PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

David Wilbur

Publications and source records attributed to David Wilbur.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Interobserver agreement on microfollicles in thyroid fine-needle aspirates.

CONTEXT: Although microfollicles are a well-known feature of follicular neoplasms in fine-needle aspirates of the thyroid, the level of agreement about classifying groups as microfollicles is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine what features are present in groups that are consistently classified as microfollicles. DESIGN: We showed 45 small groups of follicular cells each composed of fewer than 50 cells from fine-needle aspirates of the thyroid to 12 members of the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee, who then classified the groups into microfollicles, macrofollicles, and indeterminate groups. RESULTS: Twenty groups were consistently classified as microfollicles, 7 groups as macrofollicles, and 18 groups as indeterminate. Cases that were consistently classified as microfollicles were composed of fewer than 15 cells (19/20 cases), were arranged in a circle with a lumen (13/20 cases) that was at least two-thirds complete (12/20 cases), and were flat (18/20 cases). Cases that were classified as macrofollicular had between 8 and 35 cells, were arranged in sheets composed of at least 15 cells (5/7 cases) or rows of 8 cells (2/7 cases), and were flat (7/7 cases). In contrast, cases that were indeterminate were composed of either 3-dimensional groups (5/18 cases), flat groups of fewer than 10 cells (11/18 cases), or single cells (1/18 cases). CONCLUSION: Not all small groups of follicular cells are consistently classified as microfollicles, and some are more often classified as macrofollicles. The criteria described here for reproducible microfollicles (<15 cells, arranged in a circle that is at least two-thirds complete, and flat) may help improve the agreement in classification of microfollicles and lead to more consistent classification of thyroid fine-needle aspirates.

Adenocarcinoma, Follicular↗
PubMed2006

Leukemia/lymphoma in cerebrospinal fluid: distinguishing between cases that performed well and poorly in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-gynecologic Cytology.

CONTEXT: Although the cytologic features of leukemia/lymphoma in cerebrospinal fluid specimens are well known, the correlation of these features with the ability of cytologists to identify this tumor have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To identify the morphologic features of leukemia/lymphoma in cerebrospinal fluid that are associated with good performance and poor performance in an educational interlaboratory comparison program; and to identify the morphologic features associated with how well a slide performs with regard to its reference diagnosis. DESIGN: The performance of 147 cases of leukemia/lymphoma in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-gynecologic Cytology was analyzed. The cytologic features of a subset of 31 cases composed of relatively equal numbers of Romanowsky-stained and Papanicolaou-stained specimens were further evaluated, and those that performed poorly (n = 12) were compared with those that performed extremely well (n = 19). RESULTS: For all cases of leukemia/lymphoma in the program, the rate of misclassification as benign for cases with Papanicolaou stain was significantly higher than for those with Romanowsky stain (9.5% vs 2.6%, P < .001). Compared with cases that performed well, slides that performed poorly were more likely to have less than 200 abnormal cells (42% vs 5%, P = .02). The size of the tumor cells and preservation were not significant. CONCLUSION: Cases of specimens of leukemia/lymphoma in cerebrospinal fluid are more likely to be misdiagnosed as benign if they are Papanicolaou-stained or have 200 abnormal cells.

Cytodiagnosis↗
PubMed2006

Fine-needle aspiration of papillary thyroid carcinoma: distinguishing between cases that performed well and those that performed poorly in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytology Program.

CONTEXT: Although the cytologic features of papillary thyroid carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration specimens are well known, the correlation of these features with the ability of cytologists to identify this tumor has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cytologic features of cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma that performed poorly with those of cases that performed well. DESIGN: The cytologic features of 13 cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma from the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytology Program that performed poorly were compared with those of 15 cases that performed well. RESULTS: Compared with cases that performed well, cases that performed poorly were significantly more likely to lack marked nuclear enlargement (38% vs 100%, P < .001), lack pale chromatin (8% vs 47%, P = .04), and lack intranuclear inclusions (8% vs 53%, P = .02). The differences between the 2 groups in staining, type of preparation, nuclear grooves, nuclear crowding, colloid, cellularity, nuclear pleomorphism, and Hurthle cell change were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Cases of papillary thyroid carcinoma that lack marked nuclear enlargement, pale chromatin, and intranuclear inclusions are significantly more difficult to recognize than cases that have these features. Increased awareness of these types of cases might improve the performance of thyroid fine-needle aspiration in clinical practice.

Adenocarcinoma, Papillary↗
PubMed2002

The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology.

OBJECTIVES: The Bethesda 2001 Workshop was convened to evaluate and update the 1991 Bethesda System terminology for reporting the results of cervical cytology. A primary objective was to develop a new approach to broaden participation in the consensus process. PARTICIPANTS: Forum groups composed of 6 to 10 individuals were responsible for developing recommendations for discussion at the workshop. Each forum group included at least 1 cytopathologist, cytotechnologist, clinician, and international representative to ensure a broad range of views and interests. More than 400 cytopathologists, cytotechnologists, histopathologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, public health physicians, epidemiologists, patient advocates, and attorneys participated in the workshop, which was convened by the National Cancer Institute and cosponsored by 44 professional societies. More than 20 countries were represented. EVIDENCE: Literature review, expert opinion, and input from an Internet bulletin board were all considered in developing recommendations. The strength of evidence of the scientific data was considered of paramount importance. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Bethesda 2001 was a year-long iterative review process. An Internet bulletin board was used for discussion of issues and drafts of recommendations. More than 1000 comments were posted to the bulletin board over the course of 6 months. The Bethesda Workshop, held April 30-May 2, 2001, was open to the public. Postworkshop recommendations were posted on the bulletin board for a last round of critical review prior to finalizing the terminology. CONCLUSIONS: Bethesda 2001 was developed with broad participation in the consensus process. The 2001 Bethesda System terminology reflects important advances in biological understanding of cervical neoplasia and cervical screening technology.

Female↗