PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David V Sheehan

Publications and source records attributed to David V Sheehan.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Comparing the effects of antidepressants: consensus guidelines for evaluating quantitative reviews of antidepressant efficacy.

With increasing numbers of treatment options available for patients with major depression over the last decade and the growing body of evidence describing their efficacy and safety, clinicians often find it difficult to determine the best and most appropriate evidence-based treatment for each patient. Systematic reviews utilizing statistical methods that synthesize and evaluate data from a number of studies have become increasingly more available over the past decade. We review major findings and lessons learned from salient examples of quantitative analyses of antidepressant research and provide recommendations for meta-analysts, journal and grant reviewers, and research 'consumers' (ie, clinicians) for conducting, reporting, and evaluating such analyses.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed2005

Efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release paroxetine in the treatment of panic disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release paroxetine (paroxetine CR) in the treatment of adults with panic disorder. METHOD: Paroxetine CR (25-75 mg/day; N = 444) was compared with placebo (N = 445) in patients with DSM-IV panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in 3 identical, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 10-week clinical trials that were pooled for analysis. RESULTS: Paroxetine CR was statistically superior to placebo in the primary outcome measure, percentage of patients who were free of panic attacks in the 2 weeks prior to endpoint. Of the total population that completed or prematurely terminated treatment, 63% and 53% of paroxetine CR-and placebo-treated patients, respectively, were panic-free during the final 2 weeks (p < .005; odds ratio [OR] = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.19). For week 10 completers (72% of total), 73% and 60% of paroxetine CR- and placebo-treated patients, respectively, were panic-free at week 10 (p < .005; OR = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.45 to 3.07). Paroxetine CR was also statistically superior to placebo on the global improvement and severity items of the Clinical Global Impressions scale and in reducing anxiety symptoms as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety total score and total fear and avoidance on the Marks-Sheehan Phobia Scale. Adverse events leading to study withdrawal were minimal and occurred in 11% of the paroxetine CR group and 6% of the placebo group. Most of the treatment-emergent adverse events were rated as mild to moderate in severity and occurred early in the study. There were no unexpected adverse events, and serious adverse events were uncommon (10 [2.3%] of the 444 patients treated with paroxetine CR vs. 8 [1.8%] of the 445 patients treated with placebo). CONCLUSION: Paroxetine CR is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for panic disorder. Paroxetine CR is associated with low rates of treatment-emergent anxiety as well as low dropout rates from adverse events.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Differences in total medical costs across the SSRIs for the treatment of depression and anxiety.

There is growing evidence that adherence to the recommended duration of antidepressant therapy results in reduced medical costs compared with nonadherence, and that the likelihood of adhering to therapy is not equivalent across the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). As such, the purpose of this study was to assess differences in 6-month medical costs between paroxetine controlled-release (CR) and immediate-release (IR) SSRI agents in a retrospective analysis of patients initiating SSRI therapy identified from the Integrated Healthcare Information Services National Managed Care Benchmark Database during a 2.5-year time frame. Inferential analyses were performed to evaluate differences in 6-month medical costs, controlling for differences in age, sex, utilization of psychiatric specialty care services, titration, pre-period costs, and comorbidity measures. Of the 146 075 patients included in this study, approximately 7% received paroxetine CR. Approximately 29.5% of patients had an anxiety disorder diagnosis; 26.0% had a depression-only diagnosis; and 13.2% had comorbid anxiety and depression. The 6-month medical costs were 244 US dollars lower for patients initiating with paroxetine CR compared with the average medical costs for patients receiving IR SSRIs. Paroxetine CR also had the lowest medical costs compared with each individual SSRI evaluated. After log transformation of costs and adjustment for baseline covariates, the aggregated IR SSRIs were associated with 8.7% higher 6-month medical costs than paroxetine CR (P <.001) and even greater costs after stratifying by diagnosis: 12.5% higher costs in patients with anxiety, 14.3% higher costs in patients with depression, and 15.9% higher costs in patients with comorbid anxiety and depression (P <.001 for all). Each individual IR SSRI was also associated with significantly higher medical costs than paroxetine CR, irrespective of diagnosis. As demonstrated, medical costs over a 6-month time frame were significantly greater for IR SSRIs versus paroxetine CR, even after adjusting for background characteristics and stratifying by diagnosis. Future studies should measure rates of adherence in relation to medical outcomes over an expanded time frame.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Evaluating the economic consequences of early antidepressant treatment discontinuation: a comparison between controlled-release and immediate-release paroxetine.

