PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David R Vinson

Publications and source records attributed to David R Vinson.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Implications of the failure to identify high-risk electrocardiogram findings for the quality of care of patients with acute myocardial infarction: results of the Emergency Department Quality in Myocardial Infarction (EDQMI) study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of misinterpretation of the ECG in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the emergency department (ED) setting is not well known. Our goal was to assess the prevalence of the failure to identify high-risk ECG findings in ED patients with AMI and to determine whether this failure is associated with lower-quality care. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients presenting to 5 EDs in California and Colorado from July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2002, with confirmed AMI (n=1684), we determined the frequency of the failure by the treating provider to identify significant ST-segment depressions, ST-segment elevations, or T-wave inversions on the presenting ECG. In multivariable models, we assessed the relationship between missed high-risk ECG findings and evidence-based therapy in the ED after adjustment for patient characteristics and site of care. High-risk ECG findings were not documented in 201 patients (12%). The failure to identify high-risk findings was independently associated with a higher odds of not receiving treatment among ideal candidates for aspirin (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51 to 2.94), beta-blockers (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.03), and reperfusion therapy (OR, 7.69; 95% CI, 3.57 to 16.67). Among patients with missed high-risk ECG findings, in-hospital mortality was 7.9% compared with 4.9% among those without missed findings (P=0.1). CONCLUSIONS: The failure to identify high-risk ECG findings in patients with AMI results in lower-quality care in the ED. Systematic processes to improve ECG interpretation may have important implications for patient treatment and outcomes.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2006

Ambulance diversion reduction: the Sacramento solution.

PURPOSE: The diversion of ambulances away from their intended emergency departments (EDs) in the United States has become commonplace and may compromise patient care. Although ambulance diversion resulting from ED overcrowding has been well described in the literature, little is known about how to reduce the incidence of ambulance diversion on a regional level. We describe the development, implementation, and impact of a region-wide program to reduce ambulance diversion. BASIC PROCEDURES: This study was undertaken in the greater Sacramento, California region from January 2001 to December 2003. This comprehensive ambulance diversion reduction program was implemented May 15, 2002, with analysis of data for this 3-year time frame. The data for this study were obtained from 17 hospitals with ambulance diversion hours being the main outcome measure for this study. FINDINGS: The greater Sacramento region had 23785 hours of ambulance diversion in 2001. In 2003, there were 7143 ambulance diversion hours. Comparing the 17-month period before implementation of this program with the 19-month period after implementation, the difference in the means of these two groups was -1428 hours per month (95% confidence interval, -1252 to -1597), a 74% decrease in ambulance diversion hours. Notably, this reduction occurred despite overall increases in ED census (6.5%), hospital admissions from the ED (8.8%), EMS arrivals to the ED (17.1%), inpatient hospital census (7.4%), and overall Sacramento population (5.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a sizeable reduction of ambulance diversion in a large urban region after the successful implementation of a comprehensive ambulance diversion reduction program. The description of this effort may serve as a model for other regions across the country that do not have an organized approach in place for ambulance diversion, although boarding of admitted patients will still be a major hurdle to effective reduction of ambulance diversion.

Ambulances↗
PubMed2006

Development of a simplified instrument for the diagnosis and grading of akathisia in a cohort of patients receiving prochlorperazine.

