PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David Luria

Publications and source records attributed to David Luria.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

A novel form of familial bidirectional ventricular tachycardia.

We evaluated a family with 30 members, 3 of whom had incessant polymorphous and bidirectional ventricular tachycardia (VT) that was electrocardiographically similar to that described in other familial polymorphic VT series; the VT was unrelated to exercise and asymptomatic. More subtle, but morphologically similar, ventricular arrhythmias were detected in 3 other family members. Genes related to intracellular calcium transport were specifically excluded.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Managing pacemaker safety alerts: experience with three successive models of a single manufacturer.

This report describes the experience of a large pacemaker center during three successive replacement operations due to safety alerts involving three models from the same manufacturer. Between March 1993 and May 1999, 210 patients were implanted with three DDD pacemaker models (Sorin Biomedica, Saluggia, Italy) that were subsequently subject to safety alerts. Pacemaker records were reviewed for complications related to device malfunction, and those secondary to the replacement procedure. Pacemaker malfunction was observed in 16.4% of units despite much lower estimates from the company (range 1-4%). With the exception of one, all units were replaced. Malfunctions were discovered in 7 of 20 pacemakers following an urgent call for follow-up issued as a result of the alert. Twenty units implanted as substitutes for those replaced following the first alert turned out to be subject to the third alert. Significant clinical consequences of malfunction occurred in 5.3% of patients including a near fatal event in one case, while complications related to the replacement procedure occurred in 8.3% of patients, including one fatality. On the issuance of a safety alert, failure rates in a particular center may be higher than published by the manufacturer, and should prompt action by the center to weigh local incidence of device failure against complications of replacement procedures. When device failure mechanism is not entirely clear, particularly in cases of successive model failures, replacement devices from a different manufacturer should be considered.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Progressive isthmus delay during atrial flutter ablation: the critical importance of isthmus spanning electrodes for distinguishing pseudoblock from block.

Bidirectional isthmus block is associated with successful atrial flutter ablation, whereas creation of increased isthmus conduction delay without block can be proarrhythmic. Often, halo catheter electrodes fail to provide adequate sub-Eustachian isthmus recordings. The aim of this study was to determine if progressive isthmus conduction delay results in the false appearance of block during atrialflutter ablation. A 20-pole deflectable catheter was prospectively positioned across the sub-Eustachian isthmus (from the coronary sinus os [CSO] to 7:00 on the tricuspid valve annulus [TVA] clock face in the left anterior oblique [LAO] projection) in nine patients undergoing atrial flutter ablation. During sinus rhythm, conduction time was measured from the CSO to the 7:00 position while pacing the CSO. Measurements were repeated after each linear lesion and after conduction block was achieved. Transisthmus conduction time at baseline, just prior to success, and after the presence of complete block was 54 +/- 9, 123 +/- 39, and 155 +/- 30 ms, respectively (P < or = 0.01). The marked delay prior to complete block resulted in reversal of the activation sequence in electrodes at TVA 7:00, creating the false appearance of isthmus block; the isthmus electrodes clearly distinguished delay from block. Catheter ablation results in progressive isthmus conduction delay prior to the creation of complete block. Electrodes spanning the isthmus and line of block are critical for distinguishing conduction delay (and pseudoisthmus block) from block.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Multiple pulse generator malfunctions with a dual chamber pacemaker.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the dual chamber uni/bipolarpacemaker Minidual 50, manufactured by Sorin Biomedica. Between 1995 and 1998, 66 Minidual 50 models were implanted at the Heart Institute. During the follow-up period of 33 +/- 12.8 months (range 0-50 months), total function loss in seven (10.6%) units and false threshold measurement of sensing and pacing in three (4.5%) patients were observed. Average time from implantation to malfunction was 37 months (range 28-42). Malfunction was unrelated to battery status and could not be predicted by any measures obtained during the pacemaker follow-up period. Kaplan Meyer survival curve predicted a 70% 4-year malfunction-free survival of that pacemaker model. Given this high rate of total malfunction and the unpredictable nature of its occurrence, the authors recommend the replacement of all remaining Minidual 50 units at risk, at least in dependent patients.

Adult↗