PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David J Muzina

Publications and source records attributed to David J Muzina.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Acute treatment of mania: an update on new medications.

Acute mania is frequently a medical emergency requiring hospitalization for behavioral control, rapid resolution of irritability, agitation, de-escalation of mood, and decreasing of risk-taking behavior. Lithium efficacy in the management of acute mania was reported in 1949 and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1970. Chlorpromazine, from the class of typical antipsychotics, was approved for treatment of bipolar disorder in 1973. Typical antipsychotics were frequently used alone and as adjunct for the treatment of bipolar mania for the next 2 decades. Divalproex was approved by the FDA for the treatment of acute mania in 1994. Since the approval of olanzapine in 2000, all five atypical antipsychotics, namely risperidone (2003), quetiapine (2004), ziprasidone (2004), and aripiprazole (2004), have been approved by the FDA for the management of acute mania. Clozapine is the only atypical antipsychotic not FDA approved for any phase of bipolar disorder. This article will systematically review some of the major studies published, randomized controlled monotherapy, and adjunct therapy trials involving five atypical antipsychotics and newer anticonvulsants for the treatment of acute bipolar mania.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Anticonvulsants in bipolar disorder.

In recent years, a number of anticonvulsants have been more rigorously investigated for their potential mood-stabilizing properties. They are heterogeneous in their mechanisms of action and in their efficacy in the various mood states in bipolar illness (Table 3). At present, evidence from well-controlled studies supports the role of DIV and CBZ in the treatment of acute mania. DIV seems to have better efficacy than lithium in mixed mania or mania associated with depressive symptoms and is recommended as a first-line pharmacologic option in acutely manic or mixed manic patients. Neither CBZ nor DIV have robust evidence supporting their efficacy in the treatment of acute bipolar depression, although DIV clearly possesses beneficial effects on depressive symptomatology and prophylaxis against depressive episodes during long-term treatment. Results from a large study indicate that LAM has significant efficacy in bipolar depression without the associated risks of cycle acceleration or manic/hypomanic switches. LAM should be considered a primary option in patients with bipolar depression and in bipolar II patients with rapid cycling. DIV is recommended as a first-line option in bipolar I patients with rapid cycling. LAM has proven efficacy in the prophylaxis of bipolar I disorder and should be considered along with lithium or DIV as treatment of choice in the long-term management of bipolar disorder. For the other anticonvulsants, including CBZ and OXC, there is still inadequate evidence of efficacy as monotherapy in the long-term management of bipolar disorder. Even less data exist for other available AEDs, and consensus is growing that someAEDs (eg, GBP) have little or no specific effect in bipolar disorder. Despite the progress made in the past decade, a wider therapeutic armamentarium is critically needed, because a large proportion of bipolar patients do not respond to acute treatments during a manic or depressive episode and have frequent relapse and recurrences during long-term treatment. As additional AEDs become available, rigorously designed and large-scale studies examining AEDs as monotherapy and AEDs in combination therapies versus placebo must be undertaken to assess efficacy and safety more adequately to provide better guidance for the clinician faced with the management of this challenging mood disorder.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2005

