Biomedical subjects

Deniz Başkent

Publications and source records attributed to Deniz Başkent.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Frequency transposition around dead regions simulated with a noiseband vocoder.

In sensorineural hearing loss, damage to inner hair cells or the auditory nerve may result in dead regions in the cochlea, where the information transmission is disrupted. In cochlear implants, similar dead regions might appear if the spiral ganglia do not function. Shannon et al. [J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3, 185-199 (2002)] simulated dead regions of varying size and location using a noiseband vocoder. Phoneme recognition by normal-hearing subjects was measured under two frequency-place mapping conditions: the frequency range corresponding to the dead region was (1) removed or (2) reassigned to bands adjacent to the dead region to simulate the off-frequency stimulation of neurons at the edge of a dead region. The present study extends the results of Shannon et al. by including a frequency transposition mapping condition, where the overall acoustic input frequency range was distributed over the entire remaining nondead region. The frequency transposed map provided more acoustic information when compared to the map with the frequency range corresponding to the dead region removed. However, speech perception did not improve for many simulated dead region conditions, possibly due to the spectral distortions in the frequency-place mapping.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2006

Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels.

Speech recognition by normal-hearing listeners improves as a function of the number of spectral channels when tested with a noiseband vocoder simulating cochlear implant signal processing. Speech recognition by the best cochlear implant users, however, saturates around eight channels and does not improve when more electrodes are activated, presumably due to reduced frequency selectivity caused by channel interactions. Listeners with sensorineural hearing loss may also have reduced frequency selectivity due to cochlear damage and the resulting reduction in the nonlinear cochlear mechanisms. The present study investigates whether such a limitation in spectral information transmission would be observed with hearing-impaired listeners, similar to implant users. To test the hypothesis, hearing-impaired subjects were selected from a population of patients with moderate hearing loss of cochlear origin, where the frequency selectivity would be expected to be poorer compared to normal hearing. Hearing-impaired subjects were tested for vowel and consonant recognition in steady-state background noise of varying levels using a noiseband vocoder and as a function of the number of spectral channels. For comparison, normal-hearing subjects were tested with the same stimuli at different presentation levels. In quiet and low background noise, performance by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects was similar. In higher background noise, performance by hearing-impaired subjects saturated around eight channels, while performance by normal-hearing subjects continued to increase up to 12-16 channels with vowels, and 10-12 channels with consonants. A similar trend was observed for most of the presentation levels at which the normal-hearing subjects were tested. Therefore, it is unlikely that the effects observed with hearing-impaired subjects were due to insufficient audibility or high presentation levels. Consequently, the results with hearing-impaired subjects were similar to previous results obtained with implant users, but only for background noise conditions.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping.

While new electrode designs allow deeper insertion and wider coverage in the cochlea, there is still considerable variation in the insertion depth of the electrode array among cochlear implant users. The present study measures speech recognition as a function of insertion depth, varying from a deep insertion of 10 electrodes at 28.8 mm to a shallow insertion of a single electrode at 7.2 mm, in four Med-El Combi 40+ users. Short insertion depths were simulated by inactivating apical electrodes. Speech recognition increased with deeper insertion, reaching an asymptotic level at 21.6 or 26.4 mm depending on the frequency-place map used. Başkent and Shannon [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 3130-3140 (2004)] showed that speech recognition by implant users was best when the acoustic input frequency was matched onto the cochlear location that normally processes that frequency range, minimizing the spectral distortions in the map. However, if an electrode array is not fully inserted into the cochlea, a matched map will result in the loss of considerable low-frequency information. The results show a strong interaction between the optimal frequency-place mapping and electrode insertion depth. Consistent with previous studies, frequency-place matching produced better speech recognition than compressing the full speech range onto the electrode array for full insertion ranges (20 to 25 mm from the round window). For shallower insertions (16.8 and 19.2 mm) a mild amount of frequency-place compression was better than truncating the frequency range to match the basal cochlear location. These results show that patients with shallow electrode insertions might benefit from a map that assigns a narrower frequency range than patients with full insertions.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners.

In multichannel cochlear implants, low frequency information is delivered to apical cochlear locations while high frequency information is delivered to more basal locations, mimicking the normal acoustic tonotopic organization of the auditory nerves. In clinical practice, little attention has been paid to the distribution of acoustic input across the electrodes of an individual patient that might vary in terms of spacing and absolute tonotopic location. In normal-hearing listeners, Başkent and Shannon (J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 2003) simulated implant signal processing conditions in which the frequency range assigned to the array was systematically made wider or narrower than the simulated stimulation range in the cochlea, resulting in frequency-place compression or expansion, respectively. In general, the best speech recognition was obtained when the input acoustic information was delivered to the matching tonotopic place in the cochlea with least frequency-place distortion. The present study measured phoneme and sentence recognition scores with similar frequency-place manipulations in six Med-El Combi 40+ implant subjects. Stimulation locations were estimated using the Greenwood mapping function based on the estimated electrode insertion depth. Results from frequency-place compression and expansion with implants were similar to simulation results, especially for postlingually deafened subjects, despite the uncertainty in the actual stimulation sites of the auditory nerves. The present study shows that frequency-place mapping is an important factor in implant performance and an individual implant patient's map could be optimized with functional tests using frequency-place manipulations.

Acoustic Stimulation↗