PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David V Smith

Publications and source records attributed to David V Smith.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

Influence of response variability on the coding performance of central gustatory neurons.

We explored how variability in responding to taste stimuli could impact the signaling of taste quality information by neuron types and individual cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract. One hundred sixty-two neurons recorded from anesthetized rats were grouped using multivariate analysis of taste responses to the following (in m): 0.5 sucrose, 0.1 NaCl, 0.01 HCl, and 0.01 quinine-HCl. Neurons fell into one of three groups corresponding to cell types that responded optimally to sucrose, NaCl, or HCl. A statistical model was used to examine whether responses observed among neurons within each group could be correctly attributed to the optimal stimulus or another tastant on the basis of spike count. Results revealed poor classification performance in some cases attributable to wide variations in the sensitivities of neurons that compose a cell type. This outcome leads us to question whether neuron types could faithfully encode a single taste quality. We then theoretically explored whether a hypothetical observer of individual neurons could discriminate between spiking rates to different tastants during the first second of stimulus processing. Spike rate was found to be an unreliable predictor of stimulus quality for each neuron tested. However, additional analyses suggested that taste stimuli could be identified by a reader that attends to the relative spiking activities of different kinds of neurons in parallel. Rather than assigning meaning to individual neurons or categories of them, central gustatory circuits may signal quality information using a strategy that involves the relative activities of neurons with different sensitivities to tastants.

Action Potentials↗

Cholinergic modulation of neurons in the gustatory region of the nucleus of the solitary tract.

The rostral portion of the nucleus of the solitary tract (rNST) is an obligatory relay for gustatory afferent input on its way to the forebrain. Previous studies have demonstrated excitation of rNTS neurons by glutamate and substance P and inhibition by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and met-enkephalin (ENK). Despite the existence of cholinergic neurons and putative terminals within the rNTS, there are no data on the effects of acetylcholine (ACh) on rNTS processing. Here, we use patch-clamp recording of rNTS neurons in vitro to examine ACh-mediated responses and voltage-gated conductances in these cells. Results revealed (1) intrinsic voltage-gated inhibition via activation of voltage-gated potassium A-channels (I(A)), found almost exclusively in the medial rNTS, and hyperpolarization-activated potassium/sodium channels (I(h)), found more frequently in the lateral rNST; and (2) ligand-gated inhibition via activation of muscarinic m2 ACh receptors (mAChRs) linked to inward rectifier potassium channels (K(ir)) evenly distributed throughout the rNTS, a mechanism dependent on cholinergic inputs. Muscarinic responses were blocked by AFDX-116, a selective m2 mAChR antagonist, and by BaCl2, an antagonist of K(ir) channels. In addition, many rNTS neurons exhibited excitation via alpha7 and non-alpha7 nicotinic AChRs. Non-alpha7 nAChRs, blocked by 10 microM mecamylamine, occurred more frequently in the lateral rNTS. In contrast, alpha7 nAChRs, blocked by 20 nM methyllcaconitine, were evenly distributed across the nucleus. As previously reported for voltage-activated conductances, none of these currents was related to neuronal morphology. These voltage- and ligand-dependent inhibitory mechanisms would be expected to contribute to the modulation of gustatory processing through the NST.

Acetylcholine↗

Differential covariation in taste responsiveness to bitter stimuli in rats.

Variation exists in the sensitivity of individual rodents and humans to different bitter tastants. An absence of uniform correlation in responsiveness to different bitter substances across individuals within a species suggests heterogeneity in the mechanisms underlying stimulus processing within this taste modality. Here, we examined taste responsiveness of individual rats to three bitter compounds (quinine hydrochloride, denatonium benzoate, and cycloheximide) in short-term lick tests to determine the magnitude of covariation among responses to these stimuli and infer commonalities in their receptor and neural mechanisms. Rats were tested with a given pair of bitter stimuli during three sessions comprising randomized trial blocks of six concentrations of each stimulus + deionized water. Psychophysical functions were generated for individual rats for respective stimulus pairs, and concentrations of each stimulus that produced equivalent lick suppression relative to water were correlated across animals. Behavioral taste responsiveness to quinine hydrochloride strongly covaried with responsiveness to denatonium benzoate (r = +0.82). Lick responsiveness to quinine was less robustly correlated with that to cycloheximide (r = +0.44), and denatonium and cycloheximide responses failed to correlate. These results imply substantial overlap in the bitter taste coding mechanisms for quinine and denatonium but some degree of independence in the mechanisms responsible for gustatory processing of cycloheximide. More generally, these data reinforce the notion that bitter taste processing is not a homogeneous event.

