Biomedical subjects

David S Schwartzman

Publications and source records attributed to David S Schwartzman.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Decreasing pain and anxiety associated with patient-activated atrial shock: a placebo-controlled study of adjunctive sedation with oral triazolam.

INTRODUCTION: Implantable atrial defibrillators (IADs) have proved to be safe and effective in the management of atrial fibrillation. A potential limitation of self-activated IAD therapy is patient-reported pain and anxiety. The main objective of the present study was to determine whether triazolam improved patient perception of the shock experience or altered patient memory of shock discomfort relative to placebo. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 15 men and women (mean age: 59 +/- 6 years) were enrolled in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of triazolam. Randomized study medication was administered orally 75 minutes prior to scheduled atrial shock delivery. Patient perception of the shock experience was assessed along with sedation, memory, anxiety, and mood. Triazolam reduced mean pre-shock anxiety (t= 2.98, df = 14, P = 0.01) and shock-related pain (t= 2.74, df = 13, P = 0.01) and intensity (t= 2.64, df = 13, P = 0.018) relative to placebo. Similarly, participants recalled less discomfort the morning after shock with triazolam than with placebo (t= 2.82, df = 11, P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to investigate the use of an oral benzodiazepine administered prior to patient-activated shock delivery with an IAD. Our data indicate that oral triazolam is beneficial in decreasing pain and anxiety associated with self-activated atrial defibrillation. If triazolam provides a similar benefit in the community to that which has been reported here, this medication could be offered to patients as an adjunct to intermittent IAD therapy.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗

PubMed2005

Understanding atrial symptom reports: objective versus subjective predictors.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with a variety of symptoms such as dizziness, palpitations, shortness of breath, and other signs of heart failure, which in turn impact quality of life (QOL). Implantable cardioverter defibrillators with atrial therapies (ICDs-ATs) have been shown to reduce AF symptoms and improve QOL in select AF samples. METHOD: This study examined the strength of relationships between objective (device-detected AF events) versus subjective (emotional symptoms) data and AF symptoms (number) reported as part of the Patient Atrial Shock Survey of Acceptance and Tolerance Study (N = 96, 72% men, M age = 65, SD = 12). Depression and anxiety were assessed via the Center for Epidemiological Studies--Depression Scale and the-State Trait Anxiety Inventory. AF disease burden was measured via a number of device-detected AF episodes and the Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Symptom Severity Scale. RESULTS: Hierarchical multiple regression analysis indicated that negative emotions accounted for a significant 13.2% of unique variance in AF symptom score (F change (1, 54) = 9.625, P = 0.003). On the other hand, the number of device-detected AF episodes accounted for non-significant 8.2% of unique variance in the AF symptom score (P = 0.167). The full model explained 25.7% of the variance in AF symptom score (F(6, 54) = 3.110, P = 0.011). Specifically, greater number of treated AF episodes (beta= 0.251, P = 0.043) and higher levels of negative emotions (beta= 0.369, P = 0.003) predicted greater number of reported AF symptoms. CONCLUSION: Therefore, psychological distress may be a significant confounding factor affecting patient's report of AF symptoms rather than the actual experience of recurrent AF episodes.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Do patients accept implantable atrial defibrillation therapy? Results from the Patient Atrial Shock Survey of Acceptance and Tolerance (PASSAT) Study.

