Biomedical subjects

Devin L Jindrich

Publications and source records attributed to Devin L Jindrich.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Keyswitch orientation can reduce finger joint torques during tapping on a computer keyswitch.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of keyswitch orientation on joint torques. BACKGROUND: The fingertip produces primarily vertical forces during single-finger tapping on a computer keyswitch. However, horizontal force components within the sagittal plane of the finger could reduce net joint torques. METHOD: Eleven participants tapped on a keyswitch oriented in three directions: vertical, tilted 30 degrees such that when pressed it moved away from the user (similar to a positive-tilt keyboard), and tilted 30 degrees such that when pressed it moved toward the user (similar to a negative-tilt keyboard). Participants also tapped on a prototype cantilever keyswitch design in which the key cap moves along the arc of a bending beam gradually away from the user. Miniature electro-optical goniometers measured the finger posture, and a two-axis force sensor measured fingertip forces. RESULTS: Tapping on a keyswitch oriented such that it moves away from the user when pressed reduced net joint torques by 47% relative to tapping on a vertically orientated keyswitch and by 56% relative to tapping on a keyswitch oriented toward the user, whereas the cantilever design resulted in 14% decreases in net joint torque relative to the vertical orientation. CONCLUSION: Reductions of torques resulted from decreasing the moment arm of the fingertip force about the joints. APPLICATION: Keyboard design should incorporate keyswitch mechanism angles along with other postural and geometric constraints to reduce exposure of the finger joints and muscles to force during typing.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Finger joint coordination during tapping.

We investigated finger joint coordination during tapping by characterizing joint kinematics and torques in terms of muscle activation patterns and energy profiles. Six subjects tapped with their index finger on a computer keyswitch as if they were typing on the middle row of a keyboard. Fingertip force, keyswitch position, kinematics of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and the proximal and distal interphalangeal (IP) joints, and intramuscular electromyography of intrinsic and extrinsic finger muscles were measured simultaneously. Finger joint torques were calculated based on a closed-form Newton-Euler inverse dynamic model of the finger. During the keystroke, the MCP joint flexed and the IP joints extended before and throughout the loading phase of the contact period, creating a closing reciprocal motion of the finger joints. As the finger lifted, the MCP joint extended and the interphalangeal (IP) joints flexed, creating an opening reciprocal motion. Intrinsic finger muscle and extrinsic flexor activities both began after the initiation of the downward finger movement. The intrinsic finger muscle activity preceded both the IP joint extension and the onset of extrinsic muscle activity. Only extrinsic extensor activity was present as the finger was lifted. While both potential energy and kinetic energy are present and large enough to overcome the work necessary to press the keyswitch, the motor control strategies utilize the muscle forces and joint torques to ensure a successful keystroke.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

A hypothesis for the function of braking forces during running turns.

We examined the functional role of braking forces observed when humans execute turning maneuvers. Deceleration caused by braking forces contributes to changing the movement direction of the center of mass (COM) and maintaining constant velocity. We argue that braking forces also prevent over-rotation of the body about the vertical axis during maneuvers. We analyzed data from sidestep and crossover cuts at average initial running velocities of 3 m s(-1). Absent braking, lateral forces would result in body rotations 1.4-3 times the change in COM movement direction, causing the orientation of the body to be substantially mis-aligned with the direction of movement at the end of the step. A simple model based on the hypothesis that body rotation should match COM deflection can explain 70% of the variance in braking forces employed during running turns.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

PubMed2004

Effects of keyswitch design and finger posture on finger joint kinematics and dynamics during tapping on computer keyswitches.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of postural and keyswitch characteristics on musculoskeletal tissue loading during tapping on computer keyswitches. DESIGN: We hypothesized that joint torques, stiffness and work parameters differ across keyswitch designs and finger postures typical of those observed during computer keyboard typing. We experimentally measured joint kinematics and calculated joint torques while tapping on different keyswitches in different postures, and analyzed the data using mechanical impedance models. METHODS: Sixteen human subjects tapped with the index finger on computer keyswitches mounted on a sensor which measured vertical and horizontal forces. Miniature electro-optical goniometers mounted dorsally across each finger joint measured joint kinematics. Joint torques were calculated from endpoint forces and joint kinematics using an inverse dynamics algorithm. A linear spring-damper impedance model was fitted to joint torque, position, and velocity during the contact period of each tap. Subjects tapped in three postures approximating those employed during tapping on three rows of a computer keyboard, on four different keyswitches, resulting in 12 conditions. RESULTS: More extended finger posture was associated with greater joint torques, energies, and stiffnesses, despite minimal differences in endpoint forces across posture. Greater keyswitch make forces were associated with increased forces, joint torques and joint stiffnesses, however this relationship was not monotonic. CONCLUSIONS: Joint torques and stiffness parameters differed across keyswitch designs and finger postures. Estimates of joint impedance and work provided a unique perspective into finger dynamics. RELEVANCE: Determining the causes of work-related musculoskeletal disorders is facilitated by characterizing workplace task biomechanics, which can be linked to specific injury mechanisms.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Finger joint impedance during tapping on a computer keyswitch.

