Agromedicine program development: a commentary and book review.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Debra M Phillips.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
One of the most recalcitrant problems of the rural health landscape is the uneven distribution and relative shortage of medical care providers. Despite considerable efforts by federal and state governments over the past three decades to address these problems, rural provider distribution and shortage issues have persisted. The purpose of this article is to identify the challenges for rural health research and policy regarding health provider supply in the first decade of the 21st century. While the emphasis in this article is on physicians, workforce concerns pertaining to nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants are briefly described. Physician supply, geographic and specialty distribution, age, gender, quality of care, recruitment and retention, training, productivity and income, reimbursement and managed care, federal and state ameliorative programs, safety net, and telehealth are discussed. Also highlighted are issues concerning rural health care workforce research, methods, and data as well as a series of policy-relevant questions. Solutions to rural health personnel problems can only be successfully addressed through multifaceted approaches. No vision of the future of rural health can come to fruition if it does not promote stable, rewarding, and fulfilling professional and personal lives for rural health care providers.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent recommendations requiring resident training in community-oriented primary care (COPC) indicate a continued interest among family medicine educators. This study examines COPC-related aspects of training and practice and whether or not respondents report COPC knowledge. The study also compares residency program and physician responses. METHODS: A total of 400 randomly selected practicing physicians and 470 residency directors were asked about COPC curricular and practice experiences. Physicians were asked if they practice COPC. Programs were asked if they taught COPC. Both were asked if they were knowledgeable about COPC. RESULTS: Response rates for practicing physicians and programs were 58.4% and 71.8%, respectively; 38.8% of programs teach COPC, and 6.7% of physicians reported that they practice COPC. Sixty-seven percent of programs and 19% of physicians reported COPC knowledge. Programs with knowledge of COPC conducted more COPC-related activities than those without such knowledge. This relationship was not seen among practicing physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Aspects of COPC exist in training and in practice environments. Knowledge about COPC is associated with differences in programs' COPC activities but not in the COPC activities of practicing physicians. Programs and physicians differ in COPC implementation in training and practice.