Falsely low urinary albumin concentrations after prolonged frozen storage of urine samples.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Dick de Zeeuw.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Agents that interfere with the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) reduce proteinuria and afford renal protection. The combination of different measures that serve maximization of RAS blockade is thought to improve the antiproteinuric efficacy. The feasibility and the efficacy of such a combination strategy were studied in nondiabetic patients with residual proteinuria during previous RAS blockade by individual antiproteinuric titration. Previous medication was replaced by irbesartan 300 mg combined with a diuretic. Lisinopril was added in increasing doses until a maximal dose of 40 mg/d. Titration stopped when target proteinuria (< 1 g/d) was reached or further dose titration was not tolerated because of side effects. Residual proteinuria (median, 3.2 g/d; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 5.2 g/d) was significantly reduced with 55.6% (95% confidence interval, 16.0 to 73.2%; P < 0.02) on the maximal additional tolerated dose of lisinopril. The maximal dose of lisinopril was 10 mg in two of eight, 20 mg in two of eight, 30 mg in one of eight, and 40 mg in three of eight patients. At this dose, target proteinuria of < 1 g/d was reached in two of eight patients. The number of patients with adverse events during dose titration was five of eight patients: two had cough; two had hyperkalemia (> 5.5 mmol/L), one of whom had > 50% increase of serum creatinine; and one had dizziness. In conclusion, individual titration for maximal RAS blockade, entailing dose titration of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on top of high-dose angiotensin II antagonists with diuretic, induces further reduction of residual proteinuria. However, this occurs at the expense of adverse events. To further improve renoprotective treatment strategies, it is important to explore other modes of antiproteinuric intervention in patients with residual proteinuria during RAS blockade.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate urinary albumin excretion (UAE) and its relation with C-reactive protein (CRP) and the metabolic syndrome in the prediction of the development of type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data from the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End Stage Disease (PREVEND) study, an ongoing, community-based, prospective cohort study initiated in 1997 in the Netherlands. The initial cohort consisted of 8,592 subjects. After 4 years, 6,894 subjects participated in a follow-up survey. Subjects with diabetes at baseline or missing data on fasting glucose were excluded, leaving 5,654 subjects for analysis. The development of type 2 diabetes, defined as a fasting glucose > or = 7.0 mmol/l and/or the use of antidiabetic medication, was used as the outcome measure. UAE was calculated as the mean UAE from two consecutive 24-h urine collections. Logistic regression models were used, with the development of type 2 diabetes as the dependent variable. RESULTS: Of the 5,654 subjects for whom data were analyzed, 185 (3.3%) developed type 2 diabetes during a mean follow-up period of 4.2 years. UAE, CRP, and the presence of the metabolic syndrome at baseline were significantly associated with the incidence of type 2 diabetes (P < 0.001 for all variables). In a univariate model, the odds ratio (OR) for UAE was 1.59 (95% CI 1.42-1.79). In our full model, adjusted for age, sex, number of criteria of metabolic syndrome, and other known risk factors for the development of type 2 diabetes (including fasting insulin), the association between UAE and type 2 diabetes remained significant (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.25-1.88, P < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between UAE and CRP (P = 0.002). After CRP was stratified into tertiles, the ORs for the association between baseline UAE and the development of type 2 diabetes were 2.2 (1.47-3.3), 1.33 (0.96-1.84), and 1.04 (0.83-1.31) for the lowest to highest tertiles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: UAE predicts type 2 diabetes independent of the metabolic syndrome and other known risk markers of development of type 2 diabetes. The predictive value of UAE was modified by the level of CRP.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) reduce proteinuria and protect the kidney in proteinuric renal disease. During ACE-I therapy, circulating levels of angiotensin (1-7) [Ang (1-7)] are increased. As cardiac and renal protective effects of Ang (1-7) have been reported, we questioned whether Ang (1-7) contributes to the anti-proteinuric effects of ACE-I treatment. Therefore, we evaluated whether Ang (1-7) infusion reduces proteinuria in a rat model of adriamycin-induced renal disease. In addition, the effect of a selective Ang (1-7) blocker, [D-Ala7]-Ang (1-7) (A779), was investigated in rats treated with the ACE-I, lisinopril (LIS). Six weeks after induction of proteinuria, therapy was started in four different groups: control, Ang (1-7), LIS, and LIS+A779. After two weeks, the rats were sacrificed. Six weeks after injection of adriamycin, the rats had developed proteinuria of 323+/-40 mg/24 hours. The proteinuria remained stable in the control group and in the Ang (1-7) group, but was reduced in both LIS and LIS+A779-treated groups. Similarly, blood pressure (BP) was unchanged in the control and the Ang (1-7) groups, but reduced in both the LIS and the LIS+A779 groups. Plasma levels of Ang (1-7) were increased in the Ang (1-7) and in both LIS-treated groups. We conclude that systemic Ang (1-7) plays no major role in the anti-proteinuric and BPlowering effects of ACE-I in this rat model of adriamycin-induced nephrosis.
