PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Devorah Schwartz-Arad

Publications and source records attributed to Devorah Schwartz-Arad.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Effect of stress on information processing in the dental implant surgery setting.

OBJECTIVES: Dental implantation is a stressful experience, both physically and psychologically. The effect of anxiety on the patient's ability to process relevant information prior to a stressful clinical situation (implant insertion) was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 98 healthy patients, scheduled for implant insertion. Two different audio-tapes with relevant information regarding implant insertion were listened to immediately pre-operatively. Recognition questionnaires, consisting of 21 statements (correct and false information) were prepared, one for each tape. The dental anxiety scale (DAS), degree of state anxiety (SA), evaluation of pain expected during surgery, and extent to which patients understood the information provided were examined on 100 mm visual analogue scales. RESULTS: A significant positive correlation was found between patients' DAS and SA and between patients' expectation to experience pain during the surgical procedure. Certainty of understanding (CU) significantly contributed to the explanation of correctly classified statements (beta=-0.43, t=3.71, P<0.01). CU was positively related to SA and negatively to DAS. CONCLUSIONS: In a stressful pre-surgical situation, the ability to process relevant information may be severely impaired and should not be given to patients immediately before planned treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Success of dental implants placed in intraoral block bone grafts.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival and success of dental implants placed in alveolar bone following augmentation using intraoral block bone grafts. METHODS: A consecutive retrospective study was conducted on patients who had onlay bone grafts for vertical or horizontal augmentations followed by dental implantation from 1999 to 2001. Files of 50 healthy patients who received 129 implants in augmented sites were reviewed. Implant survival, radiologic implant success (marginal bone loss), and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Follow-up from time of implantation ranged from 6 to 67 months (mean: 24.3 +/- 11.2 months). Ranges of implant widths and lengths were 3.25 to 4.7 mm and 10 to 16 mm, respectively. The overall survival rate was 96.9% (four implants were removed). Marginal bone loss around implants ranged from 0 to 3.3 mm (average: 0.22 +/- 0.45 mm). Only 5% of the implants presented marginal bone loss > or =1.5 mm over the follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoral bone block graft surgery is a predictable operation for the use of dental implants. Implant placement in augmented areas presents high survival and radiologic success rates with minimal bone loss.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modern technique.

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment preformed using the traditional versus modern techniques. There were 110 patients who were treated by surgical endodontic treatment between 2000 and 2002 and evaluated from their dental charts. The surgical endodontic treatment was preformed using a traditional or modern technique. The traditional technique included root-end resection with a 45 degrees bevel angle, and retrograde preparation using a carbide round bur. The modern technique included root-end resection with minimal or no bevel, and retrograde preparation using ultrasonic retro-tips with the aid of a dental operating microscope. The retrograde filling material for both techniques was intermediate restorative material. There were 71 patients with 88 treated teeth that were compatible with the inclusion criteria. Complete healing rate for the teeth treated with the modern technique (91.1%) was significantly higher than that for teeth treated using the traditional technique (44.2%) (p < 0.0001). In the traditional technique a significant (p = 0.032) negative influence of the tooth type was found. Modern surgical endodontic treatment using operative microscope and ultrasonic tips significantly improves the outcome of the therapy compared to the traditional technique.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Posttraumatic dental implant placement in a patient with maple syrup urine disease.

