Complementary and integrative therapies. Introduction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Denise Murray Edwards.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To present an overview of MindBodySpirit medicine including discussions of the efficacy of select self-care approaches. DATA SOURCES: Research and clinical articles on select complementary interventions. The model developed by the Center for Mind Body Medicine. CONCLUSION: Good information, self-care skills, and a supportive environment can assist an individual to achieve a higher level of physical, emotional, and spiritual wellness while navigating the cancer experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Increasing numbers of patients with cancer are becoming active in their health care and are choosing complementary approaches. There is an increasing body of literature supporting these interventions in improving quality of life. Nurses can acquire information to help patients navigate the expanding arena of complementary practices. "What Else Can I Do?" "What Else Can I Do?"
Cast a wide net, and include internal and external customers in planning. Keep communicating about the results of the needs assessment and each plan as it emerges. Ask everyone involved for feedback. Employ clinicians with experience and solid credentials, and have a plan for measuring outcomes.
This report examines whether long-term care facilities should implement policies and procedures to support advance care planning by proxy for residents who lack decision-making capacity. The report focuses on advance care planning in the Department of Veterans Affairs. After reviewing clinical, legal, and ethical perspectives, the authors conclude that advance proxy planning is ethically sound and can improve patient care. However, because experience with advance proxy planning is still fairly limited, the authors do not recommend that a particular standardized approach be mandated at the national level. Instead, local facilities are advised to develop their own policies and then evaluate their effect. The report contains specific recommendations for the advance proxy planning process.
This report addresses the difficult situation in which a patient or surrogate decision maker wishes cardiopulmonary resuscitation to be attempted even though the physician believes that resuscitation efforts would be futile. It also reviews current controversies surrounding the subject of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and medical futility, discusses the complex medical, legal, and ethical considerations involved, and then offers recommendations as a guide to clinicians and ethics committees in resolving these difficult issues. Conflicts over DNR orders and medical futility should not be resolved through a policy that attempts to define futility in the abstract, but rather through a predefined and fair process that addresses specific cases and includes multiple safeguards. As it examines these issues, the report focuses on the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Current national VHA policy constrains physicians from entering a DNR order over the objection of a patient or surrogate even if the physician believes cardiopulmonary resuscitation to be futile. The VHA National Ethics Committee recommends that VHA policy be changed to reflect the opinions expressed in this report. The National Ethics Committee, which is composed of VHA clinicians and leaders, as well as veterans advocates, creates reports that analyze ethical issues affecting the health and care of veterans treated in the VHA, the largest integrated health care system in the United States. This report does not change or modify VHA policy.