We studied the dynamic behavior of finger joints during the contact period of tapping on a computer keyswitch, to characterize and parameterize joint function with a lumped-parameter impedance model. We tested the hypothesis that the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and interphalangeal (IP) joints act similarly in terms of kinematics, torque, and energy production when tapping. Fifteen human subjects tapped with the index finger of the right hand on a computer keyswitch mounted on a two-axis force sensor, which measured forces in the vertical and sagittal planes. Miniature fiber-optic goniometers mounted across the dorsal side of each joint measured joint kinematics. Joint torques were calculated from endpoint forces and joint kinematics using an inverse dynamic algorithm. For each joint, a linear spring and damper model was fitted to joint torque, position, and velocity during the contact period of each tap (22 per subject on average). The spring-damper model could account for over 90% of the variance in torque when loading and unloading portions of the contact were separated, with model parameters comparable to those previously measured during isometric loading of the finger. The finger joints functioned differently, as illustrated by energy production during the contact period. During the loading phase of contact the MCP joint flexed and produced energy, whereas the proximal and distal IP joints extended and absorbed energy. These results suggest that the MCP joint does work on the interphalangeal joints as well as on the keyswitch.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Non-linear viscoelastic models predict fingertip pulp force-displacement characteristics during voluntary tapping.

We evaluated whether lumped-parameter non-linear viscoelastic models of human fingertip tissue can describe fingertip force-displacement characteristics during a range of rapid, dynamic tapping tasks. Eight human subjects tapped with their index finger on the surface of a rigid load cell while an optical system tracked fingertip position using an infra-red LED attached to the fingernail. Four different tapping conditions were tested: normal and high-speed taps with a relaxed hand, and normal and high-speed taps with the other fingers co-contracted. A non-linear viscoelastic model comprised of an instantaneous stiffness function and viscous relaxation function was capable of predicting fingertip tissue force response due to measured pulp compression under these four different loading conditions. The model could successfully reconstruct very rapid (less than 5 ms) force transients, and forces occurring over time periods greater than 100 ms, with errors of 10%. Model parameters varied by less than 20% over the four conditions, despite almost 3-fold differences in average forces and 38% differences in fingertip velocities. Energy dissipation by the fingertip averaged 81%, and varied little (<3%) across conditions, despite a 1. 5-fold range of energy input. The ability of a lumped-parameter model to describe fingertip force-displacement characteristics during a range of conditions contributes both to understanding the transmission of force through the fingertip to the musculoskeletal system and to predicting the stimulation of mechano-receptors located within the fingertip.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Dynamic stabilization of rapid hexapedal locomotion.

To stabilize locomotion, animals must generate forces appropriate to overcome the effects of perturbations and to maintain a desired speed or direction of movement. We studied the stabilizing mechanism employed by rapidly running insects by using a novel apparatus to perturb running cockroaches (Blaberus discoidalis). The apparatus used chemical propellants to accelerate a small projectile, generating reaction force impulses of less than 10 ms duration. The apparatus was mounted onto the thorax of the insect, oriented to propel the projectile laterally and loaded with propellant sufficient to cause a nearly tenfold increase in lateral velocity relative to maxima observed during unperturbed locomotion. Cockroaches were able to recover from these perturbations in 27+/-12 ms (mean +/- S.D., N=9) when running on a high-friction substratum. Lateral velocity began to decrease 13+/-5 ms (mean +/- S.D., N=11) following the start of a perturbation, a time comparable with the fastest reflexes measured in cockroaches. Cockroaches did not require step transitions to recover from lateral perturbations. Instead, they exhibited viscoelastic behavior in the lateral direction, with spring constants similar to those observed during unperturbed locomotion. The rapid onset of recovery from lateral perturbations supports the possibility that, during fast locomotion, intrinsic properties of the musculoskeletal system augment neural stabilization by reflexes.

Animals↗