PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David J Graham

Publications and source records attributed to David J Graham.

17 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Factors associated with celecoxib and rofecoxib utilization.

BACKGROUND: The cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) celecoxib and rofecoxib (before its removal) are marketed as having fewer gastrointestinal (GI)-related complications than nonselective NSAIDs. However, adverse reaction data suggest that the use of COX-2 selective NSAIDs is associated with clinically significant GI events. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether patients receiving celecoxib and rofecoxib have a greater underlying disease burden than patients prescribed nonselective NSAIDs. METHODS: The study population consisted of members of 11 health plans, aged >34 years, with a pharmacy claim for celecoxib or rofecoxib or a nonselective NSAID dispensed between February 1, 1999, and July 31, 2001, who had been continuously enrolled for >364 days before the dispensing date. Celecoxib and rofecoxib patients were randomly selected without replacement from a pool of eligible users in each of the 30 months. Nonselective NSAID users were randomly chosen without replacement within each month on a 2:1 ratio to cases; they could be chosen in more than one month. Univariate analyses comparing 9000 cases and 18 000 controls were performed, followed by a multiple logistic regression analysis conditioned on time. RESULTS: Increasing age, treatment by a rheumatologist or an orthopedic specialist, treatment with a high number of different medications in the past year, treatment with oral corticosteroids in the past year, and having had a previous GI bleed increased the likelihood of receiving celecoxib or rofecoxib, whereas treatment with a high number of nonselective NSAID prescriptions in the past year decreased it. Treatment with a high number of different medications was a predictor of increased prevalence of underlying diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients having a greater underlying disease burden were more likely to receive COX-2 selective NSAIDs than nonselective ones. Paradoxically, patients at higher risk for cardiovascular disease were channeled toward treatment with COX-2 selective NSAIDs, many of which may confer an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction and other adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Health plan administrative databases can efficiently identify serious myopathy and rhabdomyolysis.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the positive predictive values (PPVs) of specific criteria based upon International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9-CM) codes documented in health plan administrative databases for identification of cases of serious myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a retrospective study among patients enrolled in 11 geographically dispersed managed care organizations. Cohorts of new users of specific statins and fibrates were identified by selecting patients with an initial dispensing of the drug during the period 1 January 1998 to 30 June 2001. Potential cases of serious myopathy or rhabdomyolysis were identified using specific criteria based upon ICD-9-CM codes suggesting a muscle disorder or acute renal failure. RESULTS: A total of 194 hospitalizations meeting the criteria for chart review selection were identified among 206,732 new users of statins and 15,485 new users of fibrates. Overall, 31 cases of serious, clinically important myopathy or rhabdomyolysis (18%) were confirmed through chart review. Of these, 26 (84%) had a claim including codes for myoglobinuria (ICD-9-CM 791.3) or other disorders of muscle, ligament, and fascia (ICD-9-CM 728.89). A PPV of 74% (26 of 35 patients meeting criteria) was found for a composite definition that included (1) a primary or secondary discharge code for myoglobinuria, (2) a primary code for "other disorders of muscle," or (3) a secondary code for "other disorders of muscle" accompanied by a claim for a CK test within 7 days of hospitalization or a discharge code for acute renal failure. CONCLUSION: For rare adverse events such as serious myopathy or rhabdomyolysis, large population-based databases that include diagnosis and laboratory test claims data can facilitate epidemiologic research.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗
PubMed2005

Risk factors for prolonged QTc among US adults: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

BACKGROUND: QT interval prolongation can lead to torsades de pointes, a potentially fatal arrhythmia. Although research exists on the relationship between QT prolongation and clinical outcome, few studies have described risk factors for prolonged QT interval in the general population. METHODS: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) collected electrocardiogram interval data on 8561 subjects over 40 years of age and projected results to the US population. QT was corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with prolonged QTc interval, defined as being in the upper 5% of the population QTc interval distribution. Analyses were conducted separately for women and men as a result of differences in the QT distribution between the sexes and also because of potential effect modification. Analytical variables included age, race/ethnicity, electrolyte measurements, body mass index, the recent use of QT-prolonging drugs and past medical histories of stroke, thyroid disease, hypertension, diabetes and myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Age, female sex, hypocalcemia (men), hypokalemia (women), and a history of thyroid disease and myocardial infarction (men) were associated with a prolonged QTc interval. In addition, taking QT-prolonging medications in the past month was associated with more than a twofold increase in the odds of prolonged QTc interval in both men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare practitioners should be aware that a prolonged QTc interval is a potential indicator of cardiovascular risk, and should exercise caution in prescribing potentially QT-prolonging medications to certain patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Incidence of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs.

