PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Dean J Kereiakes

Publications and source records attributed to Dean J Kereiakes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Coronary stent restenosis in patients treated with cilostazol.

BACKGROUND: Restenosis after implantation of coronary artery stents remains a significant clinical problem. We undertook a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether cilostazol, a drug that suppresses intimal proliferation, would reduce renarrowing in patients after stent implantation in native coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assigned 705 patients who had successful coronary stent implantation to receive, in addition to aspirin, cilostazol 100 mg BID or placebo for 6 months; clopidogrel 75 mg daily was administered to all patients for 30 days. Restenosis was determined by quantitative coronary angiography at 6 months. The minimal luminal diameter at 6 months for cilostazol-treated patients was 1.77 mm for the analysis segment (stent plus 5-mm borders) compared with 1.62 mm in the placebo group (P=0.01). Restenosis, defined as > or =50% narrowing, occurred in 22.0% of patients in the cilostazol group and in 34.5% of the placebo group (P=0.002), a 36% relative risk reduction. Restenosis was significantly lower in cilostazol-treated diabetics (17.7% versus 37.7%, P=0.01) and in those with small vessels (23.6% versus 35.2%, P=0.02), long lesions (29.9% versus 46.6%, P=0.04), and left anterior descending coronary artery site (19.3% versus 39.8%, P=0.001). There was no difference in bleeding, rehospitalization, target-vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, or death. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the drug cilostazol resulted in a significantly larger minimal luminal diameter and a significantly lower binary restenosis rate compared with placebo-treated patients. These favorable effects were apparent in patients at high risk for restenosis.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Safety and feasibility of autologous myoblast transplantation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy: four-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Successful autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation into infarcted myocardium in a variety of animal models has demonstrated improvement in cardiac function. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of transplanting autologous myoblasts into infarcted myocardium of patients undergoing concurrent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. In addition, we sought to gain preliminary information on graft survival and any associated changes in cardiac function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty patients with a history of ischemic cardiomyopathy participated in a phase I, nonrandomized, multicenter pilot study of autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation concurrent with CABG or LVAD implantation. Twenty-four patients with a history of previous myocardial infarction and a left ventricular ejection fraction <40% were enrolled in the CABG arm. In a second arm, 6 patients underwent LVAD implantation as a bridge to heart transplantation, and patients donated their explanted native hearts for testing at the time of heart transplantation. Myoblasts were successfully transplanted in all patients without any acute injection-related complications or significant long-term, unexpected adverse events. Follow-up positron emission tomography scans showed new areas of glucose uptake within the infarct scar in CABG patients. Echocardiography measured an average change in left ventricular ejection fraction from 28% to 35% at 1 year and of 36% at 2 years. Histological evaluation in 4 of 6 patients who underwent heart transplantation documented survival and engraftment of the skeletal myoblasts within the infarcted myocardium. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the survival, feasibility, and safety of autologous myoblast transplantation and suggest that this modality offers a potential therapeutic treatment for end-stage heart disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Impact of coronary culprit lesion calcium in patients undergoing paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (a TAXUS-IV sub study).

Randomized clinical trials have shown that paclitaxel-eluting stents significantly reduce restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. The impact of lesion calcification on the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting stents is unknown. In the TAXUS-IV trial, 1,314 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to a bare-metal or paclitaxel-eluting stent. By core laboratory analysis, 247 lesions (19%) were moderately or severely calcified. At the 9-month angiographic follow-up examination, the paclitaxel-eluting stent had significantly reduced the amount of late loss compared with the control stent (0.26 +/- 0.56 vs 0.51 +/- 0.48 mm, p = 0.015) within the analysis segment in the calcific lesions. The analysis segment restenosis rate was similar in patients with calcified and noncalcified lesions after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (7.5% vs 8.0%, respectively; p = 1.0). The rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year was reduced by 56% in patients with calcified lesions (11.9% vs 5.1%, p = 0.09) and by 75% in noncalcified lesions (15.7% vs 4.3%, p <0.0001). By interaction testing, the efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting stent in reducing TLR at 1 year was similar in the calcified and noncalcified lesions (p = 0.30). Moreover, by multivariate analysis, implantation of the paclitaxel-eluting stent was a powerful independent predictor of freedom from TLR, with similar hazard ratios for efficacy in calcified and noncalcified lesions (0.30 and 0.26, respectively). In conclusion, implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with de novo coronary lesions significantly reduced restenosis in patients with and without calcified lesions.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2005

