Biomedical subjects

Dene Simpson

Publications and source records attributed to Dene Simpson.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Atomoxetine: a review of its use in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

UNLABELLED: Atomoxetine (Strattera) is a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and nonstimulant that has shown greater efficacy than placebo in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. In two large, well controlled, 10-week trials in adults with ADHD, improvements in ADHD symptoms, as assessed by investigator- and patient-rated scores, were greater with oral atomoxetine (60, 90 or 120 mg/day) than with placebo. Mean reductions in the total ADHD symptom score on the investigator-rated Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS) in atomoxetine versus placebo recipients were 28.3% versus 18.1% and 30.1% versus 19.6%, respectively. Mean reductions in the scores on the Clinician Global Impression of Severity Scale, patient-rated CAARS and Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale were also significantly greater with atomoxetine than with placebo. Continued efficacy was demonstrated in a noncomparative, 34-week extension phase. Atomoxetine was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; withdrawal rates due to adverse events in atomoxetine-treated versus placebo-treated patients participating in the two major trials were 7.8% versus 4.3% and 9.3% versus 2.4% (p<0.05 for the latter trial). Adverse events reported significantly more frequently with atomoxetine than placebo included dry mouth, insomnia, nausea, decreased appetite, constipation, dizziness, sweating, dysuria, sexual problems and palpitations. Modest increases in heart rate and blood pressure were well tolerated and gradually decreased on cessation of treatment. Atomoxetine was not associated with QT interval prolongation. Atomoxetine can be administered once or twice daily. Its subjective-effects profile is different to that of methylphenidate and atomoxetine is not associated with abuse or diversion; it is therefore not a controlled substance in the US. This also means repeat prescriptions during long-term treatment can be more conveniently processed. CONCLUSION: Atomoxetine is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment for adults with ADHD. It is a nonstimulant and is the first ADHD treatment to be approved specifically for adult use based on its efficacy in well controlled adult trials. It can be administered as a single daily dose or split into two evenly divided doses. It carries negligible risk of abuse or diversion and is not a controlled substance. Atomoxetine is a valuable new treatment option for adults with ADHD and is particularly useful in patients who are at risk for substance abuse or who do not wish to take a controlled substance.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗

PubMed2004

Letrozole: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Letrozole (Femara), a nonsteroidal, third-generation aromatase inhibitor administered orally once daily, has shown efficacy in the treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage or advanced, hormone-sensitive breast cancer. In early-stage disease, extending adjuvant endocrine therapy with letrozole (beyond the standard 5-year period of tamoxifen) improved disease-free survival; compared with placebo there was a 43% relative reduction in disease recurrences or new contralateral breast tumours at a median follow-up of 2.4 years. The results of 4 months' neoadjuvant treatment with letrozole or tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with untreated primary disease favour letrozole. In advanced breast cancer, letrozole was superior to tamoxifen as first-line treatment; time to disease progression was significantly longer (9.4 vs 6.0 months, p < 0.0001) and objective response rate was significantly greater with letrozole, but median overall survival was similar between groups. For second-line therapy of advanced breast cancer that had progressed on antiestrogen therapy, letrozole showed efficacy equivalent to that of anastrozole and similar to or better than that of megestrol acetate. Letrozole is generally well tolerated and has a similar tolerability profile to tamoxifen; the most common treatment-related adverse events were hot flushes, nausea and hair thinning. In patients with tumours that had progressed on antiestrogen therapy, letrozole was tolerated as least as well as, or better than, anastrozole or megestrol acetate. In the trial of extended adjuvant therapy, adverse events reported more frequently with letrozole than placebo were hot flushes, arthralgia, myalgia and arthritis. The long-term effects of letrozole on bone mineral density or lipid profile have not been determined and these parameters may require monitoring. In several pharmacoeconomic modelling studies from various public healthcare system perspectives, letrozole was considered a cost effective choice for first-line (vs tamoxifen) or second-line (vs megestrol acetate) treatment for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. In conclusion, letrozole 2.5 mg/day is effective in the treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage or advanced breast cancer. The efficacy, cost effectiveness and favourable tolerability profile of letrozole are reflected in current treatment guidelines recommending the drug as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer. Letrozole is superior to tamoxifen for first-line treatment and is at least as effective as standard second-line treatments in disease that has progressed on antiestrogen therapy. For early-stage disease, letrozole is superior to tamoxifen in the neoadjuvant setting, and prolongs disease-free survival when administered after the standard 5-year period of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2004

Paclitaxel: as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in early breast cancer.