Maintenance therapies in bipolar disorder: focus on randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Lithium remains the cornerstone of maintenance therapy for bipolar disorder despite growing use of other agents, including divalproex, lamotrigine, carbamazepine and the atypical antipsychotics. Lithium has the largest body of data to support its continued use as a prophylactic agent; however, most of this data comes from early studies that did not use contemporary analytic methods. Alternatives to lithium are needed because of the relatively high rate of non-response to lithium monotherapy and the drug's frequent side-effects. This article reviews available data with an emphasis on double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that examine the efficacy of lithium and other putative mood stabilizers: carbamazepine, divalproex, lamotrigine and olanzapine. METHOD: The authors reviewed key literature using Medline searches using key words: bipolar disorder, controlled trials, mood stabilizer, lithium, lomotrigine, divalproex, olanzapine, carbamazepine. RESULTS: Lithium remains the gold standard for overall preventative efficacy in bipolar disorder, especially to decrease manic or hypomanic relapse. Of the mood stabilizers that have marked prophylactic antimanic properties, lithium appears to possess the greatest antidepressant effect. Divalproex may also prevent recurrent bipolar mood episodes but the relative lack of controlled maintenance studies makes this less certain. There now exists an extensive and well-designed research database supporting the use of lamotrigine in the acute and prophylactic management of bipolar I disorder. Lamotrigine offers a spectrum of clinical effectiveness that complements lithium, in that it appears to stabilize mood 'from below baseline' by preventing episodes of depression and has been shown to be effective in rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder. Carbamazepine may be a useful alternative to lithium, divalproex and lamotrigine, particularly for patients with a history of mood-incongruent delusions and other comorbidities, but controlled data is more equivocal and it may lose some of its prophylactic effect over time. Emerging data continue to support the growing use of atypical antipsychotics, particularly olanzapine. CONCLUSIONS: Any monotherapy for use as a maintenance therapy of bipolar disorder appears to be inadequate for long-term use in the management of the majority of patients with bipolar disorder. Combination therapy has become the standard of care in the treatment of bipolar disorder and particularly in patients with treatment-refractory variants such as those with rapid-cycling. The emerging consensus is that patients on monotherapy, if followed for sufficiently long periods, will eventually require concomitant treatment to maintain a full remission. There exists a need for controlled trials that use random assignment to parallel arms including combination therapy followed by data analyses that include both relapse rate and survival techniques.

Bipolar Disorder↗
PubMed2004

What physicians can do to prevent suicide.

Many people who attempt suicide or succeed at it visit their physicians shortly before the act; thus, primary care physicians have a key role in preventing suicide. The first step is to suspect that the patient might be at risk, and the second step is to ask about it. Nevertheless, one cannot predict whether any particular person will or will not attempt suicide.

Bipolar Disorder↗
PubMed2003

Recent placebo-controlled acute trials in bipolar depression: focus on methodology.

The completion of three recent large-scale, double-blind controlled acute trials in bipolar I depression has improved our understanding of the management of major depressive episodes associated with bipolar disorder. In contrast to the cross-over designs used in the early studies of lithium in bipolar depression, the designs utilized in these recent studies have employed random assignment to parallel arms including the use of placebo as a monotherapy in one study. The analyses of recent studies have all been conducted on intent-to-treat data, and included two types, change from baseline analyses and responder analyses. Lamotrigine monotherapy was shown to be superior to placebo with both types of analyses on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scales, but not the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) (n=195). The percentage of patients responding to placebo as a monotherapy were 29, 26 and 37%, respectively; there were no differences in switch rates (5% vs. 5%). Paroxetine augmentation was no better than placebo augmentation overall with both types analyses on the CGI and HAMD (n=117); the MADRS was not used. In patients with lithium levels < or =0.8 mequiv./l, the change from baseline analysis showed paroxetine to be superior to placebo, but responder analyses were negative; switch rates with paroxetine, imipramine, and placebo were 0, 8 and 2%. Moclobemide monotherapy was similar in efficacy to imipramine (n=156), but had a lower rate of switching (4% vs. 11%).

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed2002

Antiepileptic drugs in psychiatry-focus on randomized controlled trial.

It is now clear that the class of antiepileptic drugs (AED) constitute a heterogeneous grouping of medications with diverse medical applications. In particular, the spectrum of psychiatric uses of these medications has grown substantially. Valproate and carbamazepine are commonly used in the treatment of bipolar mania, lamotrigine in bipolar depression, and gabapentin in various anxiety disorders. Only divalproex sodium and carbamazepine have received regulatory approval in various countries around the world. This article will review the double-blind, placebo-controlled literature regarding the safety and spectrum of efficacy associated with the use of the above drugs in mood and anxiety disorders.

Anticonvulsants↗