Biomedical subjects

Debra Frye

Publications and source records attributed to Debra Frye.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Weekly paclitaxel improves pathologic complete remission in operable breast cancer when compared with paclitaxel once every 3 weeks.

PURPOSE: To determine the impact a change in schedule of paclitaxel administration from once every 3 weeks to frequent administration would have on the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the breast and lymph nodes for patients with invasive breast cancer treated with primary systemic chemotherapy (PST). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical stage I-IIIA breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive PST of paclitaxel doses administered either weekly (for a total of 12 doses of paclitaxel) or once every 3 weeks (four cycles), followed by four cycles of fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (FAC) in standard doses every 3 weeks. Two different doses of paclitaxel were used based on lymph node status defined by ultrasound and fine needle aspiration. Clinical response and extent of residual disease in the breast and lymph nodes was assessed after completion of all chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 258 patients were randomly assigned to receive doses of paclitaxel administered either weekly or once every 3 weeks, followed by FAC. Of these 258 patients, 110 patients had histologic lymph node involvement and 148 patients had clinical N0 disease. Weekly paclitaxel followed by FAC was administered to 127 patients and once-every-3-weeks paclitaxel followed by FAC was administered to 131 patients. Clinical response to treatment was similar between groups (P = .25). Patients receiving weekly paclitaxel had a higher pCR rate (28.2%) than patients treated with once-every-3-weeks paclitaxel (15.7%; P = .02), with improved breast conservation rates (P = .05). CONCLUSION: The change in schedule of paclitaxel from once every 3 weeks to a more frequent administration significantly improved the ability to eradicate invasive cancer in the breast and lymph nodes.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of TAS-108 in postmenopausal female patients with locally advanced, locally recurrent inoperable, or progressive metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: TAS-108 is a novel steroidal anti-estrogen compound that has a strong binding affinity to the estrogen receptor and, in preclinical studies, has antitumor activity against tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cell lines. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and the pharmacokinetics in patients with previously treated advanced breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: TAS-108 was administered orally once daily starting at 40 mg/day, with dose escalations of 60, 80, 120, and 160 mg/day. A minimum of three patients were enrolled in each dose level, and, if no drug-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were seen in the first 14 days, the next cohort of patients was treated at the next level. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained on day 1, 2, 15, and 28 of the first course. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were enrolled, and most had received six to seven prior therapies. Clinical toxicities included nausea, vomiting, hot flashes, headache, weakness and fatigue; all were grade 1-2. TAS-108 had no effect on endometrial thickness based on trans-vaginal ultrasound evaluation. The average duration of therapy was 17.4 weeks (range, 4-60 weeks). The mean terminal half-life ranged from 8.0 to 10.7 hour in the interval of 12 to 24 hours postdose. The mean C(max) ranged from 2.8 to 21.0 ng/mL and AUC(0-t) from 15.1 to 148.7 ng.h/mL, this showed a linear correlation with the dose. CONCLUSIONS: TAS-108 was well tolerated in the doses studied with no maximum tolerated dose. The drug has linear pharmacokinetics, and in this heavily treated patient population, there was evidence of biological antitumor activity. A multi-institutional phase II study is planned.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2003

First-cycle absolute neutrophil count can be used to improve chemotherapy-dose delivery and reduce the risk of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving adjuvant therapy: a validation study.