INTRODUCTION: Early antidepressant discontinuation has been linked to significant clinical and economic consequences. Clinical practice guidelines suggest that treatment should last for at least 3 to 9 months into the continuation phase; however, 30% of patients discontinue therapy within 30 days, and over 40% discontinue therapy within 90 days of initiation, primarily due to adverse events. Clinical trials have shown that controlled-release (CR) paroxetine has a favorable tolerability profile when compared to immediate-release (IR) paroxetine, which may result in lower discontinuation rates and improved economic outcomes. This is the first study to directly compare treatment discontinuation rates and health care expenditures of a CR selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors with its IR counterpart. METHODS: This matched retrospective study used claims from a national managed care database to assess differences in discontinuation rates and health care expenditures between paroxetine CR and IR for treating depression and/or anxiety. Discontinuation was assessed by survival analysis, and health care expenditure was assessed using average monthly medical and pharmacy charges. RESULTS: There were 1275 paroxetine CR patients and 2550 paroxetine IR patients matched in the analysis. At 90 days, 62% of paroxetine CR patients continued therapy versus 56% of paroxetine IR patients. At 180 days, 51% of paroxetine CR patients continued therapy versus 42% of paroxetine IR patients. When evaluating all medical charges, paroxetine CR patients incurred US 119 dollars less per month than paroxetine IR patients (P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving paroxetine CR remained on therapy longer than patients on paroxetine IR, which resulted in lower total monthly medical costs for patients receiving paroxetine CR. Differences in costs were primarily driven by reduction in hospitalization expenditures.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Depression: underdiagnosed, undertreated, underappreciated.

Major depressive disorder is significantly underdiagnosed and undertreated, particularly in the primary care environment. Although more patients are seeking help for depression and the utilization of antidepressants is on the rise, the level of treatment is inadequate. Rectifying this will involve patients, providers, payers, employers, accrediting agencies, and even governmental entities.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed2003

Paroxetine treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.

Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a prevalent and disabling anxiety disorder, conservatively believed to affect at least 5% of the general population. Cardinal symptoms of GAD include chronic and uncontrollable worry, anxiety, and tension, which result in difficulty fulfilling social, professional, and family roles. Treatment options include benzodiazepines, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) venlafaxine XR. Because of the high comorbidity of GAD with other psychiatric disorders, pharmacologic therapy should possess both anxiolytic and antidepressive properties for best outcomes. The SSRIs are a good treatment option, and paroxetine is the best studied SSRI for GAD and the only SSRI to date approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication. Results of randomized, controlled studies of paroxetine have demonstrated its efficacy in the short-term treatment of GAD, in achieving and sustaining full remission, and in preventing relapse. This article provides an overview of GAD and a discussion of studies of paroxetine treatment in this anxiety disorder.

