Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Debra A Kendall.
Like prokaryotic Sec-dependent protein transport, chloroplasts utilize SecA. However, we observe distinctive requirements for the stimulation of chloroplast SecA ATPase activity; it is optimally stimulated in the presence of galactolipid and only a small fraction of anionic lipid and by Sec-dependent thylakoid signal peptides but not Escherichia coli signal peptides.
SecA, an ATPase crucial to the Sec-dependent translocation machinery in Escherichia coli, recognizes and directly binds the N-terminal signal peptide of an exported preprotein. This interaction plays a central role in the targeting and transport of preproteins via the SecYEG channel. Here we identify the signal peptide binding groove (SPBG) on SecA addressing a key issue regarding the SecA-preprotein interaction. We employ a synthetic signal peptide containing the photoreactive benzoylphenylalanine to efficiently and specifically label SecA containing a unique Factor Xa site. Comparison of the photolabeled fragment from the subsequent proteolysis of several SecAs, which vary only in the location of the Factor Xa site, reveals one 53 residue segment in common with the entire series. The covalently modified SecA segment produced is the same in aqueous solution and in lipid vesicles. This spans amino acid residues 269 to 322 of the E. coli protein, which is distinct from a previously proposed signal peptide binding site, and contributes to a hydrophobic peptide binding groove evident in molecular models of SecA.
Many proteins synthesized in the cytoplasm ultimately function in non-cytoplasmic locations. In Escherichia coli, the general secretory (Sec) pathway transports the vast majority of these proteins. Two fundamental components of the Sec transport pathway are the SecYEG heterotrimeric complex that forms the channel through the cytoplasmic membrane, and SecA, the ATPase that drives the preprotein to and across the membrane. This review focuses on what is known about the oligomeric states of these core Sec components and how the oligomeric state might change during the course of the translocation of a preprotein.
Activation of a G-protein-coupled receptor involves changes in specific microdomain interactions within the transmembrane region of the receptor. Here, we have focused on the role of L207, proximal to the DRY motif of the human cannabinoid receptor 1 in the interconversion of the receptor resting and active states. Ligand binding analysis of the mutant receptor L207A revealed an enhanced affinity for agonists (three- to six-fold) and a diminished affinity for inverse agonists (19- to 35-fold) compared to the wild-type receptor, properties characteristic of constitutive activity. To further examine whether this mutant adopts a ligand-independent, active form, treatment with GTPgammaS was used to inhibit G protein coupling. Under these conditions, the L207A receptor exhibited a 10-fold increase in affinity for the inverse agonist SR141716A, consistent with a shift away from an enhanced precoupled state. Analysis of the cellular activity of the L207A receptor showed elevated basal cyclic AMP accumulation relative to the wild type that is inhibited by SR141716A, consistent with receptor-mediated Gs precoupling. Using toxins to selectively abrogate Gs or Gi coupling, we found that CP55940 nonetheless induced only a Gi response suggesting a strong preference of this ligand-bound form for Gi in this system. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that the single residue change of L207A impacts the association of TM3 and TM6 in the receptor by altering hydrophobic interactions involving L207, the salt bridge involving the Arg of the DRY motif, and the helical structure of TM6, consistent with events leading to activation. The structural alterations parallel those observed in models of a mutant CB(1) receptor T210I, with established constitutive activity (D'Antona, A.M., Ahn, K.H. and Kendall, D.A., 2006. Mutations of CB1 T210 produce active and inactive receptor forms: correlations with ligand affinity, receptor stability, and cellular localization. Biochemistry, 45, 5606-5617).
Human cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB(1)) has attracted substantial interest as a potential therapeutic target for treating obesity and other obsessive disorders. An understanding of the mechanism governing the transition of the CB(1) receptor between its inactive and active states is critical for understanding how therapeutics can selectively regulate receptor activity. We have examined the importance of the Thr at position 210 in CB(1) in this transition, a residue predicted to be on the same face of the helix as the Arg of the DRY motif highly conserved in the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. This Thr was substituted with Ile and Ala via mutagenesis, and the receptors, T210I and T210A, were expressed in HEK 293 cells. The T210I receptor exhibited enhanced agonist and diminished inverse agonist affinity relative to the wild type, consistent with a shift toward the active form. However, treatment with GTPgammaS to inhibit G protein coupling diminished the affinity change for the inverse agonist SR141716A. The decreased thermal stability of the T210I receptor and increased level of internalization of a T210I receptor-GFP chimera were also observed, consistent with constitutive activity. In contrast, the T210A receptor exhibited the opposite profile: diminished agonist and enhanced inverse agonist affinity. The T210A receptor was found to be more thermally stable than the wild type, and high levels of a T210A receptor-GFP chimera were localized to the cell surface as predicted for an inactive receptor form. These results suggest that T210 plays a key role in governing the transition between inactive and active CB(1) receptor states.