CONTEXT: Lipid-lowering agents are widely prescribed in the United States. Reliable estimates of rhabdomyolysis risk with various lipid-lowering agents are not available. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with different statins and fibrates, alone and in combination, in the ambulatory setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Drug-specific inception cohorts of statin and fibrate users were established using claims data from 11 managed care health plans across the United States. Patients with at least 180 days of prior health plan enrollment were entered into the cohorts between January 1, 1998, and June 30, 2001. Person-time was classified as monotherapy or combined statin-fibrate therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incidence rates of rhabdomyolysis per 10,000 person-years of treatment, number needed to treat, and relative risk of rhabdomyolysis. RESULTS: In 252,460 patients treated with lipid-lowering agents, 24 cases of hospitalized rhabdomyolysis occurred during treatment. Average incidence per 10,000 person-years for monotherapy with atorvastatin, pravastatin, or simvastatin was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.84); for cerivastatin, 5.34 (95% CI, 1.46-13.68); and for fibrate, 2.82 (95% CI, 0.58-8.24). By comparison, the incidence during unexposed person-time was 0 (95% CI, 0-0.48; P = .056). The incidence increased to 5.98 (95% CI, 0.72-216.0) for combined therapy of atorvastatin, pravastatin, or simvastatin with a fibrate, and to 1035 (95% CI, 389-2117) for combined cerivastatin-fibrate use. Per year of therapy, the number needed to treat to observe 1 case of rhabdomyolysis was 22,727 for statin monotherapy, 484 for older patients with diabetes mellitus who were treated with both a statin and fibrate, and ranged from 9.7 to 12.7 for patients who were treated with cerivastatin plus fibrate. CONCLUSIONS: Rhabdomyolysis risk was similar and low for monotherapy with atorvastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin; combined statin-fibrate use increased risk, especially in older patients with diabetes mellitus. Cerivastatin combined with fibrate conferred a risk of approximately 1 in 10 treated patients per year.

Clofibric Acid↗
PubMed2004

The risk of esophageal obstruction associated with an anti-allergy medication (Claritin-D 24-Hour--original formulation).

PURPOSE: To investigate a possible increased risk of esophageal obstruction among users of loratadine and pseudoephedrine (Claritin-D 24-Hour [C-D 24], the original, round, extended-release formulation) compared to two other tablet formulations of loratadine. METHODS: Pharmacy data of 12 managed care plans were screened to identify users in the three groups from 1 September 1996 to 31 December 1998. Users with a medical claim following their first loratadine prescription (Index prescription) indicating an esophageal obstruction or endoscopic procedure were considered claims-identified cases. Medical records were reviewed to validate case status. RESULTS: There were 233,901 users (61% female) and 245 claims-identified cases occurring within 30 days after the first prescription. The incidence rate per 10,000 users of claims-identified cases occurring on the Index prescription date was higher among C-D 24 users (IR = 1.4) than Claritin Regular (C-R) users (IR = 0.07; p < 0.002) or Claritin-D 12-Hour (C-D 12) users (IR = 0.3; p > 0.05). Medical record review of 15 claims-identified cases confirmed two cases of acute esophageal obstruction, both among C-D 24 users. CONCLUSIONS: Claims-based analysis suggested an increased risk of endoscopic procedures on the Index date among C-D 24 users compared to C-R users. However, after medical record review, the study did not provide conclusive evidence of an association between C-D 24 use and esophageal obstruction. This study highlights the importance of validating findings from claims data using medical records.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

