PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David R Badcock

Publications and source records attributed to David R Badcock.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A simple Hebbian/anti-Hebbian network learns the sparse, independent components of natural images.

Slightly modified versions of an early Hebbian/anti-Hebbian neural network are shown to be capable of extracting the sparse, independent linear components of a prefiltered natural image set. An explanation for this capability in terms of a coupling between two hypothetical networks is presented. The simple networks presented here provide alternative, biologically plausible mechanisms for sparse, factorial coding in early primate vision.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

Processing of global form and motion in migraineurs.

Previous studies have identified anomalies of cortical visual processing in migraineurs that appear to extend beyond V1. Migraineurs respond differently than controls to transcranial magnetic stimulation of V5, and can demonstrate impairments of global motion processing. This study was designed to assess the integrity of intermediate stages of both motion and form processing in people with migraine. We measured the ability to integrate local orientation information into a global form percept, and to integrate local motion information into a global motion percept. Control subjects performed significantly better than migraineurs on both tasks, suggesting a diffuse visual cortical processing anomaly in migraine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Implicit exploitation of regularities: novel correlations in images quickly alter visual perception.

Viewing a set of two thousand images in which the contrasts of a central and a surrounding pattern were highly correlated increased the suppressive influence of the surround on the perceived contrast of the central pattern. The apparent increase in inhibition supports the operation of an anti-Hebbian mechanism between the two groups of cells excited by the patterns (one group by the central pattern and the other by the surround). According to this mechanism, inhibitory connections between nearby cells increase in efficacy according to a simple function of the correlations between the cells' activities.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2005

Interactions between luminance and contrast signals in global form detection.

The human visual system is adept at detecting global structure, or form, within a scene. The initial stage of post-retinal processing for all aspects of vision is fed by On- and Off-centre cells sensitive to centred luminance increments and decrements respectively. These cells provide input to two parallel pathways that process variations in local luminance (first-order pathway) and local contrast (second-order pathway). Here, we investigate the contribution of luminance and contrast information to global form detection, a stage between the extraction of local orientation and the recognition of objects. The underlying processes involve two stages. We find that signals in the On-, Off- and second-order pathways are segregated at both stages of processing. Surprisingly, the non-linear stage in the second-order form pathway is different from that in motion processing: the second-order form detectors show an asymmetry in sensitivity to increments and decrements that is not apparent in motion. A functional architecture for global form detection is proposed along with its possible neural substrates.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2005

The detection of both global motion and global form is disrupted in glaucoma.

PURPOSE: It is well known that glaucoma results in performance impairments on tasks processed early in the visual pathways. Glaucoma should also impair cortical visual processing because of reduced input from retinal ganglion cells and also possibly because of abnormal cortical function. This study was undertaken to assess whether cortically processed global percepts are disrupted in glaucoma in areas of visual field classified as normal by standard automated perimetry (SAP). Performance on global tasks (motion and form) was compared to measures of presumed precortical magnocellular and parvocellular function in the same individuals. METHODS: Fifteen control subjects and 12 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma participated. Testing was performed foveally and midperipherally (12.5 degrees). Contrast-discrimination thresholds were measured by using the steady-pedestal (magnocellular) and pulsed-pedestal (parvocellular) contrast-discrimination tasks of Pokorny and Smith. Global motion coherence and global form coherence thresholds were measured at high and low contrast. RESULTS: Patients with glaucoma demonstrated higher global motion and form-coherence thresholds than did control subjects for targets presented in the midperiphery (P < 0.05), but not foveally. Different individuals performed poorly on the motion and form tasks. The subjects with the greatest presumed magnocellular and parvocellular loss were those with the largest deficits on the global motion and form tasks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Some subjects with glaucoma demonstrate profound impairments of global motion or global form integration in areas of visual field classified as normal by SAP. This finding implies that some people with glaucoma may have far greater difficulty with complex visual tasks (for example, navigation through the environment or face recognition) than is predicted by their visual field loss.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Abnormal global processing along the dorsal visual pathway in autism: a possible mechanism for weak visuospatial coherence?

Frith and Happe (Frith, U., & Happe, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond theory of mind. Cognition, 50, 115-132) argue that individuals with autism exhibit 'weak central coherence': an inability to integrate elements of information into coherent wholes. Some authors have speculated that a high-level impairment might be present in the dorsal visual pathway in autism, and furthermore, that this might account for weak central coherence, at least at the visuospatial level. We assessed the integrity of the dorsal visual pathway in children diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and in typically developing children, using two visual tasks, one examining functioning at higher levels of the dorsal cortical stream (Global Dot Motion (GDM)), and the other assessing lower-level dorsal stream functioning (Flicker Contrast Sensitivity (FCS)). Central coherence was tested using the Children's Embedded Figures Test (CEFT). Relative to the typically developing children, the children with ASD had shorter CEFT latencies and higher GDM thresholds but equivalent FCS thresholds. Additionally, CEFT latencies were inversely related to GDM thresholds in the ASD group. These outcomes indicate that the elevated global motion thresholds in autism are the result of high-level impairments in dorsal cortical regions. Weak visuospatial coherence in autism may be in the form of abnormal cooperative mechanisms in extra-striate cortical areas, which might contribute to differential performance when processing stimuli as Gestalts, including both dynamic (i.e., global motion perception) and static (i.e., disembedding performance) stimuli.