BACKGROUND: Microalbuminuria is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. We assessed whether therapeutic intervention aimed at lowering urinary albumin excretion would reduce cardiovascular events in microalbuminuric subjects (15 to 300 mg/24 hours). METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease (PREVEND) cohort (n=8592), 1439 subjects fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the PREVEND Intervention Trial (PREVEND IT). Of these subjects, 864 were randomized to fosinopril 20 mg or matching placebo and to pravastatin 40 mg or matching placebo. The mean follow-up was 46 months, and the primary end point was cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular morbidity. Mean age was 51+/-12 years; 65% of subjects were male, and 3.4% had a previous cardiovascular event. Mean cholesterol level was 5.8+/-1.0 mmol/L, mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 130+/-18/76+/-10 mm Hg, and median urinary albumin excretion was 22.8 (15.8 to 41.3) mg/24 hours. The primary end point occurred in 45 subjects (5.2%). Fosinopril reduced urinary albumin excretion by 26% (P<0.001). Subjects treated with fosinopril showed a 40% lower incidence of the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.60 [95% CI 0.33 to 1.10], P=0.098, log-rank). Pravastatin did not reduce urinary albumin excretion, and subjects treated with pravastatin showed a 13% lower incidence of the primary end point than subjects in the placebo group (0.87 [0.49 to 1.57], P=0.649, log-rank). CONCLUSIONS: In microalbuminuric subjects, treatment with fosinopril had a significant effect on urinary albumin excretion. In addition, fosinopril treatment was associated with a trend in reducing cardiovascular events. Treatment with pravastatin did not result in a significant reduction in urinary albumin excretion or cardiovascular events.
BACKGROUND: Albuminuria is an established risk marker for both cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Albuminuria can be reduced with drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). We questioned whether the short-term drug-induced change in albuminuria would predict the long-term cardioprotective efficacy of RAS intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from Reduction in Endpoints in Non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL), a double-blind, randomized trial in 1513 type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy, focusing on the relationship between the prespecified cardiovascular end point (composite) or hospitalization for heart failure and baseline or reduction in albuminuria. Patients with high baseline albuminuria (> or =3 g/g creatinine) had a 1.92-fold (95% CI, 1.54 to 2.38) higher risk for the cardiovascular end point and a 2.70-fold (95% CI, 1.94 to 3.75) higher risk for heart failure compared with patients with low albuminuria (<1.5 g/g). Among all available baseline risk markers, albuminuria was the strongest predictor of cardiovascular outcome. The association between albuminuria and cardiovascular outcome was driven by those patients who also had a renal event. Modeling of the initial 6-month change in risk parameters showed that albuminuria reduction was the only predictor for cardiovascular outcome: 18% reduction in cardiovascular risk for every 50% reduction in albuminuria and a 27% reduction in heart failure risk for every 50% reduction in albuminuria. CONCLUSIONS: Albuminuria is an important factor predicting cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Reducing albuminuria in the first 6 months appears to afford cardiovascular protection in these patients.