High frequency of use of rofecoxib at greater than recommended doses: cause for concern.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of chronic use of rofecoxib 50 mg. Rofecoxib is unusual among nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in that the licensed dose for acute pain is double the maximum dose recommended for chronic use. The 50 mg dose is recommended for acute pain only, for a maximum of 5 days. In clinical trials of chronic use for arthritis, hypertension was more frequent in patients assigned 50 mg rofecoxib than in those assigned lower doses or other NSAIDs. Thus chronic use of high doses of rofecoxib has implications for patient safety. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of the prevalence of chronic use of rofecoxib 50 mg in 2001, among persons aged > or =50 years, enrolled in the Tennessee Medicaid program. RESULTS: On 1 July 2001, 14% of the study population had a current prescription for an NSAID, with a supply of pills for >5 days. Of all NSAID prescriptions, 25% were for rofecoxib, and 17% of these prescriptions were for >25 mg daily. Of those prescribed >25 mg daily, 71% filled prescriptions for at least 50 mg for 30 days. In this latter group, 60% and 69% filled another rofecoxib prescription within 1 and 2 weeks, respectively, of the end of their 30 days supply. Demographics and co-morbid conditions of high dose rofecoxib users did not differ substantially from users of other NSAIDs or the total population. CONCLUSION: Use of rofecoxib 50 mg for >5 days is relatively common. In view of dose-related adverse effects, such use should be discouraged.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Peripheral neuropathy in patients treated with leflunomide.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe the clinical features, time course, and outcome of new-onset peripheral neuropathy occurring in patients treated with leflunomide. METHODS: Case reports of peripheral neuropathy submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration in association with leflunomide use were reviewed. Data on patient demographics, underlying medical conditions and medications, details of leflunomide therapy, and treatment and outcome of the neuropathy event were abstracted. Time to neuropathy onset and time to improvement or recovery were analyzed by survival analysis. RESULTS: Of 80 reported patients, 61% were women. The patients' mean age was 62 years. Symptoms of peripheral neuropathy began after a mean of 6 months of leflunomide use (range, 3 days to 3 years). Electrodiagnostic testing in 37 patients was consistent with a distal axonal, sensory, or sensorimotor polyneuropathy in most patients. Patients who stopped leflunomide use within 30 days of neuropathy symptom onset were more likely to have improvement or recovery than those who continued taking leflunomide for a longer period (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Leflunomide use is associated with peripheral neuropathy in some patients. This neuropathy is usually axonal in nature, affecting multiple sensory or motor nerves of distal extremities. Patients who stopped leflunomide use within 30 days of symptom onset were more likely to have improvement of symptoms or complete recovery than were patients who continued to use the drug for longer periods of time.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed2003

Troglitazone-induced liver failure: a case study.

BACKGROUND: Troglitazone was removed from the U.S. market because its use was associated with an increased risk of liver failure. We evaluated the clinical features of all cases reported to the Food and Drug Administration and estimated the duration and magnitude of the risk of liver failure associated with continued use of the drug. METHODS: Data from cases of liver failure associated with troglitazone use were abstracted and analyzed. The extent of troglitazone use was determined from national marketing data, and the duration of use was estimated with data from a large, multistate, health care company. Survival analysis was performed to estimate monthly incidence rates and the cumulative risk of liver failure. RESULTS: Ninety-four cases of liver failure (89 acute, 5 chronic) were reported. Of the acute cases, 58 (67%) were women and only 11 (13%) recovered without liver transplantation. Progression from normal hepatic functioning to irreversible liver injury occurred within 1 month in 19 patients who were indistinguishable clinically from the 70 patients who had an unknown time course to irreversibility, except for the post hoc observation that prior cholecystectomy was less common in those with rapid onset. The incidence of liver failure was elevated from the first through at least the 26th month of troglitazone use. Accounting for case underreporting, the number needed to harm from troglitazone use was between 600 to 1500 patients at 26 months. CONCLUSION: The progression to irreversible liver injury probably occurred within a 1-month interval in most patients, casting doubt on the value of monthly monitoring of serum aminotransferase levels as a means of preventing troglitazone-induced acute liver failure. The cumulative risk of hepatic failure increased with continued use.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2003

Incidence of idiopathic acute liver failure and hospitalized liver injury in patients treated with troglitazone.

OBJECTIVE: Troglitazone, a thiazolidinedione antidiabetic agent, was withdrawn from the U.S. market in March, 2000, after 94 cases of acute liver failure (ALF) were reported with its use. Based on a literature review, the estimated background rate of hospitalization for idiopathic acute liver injury is 22 per million person-years and for idiopathic ALF, less than 1 per million person-years. This study was conducted to estimate the incidence rates of hospitalized idiopathic acute liver injury and ALF among troglitazone-treated patients. METHODS: An observational retrospective inception cohort of patients treated with troglitazone was assembled using claims data from a large multistate health care organization. Patients with at least 90 days of health plan enrollment before their first troglitazone prescription between April, 1997 and December, 1998 were enrolled. Hospitalized cases of potential troglitazone-induced acute liver injury or ALF were identified from claims data based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, coding. Primary medical records were reviewed for case validation, and incidence rates of acute liver injury were calculated using person-years of troglitazone exposure as the denominator. RESULTS: A total of 7568 patients contributed 4020 person-years of troglitazone exposure. Of these, five were hospitalized with acute liver injury attributed to the drug and not explained by other causes. Incidence rates (95% CI) per million person-years of acute idiopathic liver injury were as follows: hospitalization (n = 5), 1244 (404, 2900); hospitalized jaundice (n = 4), 995 (271, 2546); and ALF (n = 1), 240 (6.3, 1385). CONCLUSIONS: Troglitazone use was associated with a marked increase in risk of hospitalized acute idiopathic liver injury and ALF.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

A study of compliance with FDA recommendations for pemoline (Cylert).