Akathisia is a common side-effect of dopamine receptor D2 antagonists that often remains undiagnosed. Conventional diagnostic and grading instruments are cumbersome and can be difficult to remember and to use. To facilitate the Emergency Department (ED) assessment of acute drug-induced akathisia, I sought to derive and evaluate a simplified instrument using the database compiled from three prior studies of acute drug-induced akathisia. These studies had used a conventional Long instrument in the prospective assessment of 360 adult ED patients aged 17-65 years who received intravenous prochlorperazine (10 mg) in the treatment of headache or nausea and vomiting. The Short instrument was derived from the Long instrument using the Wilcoxon z-test to identify the individual findings most strongly associated with the diagnosis of akathisia. I then retrospectively applied the Short instrument to the cohort and used pairwise analyses to compare results obtained from both instruments. Sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the impact of instrument form on diagnostic accuracy. The Long criteria diagnosed akathisia in 118 (32.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 28.0%-37.9%) patients and the Short diagnosed akathisia in 120 (33.3%; 95% CI 28.5%-38.5%). When akathisia was characterized categorically as either absent or present, the Short criteria agreed with the Long in 358 cases (99.4%; 95% CI 98.0%-99.9%). Treating the diagnoses established by the Long criteria as the gold standard, the Short instrument had a sensitivity of 100.0% (95% CI 96.9%-100%) and a specificity of 99.2% (95% CI 97.0%-99.9%). Regarding the accuracy of categorizing akathisia into four severity grades, the Short scale agreed in 325 of 360 cases (90.3%; 95% CI 86.7%-93.1%) and misgraded 35 cases (9.7%; 95% CI 6.9%-13.3%), 34 of which fell within one grade of the Long scale. The Short instrument is highly accurate in diagnosing acute drug-induced akathisia, in comparison with the Long criteria, in the ED setting. The Short instrument also provides fairly accurate grading of akathisia severity. This simplified instrument should facilitate the detection and treatment of akathisia in the ED.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Outpatient management of deep venous thrombosis: 2 models of integrated care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the impact, effectiveness, and safety of 2 models of outpatient deep venous thrombosis (DVT) management. STUDY DESIGN: Observational health-records survey conducted in 2 community hospitals using a comparative design. METHODS: The model centered around the emergency department (ED) was studied from April 15, 1997, through December 31, 1999; the decentralized model was studied from July 15, 2002, through March 15, 2004. The effect of the decentralized model on processes of care was determined by comparing the percentages of patients who were managed by office-based primary care providers under the 2 models. Two-week clinical outcomes also were compared, including symptomatic pulmonary embolism, symptomatic progression of index DVT, new DVT, major bleeding, minor bleeding, and death. RESULTS: During the study periods, 187 and 254 outpatients were enrolled in the ED-centered model and the decentralized model, respectively. Under the ED-centered model, 17 (22.1%) of 77 patients who presented to the primary care providers' offices on weekdays before 1:30 PM (on-hours) were managed exclusively within the clinic setting. Under the decentralized model, 78 (91.8%) of 85 patients who presented on-hours were managed within the clinics--a difference of 69.7 absolute percentage points (95% confidence intervals, 58.7%, 80.7%; P < .001). The models had comparable 2-week clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The decentralized model for outpatient DVT management allowed more primary care clinic patients to receive their initial care exclusively in the clinic setting. There was no significant difference between the models in short-term effectiveness of therapy and patient safety.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Team assignment system: expediting emergency department care.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We designed and implemented an emergency department (ED) team assignment system, each team consisting of 1 emergency physician, 2 nurses, and usually 1 technician. Patients were assigned in rotation upon arrival to a specific team that was responsible for their care. We monitored the time from arrival to physician assessment, percentage of patients who left without being seen by a physician, and patient satisfaction before and after team assignment system implementation. METHODS: This study was done in a suburban community hospital with an annual ED census of approximately 39,000. Time to physician assessment was defined from the completion of the medical screening evaluation by an ED nurse at triage to initiation of emergency physician evaluation. Times were documented on the ED paper record and manually entered into a computerized registration by the clerical staff. Patients who left without being seen was reported as percentage of total ED visits. Patient satisfaction scores using a 5-point Likert scale to assess satisfaction with the emergency physician, ED staff courtesy, and coordination of care were gathered every 3 months from random mailings to a subset of patients. RESULTS: The 12-month ED census was 38,716 before team assignment system implementation and 39,301 afterwards. Complete time data were recorded for 34,152 (88.2%) and 32,537 (82.8%) of the patients, respectively. The mean time to physician assessment was 71.3+/-7.0 minutes before and 61.8+/-6.4 minutes after team assignment system implementation (absolute difference -9.5 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.8 to -13.5 minutes). The percentage of patients seen by a physician within 1 hour was 56.3% before and 64.0% after team assignment system implementation (absolute difference 7.7%; 95% CI 5.1% to 10.3%). The percentage of patients who waited more than 3 hours for physician assessment was 17.8% before and 11.8% after team assignment system implementation (absolute difference -6.0%, 95% CI -4.0% to -8.1%). Before team assignment system, the left without being seen rate was 2.3% compared to 1.6% after team assignment system (absolute difference -0.8%; 95% CI -0.4% to -1.1%). Patient satisfaction reported as very good or excellent showed improvement in satisfaction with the physician (absolute increase 3.1%; 95% CI 1.0% to 5.3%), staff courtesy (absolute increase 4.5%; 95% CI 2.3% to 6.7%), and coordination of care (absolute increase 3.6%; 95% CI 0.8% to 6.4%). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a team assignment system in our ED was associated with reduced time to physician assessment, a reduced percentage of patients who left without being seen, and improved patient satisfaction.

