case to proceed further. Decision makers will wish for further information as the telemedicine application is introduced, to consider its effectiveness - its performance under routine conditions. Without information on the costs and effectiveness of telemedicine services, decision makers run the risk of supporting telemedicine systems that are not responsive to health-care needs or which do not provide cost-effective services. The most immediate needs seem to be improvements in the conduct and reporting of studies, and additional information on the performance of telemedicine in routine practice. Investigators need to provide transparent accounts of their studies, describing in detail the approaches taken, sources of data and assumptions made, and indicating the reliability of their results. Decisions may have to be made on the basis of limited studies, but sufficient detail must be made available to decision makers.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

2004 MacLean-Mueller prize enteral or parenteral nutrition for severe pancreatitis: a randomized controlled trial and health technology assessment.

BACKGROUND: The optimal route of nutrition in severe pancreatitis is controversial. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is preferred, but enteral nutrition (EN) promises to attenuate inflammation and prevent sepsis. We hypothesized that EN was at least equivalent to PN in reducing inflammation, providing effective nutrition and being cost-effective. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing PN to EN in pancreatitis in an academic, multi-institutional, tertiary care health system. We screened 728 consecutive patients. Twenty-eight patients with a Ranson's score greater than 2 who did not tolerate clear fluids 4 days after admission were randomized: 18 to PN and 10 to EN. Both groups were provided daily 105 kJ (25 kcal)/kg and 1.5 g/kg of protein, respectively, until they could tolerate a regular diet. RESULTS: C-reactive protein in EN patients was reduced by 50% 5 days faster than PN patients (Wilcoxon test, p = 0.09). Both groups received a similar number of kilojoules and achieved near normal prealbumin and 24-hour urinary nitrogen values. Neither regimen caused a change in cholecystokinin levels. Overall mortality was 4.9% (3 patients in the PN group). In 5 patients (4 PN, 1 EN) there were infected pancreatic collections. Nine EN patients dislodged the nasojejunal tube. EN had an average cost of dollar 1375 per patient compared with dollar 2608 for PN (p = 0.08). After sensitivity analysis, EN cost dollar 957 compared with dollar 2608 for PN (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: EN or PN is safe and provides adequate nutrition in severe pancreatitis. EN shows a trend toward faster attenuation of inflammation, with fewer septic complications and is the dominant therapy in terms of cost-effectiveness. This study favours EN for nutritional support in severe pancreatitis.

Acute Disease↗

The need for economic evaluation of telemedicine to evolve: the experience in Alberta, Canada.

Economic evaluation of telemedicine applications is required to provide decision makers in health care with appropriate information on costs and benefits of this information and communications technology. The level of economic evaluation should evolve as telemedicine applications mature. At the basic level, economic evaluation may include basic cost analysis and primarily observational data on nonmonetary benefits. The focus will change as telemedicine programs develop. At this intermediate level, practice patterns and workforce issues are addressed as they affect utilization and costs of telemedicine services. Longer-term economic evaluation, thus far not achieved in telemedicine assessment, should focus on assessment of health outcomes and economic impact. Alberta, Canada has made progress assessing telemedicine applications in psychiatry, radiology, rheumatology, and rehabilitation. Data availability and analytic resources continue to present challenges to economic assessment of telemedicine.

Alberta↗

Study quality and evidence of benefit in recent assessments of telemedicine.

We carried out a systematic review of recent telemedicine assessments to identify scientifically credible studies that included comparison with a non-telemedicine alternative and that reported administrative changes, patient outcomes or the results of an economic assessment. From 605 publications identified in the literature search, 44 papers met the selection criteria and were included in the review. Four other publications were identified through references cited in one of the retrieved papers and from a separate project to give a total of 48 papers for consideration, which referred to 42 telemedicine programmes and 46 studies. Some kind of economic analysis was included in 25 (52%) of the papers. In considering the studies, we used a quality appraisal approach that took account of both study design and study performance. For those studies that included an economic analysis, a further quality-scoring approach was applied to indicate how well the economic aspects had been addressed. Twenty-four of the studies were judged to be of high or good quality and 11 of fair to good quality but with some limitations. Seven studies were regarded as having limited validity and a further four as being unacceptable for decision makers. New evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of telemedicine was given by studies on geriatric care, intensive care and some of those on home care. For a number of other applications, reports of clinical or economic benefits essentially confirmed previous findings. Although further useful clinical and economic outcomes data have been obtained for some telemedicine applications, good-quality studies are still scarce.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Published evidence on the success of telecardiology: a mixed record.