OBJECTIVE: To assess compliance with product labeling recommendations to use pemoline as second-line therapy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and to obtain baseline and biweekly liver enzyme tests. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study using administrative claims data to identify first-line therapies and liver enzyme tests among pemoline users between January 1, 1998, and March 31, 2000. Prescriptions for first-line therapy were searched for 90 days prior to the first pemoline claim. Liver enzyme testing (baseline and follow-up) was compared between two groups (the prerecommendation cohort October 1,1998, to March 31, 1999, and the postrecommendation cohort October 1,1999, to March 31,2000). RESULTS: 1,308 patients received at least one pemoline prescription during the study period; 76% of patients < or = 20 years were male. ADHD was the claims-identified indication for 688 patients (52%). Despite the labeling recommendation for use as second-line therapy, only 237 ADHD patients (34%) received a first-line therapy prior to pemoline. Only 12% and 11% of the pre- and post-cohort patients, respectively, received baseline liver enzyme tests; 9% in the pre- and 12% in the post-cohort received at least one liver enzyme follow-up test. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with product labeling was low for both recommendations. Understanding the reasons for this finding could help improve risk management strategies.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Risk of acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in patients treated with cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Controversy has surrounded the question about whether high-dose rofecoxib increases or naproxen decreases the risk of serious coronary heart disease. We sought to establish if risk was enhanced with rofecoxib at either high or standard doses compared with remote non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use or celecoxib use, because celecoxib was the most common alternative to rofecoxib. METHODS: We used data from Kaiser Permanente in California to assemble a cohort of all patients age 18-84 years treated with a NSAID between Jan 1, 1999, and Dec 31, 2001, within which we did a nested case-control study. Cases of serious coronary heart disease (acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death) were risk-set matched with four controls for age, sex, and health plan region. Current exposure to cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective NSAIDs was compared with remote exposure to any NSAID, and rofecoxib was compared with celecoxib. FINDINGS: During 2302029 person-years of follow-up, 8143 cases of serious coronary heart disease occurred, of which 2210 (27.1%) were fatal. Multivariate adjusted odds ratios versus celecoxib were: for rofecoxib (all doses), 1.59 (95% CI 1.10-2.32, p=0.015); for rofecoxib 25 mg/day or less, 1.47 (0.99-2.17, p=0.054); and for rofecoxib greater than 25 mg/day, 3.58 (1.27-10.11, p=0.016). For naproxen versus remote NSAID use the adjusted odds ratio was 1.14 (1.00-1.30, p=0.05). INTERPRETATION: Rofecoxib use increases the risk of serious coronary heart disease compared with celecoxib use. Naproxen use does not protect against serious coronary heart disease.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Oral corticosteroid use among children in TennCare.

BACKGROUND: Lack of information about medication effects and use in children is a long-standing and troublesome policy issue. Documenting patterns of use for medications with potential for suboptimal use and adverse effects, such as oral corticosteroids, would be useful. OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of oral corticosteroids among children enrolled in TennCare, Tennessee's managed care program for Medicaid enrollees and uninsured individuals. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. DRUG EXPOSURE: Children enrolled in TennCare who had prescriptions filled in their name for oral corticosteroids during 1998 were identified. Descriptive information included age, race, sex, and county of residence. We identified possible indications for corticosteroid use for new users by searching encounter files for encounters temporally related to the index prescription. Subsequent use of corticosteroids was measured in the 365 days after the index prescription. RESULTS: Of 400 724 children continuously enrolled in TennCare during the study period, 29 362 (7327 per 100 000) children had a prescription filled for an oral corticosteroid. Steroid prescription filling was more common among young children and male children and less common among black children. Children in rural counties had oral corticosteroid prescriptions filled at a higher rate than children residing in urban counties. Nearly 75% of corticosteroid users filled only 1 prescription during the study period; 1319 children filled 4 or more prescriptions. Asthma was the most common indication for oral corticosteroid use (16%), whereas 1 in 5 users (22%) had an unknown indication for oral corticosteroid use. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of children enrolled in TennCare had a prescription for oral corticosteroids filled in 1998. Further population-based studies describing the development of adverse effects in users of corticosteroids would be important.

Administration, Oral↗