Paclitaxel is a antimicrotubule agent with established antitumour activity in a variety of cancers including breast cancer. The efficacy of intravenous paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer has been investigated in two large, randomised trials; it was administered sequentially to standard doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (AC) combination therapy and compared with cycles of AC alone. In both trials, the addition of sequentially administered paclitaxel to the AC regimen significantly improved disease-free survival at 5 years compared with AC alone. In one of the trials, women who received paclitaxel also had a significant improvement in overall 5-year survival time. In randomised trials of neoadjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer, paclitaxel or paclitaxel-containing regimens showed efficacy in terms of response/remission rates, local breast tumour recurrence and proportion of patients eligible for breast-conserving surgery. The most frequently reported grade 3-4 adverse events with paclitaxel administered sequentially to AC were haematological events (neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia) and nausea/vomiting.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

PubMed2004

Spotlight on atomoxetine in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

UNLABELLED: Atomoxetine (Strattera) is a selective noradrenaline (norepinephrine) reuptake inhibitor and nonstimulant that has shown greater efficacy than placebo in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. In two large, well controlled, 10-week trials in adults with ADHD, improvements in ADHD symptoms, as assessed by investigator- and patient-rated scores, were greater with oral atomoxetine (60, 90 or 120 mg/day) than with placebo. Mean reductions in the total ADHD symptom score on the investigator-rated Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS) in atomoxetine versus placebo recipients were 28.3% versus 18.1% and 30.1% versus 19.6%, respectively. Mean reductions in the scores on the Clinician Global Impression of Severity Scale, patient-rated CAARS and Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale were also significantly greater with atomoxetine than with placebo. Continued efficacy was demonstrated in a noncomparative, 34-week extension phase. Atomoxetine was generally well tolerated in clinical trials; withdrawal rates due to adverse events in atomoxetine- versus placebo-treated patients participating in the two major trials were 7.8% versus 4.3% and 9.3% versus 2.4% (p < 0.05 for the latter trial). Adverse events reported significantly more frequently with atomoxetine than placebo included dry mouth, insomnia, nausea, decreased appetite, constipation, dizziness, sweating, dysuria, sexual problems and palpitations. Modest increases in heart rate and blood pressure were well tolerated and gradually decreased on cessation of treatment. Atomoxetine was not associated with QT interval prolongation. Atomoxetine can be administered once or twice daily. Its subjective-effects profile is different to that of methylphenidate and atomoxetine is not associated with abuse or diversion; it is therefore not a controlled substance in the US. This also means repeat prescriptions during long-term treatment can be more conveniently processed. CONCLUSION: Atomoxetine is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment for adults with ADHD. It is a nonstimulant and is the first ADHD treatment to be approved specifically for adult use based on its efficacy in well controlled adult trials. It can be administered as a single daily dose or split into two evenly divided doses. It carries negligible risk of abuse or diversion and is not a controlled substance. Atomoxetine is a valuable new treatment option for adults with ADHD and is particularly useful in patients who are at risk for substance abuse or who do not wish to take a controlled substance.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2003

Ertapenem: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.

UNLABELLED: Ertapenem, a carbapenem antibacterial, has in vitro activity against many Gram- negative (including Enterobacteriaceae) and Gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria that are commonly associated with various infections.Once-daily parenteral (intravenous or intramuscular) ertapenem 1g was as effective as comparator antimicrobial agents (piperacillin/tazobactam or ceftriaxone +/- metronidazole) in patients with bacterial infections in randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trials. Response rates with ertapenem were 84% and 87% (combined microbiological and clinical) in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (CIAI), 82% (clinical) in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (CSSSI), 86% and 92% (microbiological) in patients with complicated urinary tract infections (CUTI), 92% (clinical) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) associated with typical pathogens and 94% (clinical) in patients with acute pelvic infection. Respective response rates were statistically equivalent to those with comparators (81-94%). The efficacy of ertapenem was equivalent to that of piperacillin/tazobactam in patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae or anaerobes and to ceftriaxone in patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae. Ertapenem was generally well tolerated by patients with bacterial infections, with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity. The most common ertapenem-associated adverse events were diarrhoea, infused vein complication, nausea, headache, vaginitis in females, phlebitis and/or thrombophlebitis and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Ertapenem is a broad-spectrum parenteral antibiotic with activity against many Gram-negative (including Enterobacteriaceae) and Gram-positive aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and is suitable for once-daily administration. Ertapenem has a role in the treatment of CAP associated with typical respiratory pathogens and is of particular value in the treatment of polymicrobial infections (such as CIAI, CSSSI, CUTI and acute pelvic infections), especially where Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobic bacteria are involved.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Oxaliplatin: a review of its use in combination therapy for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.