Animals↗

Neural representation of bitter taste in the nucleus of the solitary tract.

Based on the molecular findings that many bitter taste receptors (T2Rs) are expressed within the same receptor cells, it has been proposed that bitter taste is encoded by the activation of discrete neural elements. Here we examined how a variety of bitter stimuli are represented by neural activity in central gustatory neurons. Taste responses (spikes/s) evoked by bathing the tongue and palate with intensity-matched concentrations (in M) of 2 sugars (0.32 sucrose and 0.5 D-fructose), ethanol (40%), 4 salts (0.01 NaCl, 0.008 NaNO(3), 0.01 MgCl(2), and 0.05 KCl), 2 acids (0.003 HCl and 0.005 citric acid), and 10 bitter ligands (0.007 quinine-HCl, 0.015 denatonium benzoate, 0.003 l-cysteine, 0.001 nicotine, 0.005 strychnine-HCl, 0.04 tetraethylammonium chloride, 0.03 atropine-SO(4), 0.005 brucine-SO(4), 0.03 papaverine-HCl, and 0.009 sparteine) were recorded from 51 neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract of anesthetized rats. Cluster analysis was used to categorize neurons into types based on responses to sucrose, NaCl, HCl, and quinine-HCl. Three groupings emerged: type S (responded optimally to sweets), type N (sodium-optimal), and type H/Q (responded robustly to bitters, acids, and salts). Multivariate analyses revealed that across-neuron patterns of response among bitter stimuli were strongly correlated. However, neural type H/Q, which was most responsive to bitter tastants, was not differentially sensitive to bitter stimuli and Na(+) salts, which rats perceive as distinct. Thus central neurons most responsive to bitter substances receive significant input from receptors that mediate other tastes, indicating that bitter stimuli are not represented by activity in specifically tuned neurons.

Action Potentials↗

Medullary taste responses are modulated by the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

Previous studies have shown a modulatory influence of limbic forebrain areas, such as the central nucleus of the amygdala and lateral hypothalamus, on the activity of taste-responsive cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST). The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), which receives gustatory afferent information, also sends descending axons to the NST. The present studies were designed to investigate the role of the BST in the modulation of NST gustatory activity. Extracellular action potentials were recorded from 101 taste-responsive cells in the NST of urethane-anesthetized hamsters and analyzed for a change in excitability following bilateral electrical stimulation of the BST. The response of NST taste cells to stimulation of the BST was predominately inhibitory. Orthodromic inhibitory responses were observed in 29 of 101 (28.7%) NST taste-responsive cells, with four cells inhibited bilaterally. An increase in excitability was observed in seven of the 101 (6.9%) NST taste cells. Of the 34 cells showing these responses, 25 were modulated by the ipsilateral BST and 15 by the contralateral; four were inhibited bilaterally and two inhibited ipsilaterally and excited contralaterally. The duration of inhibitory responses (mean = 177.9 ms) was significantly longer than that of excitatory responses (35.4 ms). Application of subthreshold electrical stimulation to the BST during taste trials inhibited or excited the taste responses of every BST-responsive NST cell tested with this protocol. NST neurons that were most responsive to sucrose, NaCl, citric acid or quinine hydrochloride were all affected by BST stimulation, although citric acid-best cells were significantly more often modulated and NaCl-best less often modulated than expected by chance. These results combine with excitatory and inhibitory modulation of NST neurons by the insular cortex, lateral hypothalamus and central nucleus of the amygdala to demonstrate extensive centrifugal modulation of brainstem gustatory neurons.

Animals↗

Modulation of parabrachial taste neurons by electrical and chemical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus and amygdala.

The lateral hypothalamus (LH) and the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) exert an influence on ingestive behavior and are reciprocally connected to gustatory and viscerosensory areas, including the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) and the parabrachial nuclei (PbN). We investigated the effects of LH and CeA stimulation on the activity of 101 taste-responsive neurons in the hamster PbN. Eighty three of these neurons were antidromically activated by stimulation of these sites; 57 were antidromically driven by both. Of these 83 neurons, 21 were also orthodromically activated--8 by the CeA and 3 by the LH. Additional neurons were excited (n = 5) or inhibited (n = 8) by these forebrain nuclei but not antidromically activated. Taste stimuli were: 0.032 M sucrose, 0.032 M sodium chloride (NaCl), 0.032 M quinine hydrochloride (QHCl), and 0.0032 M citric acid. Among the 34 orthodromically activated neurons, more sucrose-best neurons were excited than inhibited, whereas the opposite occurred for citric-acid- and QHCl-best cells. Neurons inhibited by the forebrain responded significantly more strongly to citric acid and QHCl than cells excited by these sites. The effects of electrical stimulation were mimicked by microinjection of DL-homocysteic acid, indicating that cells at these forebrain sites were responsible for these effects. These data demonstrate that many individual PbN gustatory neurons project to both the LH and CeA and that these areas modulate the gustatory activity of a subset of PbN neurons. This neural substrate is likely involved in the modulation of taste activity by physiological and experiential factors.

