Deanna Alexis Carere | PubMed Health

PubMed2025

Pathogenic XPO1 variants cause a dominant neurodevelopmental disorder.

PURPOSE: XPO1 functions in key cellular processes, including nucleo-cytoplasmic export and mitosis. The gene is deleted in a subset of patients with the 2p15p16.1 microdeletion syndrome; however, no monogenic XPO1-related disorder has been described to date. METHODS: We collected clinical data of individuals with de novo XPO1 variants through online matchmaking. We used Drosophila to study XPO1 function in development and habituation learning. RESULTS: A total of 22 individuals met the criteria to be included in the main study cohort. Of these, half have putative loss-of-function variants, and half have coding variants (10 missense and 1 in-frame deletion variant). We found an overlapping phenotype, consistent with a monogenic neurodevelopmental disorder. We demonstrate XPO1 functions in development by ubiquitous and neuron-specific knockdown in Drosophila. GABAergic neuron specific knockdown flies demonstrated impaired habituation. CONCLUSION: Our results establish XPO1 as a novel dominant monogenic neurodevelopmental disorder gene and demonstrate a central role for XPO1 in development.

Exportin 1 Protein↗

PubMed2016

Implications of Personal Genomic Testing for Health Behaviors: The Case of Smoking.

INTRODUCTION: Direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing has the potential to influence health behaviors, including smoking. Critics of this testing highlight limited evidence to support positive behavioral benefits and caution that genomic results may provide false reassurance, leading to unhealthy behaviors. This study investigates interest in genetic risks of smoking-related diseases and changes in smoking behaviors among genomic testing consumers. METHODS: From 2012 to 2013, a longitudinal series of web surveys was conducted. A total of 1464 customers of 23andMe and Pathway Genomics completed a survey prior to viewing genomic test results, of which 1002 participants provided data on smoking behaviors 6 months after receiving results. RESULTS: At baseline, 64% of participants were never smokers, 29% were former smokers, and 7% were current smokers. Most baseline current smokers were very interested in genetic risk results for lung cancer (65%) and heart disease (72%). For lung cancer, this interest was significantly greater than former (50% very interested) and never smokers (37% very interested) (p < .0001). Even though participants were interested in smoking-related disease genetic risks, 96% reported the same smoking status at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Importantly, only 1% (n = 13/916) of former and never smokers became current smokers at 6 months and 22% (n = 14/64) of current smokers reported quitting. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, smokers show a high level of interest in genetic risks of smoking-related illnesses. The experience of receiving direct-to-consumer genomic health risks does not appear to have obvious harms related to smoking behaviors, with some potential benefits. IMPLICATIONS: In the setting of ongoing controversy surrounding direct-to-consumer genomic testing, this study provides evidence that consumers are interested in genetic risk results of smoking-related diseases. Receiving genomic testing results does not lead to smoking initiation among never smokers or reinitiation among former smokers and may be associated with a higher quit rate among current smokers at 6-month follow-up than the general population. These findings ease concerns that direct-to-consumer genomic testing could lead to false reassurance and unhealthy behaviors related to smoking.

Adolescent↗