We carried out a systematic review of the literature on telecardiology assessment from 1992 to September 2003. We selected articles reporting clinical, economic or administrative outcomes. Quality of evidence was assessed using an approach that considered both study design and study performance. Forty-four studies met the selection criteria. Studies of home care applications, particularly management of congestive heart failure, were of highest quality, giving a high degree of confidence in their findings. Studies on paediatric and non-emergency adult hospital applications were of poorer quality; they were mostly reports of case series and gave relatively little detail. Economic analysis was limited to cost studies and in most cases was judged to be of poor to fair quality. While telecardiology has been widely applied, there is still limited good-quality evidence of its benefits to health-care. Success in establishing the feasibility of telecardiology applications is offset by a failure to obtain convincing data on their influence on health outcomes and on their cost-effectiveness.

Cardiology↗

The status of telepsychiatry services in Canada: a national survey.

A survey of Canadian telepsychiatry programmes was undertaken to provide information for future health services. Fourteen programmes were identified. They used a variety of service models and administrative arrangements. The average number of clinical consultations per programme per year was 238, which corresponds to 107 psychiatric teleconsultations per million persons served by the programmes. The rate for children's telepsychiatry services was higher, at 194 per million. Comparison with some telepsychiatry programmes in the USA revealed similar patterns of activity. While the development of telepsychiatry services in Canada is promising, there is nevertheless concern regarding the viability and activity levels of these programmes over the long term. This survey demonstrates that programmes from across a large country can respond to a standardized questionnaire and provide comparable information.

Adult↗

Endoscope-based treatments for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Endoscope-based products for the treatment of more severe forms of gastroesophageal reflux disease provide an alternative to the use of drugs or surgery. Results from case series have shown that selected patients benefit through relief of symptoms and reduction of medication. Reported adverse effects appear to be minor. Efficacy has been mostly assessed over short periods and there is little information on comparison with other treatments. Procedural skills and appropriate training in their use are required. These technologies are promising, but their place in health care is not established.

Canada↗

Toward transparency in health technology assessment: a checklist for HTA reports.

OBJECTIVES: As an initiative of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA), a checklist for assessment reports was developed as a means of improving transparency and consistency in HTA. METHODS: Preparation of a summary of key elements in HTA reports, drawing on experience in preparation of such documents, information from guidelines for HTA, and individual assessments. Review by INAHTA agencies and modification of the summary to reflect the consensus. RESULTS: The resulting checklist includes 17 questions, with supporting detail. General areas covered include preliminary information, why and how the assessment has been prepared, the results of the assessment, implications of the results, and conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: The checklist is intended to be considered by those preparing or using an HTA report. It reflects the views of INAHTA members and is seen as a mechanism to improve the standard of HTA reports, being complementary to the more detailed guidelines on how to conduct assessments.

Canada↗

Health technology assessment, research, and implementation within a health region in Alberta, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the need for and implement health technology assessment (HTA) to inform decision making and policy within a regional health care system in Calgary (Alberta, Canada). METHODS: Published literature and organizational materials for the Calgary Health Region (CHR) and HTA units worldwide were reviewed. Key individuals within the provincial health ministry (Alberta Health and Wellness), CHR, the University of Calgary (U of C), funding agencies, and HTA organizations were consulted in a structured fashion. A structure for a regional HTA program was developed, taking into account relationships between these organizations. RESULTS: A locally focused HTA and implementation unit was deemed desirable. The Calgary Health Technology Implementation Unit (CaHTIU) was established. The CaHTIU was designed to efficiently integrate with CHR planning as well as undertake independent research activities. HTA activities focus primarily on CHR needs and are managed by a Health Technology Advisory Committee (HTAC) that consists of CHR management and other key individuals. Working groups contribute to and coordinate HTAs and implementation under the leadership of the unit Director, and include content as well as management individuals. The unit cooperates where appropriate with extant Canadian HTA organizations. CONCLUSIONS: The Calgary HTA unit is unique in Canada, because it functions within a regional health care system as well as a research institution. Advantages include a local focus in terms of applied HTAs, a systematic process for implementation of recommendations, and a collaborative atmosphere for research within the U of C.

