PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David Lanier

Publications and source records attributed to David Lanier.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The ecology of medical care for children in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Medical care ecology has previously been investigated for adults, but no similar exploration has been made specifically for children. OBJECTIVE: To describe proportions of children receiving care in 6 types of health care setting on a monthly basis and to identify characteristics associated with receipt of care in these settings. METHODS: Nationally representative data from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were used to estimate the number of children per 1000 per month who received care at least once in each type of setting. Multivariate analyses assessed associations between receiving care in various settings and children's sociodemographic factors (age, sex, ethnicity, poverty, parent's education, urban or rural residence, insurance status, and whether or not the child had a usual source of care). RESULTS: Of 1000 children aged 0 to 17 years, on average each month 167 visited a physician's office, 82 a dentist's office, 13 an emergency department, and 8 a hospital-based outpatient clinic. Three were hospitalized and 2 received professional health care in their home. Younger age was associated with increased proportions of children receiving care in all health care settings except dentists' clinics. Poverty, lack of health insurance, black race, and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with decreased receipt of care in physicians' and dentists' offices. Only age (<2 years and 13-17 years) and poverty status were associated with hospitalization (P <.05 for each). Rural residence was not associated with any significant variation in proportions of children receiving care in any setting. Having a usual source of care was associated with increased receipt of care in all settings except hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The ecology of children's medical care is similar to that of adults in the United States in that a substantial proportion of children receive health care each month, mostly in community-based, outpatient settings. In all settings except emergency departments, receipt of care varies significantly by children's age, race, ethnicity, income, health insurance status, and whether they have a usual source of care.

Adolescent↗

Genetics in primary care: a USA faculty development initiative.

The Genetics in Primary Care (GPC) project is a USA national faculty development initiative with the goal of enhancing the training of medical students and primary care residents by developing primary care faculty expertise in genetics. Educational strategies were developed for the project by an executive committee with input from an advisory committee, comprising individuals with primary care, medical education and genetics expertise. These committees identified the key issues in genetics education for primary care as (1) considering inherited disease in the differential diagnosis of common disorders; (2) using appropriate counseling strategies for genetic testing and diagnosis, and (3) understanding the implications of a genetic diagnosis for family members. The group emphasized the importance of a primary care perspective, which suggests that the clinical utility of genetic information is greatest when it has the potential to improve health outcomes. The group also noted that clinical practice already incorporates the use of family history information, providing a basis for discussing the application of genetic concepts in primary care. Genetics and primary care experts agreed that educational efforts will be most successful if they are integrated into existing primary care teaching programs, and use a case-based teaching format that incorporates both clinical and social dimensions of genetic disorders. Three core clinical skills were identified: (1) interpreting family history; (2) recognizing the variable clinical utility of genetic information, and (3) acquiring cultural competency. Three areas of potential controversy were identified as well: (1) the role of nondirective counseling versus shared decision-making in discussions of genetic testing; (2) the intrinsic value of genetic information when it does not influence health outcomes, and (3) indications for a genetics referral. The project provides an opportunity for ongoing discussion about these important issues.

Journal Article↗