Biomedical subjects
David Rattner
Publications and source records attributed to David Rattner.
NOTES: Gathering momentum.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Deliberate perioperative systems design improves operating room throughput.
BACKGROUND: New operating room (OR) design focuses more on the surgical environment than on the process of care. The authors sought to improve OR throughput and reduce time per case by goal-directed design of a demonstration OR and the perioperative processes occurring within and around it. METHODS: The authors constructed a three-room suite including an OR, an induction room, and an early recovery area. Traditionally sequential activities were run in parallel, and nonsurgical activities were moved from the OR to the supporting spaces. The new workflow was supported by additional anesthesia and nursing personnel. The authors used a retrospective, case- and surgeon-matched design to compare the throughput, cost, and revenue performance of the new OR to traditional ORs. RESULTS: For surgeons performing the same case mix in both environments, the new OR processed more cases per day than traditional ORs and used less time per case. Throughput improvement came from superior nonoperative performance. Nonoperative Time was reduced from 67 min (95% confidence interval, 64-70 min) to 38 min (95% confidence interval, 35-40 min) in the new OR. All components of Nonoperative Time were meaningfully reduced. Operative Time decreased by approximately 5%. Hospital and anesthesia costs per case increased, but the increased throughput offset costs and the global net margin was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Deliberate OR and perioperative process redesign improved throughput. Performance improvement derived from relocating and reorganizing nonoperative activities. Better OR throughput entailed additional costs but allowed additional patients to be accommodated in the OR while generating revenue that balanced these additional costs.
Automatic detection and notification of "wrong patient-wrong location'' errors in the operating room.
When procedures and processes to assure patient location based on human performance do not work as expected, patients are brought incrementally closer to a possible "wrong patient-wrong procedure'' error. We developed a system for automated patient location monitoring and management. Real-time data from an active infrared/radio frequency identification tracking system provides patient location data that are robust and can be compared with an "expected process'' model to automatically flag wrong-location events as soon as they occur. The system also generates messages that are automatically sent to process managers via the hospital paging system, thus creating an active alerting function to annunciate errors. We deployed the system to detect and annunciate "patient-in-wrong-OR'' events. The system detected all "wrong-operating room (OR)'' events, and all "wrong-OR'' locations were correctly assigned within 0.50+/-0.28 minutes (mean+/-SD). This corresponded to the measured latency of the tracking system. All wrong-OR events were correctly annunciated via the paging function. This experiment demonstrates that current technology can automatically collect sufficient data to remotely monitor patient flow through a hospital, provide decision support based on predefined rules, and automatically notify stakeholders of errors.
A new visualization technique for laparoscopic ultrasonography.
BACKGROUND: Using laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) is challenging for both novice and experienced ultrasonographers. The major difficulty surgeons experience is understanding the orientation of the ultrasonography image. The purpose of this study was to assess whether providing surgeons with orientation information improves their ability to interpret LUS images. METHODS: We performed a LUS examination on a 25-kg pig and simultaneously digitized video from the laparoscopic camera, the LUS, and a novel orientation system. From the video recordings, 12 different clips of intra-abdominal anatomy were prepared. Twenty surgeons (18 staff, 2 fellows) volunteered to participate in an experimental crossover study. Test subjects reviewed the LUS clips along with the laparoscopic video images and the orientation display. Controls reviewed the LUS clips with only the laparoscopic video images. Diagnostic accuracy was compared by using the odds ratio. RESULTS: For all vessels, the orientation display improved the odds ratio for correctly identifying structures from 3.7 to 8.9 (P=.02). For arteries, the orientation display improved the odds ratio from 2.4 to 9.6 (P=.01). For veins, the orientation display improved the odds ratio from 4.4 to 13.6 (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Providing orientation information significantly improves a surgeon's ability to interpret LUS images.
Robotics and ergonomics.
Industrial robotics have proven the benefit of using an untiring machine to perform precise repetitive tasks in uncomfortable or dangerous for humans environments. Highly skilled surgeons are trained to operate and adapt to difficult conditions. They are even capable of developing intelligent mechanisms to exploit a variety of tactile, visual, and other cues. The robotic systems, however, can enhance the surgeon's capability to perform a wide variety of tasks. They cannot replace the surgeon's problem-solving ability. Instead, they will redefine his role. They will significantly enhance the surgeon's skills and dexterity by providing their complementary capabilities and an ergonomically efficient and more user-friendly working environment.
CELTS: a clinically-based Computer Enhanced Laparoscopic Training System.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Intestinal anastomoses detected with a photopolymerized hydrogel.
BACKGROUND: This study examines the efficacy of a novel, absorbable photopolymerized hydrogel sealant, Focalseal (Focal Inc, Lexington, Mass), in protecting high-risk suture deficient intestinal anastomoses (HRA) compared with conventional sutured anastomoses (CSA). METHODS: Twenty-four New Zealand white rabbits were either randomized to small bowel HRA constructed with 4 interrupted 5/0 polyglyconate sutures and treated with Focalseal or small bowel CSA constructed with 8 to 10 interrupted 5/0 polyglyconate sutures. Four rabbits from each group were killed at postoperative days 3, 7, and 21. Anastomoses were assessed for evidence of dehiscence, adhesion formation, stenosis, and bursting pressure; they were also examined histologically for collagen content estimation and blood vessel formation. RESULTS: Mean operative time was 35 minutes (SD 5) for CSA and 35 minutes (SD 5) for HRA. There was 1 postoperative death in the HRA group. A postmortem examination revealed no evidence of anastomotic leak. The remaining 23 animals were assessed as planned. There was no evidence of anastomotic dehiscence in any animal. There was no significant difference in adhesion formation (P =.09), stenosis (P =.6), or bursting pressure (P =.2) between HRA and CSA groups. Collagen (P =.007) and blood vessel (P =.002) formation were significantly increased in HRA. CONCLUSIONS: HRA treated with Focalseal heal well and have similar strength to CSA. This technique may prove valuable in procedures such as laparoscopic bowel resection.
Reorganizing the system of care surrounding laparoscopic surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis using discrete-event simulation.
PURPOSE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of a proposed reorganization of surgical and anesthesia care to balance patient volume and safety. METHODS: Discrete-event simulation methods were used to compare current surgical practice with a new modular system in which patient care is handed off between 2 anesthesiologists. A health care system's perspective, using hospital and professional costs, was chosen for the cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcomes were patient throughput, flow time, wait time, and resource use. Sensitivity analyses were performed on staffing levels, mortality rates, process times, and scheduled patient volume. RESULTS: The new strategy was more effective (average 4.41 patients/d [median = 5] v. 4.29 [median = 4]) and had similar costs (average cost/ patient/d = 5327 dollars v. 5289 dollars) to the current strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness of 318 dollars/additional patient treated/d. Surgical mortality rate must be >4% or hand-off delay >15 min before the new strategy is no longer more effective. CONCLUSION: The proposed system is more cost-effective relative to current practice over a wide range of mortality rates, hand-off times, and scheduled patient volumes.