California↗
PubMed2005

Older emergency department patients with acute myocardial infarction receive lower quality of care than younger patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We assessed the independent relationship between age and the quality of medical care provided to patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: We conducted a 2-year retrospective cohort study of 2,216 acute myocardial infarction patients presenting urgently to 5 EDs in Colorado and California from July 1, 2000, through June 30, 2002. Data on patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and ED processes of care were obtained from the ED record and ECG review. Patients were divided into 6 groups based on their age at the time of their ED visit: younger than 50 years, 50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years, 70 to 79 years, 80 to 89 years, and 90 years or older. Hierarchic multivariable regression was used to assess the independent association between age and the provision of aspirin, beta-blockers, and reperfusion therapy (fibrinolytic agent or percutaneous coronary intervention) in the ED to eligible acute myocardial infarction patients. RESULTS: Of ideal candidates for treatment in the ED, 1,639 (80.5%) of 2,036 received aspirin, 552 (60.3%) of 916 received beta-blockers, and 358 (77.8%) of 460 received acute reperfusion therapy. After adjustment for demographic, medical history, and clinical factors, older patients were less likely to receive aspirin (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.93), beta-blockers (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.88), and reperfusion therapy (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.52). CONCLUSION: Older patients presenting to the ED with acute myocardial infarction receive lower-quality medical care than younger patients. Further investigation to identify the reasons for this disparity and to intervene to reduce gaps in care quality will likely lead to improved outcomes for older acute myocardial infarction patients.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2004

Electrical cardioversion of emergency department patients with atrial fibrillation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Electrical cardioversion of emergency department (ED) patients with atrial fibrillation has not been well investigated. The objective of this study is to identify the outcomes and complications associated with ED electrical cardioversion of patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: This retrospective health records survey investigated a consecutive cohort of ED patients with atrial fibrillation who underwent electrical cardioversion in 4 EDs during a 42-month period. Trained personnel reviewed medical records for demographic characteristics, clinical descriptors, medical interventions, complications, and ED return visits within 7 days. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 388 patients (mean age 61 years; range 20 to 93 years). Duration of atrial fibrillation was less than 48 hours in 99% of the cohort. Electrical cardioversion was successful in 332 (86%) patients. Twenty-eight complications were noted in 25 electrical cardioversion encounters: 22 attributed to procedural sedation and analgesia and 6 attributed to electrical cardioversion. Three hundred thirty-three (86%) patients were discharged to home from the ED: 301 after electrical cardioversion success and 32 with electrical cardioversion failure. Thirty-nine patients (10%) returned to the ED within 7 days, 25 of these patients (6% of successful electrical cardioversion patients) returned because of relapse of atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter cohort, selected ED patients with atrial fibrillation had high rates of electrical cardioversion success, infrequent hospital admission, and few immediate and short-term complications.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Diphenhydramine in the treatment of akathisia induced by prochlorperazine.