Action Potentials↗

Alcohol activates a sucrose-responsive gustatory neural pathway.

A strong positive association exists between the ingestion of alcohol and sweet-tasting solutions. The neural mechanisms underlying this relationship are unknown, although recent data suggest that gustatory substrates are involved. Here, we examined the role of sweet taste receptors and central neural circuits for sugar taste in the gustatory processing of ethanol. Taste responses to ethanol (3, 5, 10, 15, 25, and 40% vol/vol) and stimuli of different taste qualities (e.g., sucrose, NaCl, HCl, and quinine-HCl) were recorded from neurons of the nucleus of the solitary tract in anesthetized rats prior to and after oral application of the sweet receptor blocker gurmarin. The magnitude of ethanol-evoked activity was compared between sucrose-responsive (n = 21) and sucrose-unresponsive (n = 20) neurons and the central neural representation of ethanol taste was explored using multivariate analysis. Ethanol produced robust concentration-dependent responses in sucrose-responsive neurons that were dramatically larger than those in sucrose-unresponsive cells. Gurmarin selectively and similarly inhibited ethanol and sucrose responses, leaving NaCl, HCl, and quinine responses unaltered. Across-neuron patterns of response to ethanol were most similar to those evoked by sucrose, becoming increasingly more so as the ethanol concentration was raised. Results implicate taste receptors for sucrose as candidate receptors for ethanol and reveal that alcohol and sugar taste are represented similarly by gustatory activity in the CNS. These findings have important implications for the sensory and reward properties of alcohol.

Action Potentials↗

Differential gurmarin suppression of sweet taste responses in rat solitary nucleus neurons.

We examined the effect of the sweet transduction blocker gurmarin on taste responses recorded from neurons in the rat solitary nucleus (NST) to determine how gurmarin sensitivity is distributed across neuronal type. Initially, responses evoked by washing the anterior tongue and palate with 0.5 M sucrose, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.01 M HCl, and 0.01 M quinine-HCl were recorded from 35 neurons. For some cells, responses to a sucrose concentration series (0.01-1.0 M) or an array of sweet-tasting compounds were also measured. Gurmarin (10 microg/ml, 2-4 ml) was then applied to the tongue and palate. Stimuli were reapplied after 10-15 min. Neurons were segregated into groups based on similarities among their initial response profiles using hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). Results indicated that sucrose responses recorded from neurons representative of each HCA-defined class were suppressed by gurmarin. However, a disproportionate percentage of cells in each group displayed sucrose responses that were substantially attenuated after gurmarin treatment. Postgurmarin sucrose responses recorded from neurons that composed 57% of class S, 40% of class N, and 33% of class H were suppressed by >or=50% relative to control. On average, attenuation was statistically significant only in class S and N neurons. Although the magnitude of gurmarin-induced response suppression did not differ across sucrose concentration, responses to different sweet-tasting compounds were differentially affected. Responses to NaCl, HCl, or quinine were not suppressed by gurmarin. Results suggest that information from gurmarin-sensitive and -insensitive receptor processes converges onto single NST neurons.

Action Potentials↗

Opioid modulation of taste responses in the nucleus of the solitary tract.

Gustatory processing within the medulla is modulated by a number of physiologic and experiential factors. Several neurotransmitters, including excitatory amino acids, GABA, and substance P, are involved in synaptic processing within the rostral portion of the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST). Endogenous opiates have been implicated in the regulation of feeding behavior and in taste palatability and gustatory responses in the parabrachial nuclei are reduced by systemic morphine. In the present experiments, extracellular recording of neuronal activity within the NST in response to taste input was combined with local microinjection of met-enkephalin (Met-ENK) and naltrexone (NLTX) to determine the effect of these agents on gustatory activity. The anterior tongue was stimulated with anodal current pulses to determine the time course of drug action (n=85 cells) and with prototypical taste stimuli (0.032 M sucrose, NaCl, and quinine hydrochloride, and 0.0032 M citric acid) to investigate the effects of these opioid compounds on taste-evoked responses (n=80 cells). Among these 165 taste-responsive neurons in the NST, the activity of 39 (23.6%) was suppressed by Met-ENK. These effects were dose-dependent and blockable by NLTX, which alone was without effect, suggesting that opiates do not maintain a tonic inhibitory influence. Immunohistochemical experiments demonstrated both micro - and delta-opioid receptors within the gustatory portion of the NST; previous studies had shown numerous fiber terminals containing Met-ENK. These data suggest that endogenous opiates play an inhibitory role in gustatory processing within the medulla.