UNLABELLED: Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) is the only platinum compound to show clinical activity in colorectal cancer. The efficacy of a combination of oxaliplatin with various schedules of fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) as first- or second-line treatment for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer has been investigated in large phase III trials. FOLFOX4 (an oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA regimen) as first-line therapy (n = 795) was superior to irinotecan/5-FU/FA (IFL). Response rates were 45% vs 31%, and median progression-free survival duration was 8.7 vs 6.9 months. The survival advantage shown by FOLFOX4 over the irinotecan combination (median survival duration 19.5 vs 14.8 months) may be confounded by differences in post-study treatment but equivalent efficacy is supported by another phase III trial of oxaliplatin and irinotecan combinations. As first-line therapy, oxaliplatin added to various 5-FU/FA regimens more than doubled the response rates from 16-22.6% to 48.3-53% and the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer with oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA than 5-FU/FA alone (7.9-9 versus 5.3-6.2 months, respectively). In disease resistant to irinotecan-based therapies, the oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) regimen had superior efficacy to 5-FU/FA alone in a pivotal phase III trial (n = 816). Response rates and median durations of progression-free survival were 9.6% vs 0.7% and 5.6 vs 2.6 months, respectively. An oxaliplatin-induced cumulative peripheral sensory neuropathy (evident when total dose reaches approximate, equals 800 mg/m(2)) is dose limiting. The most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 toxicities in oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA-recipients were neutropenia (up to 48%) and neurological toxicities (up to 18%). Gastrointestinal effects (diarrhoea [ approximate, equals 12%], nausea, vomiting, or mucositis/stomatitis [up to 6%]) are manageable. Withdrawals from oxaliplatin treatment were due to neuropathy (up to 10%), diarrhoea and/or vomiting (1%) or cutaneous toxicity (1%). CONCLUSION: As first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, oxaliplatin with 5-FU/FA consistently improves response rates and progression-free survival compared with various regimens of 5-FU/FA alone. The significant survival advantage shown by oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA (FOLFOX4) compared with first-line therapy with irinotecan/5-FU/FA (IFL) is encouraging but may require further confirmation. Oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA produces a significantly higher response rate and longer progression-free survival than 5-FU/FA in patients failing irinotecan-based therapies, and as such is also a useful second-line treatment. Although cumulative neurotoxicity is dose limiting, oxaliplatin has a manageable tolerability profile. Oxaliplatin as first- or second-line therapy is a valuable addition to the limited, but expanding, armamentarium of cytotoxic agents useful in advanced metastatic colorectal cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2003

Spotlight on glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) is a synthetic copolymer composed of a random mixture of four amino acids that modifies the immune response that results in the CNS inflammation, demyelination and axonal loss characteristic of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In three randomised, double-blind trials in patients with RRMS, subcutaneous glatiramer acetate 20 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo for the primary outcome measure of each trial (mean relapse rate, proportion of relapse-free patients and number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] scans). The mean relapse rate was significantly reduced at endpoint (approximately one-third less) in the two larger trials (the US pivotal trial [primary endpoint] and the European/Canadian study [tertiary endpoint]) in patients receiving glatiramer acetate compared with those receiving placebo. The rate was 78% less for glatiramer acetate than placebo patients in the pilot trial that investigated a slightly different patient population. Glatiramer acetate significantly decreased disease activity and burden of disease, as assessed in the European/Canadian study using a range of MRI measures. Patients with RRMS treated with glatiramer acetate in the US trial were significantly more likely to experience improved disability (whereas placebo recipients were more likely to experience worsening disability) and their overall disability status was significantly improved compared with placebo recipients. Data from the active-treatment extension of the US trial suggest that glatiramer acetate has sustained clinical benefits up to 8 years. Glatiramer acetate was generally well tolerated; the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were localised injection-site reactions and transient post-injection systemic reactions. Both reactions were generally mild and self limiting but were responsible for the majority of withdrawals from treatment (up to 6.5% and 3.5%, respectively). Glatiramer acetate is not associated with the influenza-like syndrome or neutralising antibodies that are reported in patients treated with interferon-beta for RRMS. The cost effectiveness of glatiramer acetate has yet to be definitively determined as assessment of available data is confounded by very different models, data sources and assumptions. In conclusion, glatiramer acetate has shown efficacy in well controlled clinical trials in patients with RRMS; it reduces relapse rate and decreases MRI-assessed disease activity and burden. It is generally well tolerated and is not associated with the influenza-like symptoms and formation of neutralising antibodies seen with the interferons-beta. Based on available data and current management guidelines, glatiramer acetate is a valuable first-line treatment option for patients with RRMS.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed2003

Atomoxetine.

