PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Deepak L Bhatt

Publications and source records attributed to Deepak L Bhatt.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Superficial femoral artery occlusion: nitinol stents achieve better flow and reduce the need for medications than balloon angioplasty alone.

BACKGROUND: Nitinol slotted tube stents are of great potential benefit in superficial femoral artery (SFA) interventions due to their elastic properties. However, a paucity of data exists for their efficacy in total SFA occlusions. METHODS: Using the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Peripheral Database, we identified 40 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous revascularization for chronically occluded SFA and addressed the outcome stratifying for stent use. We evaluated the reduction in the pressure gradient across the lesion and the need for medication following revascularization. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients, twenty-six underwent balloon angioplasty alone and 14 received nitinol slotted tube stents. Patients were well matched for age and cardiovascular risk factors. Similarly, there were no differences in baseline ankle brachial index (ABI) or claudication class between the groups. Compared to angioplasty alone, stenting was associated with a greater reduction in translesional pressure gradient (72 mmHg versus 32 mmHg; p = 0.002). In addition, patients treated with stents were less likely to require post-procedure adjunctive medical treatment (7.1% versus 42.6%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: In SFA occlusion, stenting results in greater reduction in translesional pressure gradient and reduced need for adjunctive medical treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Clopidogrel is associated with better in-hospital and 30-day outcomes than ticlopidine after coronary stenting.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports of fatal ticlopidine-induced blood dyscrasias have led many interventional cardiologists to administer clopidogrel instead of ticlopidine for coronary stenting. Most studies have demonstrated similar outcomes and a more favourable safety profile supporting this change in practice patterns. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical outcomes in patients who received clopidogrel rather than ticlopidine after coronary stenting. METHODS: Between June 1996 and December 1998, 652 patients received a clopidogrel-based periprocedural regimen (300 mg loading dose followed by 75 mg daily in addition to acetylsalicylic acid 325 mg daily) and 1717 patients received a ticlopidine-based regimen (500 mg loading dose followed by 250 mg bid in addition to acetylsalicylic acid 325 mg daily). In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were assessed in the two groups. RESULTS: At 30 days, unadjusted mortality was 0.3% in the clopidogrel group versus 1.5% in the ticlopidine group, and myocardial infarction (MI) was also reduced in the clopidogrel group (4.0% versus 6.5%). No difference was found in the rate of repeat revascularization (1.4% versus 1.2%). The combination of death/MI/repeat revascularization at 30 days was reduced by 32%, an absolute difference of 2.9% (6.2% versus 9.1%). On multivariate analysis, clopidogrel was found to be an independent predictor of freedom from nonfatal MI (odds ratio [OR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.99, P=0.04), the composite of death or MI (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.95, P=0.03) and the composite of death/MI/revascularization (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.00, P=0.05). CONCLUSION: After coronary stenting, in a large, nonrandomized, consecutive patient experience, clopidogrel appears to be associated with more favourable clinical outcomes than ticlopidine, without increasing the risk of bleeding or peripheral vascular complications.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Lack of benefit from intravenous platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition as adjunctive treatment for percutaneous interventions of aortocoronary bypass grafts: a pooled analysis of five randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread use of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of bypass grafts, data supporting this strategy are lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: A pooled analysis of 5 randomized intravenous GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor trials (EPIC, EPILOG, EPISTENT, IMPACT II, and PURSUIT) was performed, and outcomes of graft interventions were assessed at 30 days and 6 months. Compared with PCI of native circulation (n=13 158), graft interventions (n=627) were associated with worse outcomes and in particular with a doubling of mortality at 30 days (2.1% versus 1.0%, P=0.006) and 6 months (4.7% versus 2.0%, P<0.001). Revascularization of a graft was identified as an independent predictor of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization at 6 months (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.63; P<0.001). Among patients undergoing graft PCI, the incidence of the triple end point at 30 days was 16.5% in the platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor group and 12.6% in the placebo group (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.85 to 2.24; P=0.18). At 6 months, 39.4% of patients randomized to GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and 32.7% of patients allocated to placebo had an ischemic event (hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.72; P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition does not improve outcomes after PCI of bypass grafts. In the absence of mechanical emboli protection, this procedure is associated with high incidence of death and nonfatal ischemic events.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2002