Use of bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus: an analysis from the randomized evaluation in percutaneous coronary intervention linking angiomax to reduced clinical events (REPLACE)-2 trial.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to confirm that the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients are not compromised by a bivalirudin-based antithrombotic strategy. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a survival benefit with use of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in diabetic patients undergoing PCI. The Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 trial showed the non-inferiority of a strategy of bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibition compared with routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibition. The relative efficacy of these two strategies in diabetic patients has not been studied. METHODS: We evaluated the diabetic patients enrolled in the REPLACE-2 trial to assess the impact of these antithrombotic strategies on the short- and long-term outcome after PCI. RESULTS: The REPLACE-2 trial enrolled 1,624 diabetic patients and 4,368 non-diabetic patients. Compared with non-diabetic patients, diabetic patients had similar short-term outcome but higher mortality at 1 year (3.06% vs. 1.85%, p = 0.004). There was no difference in short-term or long-term ischemic events among the diabetic patients randomized to the two arms. Specifically, the 1-year mortality rate was non-significantly lower in the bivalirudin arm, suggesting no differential survival impact of the two strategies (2.3% vs. 3.9%). There was less minor bleeding in the bivalirudin arm in diabetic patients (12.6% vs. 24.4%, p < 0.001), whereas no difference was seen in the incidence of major bleeding (3.0% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with routine GP IIb/IIIa inhibition, the use of bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in diabetic patients is associated with no differences in clinical outcomes at 30 days, a trend toward lesser mortality at 1 year, and a reduction in minor bleeding.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Relationship of late loss in lumen diameter to coronary restenosis in sirolimus-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: Observed rates of restenosis after drug-eluting stenting are low (<10%). Identification of a reliable and powerful angiographic end point will be useful in future trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: Late loss (postprocedural minimum lumen diameter minus 8-month minimum lumen diameter) was measured in the angiographic cohorts of the SIRIUS (n=703) and E-SIRIUS (n=308) trials. Two techniques, the standard normal approximation and an optimized power transformation, were used to predict binary angiographic restenosis rates and compare them with observed restenosis rates. The mean in-stent late loss observed in the SIRIUS trial was 0.17+/-0.45 mm (sirolimus) versus 1.00+/-0.70 mm (control). If a normal distribution was assumed, late loss accurately estimated in-stent binary angiographic restenosis for the control arm (predicted 35.4% versus observed 35.4%) but underestimated it in the sirolimus arm (predicted 0.6% versus observed 3.2%). Power transformation improved the reliability of the estimate in the sirolimus arm (predicted 3.2% [CI 1.0% to 6.7%]) with similar improvements in the E-SIRIUS trial (predicted 4.0% [CI 1.2% to 7.0%] versus observed 3.9%). In the sirolimus-eluting stent arm, in-stent late loss correlated better with target-lesion revascularization than in-segment late loss (c-statistic=0.915 versus 0.665). CONCLUSIONS: Because distributions of late loss with a low mean are right-skewed, the use of a transformation improves the accuracy of predicting low binary restenosis rates. Late loss is monotonically correlated with the probability of restenosis and yields a more efficient estimate of the restenosis process in the era of lower binary restenosis rates.

Coronary Restenosis↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of the Medtronic (Driver) cobalt-chromium alloy coronary stent system.

The Driver Registry was a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of the Driver cobalt-chromium alloy stent. Use of the cobalt-chromium alloy in place of stainless steel offers enhanced visibility and radial strength with thinner structural elements. The registry enrolled 298 patients with symptomatic ischemic heart disease attributable to de novo or restenotic nonstented native lesions of a single vessel amenable to percutaneous stenting. The primary composite end point was the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, emergency bypass surgery, or target lesion revascularization) 180 days after enrollment. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed before and after the index stent deployment and repeated at 6 months in 83 patients. Mean patient age was 62.6 years, mean reference vessel diameter was 3.07 mm before the procedure, and mean lesion length was 11.04 mm. Fifty-one patients received multiple stents. Angiographic success rate was 100% and procedural success rate was 98.3%. Cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 5.7% and target lesion revascularization was 3.4% at 180 days. In-stent late loss was 0.94 mm at 180 days, and no subacute stent thromboses were observed. This registry demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this novel coronary stent platform.

Chromium Alloys↗
PubMed2005

Closure devices and vascular complications among percutaneous coronary intervention patients receiving enoxaparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and clopidogrel.

