Biomedical subjects

Dhruv Ahuja

Publications and source records attributed to Dhruv Ahuja.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Assessment of temporomandibular joint space changes after orthognathic surgery in skeletal malocclusion patients: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To interpret postoperative changes in temporomandibular joint (TMJ) joint space dimensions and condylar position following orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal malocclusions, and to determine whether reported alterations represent clinically meaningful displacement or physiological adaptive remodeling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane Library was performed to assess pre- and postoperative TMJ changes using three-dimensional imaging. Joint spaces including anterior (AJS), superior (SJS), and posterior (PJS) and condylar morphology were evaluated. Methodological quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Due to methodological and clinical heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively with attention to malocclusion type and surgical movement. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies consisting 628 patients undergoing BSSO, Le Fort I osteotomy, vertical ramus osteotomy, or bimaxillary surgery were included. Most studies reported minor, adaptive postoperative changes in AJS, SJS, and PJS. Class II patients showed more consistent increases in AJS/SJS, whereas Class III patients demonstrated variable posterior or anterior remodelling depending on surgical movement. Volumetric analyses revealed region-specific adaptations without significant condylar displacement. Postoperative temporomandibular disorder symptoms were infrequent, and no consistent evidence supported detrimental TMJ effects attributable to surgery. CONCLUSION: Postoperative TMJ joint space changes after orthognathic surgery primarily represent physiological adaptive remodeling rather than pathological condylar displacement, with reported variability driven by malocclusion type, surgical movement, fixation method, and imaging protocol. Recognizing these predictable patterns is essential to prevent overinterpretation of postoperative imaging and to improve clinical assessment through standardized three-dimensional and long-term evaluation strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Comparative Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors vs Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors vs tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF) antagonists in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). METHODS: Using an administrative claims database, we identified patients with IBD who were new users of either JAK inhibitors or TNF antagonists between 2016 and 2023 and had insurance coverage for at least 1 year before and after treatment initiation. We compared the risk of infections (overall and serious infections requiring hospitalization), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) through stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards model accounting for disease characteristics, health care utilization, comorbidities, prior and concomitant medications, and competing risk of mortality. RESULTS: We included 856 patients treated with JAK inhibitors (age, 47 ± 17 years; 82% with ulcerative colitis [UC]) and 9422 patients treated with TNF antagonists (age, 45 ± 18 years; 44% with UC). JAK inhibitors were associated with higher risk of overall infections (incidence rate, 62.4 per 100 person-years [PY] vs 37.4 per 100 PY; hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-1.93), but not serious infections (4.9 vs 5.4; HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.66-1.44) compared with TNF antagonists. There was no difference in the risk of VTE (1.3 vs 1.2; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.28-1.57) and MACE (0.4 vs 0.7; HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.19-1.30). Findings were largely stable on subgroup analyses based on type of IBD, type of JAK inhibitors, age, prior biologic exposure, concomitant use of corticosteroids, and baseline risk of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In an observational study of patients with IBD, JAK inhibitors were not associated with an increased risk of serious infections, VTE, or MACE compared with TNF antagonists, although the overall risk of infections was higher.

Humans↗