Control of current and future neural prostheses.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Bionics↗
Biomedical subjects
Dejan B Popovic
Publications and source records attributed to Dejan B Popovic.
Restitution of reaching and grasping promoted by functional electrical therapy.
Functional electrical therapy (FET) is a new term describing a combination of functional electrical stimulation that generates life-like movement and intensive exercise in humans with central nervous system lesions. We hypothesized that FET can promote a significant recovery of functioning if applied in subacute stroke subjects. The study included 16 stroke subjects divided into a low functioning group (LFG) and a high functioning group (HFG) based on their ability to control wrist and fingers and randomly associated into FET and controls. The FET consisted of 30 min daily sessions during 3 weeks. The exercise comprised functional use of daily necessary activities (e.g., writing, using a telephone receiver, and drinking from a can). The outcome presented in this article is the upper-extremity function test performed before and after the therapy. The change in performance of the HFG group was significant. The number of successful repetitive movements in 2 min was doubled and 1.6 times increased for controls, and the time to perform the movement was decreased by 71% percent and by 36% in controls. In the LFG FET group, the difference in performance was the following. First, the number of tasks was increased from 0 to 6 (total of 11 tasks). Second, the averaged number of successful repetitive movements was increased from 0 to 3. The functional improvement in the FET LFG is probably not sufficient to make the more affected arm/hand effective for daily necessities; thus, the FET effects could deteriorate over a longer time. The subjects from the control LFG made only a marginal improvement. The follow-up for each subject will continue for 12 months after the beginning of the treatment.
Adult↗
Neuroprostheses for grasping.
In recent years a number of neuroprostheses have been developed and used to assist stroke and spinal cord injured subjects to restore or improve grasping function. These neuroprostheses clearly demonstrated that the targeted group of subjects can significantly benefit from this technology and that functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a viable method for restoring or improving grasping function. In this article the FES technology is briefly explained and some of the better known neuroprostheses for grasping are discussed. Furthermore, a typical population of subjects that can benefit from this technology is indicated as well as the methodology to select and train these subjects to apply the neuroprosthesis in daily living activities. This article also provides a brief summary of the achieved results with the existing neuroprostheses for grasping and discusses some of the challenges this technology is currently facing.
Artificial Limbs↗
Therapy of paretic arm in hemiplegic subjects augmented with a neural prosthesis: a cross-over study.
There are indications that both intensive exercise and electrical stimulation have a beneficial effect on arm function in post-stroke hemiplegic patients. We recommend the use of Functional Electrical Therapy (FET), which combines electrical stimulation of the paretic arm and intensive voluntary movement of the arm to exercise daily functions. FET was applied 30 min daily for 3 weeks. Forty-one acute hemiplegics volunteered in the 18-months single blinded cross-over study (CoS). Nineteen patients (Group A) participated in FET during their acute hemiplegia, and 22 patients (Group B) participated in FET during their chronic phase of hemiplegia. Group B patients were controls during FET in acute hemiplegia, and Group A patients were controls during the FET in chronic hemiplegia. Thirty-two patients completed the study. The outcomes of the Upper Extremity Function Test (UEFT) were used to assess the ability of patients to functionally use objects, as were the Drawing Test (DT) (used to assess the coordination of the arm), the Modified Ashworth Scale, the range of movement, and the questionnaire estimating the patients' satisfaction with the usage of the paretic arm. Patients who participated in the FET during the acute phase of hemiplegia (Group A) reached functionality of the paretic arm, on average, in less than 6 weeks, and maintained this near-normal use of the arm and hand throughout the follow-up. The gains in all outcome scores were significantly larger in Group A after FET and at all follow-ups compared with the scores before the treatment. The gains in patients who participated in the FET in the chronic phase of hemiplegia (Group B) were measurable, yet not significant. The speed of recovery was larger during the period of the FET compared with the follow-up period. The gains in Group A were significantly larger compared with the gains in Group B. The FET greatly promotes the recovery of the paretic arm if applied during the acute phase of post-stroke hemiplegia.
Acute Disease↗
Clinical evaluation of Functional Electrical Therapy in acute hemiplegic subjects.
This paper describes a clinical randomized single-blinded study of the effects of Functional Electrical Therapy (FET) on the paretic arms of subjects with acute hemiplegia caused by strokes. FET is an exercise program that comprises voluntary arm movements and opening, closing, holding, and releasing of objects that are assisted by a neural prosthesis (electrical stimulation). FET consisted of a 30 min everyday exercise for 3 consecutive weeks in addition to conventional therapy. Twenty-eight acute hemiplegic subjects participated in a 6 mo study. The subjects were divided into lower functioning groups (LFGs) and higher functioning groups (HFGs) based on their capacity to voluntarily extend the wrist and fingers against the gravity, and were randomly assigned to controls or FET groups. The outcomes included the Upper Extremity Function Test, the coordination of elbow and shoulder movements, spasticity of key muscles of the paretic arm, and Reduced Upper Extremity Motor Activity Log. FET and control groups showed a recovery trend in all outcome measures. The gains in FET groups were much larger compared with the gains in control groups. The speed of recovery in FET groups was substantially faster compared with the recovery rate in control groups during the first 3 weeks (treatment). The LFG subjects showed less improvement than the HFG in both the FET and control groups.
Adult↗