Action Potentials↗

Descending influences from the lateral hypothalamus and amygdala converge onto medullary taste neurons.

The lateral hypothalamus (LH) and the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) exert an influence on many aspects of ingestive behavior. These nuclei receive projections from several areas carrying gustatory and viscerosensory information, and send axons to these nuclei as well, including the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST). Gustatory responses of NST neurons are modulated by stimulation of the LH and the CeA, and by several physiological factors related to ingestive behavior. We investigated the effect of both LH and CeA stimulation on the activity of 215 taste-responsive neurons in the hamster NST. More than half of these neurons (113/215) were modulated by electrical stimulation of the LH and/or CeA; of these, 52 cells were influenced by both areas, often bilaterally. The LH influenced more neurons than the CeA (101 versus 64 cells). Contralateral stimulation of these forebrain areas was more often effective (144 responses) than ipsilateral (74). Modulatory effects were mostly excitatory (102 cells); 11 cells were inhibited, mostly by ipsilateral LH stimulation. A subset of these cells (n = 25) was examined for the effects of microinjection of DL-homocysteic acid (DLH), a glutamate receptor agonist, into the LH and/or CeA. The effects of electrical stimulation were completely mimicked by DLH, indicating that cell somata in and around the stimulating sites were responsible for these effects. Other cells (n = 25) were tested for the effects of electrical stimulation of the LH and/or CeA on the responses to taste stimulation of the tongue (32 mM sucrose, NaCl and quinine hydrochloride, and 3.2 mM citric acid). Responses to taste stimuli were enhanced by the excitatory influence of the LH and/or CeA. These data demonstrate that descending influences from the LH and CeA reach many of the same cells in the gustatory NST and can modulate their responses to taste stimulation.

Action Potentials↗

Gustatory projections from the nucleus of the solitary tract to the parabrachial nuclei in the hamster.

Taste-responsive cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) either project to the parabrachial nuclei (PbN) of the pons, through which taste information is transmitted to forebrain gustatory nuclei, or give rise to axons terminating locally within the medulla. Numerous anatomical studies clearly demonstrate a substantial projection from the rostral NST, where most taste-responsive cells are found, to the PbN. In contrast, previous electrophysiological studies in the rat have shown that only a small proportion (21-45%) of taste-responsive NST cells are antidromically activated from the PbN, suggesting that less than half the cells recorded from the NST are actually involved in forebrain processing of gustatory information. In the present experiment we investigated the projections from the NST to the PbN electrophysiologically in urethane anesthetized hamsters. Responses of 101 single neurons in the rostral NST were recorded extracellularly following lingual stimulation with 32 mM NaCl, sucrose and quinine hydrochloride (QHCl) and 3.2 mM citric acid. The taste-responsive region of the PbN was identified electrophysiologically and stimulated with a concentric bipolar electrode to antidromically activate each NST cell. Of the 101 taste-responsive NST cells, 81 (80.2%) were antidromically activated from the ipsilateral PbN. The mean firing rates to taste stimulation and the spontaneous activity of these projection neurons were significantly greater than those of non-projecting cells. Every sucrose-best neuron in the sample projected to the PbN. The mean conduction velocity of the 23 QHCl-best neurons was significantly lower than that of the other 58 PbN projection neurons, suggesting that the most QHCl-responsive cells are a subset of smaller neurons. These data show that a large majority of NST cells responsive to taste stimulation of the anterior tongue project to the gustatory subdivisions of the PbN and that these cells have the most robust responses to gustatory stimulation.

Action Potentials↗

A brief-access test for bitter taste in mice.

