AED to defibrillate an infant with a 50 J shock.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Defibrillators↗
Biomedical subjects
Dawn Jorgenson
Publications and source records attributed to Dawn Jorgenson.
Animal defibrillation study must be interpreted with caution.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
The effects of biphasic waveform design on post-resuscitation myocardial function.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of biphasic truncated exponential waveform design on survival and post-resuscitation myocardial function after prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF). BACKGROUND: Biphasic waveforms are more effective than monophasic waveforms for successful defibrillation, but optimization of energy and current levels to minimize post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction has been largely unexplored. We examined a low-capacitance waveform typical of low-energy application (low-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEL]; 100 microF, < or =200 J) and a high-capacitance waveform typical of high-energy application (high-energy biphasic truncated exponential [BTEH]; 200 microF, > or =200 J). METHODS: Four groups of anesthetized 40- to 45-kg pigs were investigated. After 7 min of electrically induced VF, a 15-min resuscitation attempt was made using sequences of up to three defibrillation shocks followed by 1 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Animals were randomized to BTEL at 150 J or 200 J or to BTEH at 200 J or 360 J. RESULTS: Resuscitation was unsuccessful in three of the five animals treated with BTEH at 200 J. All other attempts were successful. Significant therapy effects were observed for survival (p = 0.035), left ventricular ejection fraction (p < 0.001), stroke volume (p < 0.001), fractional area change (p < 0.001), cardiac output (p = 0.044), and mean aortic pressure (p < 0.001). Hemodynamic outcomes were negatively associated with energy and average current but positively associated with peak current. Peak current was the only significant predictor of survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Maximum survival and minimum myocardial dysfunction were observed with the low-capacitance 150-J waveform, which delivered higher peak current while minimizing energy and average current.
Animals↗
Human factors impact successful lay person automated external defibrillator use during simulated cardiac arrest.
OBJECTIVE: With the dissemination of automated external defibrillators in the community, there is increasing lay person use, along with less formal automated external defibrillator training and retraining. Therefore, the "ease of use" factors related to the human-device interface may be vital for successful use. We sought to determine whether human factor differences would result in differences in parameters of successful or safe use by lay persons in the setting of simulated cardiac arrest. METHODS: We measured parameters of successful and safe use with two automated external defibrillator devices among two groups of volunteers, those trained with a brief video tape and those without any training (completely naive). Both devices (the Philips FR2 or the HS1) are used in public access defibrillator settings. Volunteers entered a mock cardiac arrest scenario after randomization to either the naive (untrained) group or to a video-trained group. RESULTS: Both the FR2 and HS1 were found to be completely safe when used by video-trained and by naive groups of participants, with no adverse events observed (total, n = 256). For both devices, video-trained participants demonstrated high rates of successful defibrillation in the simulated testing (86% for FR2 and 89% for HS1). With the FR2, video-trained participants were significantly more successful compared with naive, untrained participants (86% vs. 48% successful use; p < .001). However, for the HS1, there was no significant difference in success rates for the video-trained vs. naive, untrained groups (89% vs. 87%; p = .79). CONCLUSIONS: Both devices are safe with either video-trained or naive users. The successful use of each device is high when participants view the training videotape designed for the device. An important difference in successful use was observed for naive users where the HS1 showed improved successful use compared with the FR2. Because defibrillation in the community may increasingly be attempted by lay persons whose training is remote or who have not been trained at all, the "naive" scenario may be increasingly relevant to automated external defibrillator use. Collectively, these data support the notion that human factors associated with ease of use may play a critical factor in survival rates achieved by specific devices.
Adult↗
Energy attenuator for pediatric application of an automated external defibrillator.
Although automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) are extensively deployed to rapidly treat sudden cardiac arrest in adults, their applicability for children is presently limited. It is desirable to extend the indications for this lifesaving equipment to all ages, even though AED application to children will be rare compared with adults. It is imperative that the inherent simplicity of present adult AED operation not be compromised to extend its use to include children. We propose a method that does not affect the normal operation of an AED on adults. For adults, unmodified AEDs would be used normally with adult electrodes. However, special pediatric electrodes would be available as a disposable accessory. When used with the AED, the delivered energy would be reduced within the electrodes, and only a portion of the energy output by the AED would be delivered to the pediatric patient. These electrodes could be used in conjunction with currently deployed AEDs with electrocardiographic analysis algorithms appropriate for children. This eliminates the need for a separate AED specifically for children or the purchase of a new AED with pediatric capability to replace previously deployed models.
Child↗
Fixed-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation in a pediatric model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation.
OBJECTIVE: For adults, 150-J fixed-energy, impedance-compensating biphasic truncated exponential (ICBTE) shocks are now effectively used in automated defibrillators. However, the high energy levels delivered by adult automated defibrillators preclude their use for pediatric patients. Accordingly, we investigated a method by which adult automated defibrillators may be adapted to deliver a 50-J ICBTE shock for pediatric defibrillation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. SETTING: A university-affiliated research institution. SUBJECT: Domestic piglets. INTERVENTIONS: We initially investigated four groups of anesthetized mechanically ventilated piglets weighing 3.8, 7.5, 15, and 25 kg. Ventricular fibrillation was induced with an AC current delivered to the right ventricular endocardium. After 7 mins of untreated ventricular fibrillation, a conventional manual defibrillator was used to deliver up to three 50-J ICBTE shocks. If ventricular fibrillation was not reversed, a 1-min interval of precordial compression preceded a second sequence of up to three shocks. The protocol was repeated until spontaneous circulation was restored, or for a total of 15 mins. In a second set of experiments, we evaluated a 150-J biphasic adult automated defibrillator that was operated in conjunction with energy-reducing electrodes such as to deliver 50-J shocks. The same resuscitation protocol was then exercised on piglets weighing 3.7, 13.5, and 24.2 kg. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All animals were successfully resuscitated. Postresuscitation hemodynamic and myocardial function quickly returned to baseline values in both experimental groups, and all animals survived. CONCLUSION: An adaptation of a 150-J biphasic adult automated defibrillator in which energy-reducing electrodes delivered 50-J shocks successfully resuscitated animals ranging from 3.7 to 25 kg without compromise of postresuscitation myocardial function or survival.
Analysis of Variance↗
The safe use of automated external defibrillators in a wet environment.
UNLABELLED: There has been concern regarding potential shock hazards for rescuers or bystanders when a defibrillator is used in a wet environment and the recommended safety procedure, moving the patient to a dry area, is not followed. OBJECTIVE: To measure the electrical potentials associated with the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) in a realistically modeled wet environment. METHODS: A raw processed turkey was used as a patient surrogate. The turkey was placed on a cement floor while pool water was applied to the surrounding area. To simulate a rescuer or bystander in the vicinity of a patient, a custom sense probe was constructed. Defibrillation shocks were delivered to the turkey and the probe was used to measure the voltage an operator/bystander would receive at different points surrounding the surrogate. The test was repeated with salt water. RESULTS: The maximum voltage occurred approximately 15 cm from the simulated patient and measured 14 V peak (current 14 mA peak) in the case of pool water, and 30 V peak (current 30 mA peak) in the case of salt water. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty volts may result in some minor sensation by the operator or bystander, but is considered unlikely to be hazardous under these circumstances. The maximum currents were lower than allowed by safety standards. Although defibrillation in a wet environment is not recommended practice, our simulation of a patient and a rescuer/bystander in a wet environment did not show significant risk should circumstances demand it.
Animals↗