Autistic Disorder↗
PubMed2004

Decreased visual field sensitivity measured 1 day, then 1 week, after migraine.

PURPOSE: To determine whether perimetric performance is worse the day after a migraine than prior interictal measurements, and if so, to determine whether differences have resolved by 1 week after migraine. METHODS: Twenty-two nonheadache control subjects (aged 18-45 years) and 22 migraineurs (aged 18-45 years: 10 migraine with visual aura, 12 migraine without aura) participated. Standard automated perimetry (SAP) and temporal modulation perimetry (TMP) were measured by perimeter (model M-700; Medmont, Pty Ltd., Camberwell, Victoria, Australia). Control subjects attended two test visits: baseline and retest. Migraineurs attended three times: baseline (>or=4 days after migraine), the day after the offset of the next migraine, and 7 days later. Groups were compared using the global indices of the perimeter: Average Defect (AD) and Pattern Defect (PD), in addition to point-wise comparisons. RESULTS: Group migraineur TMP performance was significantly worse the day after a migraine, showing decreased general sensitivity and increased localized loss. Performance measured 7 days later was not significantly different from that measured the day after a migraine. Group migraineur SAP performance was not significantly worse after migraine; however, a subgroup of six eyes from five patients had 10 or more visual field locations with decreases in sensitivity greater than control test-retest 95% confidence limits. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased visual field performance was present after migraine, as well as greater test-retest variability in the migraine group compared with control subjects. As migraineurs constitute 10% to 15% of the general population, the presence of this subgroup of patients with periodic prolonged decreased visual field sensitivity after migraine has implications for differential clinical diagnosis, and for clinical research using perimetry.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Psychophysical measurement of neural adaptation abnormalities in magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in glaucoma.

PURPOSE: It is well established that contrast sensitivity is reduced in glaucoma. This study explored whether such contrast processing abnormalities consist of an absolute threshold level difference or a problem with contrast gain control. METHODS: Seventeen patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and 17 approximately age-matched control subjects participated. Subjects were tested foveally and midperipherally (12.5 degrees ). Subjects with glaucoma were tested in a peripheral region of relatively normal visual field (neighboring locations required to be within the normal 95% confidence limit on the total deviation plot of their most recent SITA/full threshold Humphrey Field Analyzer assessment; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Control subjects were tested in matching locations. Contrast discrimination was assessed using the steady-pedestal (magnocellular [M] pathway) and pulsed-pedestal (parvocellular [P] pathway) stimuli of Pokorny and Smith for seven pedestal luminances between 15 and 75 cd/m(2), presented on a background of 30 cd/m(2). RESULTS: Glaucoma group thresholds were significantly elevated compared with control subjects foveally and peripherally on both the pulsed-pedestal (P) and steady-pedestal (M) tasks (P < 0.01). Effect size statistics revealed slightly greater deficits on the P pathway task and greater deficits for pedestals that were decrements, rather than increments, from the surround luminance. Foveal deficits were of a magnitude to be explained by a reduction in contrast sensitivity; however, the peripheral deficits were greater than predicted by this factor alone. CONCLUSIONS: Foveal and midperipheral dysfunction of both M and P pathways was identified in people with glaucoma, in areas of relatively normal visual field performance. These findings are supportive of nonselective neural adaptation abnormalities in early glaucoma.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2003

Motion distorts perceived depth.

Two important tasks that the visual system has to perform are determining the direction of motion and the spatial location of objects. It has recently been shown that the perceived location of an object moving in the frontal-plane is displaced along the direction of motion (e.g. Nature 397 (1999) 610; Vision Research 31 (1991) 1619). The aim of the present study is to examine the extent of this interaction between motion and perceived location. The observers' task was to indicate which of two vertically separated moving stimuli was closer. The two stimuli were presented at various relative disparity offsets. The stimuli consisted of moving dot patterns (optic-flow) that simulated either fronto-parallel motion (all the dots moved one direction) or motion in depth. Motion of the dots towards the centre of the stimulus simulated object motion away from the observer and motion of the dots away from the centre of the stimulus simulated object motion towards the observer. Results indicate that motion-in-depth information can bias perceived stereoscopic-based depth. Simulated motion towards the observer made the object appear closer to the observer than the depth signalled by the disparity information and simulated motion away from the observer made it seem further away. The results of this study, when combined with those of previous studies, show that motion can distort our entire three dimensional representation of space.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed2003

Pattern cues disambiguate perceived direction in simple moving stimuli.

Much of our knowledge about motion perception has been obtained by studying bars moving within apertures. When viewed within an ambiguously oriented aperture such as a circle, bars appear to move orthogonal to their orientation. We demonstrate that if the local orientation of the aperture edges is altered, a direction consistent with the edge orientation is seen. Indeed, the perceived direction can be strongly influenced by static lines separated from the edge of the moving stimulus. These results support recent suggestions that precise motion direction is likely to be determined by static orientation cues.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Mach bands change asymmetrically during solar eclipses.