Mortality benefit of beta-blockade after successful elective percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the mortality benefit of beta-blockers after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers reduce mortality after myocardial infarction (MI), though limited data are available regarding their role after successful PCI. METHODS: Each year from 1993 through 1999, the first 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing PCI were systematically followed up. Patients presenting with acute or recent MI, shock, or unsuccessful revascularization procedures were excluded from the analysis. Clinical, procedural, and follow-up data of beta-blocker-treated and non-beta-blocker-treated patients were compared. A multivariate survival analysis model using propensity analysis was used to adjust for heterogeneity between the two groups. RESULTS: Of the 4,553 patients, 2,056 (45%) were treated with beta-blockers at the time of the procedure. Beta-blocker therapy was associated with a mortality reduction from 1.3% to 0.8% at 30 days (p = 0.13) and a reduction from 6.0% to 3.9% at one year (p = 0.0014). This survival benefit of beta-blockers was independent of left ventricular function, diabetic status, history of hypertension, or history of MI. Using propensity analysis, beta-blocker therapy remained an independent predictor for one-year survival after PCI (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 0.87; p = 0.0054). CONCLUSIONS: Within this large prospective registry, beta-blocker use was associated with a marked long-term survival benefit among patients undergoing successful elective percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2002

Early and sustained survival benefit associated with statin therapy at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Long-term administration of statin therapy has been shown to reduce major coronary events and cardiac mortality within randomized clinical trials. In addition to lowering lipids, statins favorably affect platelet adhesion, thrombosis, endothelial function, inflammation, and plaque stability, which may potentially improve outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, we hypothesized that statin therapy has an early beneficial effect among patients undergoing PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Each year from 1993 to 1999, we prospectively collected data among the first 1000 patients undergoing PCI. Patients who presented with acute or recent myocardial infarction or cardiogenic shock were excluded from the analysis. Baseline, procedural, and 6-month data of statin-treated and non-statin-treated patients were compared. Propensity score and multivariate survival analysis were used to adjust for heterogeneity between the two groups. Of 5052 patients who completed follow-up, 26.5% were treated with statin at the time of the procedure. Statin therapy was associated with a mortality reduction at 30 days (0.8% versus 1.5%; hazard ratio, 0.53; P=0.048) and at 6 months (2.4% versus 3.6%; hazard ratio, 0.67; P=0.046). After adjusting for the propensity to receive statin therapy before the procedure and other confounders, statin therapy remained an independent predictor for survival at 6 months after coronary intervention (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.99; P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: In this large study cohort, statin therapy among PCI patients seems to be associated with a significant mortality advantage at early and intermediate-term follow-up.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Long-term mortality benefit with the combination of stents and abciximab for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Cardiogenic shock secondary to ischemic heart disease is associated with a high mortality rate, and recent trials have established the benefit of an early invasive approach. However, the role of adjunctive abciximab and stenting for cardiogenic shock has not been established. We prospectively examined collected data from 96 consecutive patients who underwent emergent percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock over the past 7 years. Patients were classified as receiving stent plus abciximab, stent alone, percutaneous transluminal coronary angiopplasty (PTCA) plus abciximab, or PTCA alone. Baseline characteristics of the 4 groups were similar. During 2.5 years of follow-up, the mortality rates for stent plus abciximab, stent only, PTCA plus abciximab, and PTCA alone were 33%, 43%, 61%, and 68%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.028). Achievement of postprocedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow was higher with stent plus abciximab than with the other interventions (85% vs 65%, p = 0.048). By multivariate analysis, absence of stent use (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 1.36 to 4.90, p = 0.004) and left ventricular ejection function </=30% (hazard ratio 3.89, 95% confidence interval 1.53 to 9.87, p = 0.004) were independent predictors for mortality during 2.5 years of follow-up. In conclusion, treatment with the combination of stent and abciximab resulted in higher procedural Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow rates and a long-term mortality benefit in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Abciximab↗
PubMed2002

Meta-analysis of randomized and registry comparisons of ticlopidine with clopidogrel after stenting.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether clopidogrel is at least as efficacious as ticlopidine. BACKGROUND: Several trials have supported the enhanced safety and tolerability of clopidogrel compared with ticlopidine after coronary stent deployment. However, none of these individual trials were powered to detect possible differences in the efficacy for reducing ischemic end points. METHODS: Published data from trials and registries that compared clopidogrel with ticlopidine in patients receiving coronary stents were pooled, and a formal meta-analysis was performed. The rate of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as defined in each trial, was used as the primary end point. RESULTS: There were a total of 13,955 patients. The pooled rate of major adverse cardiac events was 2.10% in the clopidogrel group and 4.04% in the ticlopidine group. After adjustment for heterogeneity in the trials, the odds ratio (OR) of having an ischemic event with clopidogrel, as compared with ticlopidine, was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 0.89, p = 0.002). Mortality was also lower in the clopidogrel group compared with the ticlopidine group-0.48% versus 1.09% (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.82; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Based on all available evidence from randomized clinical trials or registries, clopidogrel, in addition to better tolerability and fewer side effects, is at least as efficacious as ticlopidine in reducing MACE. This finding may be due to the more rapid onset of an antiplatelet effect seen with the loading dose of clopidogrel, which was used in most of these studies, or to better patient compliance with clopidogrel therapy. Therefore, clopidogrel plus aspirin should replace ticlopidine plus aspirin as the standard antiplatelet regimen after stent deployment.

Aspirin↗