PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David R Lichtenstein

Publications and source records attributed to David R Lichtenstein.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Treatment of Biliary Problems in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The most common biliary problem in patients with inflammatory bowel disease is primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The treatment of this disease is multifaceted and frequently requires a multidisciplinary approach involving internists, nutritionists, gastroenterologists, and surgeons. Unfortunately, other than liver transplantation, no therapy that is currently available has been proven to alter the natural history of PSC or prolong survival. Ursodeoxycholic acid is currently the most promising pharmacologic treatment option for slowing disease progression and should be used in higher than usual doses (20 to 30 mg/kg/d). Treatment of symptoms due to cholestasis, such as pruritis and steatorrhea, is an important aspect of the medical care of patients with PSC. Our preferred treatment of pruritis due to cholestasis is with bile acid binding exchange resins such as cholestyramine or colestipol (which is generally better tolerated than cholestyramine). Endoscopic therapy should be reserved for patients with obstructive jaundice, cholangitis, or symptomatic dominant biliary strictures. We recommend dilation of dominant strictures with graduated or balloon dilators followed by temporary stenting if the postdilation cholangiographic appearance is not improved or adequate biliary drainage cannot be assured. There is indirect evidence that the combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and endoscopic therapy to maintain biliary patency may improve transplant-free survival in patients with PSC, although this remains to be proven. Liver transplantation remains the only effective treatment of advanced PSC, and should be considered in patients with complications of cirrhosis or intractable pruritis or fatigue.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2003

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Nonvariceal UGI bleeding is one of the most common emergencies that gastroenterologists encounter, and continues to be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The keys to management are rapid resuscitation and stabilization; appropriate triage based on pre-endoscopic risk factors; early endoscopy to achieve prompt diagnosis and implement hemostatic therapy to high-risk lesions; and aggressive antisecretory therapy (in the case of peptic ulcer bleeding) to reduce the risk of continued or recurrent bleeding.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2002

Pancreatic and biliary tract disorders in inflammatory bowel disease.

Hepatobiliary disorders occur frequently in patients with IBD, with PSC and cholangiocarcinoma being the most clinically significant for endoscopists. Endoscopic therapy for PSC is effective in improving symptoms, biochemical parameters, and radiographic abnormalities. Endoscopic therapy may also confer survival benefit, but this has yet to be confirmed in randomized, controlled trials. Treatment should be restricted to those individuals with a rapid decline in liver function testing or those with recurrent cholangitis. Cholangiocarcinoma is a serious complication of PSC and carries an extremely poor prognosis. ERCP with brush cytology has a relatively low sensitivity and the diagnosis is usually made after the disease has become metastatic. Malignant biliary obstruction can be palliated by endoscopic stenting. Photodynamic therapy is a promising experimental technique that may confer symptomatic and survival benefit in patients with nonresectable, advanced cholangiocarcinoma. IBD patients also have an elevated risk for developing acute and chronic pancreatitis as well as pancreatic insufficiency. The majority of cases of acute pancreatitis are likely due to medication side effects and local structural complications of IBD. The remainder may possibly represent true extraintestinal manifestations of IBD. Chronic pancreatitis is frequently subclinical, but may be accompanied by clinically relevant exocrine insufficiency. ERCP is the test of choice for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis, but the role of endoscopy in the therapeutic management of IBD-associated chronic pancreatitis remains to be defined.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗
PubMed2002

Pancreatic stent placement for duct disruption.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify predictors of outcome after pancreatic duct stent placement for duct disruption. METHODS: Patients were identified from endoscopy databases. Disruption was defined by extravasation of contrast from the pancreatic duct during endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Data collected included demographic information, imaging studies, management before and outcome after stent placement. Success was defined as resolution of the disruption clinically, on radiologic imaging, and/or at endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (23 women, 20 men; mean age 57 years, [SD] 15.2 years) were studied. The etiology of pancreatic duct disruption was acute pancreatitis in 24, chronic pancreatitis in 9, operative injury in 7, and trauma in 3 patients. In 25 patients there was resolution of the disruption, whereas stent therapy was unsuccessful in 16 and the outcome was indeterminate in 2 patients. On univariate analysis, stent positioned to bridge the disruption (p = 0.04) and longer duration of stent therapy (p = 0.002) were associated with a successful outcome. Female gender (p = 0.05) and acute pancreatitis (p = 0.05) were associated with a lack of success. On multivariate analysis, only the bridging stent position remained correlated to outcome. Complications occurred in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: A bridging stent is associated with a successful outcome after pancreatic duct stent placement for duct disruption.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP.

BACKGROUND: ERCP has become widely available for the diagnosis and treatment of benign and malignant pancreaticobiliary diseases. In this prospective study, the overall complication rate and risk factors for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP were identified. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on patient characteristics and endoscopic techniques from 1223 ERCPs performed at a single referral center and entered into a database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for ERCP-associated complications. RESULTS: Of 1223 ERCPs performed, 554 (45.3%) were diagnostic and 667 (54.7%) therapeutic. The overall complication rate was 11.2%. Post-ERCP pancreatitis was the most common (7.2%) and in 93% of cases was self-limiting, requiring only conservative treatment. Bleeding occurred in 10 patients (0.8%) and was related to a therapeutic procedure in all cases. Nine patients had cholangitis develop, most cases being secondary to incomplete drainage. There was one perforation (0.08%). All other complications totaled 1.5%. Variables derived from cannulation technique associated with an increased risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis were precut access papillotomy (20%), multiple cannulation attempts (14.9%), sphincterotome use to achieve cannulation (13.1%), pancreatic duct manipulation (13%), multiple pancreatic injections (12.3%), guidewire use to achieve cannulation (10.2%), and the extent of pancreatic duct opacification (10%). Patient characteristics associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis were sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (21.7%) documented by manometry, previous ERCP-related pancreatitis (19%), and recurrent pancreatitis (16.2%). Pain during the procedure was an important indicator of an increased risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (27%). Independent risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis were identified as a history of recurrent pancreatitis, previous ERCP-related pancreatitis, multiple cannulation attempts, pancreatic brush cytology, and pain during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent ERCP-related complication was pancreatitis, which was mild in the majority of patients. The frequency of post-ERCP pancreatitis was similar for both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Bleeding was rare and mostly associated with sphincterotomy. Other complications such as cholangitis and perforation were rare. Specific patient- and technique-related characteristics that can increase the risk of post-ERCP complications were identified.

Adolescent↗