Planetary science: magnetic impact craters.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to David J Dunlop.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Compression devices have been shown to prevent thromboembolic disease. However, the pressures generated may not be the same as the ones recommended by the manufacturer. The purpose of this study is to investigate a new sequential compression device with feedback to maintain optimal therapy, and to determine whether therapy is improved with this new device. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A series of 50 patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty at a major tertiary-care hospital with a special interest in joint replacement were enrolled prospectively. In addition to pharmacological prophylaxis for thromboembolic disease, all patients received compression from a modified device. Maximum pressures generated and the rate of pressure rise in each of the 3 compartments within the device sleeves were measured and the results compared with data from historical controls. RESULTS: We considered therapy to be ideal when in a particular compression cycle all chambers of both right and left sleeves reach within 10% of their target pressures at within 10% of their target pressure rise rates. The average patient received this ideal therapy 88% of the time that the new trial sequential compression device was operating. This represents a dramatic improvement over previous devices. CONCLUSIONS: The new device allows dramatically improved pressures within the device because of a feedback loop that allows dynamic control of each chamber's pressure. Improved consistency of delivery should make it easier to accurately assess the true benefits of mechanical prophylaxis with a sequential compression device.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prognosis in patients with primary refractory or relapsed high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) is very poor--the 5-year survival being generally reported at 10%. DESIGN AND METHODS: Multiple salvage regimens have been investigated and, while response rates of 50-80% have been noted in selected patients, the long-term prognosis remains poor. Following the encouraging results in high risk Burkitt's and Burkitt-like lymphoma using the CODOX-M and IVAC protocols, we performed a pilot study using a similar regimen in patients with primary refractory or relapsed high grade NHL. RESULTS: The regimens were modified by a reduction in the intensity of intrathecal therapy. It was planned to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells following the IVAC cycle for use in subsequent autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in chemosensitive patients. The initial plan was to recruit 50 patients, but the study was closed after 8 due to excessive toxicity. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the CODOX-M/IVAC regimen is too toxic for this group of patients and does not result in better response rates than those to currently available salvage regimens.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.