Maple syrup urine disease (MSUD) is an inborn error of metabolism resulting from a defect in the oxidation of the branched-chain amino acids leucine, isoleucine, and valine. Patients present in early infancy with brain edema; delay in diagnosis and treatment is common and associated with residual neurologic damage, which includes alternating muscular hypotonia and hypertonia, dystonia, and seizures. These signs can result in trauma, especially to the anterior maxilla, which is the most traumatized region. In patients with MSUD, a fixed prosthesis is recommended because a removable one can be dangerous because of the risk of aspiration. Rehabilitation, using dental implants, is especially challenging in these patients because of the strong muscular forces of the tongue and lips. An implant-supported fixed prosthesis might provide an effective functional, esthetic, and predictable solution for patients with late-treated MSUD. The present report describes a 10-year follow-up of the successful, posttraumatic use of a dental implant to replace an anterior maxillary tooth in a patient with MSUD.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Long-term success of implants replacing a single molar.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term success and survival rates of implants replacing a single molar between two natural teeth and to evaluate the influence of implant characteristics on implant success. METHODS: The study was based on a consecutive cohort of 81 patients who received implants to replace a single molar between the years 1994 and 2004. Inclusion criteria for patients were having an implant replacing a molar between two natural teeth and follow-up data of at least 6 months. Data were recorded regarding the incidence of complications and success and survival rates of these implants. RESULTS: The range of follow-up was from 6 to 125 months (mean: 36 months). Smoking was reported by 18.5% of patients. The replacement of a mandibular molar was more frequent (87.7%), with 25.9% of the implants placed immediately after tooth extraction. Two implants were used to replace a single molar in seven patients (8.6%). The failure rate was 7.4% (six implants failed: three had broken necks, and three failed because of infection or bone loss). Complications included suppuration in 11.1% of implants and a pocket around the implant in two patients (2.5%). No relation was found among failure, complications, timing of implant placement, and smoking habits. CONCLUSION: A single implant can serve as a good long-term and predictable treatment modality to replace a single molar with low complication and failure rates.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Surgical success of intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation.

This article evaluates the surgical success of alveolar bone augmentation using intraoral block bone graft prior to dental implantation and measures the amount of bone accumulation using this technique. A consecutive retrospective study was conducted on patients who had onlay bone grafts from 1999 to 2001. Files of 56 healthy patients reporting 64 bone graft operations were reviewed. Medical history, smoking status, area of surgery, bone origin (donor sites) and complications were recorded. Panoramic and tomographic radiographs were measured for the vertical and horizontal bone addition and mesiodistal dimension of the graft. Graft exposure or/and graft removal were defined as failure; hematoma, swelling, inflammation, or temporary paresthesia were defined as complications. The average vertical addition was 5.6 mm measured from the bottom of the vertical lesion before bone grafting to the top of the graft. The average faciolingual addition was 3.8 mm. The mesiodistal graft length ranged from 4 mm to 67 mm (average 15.2 mm). According to our criteria, 56 (87.5%) of the 64 bone grafts were successful, 46 (71.9%) were totally uneventful, and 10 (15.6%) had complications. Smoking and diabetes were associated with a high rate of complications and graft failure. More complications were observed in the vertical than in the horizontal bone grafts. Intraoral bone block graft is a predictable operation with high success rates that provides faciolingual and vertical bone addition. Onlay bone grafting has a low rate of complications and failures. Intraoral bone graft should not be recommended for diabetic patients and smokers.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

The effect of cigarette smoking on dental implants and related surgery.

Cigarette smoking is still considered a common habit. Of smokers, increased plaque accumulation, higher incidence of gingivitis and periodontitis, higher rate of tooth loss, and increased resorption of the alveolar ridge have been found in the oral cavity. Cigarette smoking may adversely affect wound healing, and, thus, jeopardize the success of bone grafting and dental implantation. Bone grafts and sinus lift operations are both common and well-documented procedures before dental implant placement. Heat as well as toxic by-products of cigarette smoking, such as nicotine, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen cyanide, have been implicated as risk factors for impaired healing, and, thus, may affect the success and complications of those surgical procedures. An association among dental implants, grafting procedures (i.e., bone grafts, maxillary sinuses augmentation), and history of smoking has been reported. A higher degree of complication, or implant failure rates, were found in smokers with and without bone grafts. The relationship between cigarette smoking and implant-related surgical procedures, including the incidence of complications associated with these procedures, will be described and discussed based on relevant literature and results of our recent studies.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMed2005

Evaluation of long-term implant success.