Inbred mouse strains vary in their response to bitter-tasting compounds as assessed by 48 h preference tests. These differences are generally assumed to result from altered gustatory function, although such long-term tests could easily reflect additional factors. We developed a brief-access taste test and tested the responses of two inbred strains, as well as C3. SW congenic mice, to the bitter stimulus sucrose octaacetate (SOA). Water-deprived trained mice were tested with five concentrations of SOA (0.00018-0.18 mM) and distilled water in a Davis MS- 160 apparatus. Trials were 5 s in duration and stimuli were presented randomly within blocks; each stimulus trial was preceded by a water rinse trial. Each concentration was presented twice in a session and mice were repeatedly tested across consecutive days. SOA-taster mice, including the SWR/J (SW) inbred and C3. SW congenic taster (T) mice, avoided licking SOA at concentrations >0.003 mM. In comparison, C3HeB/FeJ (C3) and C3. SW demitaster mice (D) licked all concentrations at the same rate as water. Concentration-response functions were similar across strains for both the brief-access test and a parallel 48 h preference test run on separate groups of mice. Furthermore, concentration-response functions were similar whether or not the brief-access test was preceded by a 4 day, single concentration pretest with SOA. The brief-access test is a suitable assay for bitter taste function in mice because it minimizes possible post-ingestive influences on taste.

Animals↗

Taste responses of neurons in the hamster solitary nucleus are modulated by the central nucleus of the amygdala.

Previous studies have shown a modulatory influence of forebrain gustatory areas, such as the gustatory cortex and lateral hypothalamus, on the activity of taste-responsive cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST). The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), which receives gustatory afferent information, also exerts descending control over taste neurons in the parabrachial nuclei (PbN) of the pons. The present studies were designed to investigate the role of descending amgydaloid projections to the NST in the modulation of gustatory activity. Extracellular action potentials were recorded from 109 taste-responsive cells in the NST of urethan-anesthetized hamsters and analyzed for a change in excitability following electrical and chemical stimulation of the CeA. Electrical stimulation of the CeA orthodromically modulated 36 of 109 (33.0%) taste-responsive NST cells. An excitatory response was observed in 33 (30.28%) cells. An initial decrease in excitability to electrical stimulation of the CeA, suggestive of postsynaptic inhibition, was observed in three (2.75%) NST taste cells. NST cells modulated by the CeA were significantly less responsive to taste stimuli than cells that were not. Many of these cells were under the modulatory influence of the contralateral CeA (28/36 = 77.8%) as well as the ipsilateral (22/36 = 61.1%); 14 (38.9%) were excited bilaterally. Latencies for excitation were longer after ipsilateral than after contralateral CeA stimulation. Microinjection of DL-homocysteic acid (DLH) into the CeA mimicked the effect of electrical stimulation on each of the nine cells tested: DLH excited eight and inhibited one of these electrically activated NST cells. Application of subthreshold electrical stimulation to the CeA during taste trials increased the taste responses of every CeA-responsive NST cell (n = 7) tested with this protocol. These effects would enhance taste discriminability by increasing the signal-to-noise ratio of taste-evoked activity.

Amygdala↗

Taste responses of neurons of the hamster solitary nucleus are enhanced by lateral hypothalamic stimulation.

Gustatory responses in the brain stem are modifiable by several physiological factors, including blood insulin and glucose, intraduodenal lipids, gastric distension, and learning, although the neural substrates for these modulatory effects are not known. Stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus (LH) produces increases in food intake and alterations in taste preference behavior, whereas damage to this area has opposite effects. In the present study, we investigated the effects of LH stimulation on the neural activity of taste-responsive cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST) of the hamster. Bipolar stimulating electrodes were bilaterally implanted in the LH, and the responses of 99 neurons in the NST, which were first characterized for their taste sensitivities, were tested for their response to both ipsilateral and contralateral LH stimulation. Half of the taste-responsive cells in the NST (49/99) were modulated by LH stimulation. Contralateral stimulation was more often effective (41 cells) than ipsilateral (13 cells) and always excitatory; 10 cells were excited bilaterally. Six cells were inhibited by ipsilateral stimulation. A subset of these cells (n = 13) was examined for the effects of microinjection of DL-homocysteic acid (DLH), a glutamate receptor agonist, into the LH. The effects of electrical stimulation were completely mimicked by DLH, indicating that cell somata in and around the LH are responsible for these effects. Other cells (n = 14) were tested for the effects of electrical stimulation of the LH on the responses to stimulation of the tongue with 0.032 M sucrose, NaCl, and quinine hydrochloride, and 0.0032 M citric acid. Responses to taste stimuli were more than doubled by the excitatory influence of the LH. These data show that the LH, in addition to its role in feeding and metabolism, exerts descending control over the processing of gustatory information through the brain stem.

Animals↗