PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Devarajan Thirumalai

Publications and source records attributed to Devarajan Thirumalai.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Orientational potentials extracted from protein structures improve native fold recognition.

We develop coarse-grained, distance- and orientation-dependent statistical potentials from the growing protein structural databases. For protein structural classes (alpha, beta, and alpha/beta), a substantial number of backbone-backbone and backbone-side-chain contacts stabilize the native folds. By taking into account the importance of backbone interactions with a virtual backbone interaction center as the 21st anisotropic site, we construct a 21 x 21 interaction scheme. The new potentials are studied using spherical harmonics analysis (SHA) and a smooth, continuous version is constructed using spherical harmonic synthesis (SHS). Our approach has the following advantages: (1) The smooth, continuous form of the resulting potentials is more realistic and presents significant advantages for computational simulations, and (2) with SHS, the potential values can be computed efficiently for arbitrary coordinates, requiring only the knowledge of a few spherical harmonic coefficients. The performance of the new orientation-dependent potentials was tested using a standard database of decoy structures. The results show that the ability of the new orientation-dependent potentials to recognize native protein folds from a set of decoy structures is strongly enhanced by the inclusion of anisotropic backbone interaction centers. The anisotropic potentials can be used to develop realistic coarse-grained simulations of proteins, with direct applications to protein design, folding, and aggregation.

Amino Acids↗

The dominant interaction between peptide and urea is electrostatic in nature: a molecular dynamics simulation study.

The conformational equilibrium of a blocked valine peptide in water and aqueous urea solution is studied using molecular dynamics simulations. Pair correlation functions indicate enhanced concentration of urea near the peptide. Stronger hydrogen bonding of urea-peptide compared to water-peptide is observed with preference for helical conformation. The potential of mean force, computed using umbrella sampling, shows only small differences between urea and water solvation that are difficult to quantify. The changes in solvent structure around the peptide are explained by favorable electrostatic interactions (hydrogen bonds) of urea with the peptide backbone. There is no evidence for significant changes in hydrophobic interactions in the two conformations of the peptide in urea solution. Our simulations suggest that urea denatures proteins by preferentially forming hydrogen bonds to the peptide backbone, reducing the barrier for exposing protein residues to the solvent, and reaching the unfolded state.

Computer Simulation↗