SecA, the peripheral subunit of the Escherichia coli preprotein translocase, interacts with a number of ligands during export, including signal peptides, membrane phospholipids, and nucleotides. Using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), we studied the interactions of wild-type (WT) and mutant SecAs with IAEDANS-labeled signal peptide, and how these interactions are modified in the presence of other transport ligands. We find that residues on the third alpha-helix in the preprotein cross-linking domain (PPXD) are important for the interaction of SecA and signal peptide. For SecA in aqueous solution, saturation binding data using FRET analysis fit a single-site binding model and yielded a Kd of 2.4 microM. FRET is inhibited for SecA in lipid vesicles relative to that in aqueous solution at a low signal peptide concentration. The sigmoidal nature of the binding curve suggests that SecA in lipids has two conformational states; our results do not support different oligomeric states of SecA. Using native gel electrophoresis, we establish signal peptide-induced SecA monomerization in both aqueous solution and lipid vesicles. Whereas the affinity of SecA for signal peptide in an aqueous environment is unaffected by temperature or the presence of nucleotides, in lipids the affinity decreases in the presence of ADP or AMP-PCP but increases at higher temperature. The latter finding is consistent with SecA existing in an elongated form while inserting the signal peptide into membranes.
Protein translocation in Escherichia coli is initiated by the interaction of a preprotein with the membrane translocase composed of a motor protein, SecA ATPase, and a membrane-embedded channel, the SecYEG complex. The extent to which the signal peptide region of the preprotein plays a role in SecYEG interactions is unclear, in part because studies in this area typically employ the entire preprotein. Using a synthetic signal peptide harboring a photoaffinity label in its hydrophobic core, we examined this interaction with SecYEG in a detergent micellar environment. The signal peptide was found to specifically bind SecY in a saturable manner and at levels comparable to those that stimulate SecA ATPase activity. Chemical and proteolytic cleavage of cross-linked SecY and analysis of the signal peptide adducts indicate that the binding was primarily to regions of the protein containing transmembrane domains seven and two. The signal peptide-SecY interaction was affected by the presence of SecA and nucleotides in a manner consistent with the transfer of signal peptide to SecY upon nucleotide hydrolysis at SecA.
In Escherichia coli, SecA is a large, multifunctional protein that is a vital component of the general protein secretion pathway. In its membrane-bound form it functions as the motor component of the protein translocase, perhaps through successive rounds of membrane insertion and ATP hydrolysis. To understand both the energy conversion process and translocase assembly, we have used contrast-matched, small-angle neutron-scattering (SANS) experiments to examine SecA in small unilamellar vesicles of E.coli phospholipids. In the absence of nucleotide, we observe a dimeric form of SecA with a radius of gyration comparable to that previously observed for SecA in solution. In contrast, the presence of either ADP or a non-hydrolyzable ATP analog induces conversion to a monomeric form. The larger radius of gyration for the ATP-bound relative to the ADP-bound form suggests the former has a more expanded global conformation. This is the first direct structural determination of SecA in a lipid bilayer. The SANS data indicate that nucleotide turnover can function as a switch of conformation of SecA in the membrane in a manner consistent with its proposed role in successive cycles of deep membrane penetration and release with concommitant preprotein insertion.
Like other G-protein coupled receptors with hydrophobic ligands, the human cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) is thought to bind its ligands within the transmembrane region of the receptor. However, for some of these receptors the extracellular loops (ECs) have also been shown to play a role in ligand recognition and selectivity. We have taken a mutagenesis approach to examine the role of the amino terminus, EC1, and EC3 of CB1 in ligand binding. Eight mutant receptors, each with a dipeptide insertion, were constructed, expressed, and evaluated for binding to the cannabinoid ligands (-)-cis-3[2-hydroxy-4-(1',1'-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexanol (CP 55,940) and N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride (SR 141716A). Mutants with insertions in the membrane distal region of the amino terminus or EC3 maintained affinity for both ligands. Those with insertions in the membrane proximal region of the amino terminus or EC1 exhibited a loss of affinity for CP 55,940 while retaining wild-type affinity for SR 141716A. Representative mutants were analyzed for agonist-induced inhibition of cyclic AMP accumulation, and the results indicated that G-protein coupling remained intact. Alanine substitution mutants were made to address whether it was the perturbation of the overall structure of the region or the displacement of particular side chains that was responsible for the loss of CP 55,940 binding. We conclude that a structurally intact EC1, but not the comparably short EC3, is essential for high-affinity CP 55,940 binding.
The human cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. Among the members of GPCR family, it has an exceptionally long extracellular N-terminal domain (N-tail) of 116 amino acids but has no typical signal sequence. This poses questions of how the long N-tail affects the biosynthesis of the receptor and of how it is inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. Here we have examined the process of membrane assembly of CB1 in the ER membrane and the maturation of the receptor from the ER to the plasma membrane. We find that the long N-tail cannot be efficiently translocated across the ER membrane, causing the rapid degradation of CB1 by proteasomes; this leads to a low level of expression of the receptor at the plasma membrane. The addition of a signal peptide at the N terminus of CB1 or shortening of the long N-tail greatly enhances the stability and cell surface expression of the receptor without affecting receptor binding to a cannabinoid ligand, CP-55,940. We propose that the N-tail translocation is a crucial early step in biosynthesis of the receptor and may play a role in regulating the stability and surface expression of CB1.
