Biomedical subjects

Deepak Kilari

Publications and source records attributed to Deepak Kilari.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Genomic and Transcriptomic Correlates of Deep PSA Response in Patients with Metastatic Androgen Pathway Modulation-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in metastatic androgen pathway modulation-sensitive prostate cancer (mAPMS) treatment, outcomes remain heterogeneous. Achieving a post-treatment undetectable prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a strong prognostic marker. We aimed to identify genomic and transcriptomic determinants of PSA response in a real-world clinical-genomic cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mAPMS who underwent DNA (Tempus xT) and, in a subset, RNA (Tempus xR) sequencing were identified from the Tempus Lens database. Inclusion required stage IV disease within 90 days of sample collection and samples obtained within 12 months before or 3 months after treatment initiation. Patients with PSA at 6 months (n = 525) were classified as PSA-low (<0.1 ng/mL, n = 240) or PSA-high (≥0.1 ng/mL, n = 285). Overall survival (OS) was assessed by 6-month landmark analysis with delayed-entry adjustment. Logistic and Cox models were adjusted for clinical variables. Sensitivity analyses used a relative definition of > 95% PSA decline from baseline. RESULTS: Baseline PSA was lower in PSA-low versus PSA-high patients (24 vs 36 ng/mL, p = 0.01). SPOP (17% vs 11%) and ZFHX3 (2.5% vs 6%) alterations differed between groups, but neither persisted after adjustment. Using the relative definition, ZMYM3 and JAK1 alterations were independently associated with failure to achieve a deep PSA response. Expression of PSMA, TROP2, B7-H3, and STEAP1 did not differ between groups. PSA-low status was independently associated with improved OS, as was deep relative response. CONCLUSION: Deep PSA response at 6 months correlates with improved OS in mAPMS. Integrating molecular markers with PSA response may inform treatment intensification or de-escalation strategies.

Biomarkers↗

PubMed2026

Association between smoking, tumor genetics, and outcomes in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Smoking has been associated with increased metastatic prostate cancer mortality, but the mechanisms behind this are largely unknown. We hypothesized that smoking increases the risk of genetic alterations associated with aggressive disease and/or the transformation to neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We utilized the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) clinical genomic database for this retrospective analysis. We associated patient characteristics and tumor genetic data with smoking exposure at diagnosis (current, former, never and pack years) and with clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) from diagnosis or time to developing metastatic disease and NEPC status. RESULTS: We identified 2353 men with prostate cancer and next generation somatic tumor sequencing evaluable for analysis in PROMISE, including 8% current, 39% former, and 52% never smokers. Current smokers were more likely to be younger and to have metastatic (M1 or N1) disease at diagnosis, and less likely to have prior local therapy (all p < 0.001). Current smoking was associated with worse OS from diagnosis (99.9 mo vs 137.6 mo, HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14-1.77), which remained significant after adjusting for disease characteristics. We found no difference in the percentage of NEPC at initial diagnosis or at any time between current, former, and never smokers (p = 0.8). We found positive associations between smoking status and genetic alterations in SPOP (current: 15%, former 6.7%, never 3.8%; p = 0.018), FGFR1 (current 10%, former 0.4%, never 1.1% p = 0.001), and ARID1A (current 5.1%, former 2.2%, never 0.4%; p = 0.035) in patients with metastatic androgen pathway modulator sensitive prostate cancer (APMS). CONCLUSION: Active smoking is associated with worse overall and prostate cancer specific survival as compared to never/former smoking and was associated with specific tumor genetic alterations but not small cell/NEPC transformation.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of commercially available molecularly matched targeted therapies in the second-line setting.

BACKGROUND: Initial studies have shown improved outcomes in patients receiving cancer therapies matched to their molecular alterations. To improve the chances of finding a therapeutic match for patients, this study evaluated the preliminary antitumor activity of 3 commercially available multitargeted agents in the United States, regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib. METHODS: In this phase II trial, patients who did not benefit from first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), upper aerodigestive tract cancers, non-colon gastrointestinal cancers, and urothelial carcinoma underwent next-generation sequencing to identify actionable genomic alterations. Eligible patients, based on identified mutations deemed treatable by regorafenib, cabozantinib, or afatinib, were enrolled to receive matched targeted therapies. Outcomes were monitored via Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, with dose modifications per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v4.03 guidelines for adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: One hundred patients with metastatic cancers were enrolled across tumor types. Median treatment durations were 12 weeks (regorafenib), 10.7 weeks (afatinib), and 24.1 weeks (cabozantinib). The overall objective response rate was 7.0%, with 1 complete response and 8 partial responses. The clinical benefit rate, including responses and stable disease >6 months, was 16.0%. Median progression-free survival ranged from 1.9 months for urothelial carcinoma to 3.2 months for NSCLC. Toxicities were common for all medications; for regorafenib, 90.7% of patients had AEs (50% Grade 3/4); for afatinib, 86% of patients had AEs (54% Grade 3/4); for cabozantinib, 100% of patients had AEs (36% Grade 3/4). The most common AEs were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, and stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib, afatinib, and cabozantinib had modest effects when used as molecularly matched targeted therapies in patients with NSCLC, upper aerodigestive tract cancers, non-colon gastrointestinal cancers, and urothelial carcinoma in the second-line setting. Future research could examine more precise matching of therapies to genomic alterations and evaluate combination therapies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Phase II Randomized Trial of Radium-223 Dichloride and Cabozantinib in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma With Bone Metastases: RADICAL (Alliance A031801).

PURPOSE: Bone metastases (BM) occur in approximately 30% of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and are associated with poor survival and symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs). Radium-223, an alpha-emitting bone-seeking radioisotope, and cabozantinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, have demonstrated activity in BM. RADICAL (Alliance A031801; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04071223) evaluated cabozantinib ± radium-223 in mRCC with BM. METHODS: This phase II trial enrolled patients with mRCC of any histology with ≥1 BM. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to cabozantinib ± radium-223, stratified by osteoclast-targeted therapy (OTT), prior therapy, opioid use, and International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk. The primary end point was SSE-free survival (SSE-FS). Secondary end points included safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). A target of 124 evaluable patients was planned, with a prespecified interim futility analysis at 50% of expected SSE-FS events; the trial would stop if the stratified hazard ratio (sHR) > 1.0. RESULTS: The prespecified interim futility analysis was conducted after 90 patients were enrolled and crossed the futility boundary, leading to closure at 98 patients. The final analysis included all 98 patients. Median age was 63 years, 82.7% had clear cell histology, and 79.6% were using an OTT. IMDC risk was favorable (18.4%), intermediate (67.3%), and poor (14.3%). Median follow-up was 13.1 months. Median SSE-FS for cabozantinib with radium-223 versus cabozantinib was 16.7 versus 17.6 months (sHR, 1.46 [90% CI, 0.86 to 2.51]). Median OS was 28.3 versus 19.7 months (sHR, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.70 to 2.79]). ORR was 19.4% versus 25.0% (P = .78). Grade ≥3 adverse events were similar across arms (69.6% v 75.5%). CONCLUSION: Radium-223 did not improve SSE-FS when added to cabozantinib. The combination demonstrated a manageable safety profile.

Humans↗