INTRODUCTION: The Medtronic Jewel AF 7250 is an implantable cardioverter defibrillator with atrial and ventricular therapies (ICD-AT). The ICD-AT is effective in managing atrial tachyarrhythmias (atrial fibrillation [AF]), but patient acceptance remains an issue. This aim of this study was to measure ICD-AT acceptance. METHODS AND RESULTS: ICD-AT acceptance was evaluated in 96 patients enrolled in the "Jewel AF-AF-Only Study" for > or =3 months of follow-up (mean 19 months). Patients were mostly men (72%; age 65 +/- 12 years). Clinical data and a written survey (75% response rate) were used to quantify demographics, AF frequency and symptoms, atrial defibrillation therapy, quality of life (QOL), psychosocial distress, and ICD-AT therapy acceptance. From implant to survey, AF symptom and severity scores decreased by 18% (P < or = 0.05), and QOL (SF-36) scores increased by 15% to 50% (P < or = 0.05). ICD-AT therapy acceptance was high, with 71.3% of patients scoring in the 75th percentile on the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey. ICD-AT acceptance was correlated with the Physical Component Scale and Mental Health Component Scale scores of the SF-36 (r = 0.28 and 0.35, respectively). ICD-AT acceptance was negatively correlated with depressive symptomatology (r =-0.59), trait anxiety (r =-0.48), illness intrusiveness (r =-0.55), and AF symptom and severity scores (r =-0.26). ICD-AT acceptance did not correlate with preimplant cardioversions, number of atrial shocks, AF episodes detected by the device, or device implant duration. CONCLUSION: Most patients accepted ICD-AT therapy. Patients were more likely to accept ICD-AT if they had less psychosocial distress, greater QOL, and lower AF symptom burden.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Effect of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator with atrial detection and shock therapies on patient-perceived, health-related quality of life.

BACKGROUND: This study used a device (DDD implantable cardioverter defibrillator [ICD]) capable of delivering pacing and shock therapies to restore normal sinus rhythm in patients with atrial tachycardias or atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of the device on patient-perceived, health-related quality of life (QOL). METHODS: The DDD ICD was implanted in 267 patients with drug refractory, symptomatic AF from 45 centers across Europe, the United States, and Canada. Patients completed self-reported, validated QOL assessments at baseline and at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits (The Medical Outcomes Short Form 36 [SF-36] and the Symptom Checklist [SCL]). RESULTS: The mean age of the study group was 62 +/- 12 years, and 73% of the patients were male. A total of 150 patients completed SF-36 assessments, and 138 patients completed SCL assessments at all 3 times. Baseline scores were more impaired (P <.05) on most SF-36 scales compared with norms for a general population, but were similar to a comparison group of patients with AF who were referred to tertiary care centers. The role-physical, physical functioning, vitality, mental health, and social functioning scales all improved significantly with time (all P <.04). Similarly, symptom frequency and severity (SCL) also improved significantly from baseline to 6 months (both P <.01). Shock therapy was delivered in 86 of the 150 patients (57%) with complete SF-36 evaluations. There was no evidence that receiving shocks decreased the relative improvement in QOL associated with implantation of the device. CONCLUSIONS: In a 6-month period, QOL improves after implantation of a DDD ICD with atrial shock and pacing therapies. These improvements were not attenuated by receipt of shocks.

Atrial Fibrillation↗

PubMed2003

Sleep quality among patients treated with implantable atrial defibrillation therapy: effect of nocturnal shock delivery and psychological distress.

INTRODUCTION: The Medtronic ICD-AT has atrial/ventricular therapies, which can be programmed to deliver atrial defibrillation during sleep, intended to potentially decrease shock anxiety/pain and lifestyle disruption. However, these shocks may diminish sleep quality. This study examined atrial shock characteristics (i.e., mode, frequency), AF symptoms, and psychological factors as determinants of sleep quality. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 96 ICD-AT patients were mostly men (72%; M age 65 +/- 12 years) and implanted for 1.6 years (SD = 0.8 years). Patients were divided into shock groups based on the proportion of mode (> or =90%) of total atrial shocks received. Patients were grouped into either automatic-nocturnal shock group (8 P.M.-8 A.M.; n = 35) or manual-awake shock group (n = 42). Psychological measures included Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Center for Epidemiology Studies-Depression Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale. Atrial fibrillation disease burden was assessed via atrial symptom score and atrial shock use. PSQI global scores were similar between manual (7.67 +/- 2.53) and automatic shock (8.20 +/- 2.93) groups. A multiple hierarchical regression analysis indicated that no atrial shock variables were predictive of sleep quality; yet, both AF symptom (B = 0.226, P = 0.040) and depression (B = 0.392, P = 0.034) scores predicted diminished sleep quality, accounting for 42% of the variance in global sleep quality (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that atrial defibrillation therapy does not have a deleterious impact on sleep. However, the significance of AF symptoms and depression indicate that comprehensive care of both physical and psychological symptomatology may improve sleep quality in ICD-AT patients.

Aged↗