Dopamine D(2) antagonists are known to induce akathisia, the emergency management of which remains undetermined. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of diphenhydramine in the treatment of akathisia induced by 10 mg intravenous prochlorperazine. This prospective, open-label, uncontrolled study evaluated a cohort of akathisic adult Emergency Department patients who were participating in a series of three studies of acute akathisia at an academic medical center. Each subject received intravenous diphenhydramine, with akathisia measurements (graded from 0-17 points) performed just before and 30 min after infusion. Mean scores were calculated using descriptive statistical analyses. The effect of treatment was evaluated using the paired t-test. For the 87 akathisic patients, the mean score before treatment was 9.8 +/- 3.6, and after treatment was 1.2 +/- 2.6, a mean reduction of 8.5 +/- 3.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.8 to 9.4; p < 0.0001). In conclusion, intravenous diphenhydramine rapidly reduces signs and symptoms of acute akathisia induced by prochlorperazine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Variations among emergency departments in the treatment of benign headache.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The practice patterns of US emergency departments in the treatment of patients with isolated benign headache have been recently described. How treatment varies among EDs has not been reported. To assess institutional variability in the pharmacotherapy of patients with benign headache, we describe and analyze the practice patterns of 3 US EDs. METHODS: This health records survey included a cohort sample of consecutive adult patients aged 16 to 65 years treated with parenteral medication for isolated benign headache at 3 nonaffiliated US EDs: a large, group-model health maintenance organization, a tertiary-care academic center, and a rural community hospital. Patients who underwent a diagnostic search for intracranial pathology, who had any nonheadache secondary diagnosis, or who had coexistent trauma, fever (temperature of > or =38.0 degrees C [100.4 degrees F]), or known pregnancy were excluded from study analysis. Demographic, clinical, and pharmacotherapeutic variables were collected for each ED visit. Descriptive analyses were performed; comparisons were made with t tests. RESULTS: Of the 490 eligible patients treated during the 4-month study period, the mean age was 36.4 years, and 374 (76%) were women. During their 629 visits, 364 (58%) received a migraine diagnosis, and 258 (41%) received a nonspecific headache diagnosis. Polypharmacy was common: 515 (82%) received 2 or more medications, and 154 (25%) received 3 or more medications. Pharmacotherapy varied greatly among the EDs. Use of opioid agonists showed the widest variation (16% to 72%), although use of dihydroergotamine (5% to 16%), prochlorperazine (32% to 59%), and adjunct diphenhydramine with prochlorperazine (42% versus 88%) also varied. CONCLUSION: Great institutional variability exists among US EDs in the parenteral treatment of patients with isolated benign headache.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Treatment patterns of isolated benign headache in US emergency departments.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: I sought to describe and analyze the treatment of a large representative sample of adult US emergency department patients with isolated primary headache. METHODS: Information on adult patients with an isolated diagnosis of migraine headache or unspecified headache was extracted from the 100.4 million ED visits represented by the 1998 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Demographic and clinical information are presented with descriptive statistics. The treatment of migraine headache was assessed in light of Canadian and US practice parameters. RESULTS: The migraine headache and unspecified headache cohorts included 811,419 and 604,977 participants, respectively. The majority of patients were young, white, and female. Patients received a mean of 1.8 medications from a pharmacopoeia of 36 drugs. Most patients (84.8%) given a diagnosis of migraine headache received a parenteral agent. The most commonly used medications were meperidine (30.0%), ketorolac (21.4%), and prochlorperazine (16.7%). Adjunct antiemetics were commonly administered with parenteral opioids (89.8%). Promethazine and hydroxyzine, antiemetics without anti-headache effects, were used 6 times more commonly as adjuncts than the dopamine antagonists that have established anti-headache effects (ie, prochlorperazine, metoclopramide, droperidol; 78.0% versus 11.8%). The US and Canadian recommendations for the use of nonopioid abortive medications (dopamine-antagonist antiemetics, dihydroergotamine, and 5-hydroxytrypamine(1) [5-HT(1)] receptor agonists) are supported by strong evidence. However, parenterally treated patients with migraines received opioids as their only anti-headache medication more commonly than they received any of the aforementioned non-opioids in their regimen (45.7% versus 26.0%). Of all the opioid recipients, most (77%) did not receive any nonopioid abortive headache medication. Meperidine was the most commonly administered opioid (70%). CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy and a broad pharmacopoeia characterize the US ED treatment of isolated benign headache. Opioid use, particularly meperidine, exceeds that of recommended nonopioid abortive migraine medications.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Etomidate for procedural sedation in emergency medicine.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We describe and analyze the effectiveness and safety of etomidate for procedural sedation and evaluate the patient's perspective on effectiveness, side effects, and satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective study of all patients who received etomidate for procedural sedation over 2 years in 3 affiliated suburban emergency departments of a large group-model health maintenance organization. Data were abstracted from the ED records. Additionally, a patient questionnaire was prospectively administered by telephone. RESULTS: Etomidate was used for sedation in 134 patients between 6 and 93 years of age during 150 procedures. The mean cumulative dose was 0.20 mg/kg. Adjunctive medication was used in 36 (23%) procedures. Moderate sedation with verbal arousability was induced in 48 (32%) patients, and deep sedation with verbal unresponsiveness was induced in 102 (68%) patients. Full recovery to the preprocedural level of alertness was achieved within 30 minutes in 142 (95%) of procedures. Mean changes in systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and oxygen saturation were clinically insignificant. There were 7 (4.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9% to 9.4%) adverse events, including 5 (3.3%; 95% CI 1.1% to 7.6%) cases of oxygen desaturation below 94% in older patients (>55 years of age) who received slightly higher mean doses of etomidate (0.23 mg/kg). Four of these patients received brief assisted bag-valve-mask ventilation and recovered uneventfully; none required endotracheal intubation. The questionnaire was completed by 120 (90%) of 134 patients and involved 136 procedures. During 127 (93%) of these, etomidate was believed to be extremely effective in causing sleep, and for 127 (93%) it induced complete procedural amnesia. Only 5 (4%) patients experienced nausea or vomiting. Regarding willingness to receive etomidate for their next procedure, the patients' responses were favorable: extremely, 95%; moderately, 2%; slightly, 3%; and not at all, 1%. CONCLUSION: Etomidate is a useful agent for carefully conducted procedural sedation because it provides effective, brief, deep sedation with little hemodynamic compromise. Its safety may be jeopardized by the occurrence of respiratory depression in older patients receiving higher doses. Patients report a high degree of satisfaction with etomidate.

Adolescent↗