Implant success criteria, regarding marginal bone loss and other parameters, were first suggested in 1986 and today are still frequently referred to as the gold standard for implant success. However, according to the recent abundance of data on marginal bone loss and a better understanding of bone and soft tissue behavior around the implant neck and body, these criteria are inaccurate for the wide variety of implant systems. The purpose of this article is to review some of the relevant literature regarding marginal bone loss and to propose guidelines for a novel approach to evaluate the long-term success of implants regarding marginal bone loss. Four hypothetical patterns of implant marginal bone loss after the first year are suggested: a low-rate marginal bone loss over the years (Albrektsson's pattern); low-rate marginal bone loss in the first few years followed by a rapid loss of bone support; high-rate marginal bone loss in the first few years followed by almost no bone loss; and continuous high-rate marginal bone loss leading to a complete loss of bone support.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMed2005

Intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for extensive reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges.

BACKGROUND: Endosseous implants require sufficient bone volume for complete bone coverage. Alveolar deficiency can prevent ideal implant placement. Local bone grafts are a convenient source of autogenous bone in alveolar reconstruction. The aim of this study was to describe a technique, and to evaluate the success of extensive bone reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges using only intraoral block bone grafts prior to dental implantation. METHODS: Files of 10 healthy patients with extensive bone reconstruction of the maxillary alveolar ridge using intraoral block bone graft operations were reviewed. Medical history, smoking status, bone origin (donor sites), number of bone blocks, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 10 extensive bone maxillary reconstructions, four were uneventful, two required additional bone augmentation at the time of dental implant placement, two had a minimal graft exposure, one had a minor adverse effect (temporary paresthesia), and one operation partially failed and required partial graft removal. CONCLUSION: Intraoral bone block grafting is a predictable operation with a high success rate for long-span augmentation, up to complete jaw augmentation/ extensive bone reconstruction of the maxillary alveolar ridge.

Alveolar Bone Loss↗
PubMed2005

A long-term study of implants supporting overdentures as a model for implant success.

BACKGROUND: Implant-supported overdentures have been a common treatment for edentulous patients for the past 20 years, achieving good clinical results. The purpose of this study was to examine survival and success rates of implants supporting overdentures in the maxilla and mandible and to examine the influence of factors related to patients, implant procedure, implant data, and follow-up period on implant success. METHODS: During a 10-year period (1990 to 2000), 285 implants were placed in 62 patients to support 69 overdentures (seven patients had overdentures in both jaws). Patients ranged in age from 45 to 85 years (mean 64.5 years). The files of 61 patients, including 277 implants supporting 68 overdentures (14 maxillary and 54 mandibular), had measurable radiographic post-exposure follow-up (range 6.63 to 110.93 months, mean 37.93 months) for cervical bone loss (CBL) measurements. Bone loss was measured by radiographic examination in which the mean number of exposed threads in mesial and distal sides of the implant was considered. Implants were rehabilitated by overdentures with bar (N = 52) or ball (N = 16) attachments. RESULTS: Implant survival rate was 96.1% (11/285 did not survive) and total 10-year cumulative survival rate was 95.4% (maxilla, 83.5%, mandible, 99.5%). The success rate was 70.4% (maxilla, 41.9%; mandible, 80.8%) when using Albrektsson et al. success criteria. A logistic regression analysis showed that the maxilla (P <0.0001) and a short follow-up period (up to 5 years) (P = 0.017) were the most influencing factors enhancing CBL. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Survival of implants supporting overdentures was very high; 2) implants supporting overdentures in the maxilla had greater CBL than in the mandible; and 3) new criteria of implant success should be considered.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Aesthetic versus surgical success of single dental implants: 1- to 9-year follow-up.

Anterior maxillary implantation is a challenging treatment. The authors examined the aesthetic and surgical success of a single dental implant in the anterior by studying 52 implants with a mean follow-up of 37.5 months. Marginal bone loss (MBL), aesthetic parameters, and examiners' satisfaction from the aesthetic outcome were examined. The total surgical survival and success rates as well as the average examiner's aesthetic satisfaction and success rates are presented. Implantation in the anterior has high surgical survival and success rates, as well as a considerably high aesthetic success rate. The high surgical success and survival rates cannot, however, predict aesthetic success.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Rehabilitation of an irradiated mandible after mandibular resection using implant/tooth-supported fixed prosthesis: a clinical report.