BACKGROUND: The nadir value of the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) in the first cycle of chemotherapy is an effective predictor of subsequent neutropenic events. This study was designed to validate an earlier published study based on a retrospective data analysis from a prospective randomized clinical trial. METHODS: The original published model was applied to a trial of 143 patients to cross-validate the model. We also tested the specification of the model on our data by using a logistic regression model with several variables, including first-cycle nadir ANC, age, menopausal status, hormone-receptor status, previous radiotherapy, and first-cycle decrease in hemoglobin concentration. Patients received fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide every 21 or 28 days for six cycles without hematopoietic support from colony-stimulating factor. RESULTS: In the cross-validation analysis, the original model successfully classified patients by risk of neutropenic events (C = 0.78). When the model specification was tested, first-cycle nadir ANC was the sole significant (P < 0.0001) predictor of neutropenic events and the model had a good predictive power (C = 0.78). The estimated relative risk of 4.8 did not differ from the risk cited in the original model (P = 0.91). A significantly higher percentage of our patients with a low first-cycle nadir ANC of 0.25 x 10(9)/liter or less experienced febrile neutropenia (30% versus 10%, P = 0.04) and received at least 85% of the planned dose intensity (55% versus 32%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The original risk model used to predict neutropenic events was validated by our study. This information can be used to target high-risk patients for prophylactic treatment with filgrastim (recombinant methionyl human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in chemotherapy cycles 2 to 6.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2002

Multicenter phase II study of a 28-day regimen of orally administered eniluracil and fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Eniluracil (776C85), a potent inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, allows fluorouracil (5-FU) to be administered orally on a schedule that simulates continuous-infusion 5-FU. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the objective tumor response rate of orally administered eniluracil and 5-FU in the treatment of anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with anthracycline- and taxane-resistant advanced breast cancer were enrolled onto this open-label, phase II, multicenter study. Patients received orally administered 5-FU 1.0 mg/m(2) with eniluracil given in a 10:1 ratio (eniluracil:5-FU) twice daily for the first 28 days of each 35-day cycle. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were enrolled. Eight partial responses were observed in 84 patients (10%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2% to 17.9%), and 20 patients (24%) had stable disease. The median duration of partial response was 20.1 weeks (95% CI, 12 to 26.7 weeks). The median duration of progression-free survival and overall survival for all patients was 9.9 weeks and 40.4 weeks, respectively. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2 in intensity. Diarrhea, nausea, malaise/fatigue, vomiting, and mucositis were the most common treatment-related nonhematologic adverse events. The most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were malaise/fatigue and diarrhea, occurring in 17% and 7% of patients, respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was low. Grade 3 or 4 hyperbilirubinemia occurred in 17% of patients. CONCLUSION: Eniluracil-5-FU has modest antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile in anthracycline- and taxane-resistant breast cancer. Treatment was convenient, and patient compliance was high.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2002

Phase I study of vinorelbine and docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Vinorelbine and docetaxel are two active agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. When given together, these drugs exhibit synergistic antitumor activity without significant pharmacokinetic interaction. The dose-limiting toxicities of this combination are neutropenic fever and mucositis. Adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) might lessen the toxicity and increase the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of this combination. The aim of this study was to determine the MTD of vinorelbine and docetaxel given in combination with G-CSF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 1997 and December 1998, 14 patients with metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in this study. All patients had received doxorubicin-based therapy, and 46% had received paclitaxel in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. Patients were treated with vinorelbine at a starting dose of 20 mg/m2 intravenously over 10 min on days 1 and 5 and docetaxel at a starting dose of 85 mg/m2 intravenously over 1 hr on day 1, following the vinorelbine. Treatments were repeated every 21 days. Prophylactic G-CSF 5 mcg/kg was given subcutaneously on days 3-10. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute's grading system. RESULTS: A total of 65 cycles was administered at dose levels 0, -1, -2, and -3. The median absolute granulocyte count nadir for all courses was 200 mm(-3) (range, 0.1-7700 mm(-3)), and the median time to this nadir was 9 days (range, 7-30). The median platelet nadir was 163 (range, 27-401 k), and the median time to this nadir was 8 days (range, 7-30). The most common grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities for all courses were fatigue and myalgia, which occurred in 32 and 10 cycles, respectively. Neutropenic fever was encountered in 11 cycles. Three patients developed colitis-like pictures, two of whom died as a result. Consequently, the protocol was closed to accrual before a MTD was reached. CONCLUSION: The combination of vinorelbine, docetaxel, and G-CSF in our hands has proven to be a toxic regimen, even when relatively low doses of vinorelbine and docetaxel are given. Meticulous observation of patients receiving this combination is warranted since the combination resulted in two deaths in this study.

Adult↗