The third cytoplasmic loop (IC3) is a determinant in the dynamic life cycle of G protein-coupled receptors, including the activation, internalization, desensitization, and resensitization processes. Here, we characterize the structural features of the IC3 of the cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB1) in micelle solution using heteronuclear, (1)H,(15)N-high-resolution NMR methods. The IC3 construct was designed to contain one-third of each of the transmembrane helices (TMs 5 and 6) to tether the protein to the hydrophobic portion of the micelle. Indeed, the NMR analysis illustrates prominent alpha-helices at the N-terminus (G1-R10) and C-terminus (Q37-T47) of the IC3 receptor domain, corresponding to the cytoplasmic termini of TM5 and TM6. The structural features of the central portion of the IC3 consist of a small alpha-helix, adjacent to the terminus of TM5. The remainder is mostly unstructured as indicated by the NMR-based observables (NOEs and chemical shifts). Despite the lack of secondary structure, the hydrophobic triplet of isoleucine residues in the center of the IC3 is found in molecular dynamics simulations to associate with the lipid environment, producing two smaller loops out of the IC3. Previous studies examining mastoparan and related peptides and their ability to activate G proteins have concluded an alpha-helix is required for efficient binding and activation. Our structural results for the IC3 of CB1 would then suggest that in the intact receptor the G protein is activated by the alpha-helices of the cytoplasmic ends of TM5 or TM6 and not the unstructured central region of the IC3.
In Escherichia coli, exported proteins are synthesized as precursors containing an amino-terminal signal peptide which directs transport through the translocase to the proper destination. We have constructed a series of signal peptide mutants, incorporating linker sequences of varying lengths between the amino-terminal charge and core region hydrophobicity, to examine the requirement for the juxtaposition of these two structural features in promoting protein transport. In vivo and in vitro analyses indicated that high transport efficiency via signal peptides with core regions of marginal hydrophobicity absolutely requires the proximity of sufficient charge.
SecA performs a critical function in the recognition, targeting, and transport of secretory proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli. In this study we investigate the substrate specificity of SecA, including the influence of the early mature region of the preprotein on SecA interactions, and the extent to which SecA recognizes targeting signals from different transport pathways. A series of fusion proteins were generated which involved the tandem expression of GST, signal peptide, and the first 30 residues from alkaline phosphatase. These were purified and evaluated for their ability to promote SecA ATPase activity. No significant difference in the stimulation of SecA-lipid ATPase activity between the synthetic wild-type alkaline phosphatase signal peptide and a fusion that also contains the first 30 residues of alkaline phosphatase was observed. The incorporation of sequence motifs in the mature region, which confer SecB dependence in vivo, had no impact on SecA activation in vitro. These results suggest that the early mature region of alkaline phosphatase does not affect the interactions between SecA and the signal peptide. Sec, Tat, and YidC signal peptide fusions were also assayed for their ability to stimulate SecA ATPase activity in vitro and further analyzed in vivo for the Sec dependence of the transport of the corresponding signal peptide mutants of alkaline phosphatase. Our results demonstrate that E. coli Sec signals give the highest level of SecA activation; however, SecA-signal peptide interactions in vitro are not the only arbiter of whether the preprotein utilizes the Sec pathway in vivo.
In Escherichia coli, the formation of SecA-SecB complexes has a direct effect on SecA ATPase activity. The mechanism of this interaction was evaluated and defined using controlled trypsinolysis, equilibrium dialysis at low temperature, and kinetic analyses of the SecA ATPase reaction. The proteolysis data indicate that SecB and the nonhydrolyzable ATP analogue AMP-P-C-P induce similar conformational changes in SecA which result in a more open or extended structure that is suggestive of the ATP-bound form. The effect is synergistic and concentration-dependent, and requires the occupation of both the high- and low-affinity nucleotide binding sites for maximum effect. The equilibrium dialysis experiments and kinetic data support the observation that the SecB-enhanced SecA ATPase activity is the result of an increased rate of ATP hydrolysis rather than an increase in the affinity of ATP for SecA and that the high-affinity nucleotide binding site is conformationally regulated by SecB. It appears that SecB may function as an intermolecular regulator of ATP hydrolysis by promoting the ATP-bound state of SecA. The inhibition of SecA ATPase activity by sodium azide in the presence of IMVs and a functional signal peptide further indicates that SecB promotes the ATP-bound form of SecA.
The structure of the C-terminal region of the third cytoplasmic loop (IC3) of the cannabinoid receptor one (CB1) bound to G(alphai1) has been determined using transferred nuclear Overhauser effects (NOEs). The wild-type IC3 sequence is helical when associated with G(alphai1). In contrast, a peptide containing the amino-acid inversion, Ala(341)-Leu(342) adopts a single turn. These findings correlate with the attenuated G(i) association of CB1 with the Ala(341)-Leu(342) mutation previously observed in vivo and the diminished stimulation of G(alphai1) GTPase activity by the corresponding peptide demonstrated in vitro here. These results, the first to report the structure of a GPCR domain while associated with G protein, imply the C-terminus of CB1 IC3, a region with high-sequence conservation among G-protein coupled receptors, must be helical for efficient coupling and activation of the G(i) protein.