Atomoxetine, formerly tomoxetine, is a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and a new, nonstimulant treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo studies have shown that atomoxetine is a highly selective antagonist of the presynaptic norepinephrine transporter with little or no affinity for other noradrenergic receptors or other neurotransmitter transporters or receptors. In four randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials conducted over 6-9 weeks in children and adolescents with ADHD, atomoxetine (total daily dose 1-1.8 mg/kg administered in one or two doses daily) reduced symptoms (hyperactivity, impulsiveness and inattention) as determined by the reduction in ADHD total score (34-38% with atomoxetine versus 13-15.7% with placebo [p < 0.05]). Atomoxetine also significantly improved ADHD subscale rating scores (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001), psychosocial well-being (p < 0.05) and ADHD-related problem behavior according to parent and teacher ratings (p < 0.05). Atomoxetine was well tolerated in clinical trials and discontinuation rates due to adverse events were low (<5%). The most common treatment-related adverse event was decreased appetite. Atomoxetine shows no abuse potential and is not a controlled substance in the US.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Perindopril: in congestive heart failure.

Perindopril is a long-acting ACE inhibitor, acting through its only active metabolite perindoprilat. It inhibits the renin-angiotensin system by preventing both the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II and the degradation of bradykinin, thereby reducing the vasoconstriction and left ventricular remodelling characteristic of heart failure. Perindopril 4mg significantly improved a range of haemodynamic parameters in single-dose and long-term (8 weeks and 3 months) studies involving patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), with little or no effect on blood pressure or heart rate. In randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials conducted over 3 months and a large noncomparative study (up to 30 months), perindopril 4mg once daily significantly increased exercise tolerance and reduced symptoms of heart failure in patients with mild to moderate CHF. Perindopril 4mg once daily is generally well tolerated in patients with mild to moderate CHF. In a large noncomparative study the most commonly reported adverse clinical event was cough, which led to 2.8% of patients discontinuing treatment. In short-term comparative trials there was a significantly lower incidence of first-dose hypotension following the recommended starting dose of perindopril 2mg than after the equivalent starting doses of captopril, enalapril and lisinopril.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors↗

PubMed2002

Glatiramer acetate: a review of its use in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

UNLABELLED: Glatiramer acetate is a synthetic copolymer composed of a random mixture of four amino acids that modifies the immune response that results in the CNS inflammation, demyelination and axonal loss characteristic of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In three randomised, double-blind trials in patients with RRMS, subcutaneous glatiramer acetate 20 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo for the primary outcome measure of each trial (mean relapse rate, proportion of relapse-free patients and number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] scans). The mean relapse rate was significantly reduced at endpoint (approximately one-third less) in the two larger trials (the US pivotal trial [primary endpoint] and the European/Canadian study [tertiary endpoint]) in patients receiving glatiramer acetate compared with those receiving placebo. The rate was 78% less for glatiramer acetate than placebo patients in the pilot trial that investigated a slightly different patient population. Glatiramer acetate significantly decreased disease activity and burden of disease, as assessed in the European/Canadian study using a range of MRI measures. Patients with RRMS treated with glatiramer acetate in the US trial were significantly more likely to experience improved disability (whereas placebo recipients were more likely to experience worsening disability) and their overall disability status was significantly improved compared with placebo recipients. Data from the active-treatment extension of the US trial suggest that glatiramer acetate has sustained clinical benefits up to 8 years. Glatiramer acetate was generally well tolerated; the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were localised injection-site reactions and transient post-injection systemic reactions. Both reactions were generally mild and self limiting but were responsible for the majority of withdrawals from treatment (up to 6.5 and 3.5%, respectively). Glatiramer acetate is not associated with the influenza-like syndrome or neutralising antibodies that are reported in patients treated with interferon-beta for RRMS. The cost effectiveness of glatiramer acetate has yet to be definitively determined as assessment of available data is confounded by very different models, data sources and assumptions. CONCLUSION: Glatiramer acetate has shown efficacy in well controlled clinical trials in patients with RRMS; it reduces relapse rate and decreases MRI-assessed disease activity and burden. It is generally well tolerated and is not associated with the influenza-like symptoms and formation of neutralising antibodies seen with the interferons-beta. Based on available data and current management guidelines, glatiramer acetate is a valuable first-line treatment option for patients with RRMS.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