Observations made during two partial eclipses of the Sun show that the Mach bands on shadows cast by the Sun disappear and reappear asymmetrically as an eclipse progresses. These changes can be explained as due to changes in the shape of the penumbras of shadows as the visible portion of the Sun forms crescents of different orientation.

Humans↗
PubMed2003

Neither here nor there: localizing conflicting visual attributes.

Natural visual scenes are a rich source of information. Objects often carry luminance, colour, motion, depth and textural cues, each of which can serve to aid detection and localization of the object within a scene. Contemporary neuroscience presumes a modular approach to visual analysis in which each of these attributes are processed within ostensibly independent visual streams and are transmitted to geographically distinct and functionally dedicated centres in visual cortex (van Essen & Maunsell, 1983; Zihl, von Cramon & Mai, 1983; Maunsell & Newsome, 1987; Tootell, Hadjikhani, Mendola, Marrett & Dale, 1998). In the present study we ask how the visual system localizes objects within this framework. Specifically, we investigate how the visual system assigns a unitary location to objects defined by multiple stimulus attributes, where such attributes provide conflicting positional cues. The results show that conflicting sources of visual information can be effortlessly combined to form a global estimate of spatial position, yet, this conflation of visual attributes is achieved at a cost to localization accuracy. Furthermore, our results suggest that the visual system assigns more perceptual weight (Landy, 1993; Landy & Kojima, 2001) to visual attributes which are reliably related to object contours.

Attention↗
PubMed2003

Contrast-processing dysfunction in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in migraineurs with or without aura.

PURPOSE: To assess contrast-discrimination thresholds in patients with migraine who have manifest visual field loss. This study was undertaken to determine whether contrast processing abnormalities in migraineurs are more readily identified by using stimuli that elicit a response from the subject that depends, at least in part, on adaptation mechanisms, and if so, whether deficits appear more pronounced in magnocellular (M) or parvocellular (P) visual pathways. METHODS: Ten patients with migraine who had abnormal visual fields measured with flicker perimetry but had normal standard automated perimetry (SAP) thresholds participated, along with 15 age-matched control subjects. Contrast-discrimination performance was assessed with the steady-pedestal (magnocellular) and pulsed-pedestal (parvocellular) stimuli of Pokorny and Smith for seven pedestal luminances between 15 and 60 cd/m(2) on a background of 30 cd/m(2). Subjects were tested foveally and midperipherally at 12.5 degrees. Migraineurs were tested in the quadrant of worst visual field performance. Control subjects were assessed in locations matched to those of the migraine group. RESULTS: Foveal performance was not significantly different between the migraine and control groups for either task. At 12.5 degrees the migraine group had significantly raised thresholds for both conditions. Effect size statistics revealed similar deficit magnitudes for each test (steady pedestal, -1.06; pulsed pedestal, -1.04). CONCLUSIONS: Dysfunction in both the M and P pathways was identified in the midperipheral visual field of the migraine group. The P pathway dysfunction was not identified by SAP. These findings support the possibility of nonselective neural adaptation abnormalities in some subjects with migraine.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Global speed processing: evidence for local averaging within, but not across two speed ranges.

A primary task of the visual system is to extract the direction and speed of animate objects from the retinal image. We examined global speed processing by determining how local speeds are integrated and whether integration occurs across all speeds or within fixed speed ranges. The first experiment addressed how local motion signals are combined to determine the speed of an object in motion. Observers judged the speed of a moving cloud of dots that took a random walk in direction while the dots inside the cloud moved somewhat independently of the cloud itself. The apparent speed of the cloud of dots is found to change in proportion with the dot speed and is well predicted by calculating the average speed resulting from nearest neighbour matches across stimulus frames. The second experiment addressed whether local speeds are combined across all speeds or within fixed speed ranges for the detection of global motion. Global dot motion (GDM) stimuli that moved in a radial or rotational directions moving at a low speed of 1.2 degrees /s or a high speed of 9.6 degrees /s were used to measure the thresholds for detecting structured motion as a function of the speed of noise dots (0 degrees /s-10.8 degrees /s) added to the stimulus. With low-speed targets, only additional noise dots moving at low speeds interfered with signal detection. High-speed targets were only interfered with by dots moving at high speeds. This finding established the existence of at least two independent speed tuned systems in the range of speeds tested. Experiment 3 investigated how speed signals are combined within a system to determine the global speed. Using sectored radial GDM stimuli the perceived speed of the fastest dots was measured as a function of whether the speed of the dots in alternate sectors either activated the high or low-speed systems. Averaging only occurred when dots were all within the sensitivity range of the high-speed system, however, if alternate sectors activated separate speed systems, averaging did not occur. Thus local speeds are averaged, independent of direction, to derive a global speed estimate, but averaging only occurs within, and not across, speed tuned mechanisms.

Adult↗