The objectives of this study were to explore the rate of vascular complications using closure devices (CDs) vs. manual compression (MC) among percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients receiving enoxaparin, clopidogrel, aspirin, and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The Evaluating Enoxaparin Clotting Times (ELECT) study enrolled patients receiving enoxaparin, clopidogrel, and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors when necessary. Any approved CD or MC was allowed post-PCI, and clinical outcome data were prospectively collected. Four hundred forty-five patients had anti-Xa levels measured by a core laboratory and by a novel point-of-care device that reports ENOX times. All received enoxaparin, aspirin, and clopidogrel, and 75% received a concomitant GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Major and minor bleeding were defined according to TIMI criteria. "Any bleeding" included the occurrence of access site complications including hematoma, significant rebleeding, or bleeding delaying hospital discharge. TIMI major plus minor bleeding occurred in 1.5% of the patients who received CD vs. 1.8% of patients with MC (P = 0.83). Any bleeding occurred in 12.2% of CD vs. 5.7% MC (P = 0.02), and in 9.5% of patients receiving GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor vs. 2.8% (P = 0.01) among those who did not. For patients receiving both a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor and CD, any bleeding was observed in 13.7% vs. 3.4% (P = 0.006) among patients who received neither. While minor and major TIMI bleeding remained very low in both groups, CD was associated with a twofold increase in risk of any-bleeding event when compared to MC, especially when using GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents.

This review characterizes the relative effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) compared to bare metal stents. The data evaluated will include clinical and angiographic outcomes from randomized clinical trials as well as observational databases and registries including RESEARCH, e-Cypher, and DYNAMIC, which typically include a much broader spectrum of patients. In addition, specific patient subsets, including those patients with multivessel coronary disease, will be evaluated.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2005

The approach to small vessels in the era of drug-eluting stents.

The treatment of small-vessel disease will occupy an increasingly important part of interventional cardiology practice and this raises several issues. The definition of "small vessels" has great implications for device size selection, and knowledge of "normal" small-vessel dimensions is important. Stents have been applied in the setting of smaller-vessel disease and future iterations of small-vessel stents will need to address several design factors. Stent strut thickness might impact on subsequent restenosis as well as late lumen loss. There has been great interest in the use of drug-eluting stents for small vessels. Randomized clinical trials of sirolimus-eluting versus bare metal stents in the treatment of small-vessel disease have shown significant improvements in the rates of target lesion revascularization and restenosis with sirolimus-eluting stents. These improvements in restenosis rates are attributable to the low levels of late loss with the drug-eluting stent.

Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation↗
PubMed2005

Percutaneous coronary revascularization of diabetic patients in the era of drug-eluting stents.

Patients with diabetes have worse clinical outcomes following both surgical revascularization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although coronary stenting has improved late outcomes (versus balloon angioplasty) following PCI, both angiographic restenosis and the requirement for repeat revascularization are increased in diabetics versus nondiabetics and limit the durability of PCI compared with surgery. Polymer-based drug-eluting stents (DES) have markedly reduced late coronary lumen loss and angiographic restenosis as well as the need for repeat revascularization when compared with conventional (non-drug-eluting) coronary stent deployment. Specifically, the CYPHER sirolimus-eluting stent (Cordis Cardiology, Miami Lakes, FL) has demonstrated durable clinical and angiographic benefit for diabetic patients in both randomized clinical trials and postmarket surveillance registries. Data on the more recently approved paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) stent suggest similar efficacy for the treatment of diabetic patients. By markedly reducing restenosis, DES significantly improve or eliminate the major limitation of conventional stenting/PCI in diabetic patients. The advent of DES promises a paradigm shift from surgical revascularization in diabetic patients (especially those with multivessel disease) to PCI. Nevertheless, continued improvement in DES delivery as well as optimal adjunctive pharmacotherapy and control of hyperglycemia will be required to achieve the best clinical outcomes following PCI with DES in patients with diabetes.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2004

Long-term efficacy of bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade vs heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary revascularization: REPLACE-2 randomized trial.

CONTEXT: In the Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE)-2 trial, bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (Gp IIb/IIIa) inhibition was found to be noninferior to heparin plus planned Gp IIb/IIIa blockade in the prevention of acute ischemic end points and was associated with significantly less bleeding by 30 days after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the efficacy of bivalirudin remains comparable with that of heparin plus Gp IIb/IIIa blockade over 6 months and 1 year. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Follow-up study to 1 year of a randomized, double-blind trial conducted among 6010 patients undergoing urgent or elective PCI at 233 community or referral hospitals in 9 countries from October 2001 through August 2002. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenously bivalirudin (0.75 mg/kg bolus, 1.75 mg/kg per hour for the duration of PCI), with provisional Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition, or to receive heparin (65 U/kg bolus), with planned Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition (abciximab or eptifibatide). Both groups received daily aspirin and a thienopyridine for at least 30 days after PCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization by 6 months and death by 12 months after enrollment. RESULTS: At 6 months, death occurred in 1.4% of patients in the heparin plus Gp IIb/IIIa group and in 1.0% of patients in the bivalirudin group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.14; P =.15). Myocardial infarction occurred in 7.4% and 8.2% of patients, respectively (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.93-1.34; P =.24), and repeat revascularization was required in 11.4% and 12.1% of patients, respectively (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91-1.23; P =.45). By 1 year, death occurred in 2.46% of patients treated with heparin plus Gp IIb/IIIa blockade and in 1.89% of patients treated with bivalirudin (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.55-1.11; P =.16). Nonsignificant trends toward lower 1-year mortality with bivalirudin were present in all patient subgroups analyzed and were of greatest magnitude among high-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Long-term clinical outcome with bivalirudin and provisional Gp IIb/IIIa blockade is comparable with that of heparin plus planned Gp IIb/IIIa inhibition during contemporary PCI.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2004