Patients undergoing mandibular resection often have facial asymmetry and cosmetic disfigurement, which include a retruded, deviated mandible, motor and sensory deficiencies, and abnormal intermaxillary relationship and occlusion. An implant-supported fixed prosthesis can be an optimal treatment modality. However, there is a problem in creating a repeatable, stable plane of occlusion and maxillomandibular relationship. This report describes the treatment sequence and considerations to rehabilitate a patient undergoing mandibular resection and radiotherapy with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Treatment options of untreatable traumatized anterior maxillary teeth for future use of dental implantation.

The anterior maxilla is the most traumatized region during childhood. Posttraumatic complications occasionally lead to tooth loss as well as the need for future implants. Unfortunately, it is contraindicated to place dental implants during childhood. A waiting period of approximately 8 to 10 years before completion of growth is required. For this patient to become a candidate for future dental implants, it is necessary to ensure the continuous growth and to preserve the dimensions of the alveolar process until growth has ceased from time of injury until joint maturation. To achieve these goals, it is essential to coordinate the treatment sequence at the time of trauma. After loss of a traumatized anterior permanent maxillary incisor in young adults, treatment options are limited: orthodontic closure of the gap and reshaping the adjacent teeth, or tooth extraction and maintaining the gap with a temporary restoration. Orthdontic space closure has limited indications and requires prosthetic restoration of at least 2 teeth. Extraction and temporary restoration will usually lead to bone augmentation before implantation. Other possible treatment options include orthodontic extrusion of the root remnant (in cases of untreatable root fracture or complicated crown-root fracture) and a temporary crown to serve the patient until the completion of growth and development, autogenous tooth transplantation, intentional extraction and immediate tooth replantation, distraction osteogenesis, and decoronation. Because general rules do not apply, individual treatment plans are necessary.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Post-traumatic use of dental implants to rehabilitate anterior maxillary teeth.

The treatment sequel of post-traumatic teeth for the use of dental implants in the anterior maxillary region to rehabilitate anterior maxillary missing teeth was evaluated. Files of 53 healthy patients reporting anterior dental trauma were reviewed. All patients had an anterior maxillary dental implant because of tooth loss after trauma. At initial examination, 18 patients (34%) had root canal treatment and an inflammatory lesion, 15 (28.3%) had a missing tooth on admission, 12 (22.6%) had a prior operation (i.e. root-end surgery or crown lengthening), 4 (7.5%) presented an ankylotic root, and 4 (7.5%) had a root remnant not suitable for rehabilitation, with no inflammatory periapical lesion. Treatment sequences and complications were recorded. Augmentation procedure (i.e. onlay bone graft or guided bone regeneration) was performed in 43 patients (81.1%), and 2 patients (3.8%) had orthodontic extrusion prior to tooth extraction and implantation. Implants were placed immediately in 25 patients (47.2%) and 4 (7.5%) had immediate loading at the time of implantation. Complications and postoperative incidents (fistula, inflammation, swelling hematoma, etc.) were observed in 24 patients (45.3%). There was no difference in complication and postoperative incident rates with regards to the implantation technique. Complications were found at the prosthetic phase in seven patients (13.2%; six fistula and one implant failure). When patients were divided into two groups, with and without an inflammatory lesion, a significantly lower complication and postoperative incident rate were found in the non-inflammatory group (P = 0.057). This study reaffirmed the necessity for scrupulous diagnosis of teeth and alveolar bone after a traumatic injury. Treatment is multidisciplinary, requiring surgical, orthodontic, endodontic, operative, and prosthetic compliance. A specially designed treatment plan for each patient is necessary. General rules do not apply.

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation↗
PubMed2004

The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival.

