PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David M Bagley

Publications and source records attributed to David M Bagley.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Supersaturation of dissolved H(2) and CO (2) during fermentative hydrogen production with N(2) sparging.

Dissolved H(2) and CO(2) were measured by an improved manual headspace-gas chromatographic method during fermentative H(2) production with N(2) sparging. Sparging increased the yield from 1.3 to 1.8 mol H(2)/mol glucose converted, although H(2) and CO(2) were still supersaturated regardless of sparging. The common assumption that sparging increases the H(2) yield because of lower dissolved H(2) concentrations may be incorrect, because H(2) was not lowered into the range necessary to affect the relevant enzymes. More likely, N(2) sparging decreased the rate of H(2) consumption via lower substrate concentrations.

Biomass↗

Continuous fermentative hydrogen production using a two-phase reactor system with recycle.

The effects of effluent recycle were examined in a two-phase anaerobic system where the first phase was operated for fermentative hydrogen production and the second for methanogenesis. The hydrogen reactor was operated as a chemostat at 35 degrees C and pH 5.5 with a 10 h hydraulic retention time, and the methane reactor was operated as an up-flow reactor at 28 degrees C and pH between 6.9 and 7.2. Two recycle ratios were examined: 0 and 0.98. Effluent recycle reduced the required alkalinity for pH control by approximately 40%. The H2 productivity metric, with a basis in electrons and incorporating both gaseous and dissolved H2, was developed as a more fundamental reporting method than the molar H2 yield. Without recycle, the H2 productivity was 0.115 g of H2 COD/g of feed COD, but decreased to 0.015 q of H2 COD/g of feed COD with recycle (COD = chemical oxygen demand). Mass balances indicated the lower H2 productivity during recycle was due to electrons being partitioned to methane and less-oxidized soluble constituents such as propionic acid, ethanol, and butanol. The results indicated that achieving high H2 productivity with nonsterile wastewaters will be challenging and membrane filtration of the recycle liquid may be required to exclude the return of hydrogen-consuming organisms.

1-Butanol↗

Evaluation of an MBR-RO system to produce high quality reuse water: microbial control, DBP formation and nitrate.

A membrane bioreactor and reverse osmosis (MBR-RO) system was developed to assess potential reuse applications of municipal wastewater. The objective of the study was to examine the water quality throughout the system with a focus on waterborne pathogens, disinfection by-products (DBPs) and nitrate. This paper will discuss the presence of these contaminants in MBR effluent and focus on their subsequent removal by RO. This study has shown that high quality reuse water can be produced from municipal wastewater through the use of an MBR-RO system. The water meets California Title 22 reuse regulations for non-potable applications and US EPA drinking water limits for trihalomethanes (THM) (80 microg/L), haloacetic acids (HAA) (60 microg/L), chlorite (1.0 mg/L), total coliform (not detectable), viruses (not detectable), and nitrate/nitrite (10 mg N/L). However, THM formation (182-689 microg/L) attributed to cleaning of the MBR with chlorine and incomplete removal by subsequent RO treatment resulted in reuse water with THM levels (40.2+/-19.9 microg/L) high enough to present a potential concern when considering drinking water applications. Nitrate levels of up to 3.6 mg N/L, which resulted from incomplete removal by the RO membrane, are also a potential concern. A denitrification step in the MBR should be considered in potable water applications.

Bioreactors↗

Improving anaerobic sequencing batch reactor performance by modifying operational parameters.

A lab-scale anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) that had operated with glucose at an organic loading rate of 2.1 kg COD m(-3) d(-1) was stressed with an organic loading rate of 3.2 kg COD m(-3) (-1). Five different combinations of influent concentration, total cycle time, and fill time to cycle time ratio were examined. No external pH control was used. In all cases, acetate and propionate were the main constituents of the effluent. Larger fill time to cycle time ratios and lower initial substrate concentrations resulted in improved performance suggesting that ASBR operation may be improved by changing operational parameters.

Bacteria, Anaerobic↗

Effects of C18 long chain fatty acids on glucose, butyrate and hydrogen degradation.

The effects of linoleic (C18:2), oleic (C18:1), and stearic (C18:0) acids on glucose, butyrate and hydrogen degradation were investigated at 21 degrees C using a culture unacclimated to long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs). Diethyl ether was used to facilitate precise addition of LCFAs and provide adequate dispersion in cultures. Butyrate degradation was affected by diethyl ether but minimal effects were observed on hydrogen and glucose consumption. In the presence of oleic and stearic acids, the glucose consumption rate was similar but was approximately 50% lower in the presence of linoleic acid. The effect of a mixture of 100 mg l(-1) of each individual LCFA (300 mg l(-1) total LCFA) was approximately the same as 100 mg l(-1) linoleic acid alone, suggesting no synergistic inhibition of glucose degradation. Butyric acid degradation was more severely inhibited by the LCFAs with inhibition becoming more severe with the addition of double bonds to the LCFA. Furthermore, mixtures of LCFAs synergistically inhibited butyric acid degradation compared to the results with individual LCFAs. In contrast, although lower hydrogen consumption rates were observed in cultures receiving oleic and linoleic acids compared to cultures receiving stearic acid, inhibition by all three acids individually or in mixture was limited. The introduction of LCFAs into a system may severly inhibit intermediate acid degradation while having little effect on acid production.

Bioreactors↗

A rational procedure for estimation of greenhouse-gas emissions from municipal wastewater treatment plants.

Municipal wastewater treatment may lead to the emission of greenhouse gases. The current Intergovenmental Panel on Climate Change (Geneva, Switzerland) approach attributes only methane emissions to wastewater treatment, but this approach may overestimate greenhouse gas emissions from the highly aerobic processes primarily used in North America. To better estimate greenhouse gas emissions, a procedure is developed that can be used either with plant-specific data or more general regional data. The procedure was evaluated using full-scale data from 16 Canadian wastewater treatment facilities and then applied to all 10 Canadian provinces. The principal greenhouse gas emitted from municipal wastewater treatment plants was estimated to be carbon dioxide (CO2), with very little methane expected. The emission rates ranged from 0.005 kg CO2-equivalent/m3 treated for primary treatment facilities to 0.26 kg CO2-equivalent/m3 for conventional activated sludge, with anaerobic sludge digestion to over 0.8 kg CO2-equivalent/m3 for extended aeration with aerobic digestion. Increasing the effectiveness of biogas generation and use will decrease the greenhouse gas emissions that may be assigned to the wastewater treatment plant.

Air Pollution↗