Relation of an elevated white blood cell count after percutaneous coronary intervention to long-term mortality.

Increased inflammatory markers are associated with a poor prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Leukocytes play a key role in inflammation, and an increase in white blood cell (WBC) counts is a nonspecific marker of inflammation. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, baseline WBC counts independently predict long-term mortality. In a pooled cohort of patients from the Evaluation of c7E3 for the Prevention of Ischemic Complications (EPIC), the Evaluation in PTCA to Improve Long-term Outcome with abciximab Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade (EPILOG), and Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor for STENTing (EPISTENT) trials, postprocedural WBC counts were also found to be an independent predictor of long-term mortality.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial.

CONTEXT: Enoxaparin has demonstrated advantages over unfractionated heparin in low- to moderate-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with a conservative strategy. OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of patients treated with enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin and to define the role of enoxaparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS at high risk for ischemic cardiac complications managed with an early invasive approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Superior Yield of the New Strategy of Enoxaparin, Revascularization and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (SYNERGY) trial was a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, international trial conducted between August 2001 and December 2003. A total of 10 027 high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS to be treated with an intended early invasive strategy were recruited. INTERVENTIONS: Subcutaneous enoxaparin (n = 4993) or intravenous unfractionated heparin (n = 4985) was to be administered immediately after enrollment and continued until the patient required no further anticoagulation, as judged by the treating physician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy outcome was the composite clinical end point of all-cause death or nonfatal myocardial infarction during the first 30 days after randomization. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding or stroke. RESULTS: The primary end point occurred in 14.0% (696/4993) of patients assigned to enoxaparin and 14.5% (722/4985) of patients assigned to unfractionated heparin (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-1.06). No differences in ischemic events during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were observed between enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin groups, respectively, including similar rates of abrupt closure (31/2321 [1.3%] vs 40/2364 [1.7%]), threatened abrupt closure (25/2321 [1.1%] vs 24/2363 [1.0%]), unsuccessful PCI (81/2281 [3.6%] vs 79/2328 [3.4%]), or emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery (6/2323 [0.3%] vs 8/2363 [0.3%]). More bleeding was observed with enoxaparin, with a statistically significant increase in TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) major bleeding (9.1% vs 7.6%, P =.008) but nonsignificant excess in GUSTO (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Arteries) severe bleeding (2.7% vs 2.2%, P =.08) and transfusions (17.0% vs 16.0%, P =.16). CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin was not superior to unfractionated heparin but was noninferior for the treatment of high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS. Enoxaparin is a safe and effective alternative to unfractionated heparin and the advantages of convenience should be balanced with the modest excess of major bleeding.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Double jeopardy of renal insufficiency and anemia in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Anemia and renal insufficiency impart an increased risk of mortality in patients with congestive heart failure. There is a paucity of data on the mortality hazard associated with anemia and renal insufficiency in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the setting of contemporary practice. We analyzed the short- and long-term outcomes among patients enrolled in EPIC, EPILOG and EPISTENT trials according to degree of kidney dysfunction (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] <60, 60 to 75, and >75 ml/min/1.73 m2) and by hematocrit (<35, 35 to 39 and 40). GFR was calculated as GFR = 186 x (serum creatinine-1.154) x (age-0.203) x 1.212 (if black) or x 0.742 (if female). There were 20 deaths (3.2%) among 638 patients with a hematocrit of <35, 41 deaths among 2,066 patients (2.0%) with a hematocrit of 35 to 39, and 43 deaths in 3,618 patients (1.2%) with a hematocrit >40 at 6 months (p <0.001). Similarly, a significant increase in mortality was seen with lower GFR [33 of 1,168 (2.9%) at GFR <60, 33 of 1,766 (1.9%) at GFR 60 to 75 and 37 of 3,317 (1.1%) at GFR >75, p <0.001)]. Further, GFR and anemia independently and in combination predicted mortality at 3 years. Thus, renal insufficiency and anemia are significant independent and additive predictors of short- and long-term complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Aged↗