Agoraphobia↗
PubMed2002

Effect of Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) in major depressive disorder: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Extracts of Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) are widely used for the treatment of depression of varying severity. Their efficacy in major depressive disorder, however, has not been conclusively demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy and safety of a well-characterized H perforatum extract (LI-160) in major depressive disorder. DESIGN AND SETTING: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 12 academic and community psychiatric research clinics in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adult outpatients (n = 340) recruited between December 1998 and June 2000 with major depression and a baseline total score on the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) of at least 20. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive H perforatum, placebo, or sertraline (as an active comparator) for 8 weeks. Based on clinical response, the daily dose of H perforatum could range from 900 to 1500 mg and that of sertraline from 50 to 100 mg. Responders at week 8 could continue blinded treatment for another 18 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in the HAM-D total score from baseline to 8 weeks; rates of full response, determined by the HAM-D and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scores. RESULTS: On the 2 primary outcome measures, neither sertraline nor H perforatum was significantly different from placebo. The random regression parameter estimate for mean (SE) change in HAM-D total score from baseline to week 8 (with a greater decline indicating more improvement) was -9.20 (0.67) (95% confidence interval [CI], -10.51 to -7.89) for placebo vs -8.68 (0.68) (95% CI, -10.01 to -7.35) for H perforatum (P =.59) and -10.53 (0.72) (95% CI, -11.94 to -9.12) for sertraline (P =.18). Full response occurred in 31.9% of the placebo-treated patients vs 23.9% of the H perforatum-treated patients (P =.21) and 24.8% of sertraline-treated patients (P =.26). Sertraline was better than placebo on the CGI improvement scale (P =.02), which was a secondary measure in this study. Adverse-effect profiles for H perforatum and sertraline differed relative to placebo. CONCLUSION: This study fails to support the efficacy of H perforatum in moderately severe major depression. The result may be due to low assay sensitivity of the trial, but the complete absence of trends suggestive of efficacy for H perforatum is noteworthy.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Impact of formulary restrictions on the cost-effectiveness of antidepressant treatment.

Newer antidepressants are associated with higher costs of treatment of anxiety and depression. Managed care organizations are challenged to control treatment costs by implementing restricted formularies based on price and perceived medical value. Despite unfavorable side effects of efficacious tricyclic antidepressants, the low acquisition cost rationalizes the inclusion of this older class of agents on a formulary. On the other hand, cost-containment approaches have been taken toward more expensive drug classes (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) despite a superior safety profile of these drug classes over tricyclics. There is compelling evidence that dual reuptake inhibitors (e.g., venlafaxine extended-release), which have acquisition costs similar to serotonin reuptake inhibitors, have a broad spectrum of efficacy and thus added value, contributing to the cost-effectiveness of including this agent in the managed care formulary. Assessment of overall cost-effectiveness should not be limited by acquisition costs but should take total healthcare costs into consideration.

Antidepressive Agents↗
PubMed2002

The management of panic disorder.

The evidence for benzodiazepines in panic disorder is compelling; along with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), they are a standard treatment for panic and other anxiety disorders. However, extended-release formulations of these agents may prove to be as effective as the immediate-release formulations, and extended-release agents have clinical benefits that may make them more attractive treatments than the currently available, shorter-acting benzodiazepines. Because of their longer duration of action, extended-release benzodiazepines can protect against breakthrough anxiety and need to be taken only once or twice a day, which may improve compliance in some patients. Because the other standard treatments of panic disorder, the SSRIs, have a slow onset of action, adding an extended-release benzodiazepine to the treatment regimen for the initial 6 to 8 weeks could serve as an effective bridge until the desired SSRI effect is realized.

Alprazolam↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Characterization of the longitudinal course of improvement in generalized anxiety disorder during long-term treatment with venlafaxine XR.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the response to the serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, venlafaxine extended release (XR), during the long-term treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. METHODS: Data from two double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-month trials of venlafaxine XR for the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder were pooled. Criteria for response (> or = 50% improvement from baseline HAM-A score) and remission (HAM-A score < or = 7) and their temporal profile were used to characterize patient improvement over 6 months of treatment with venlafaxine XR and placebo. RESULTS: Venlafaxine XR was associated with significantly (P<0.001) higher response and remission rates (66 and 43%, respectively) compared with placebo (39 and 19%), regardless of the level of baseline anxiety. In the venlafaxine XR group, 61% of the patients who had responded but not remitted by week 8 showed remission by the end of 6 months. In comparison, only 39% of placebo responders who did not qualify for remission at the end of the first 8 weeks of therapy remitted by the end of the 6 months (P=0.007). Relapse occurred in 6% of venlafaxine XR-treated patients and 15% of placebo-treated patients (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: This analysis provides further insight into the outcome of long-term treatment of generalised anxiety disorder with venlafaxine XR and shows for the first time that long-term treatment might be necessary to achieve and maintain remission of symptoms.

Adult↗