BACKGROUND: Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor has been performed successfully over the last decade. The ultimate goal of this procedure is to allow surviving implants to support a functional prosthesis. Surgical complications of the procedure are rarely reported and their impact on implant survival has been investigated even to a lesser extent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. METHODS: The study consisted of 70 patients who underwent 81 sinus graft procedures using the lateral wall approach from 1995 to 2000. A total of 212 screw-shaped implants were placed in the grafted sinuses and were restored by fixed prosthesis. Mean follow-up period for the implants was 43.6 months. Intra- and postoperative complications were thoroughly documented regarding clinical signs, times of occurrence, and treatment regimens. RESULTS: Perforation of the Schneiderian membrane was the major intraoperative complication, observed in 36 of the 81 sinuses (44%). Of the 70 patients, seven (10%) suffered from postoperative complications, specifically related to the sinus graft procedure, which included an uncommon cyst formation and an infection. Membrane perforations were strongly associated with the appearance of postoperative complications (specific and non-specific to the procedure) (P < 0.001). However, no association was found between membrane perforations or postoperative complications and implant survival. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative complications may lead to postoperative complications. Surgical complications did not significantly influence implant survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A radiographic evaluation of cervical bone loss associated with immediate and delayed implants placed for fixed restorations in edentulous jaws.

BACKGROUND: Placement of dental implants is considered a successful and predictable procedure. An important biological benefit is the preservation of bone height following implantation. The purpose of this study was to examine the cervical bone loss (CBL) and its correlation with implant characteristics and anatomic factors, 1 to 8 years post-implantation of immediate and delayed implants. METHODS: A total of 381 implants (144 immediate and 237 delayed) were placed in 44 edentulous patients (53 jaws) for fixed ceramometal restoration from 1989 to 1996. The mean mesial and distal cervical bone resorption of each implant was measured using panoramic radiographs, by an objective examiner using a computerized scanner before second stage surgery and 1 to 8 years (mean 3.5 years) follow-up. The length of the implant served as an internal standard. The examiner had no prior information on the examined implants. RESULTS: Total CBL was 0.78 +/- 1.22 mm. There was a significant difference (P = 0.049) between CBL of immediate implants compared to delayed ones. Implants > 13 mm showed a significantly (P < 0.001) lower CBL than shorter implants. Hydroxyapatite-coated implants had a higher CBL (P < 0.001) compared to commercially pure titanium implants (P < 0.001). The CBL of maxillary implants was higher than mandibular implants (P < 0.001). Step-wise multiple regression pr.obability tests demonstrated that implant location followed by coating, length, and timing of placement were the most important parameters for implant success (R2 = 0.102). CONCLUSION: Cervical bone loss around dental implants is influenced by location, coating, length, and implant timing.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Treatment options of untreatable traumatized anterior maxillary teeth for future use of dental implantation.

The anterior maxilla is the most traumatized region during childhood. Posttraumatic complications occasionally lead to tooth loss as well as the need for future implants. Unfortunately, it is contraindicated to place dental implants during childhood. A waiting period of approximately 8 to 10 years before completion of growth is required. For this patient to become a candidate for future dental implants, it is necessary to ensure the continuous growth and to preserve the dimensions of the alveolar process until growth has ceased from time of injury until joint maturation. To achieve these goals, it is essential to coordinate the treatment sequence at the time of trauma. After loss of a traumatized anterior permanent maxillary incisor in young adults, treatment options are limited: orthodontic closure of the gap and reshaping the adjacent teeth, or tooth extraction and maintaining the gap with a temporary restoration. Orthodontic space closure has limited indications and requires prosthetic restoration of at least 2 teeth. Extraction and temporary restoration will usually lead to bone augmentation before implantation. Other possible treatment options include orthodontic extrusion of the root remnant (in cases of untreatable root fracture or complicated crown-root fracture) and a temporary crown to serve the patient until the completion of growth and development, autogenous tooth transplantation, intentional extraction and immediate tooth replantation, distraction osteogenesis, and decoronation. Because general rules do not apply, individual treatment plans are necessary.

Adult↗