Alberta↗

A profile of success and failure in telehealth--evidence and opinion from the Success and Failures in Telehealth conferences.

Papers presented at the three Successes and Failures in Telehealth conferences have made a helpful contribution to what is known about the practicalities of implementing and using telehealth. Ten of the 89 papers covered general concepts, 40 described primary studies and 26 discussed telehealth programmes or networks. Common themes that emerged on determinants of success and failure included the reliability of equipment, the reliability of vendors, political and budgetary issues,the perceived need for telehealth, the involvement of stakeholders, health professionals' opinions, the stability of management structures, the turnover of personnel and cooperation between organizations. Limitations in some papers included an absence of data, weak study designs, short-term perspectives and lack of information on health outcomes. Despite these limitations, the papers have made a valuable contribution to our knowledge of what has worked and what has failed in the field of telehealth.

Congresses as Topic↗

The reality of applying an assessment guideline to a telemedicine mental health programme.

A guideline for assessment of telemedicine applications was used by the Alberta Mental Health Board (AMHB) in its evaluation of a telemedicine mental health (TMH) service. Many attributes referred to in the guideline were well covered in the AMHB evaluation. However, there were limitations on the assessment of outcomes and cost-effectiveness. From the perspective of the AMHB, the guideline was helpful, although more so in the earlier stages of the TMH service than for its appraisal as it reached maturity. The measures of performance suggested by the guideline did not fully match local operational conditions. Constraints on the assessment of the mature TMH service included the complexity of the network, the limited resources available for evaluation and the routine administrative demands of decision makers. This experience points to the usefulness of standardized assessment approaches to telemedicine, but also to their limitations.

Alberta↗

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects.

Until recently, surgical repair was the standard treatment for an ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD), a common congenital heart defect. Closing ASDs using a device inserted via a catheter now offers another option for some patients. Limited comparative data indicate that newer approaches to transcatheter repair have a higher failure rate than that for surgery, but short-term complication rates are lower. Evidence from long-term follow-up of patients with device closure of ASDs is not yet available. Equipment and procedure costs may be higher for transcatheter closure than for surgery, but overall costs may be reduced through avoiding intensive care unit costs and through shorter hospital stays.

Canada↗

Publication bias in gastroenterological research - a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the determinants of publication and whether publication bias occurred in gastroenterological research. METHODS: A random sample of abstracts submitted to DDW, the major GI meeting (1992-1995) was evaluated. The publication status was determined by database searches, complemented by a mailed survey to abstract authors. Determinants of publication were examined by Cox proportional hazards model and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The sample included abstracts on 326 controlled clinical trials (CCT), 336 other clinical research reports (OCR), and 174 basic science studies (BSS). 392 abstracts (47%) were published as full papers. Acceptance for presentation at the meeting was a strong predictor of subsequent publication for all research types (overall, 54% vs. 34%, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.1). In the multivariate analysis, multi-center status was found to predict publication (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6-4.9). There was no significant association between direction of study results and subsequent publication. Studies were less likely to be published in high impact journals if the results were not statistically significant (OR 0.5, 95 CI 95% 0.3-0.6). The author survey identified lack of time or interest as the main reason for failure to publish. CONCLUSIONS: Abstracts which were selected for presentation at the DDW are more likely to be followed by full publications. The statistical significance of the study results was not found to be a predictor of publication but influences the chances for high impact publication.

Abstracting and Indexing↗