Low dietary sodium (LS) increases the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor therapy in patients and experimental models, but mechanisms underlying this enhanced efficacy are largely unknown. Because the benefits of ACE inhibition are mediated to a considerable extent by their effect on the vasculature, we studied whether low sodium alters the vascular effects of ACE inhibition. Baseline functional and morphological characteristics, and endothelium-dependent and -independent dilatory responses were studied in isolated perfused small intrarenal and mesenteric arteries obtained from control rats (CON), rats on LS, lisinopril-treated rats (CON-LIS), or rats treated with lisinopril during LS (LS-LIS). We found, first, that LS-LIS compared with CON-LIS enhances blood pressure reduction. Second, interlobar renal arteries had increased lumen diameter and reduced adrenergic contractility in CON-LIS compared with CON, without additional effects of LS. In contrast, mesenteric arteries were not altered in CON-LIS compared with CON, but became triggered for increased myogenic and adrenergic constriction in LS-LIS. Third, LS-LIS decreased acetylcholine (ACh)-induced vasodilation in both mesenteric and renal arteries compared with CON-LIS. During the latter condition, opposite prostaglandins are involved in the endothelial function of the two different vascular beds, i.e., increased involvement of contractile prostaglandins in ACh-induced vasodilatation in renal arteries, versus dilatory prostaglandins in mesenteric arteries. Whether cause or consequence of the enhanced blood pressure response, our data demonstrate a modifying effect of dietary sodium on vascular effects of ACE inhibition. These findings provide a rationale for further studies addressing the mechanism-of-actions of our therapies to find additional strategies to improve therapy response.
C-reactive protein (CRP) and microalbuminuria reflect intimately related components of the atherosclerotic disease process. Epidemiological studies found only modest associations between CRP and microalbuminuria. Blood pressure, one of the components of the metabolic syndrome in the general population, is the main determinant of microalbuminuria in diabetes and hypertension. We questioned whether CRP modifies the relationship of blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors with microalbuminuria in a cross-sectional study in 8592 inhabitants from Groningen, The Netherlands. The crude data showed an increase in the prevalence of microalbuminuria with increasing CRP quartiles (4.8, 9.6, 14.5, and 18.6%, P<0.0001). On stratification for cardiovascular risk factors, the data revealed a significant and positive interaction between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and quartiles of CRP with respect to the risk of microalbuminuria (Wald statistic 9.2, P=0.03). In subjects with a MAP <90 mm Hg, a nonsignificant trend in the association between CRP quartiles and microalbuminuria was found (prevalence: 3.9%, 5.8%, 6.6%, 8.7%; P=0.11). This trend was much steeper and significant in subjects with an MAP >90 mm Hg (prevalence: 6.7%, 13.6%, 20.4%, 25.1%; P<0.0001). Controlling for other risk factors in multivariate analyses, the positive interaction persisted (P=0.0004). No significant interactions between other risk factors and CRP with respect to the risk of microalbuminuria were encountered. Thus, CRP modifies the relation between blood pressure and microalbuminuria.
BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction is a strong predictor of mortality in chronic heart failure (CHF). Most patients with CHF have atherosclerotic vascular disease, and several authors have suggested that impaired renal function is only a marker of advanced atherosclerosis. We compared renal function in patients with ischemic and nonischemic CHF and examined associations with prognosis and extent of neurohormonal activation. METHODS: In a large survival study (1906 patients), patients with documented coronary artery disease (CAD, n = 995), were compared with patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC, n = 429). In a smaller substudy, plasma neurohormones were determined in 270 patients and 37 patients (CAD and IDC, respectively). All patients had advanced CHF (New York Heart Association functional class III-IV). At baseline, the mean patient age was 64 +/- 10 years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.26 +/- 0.08. The baseline glomerular filtration rate was calculated with the Cockcroft-Gault equation (GFRc). RESULTS: GFRc was a strong predictor for mortality in both groups on multivariate analysis. The relative risk was 3.04 for patients with IDC (P < or =.01, for the lowest quartile < or =53 mL/min), and the relative risk for patients with CAD was 1.81 (P =.01 for the lowest quartile < or =42 mL/min). Plasma neurohormones showed a relation with GFRc in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: GFRc is related to survival and plasma neurohormones in both patient groups. In patients with IDC, this association appears to be at least as strong as in patients with CAD.
Conventional risk factors associated with cardiovascular and renal complications of diabetes include hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and smoking. Recently, albuminuria has also emerged as an important risk factor, as it is independently associated with increased cardiovascular and renal risk. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) reduces both blood pressure (BP) and albuminuria, and induced cardiovascular and renal protection is associated with this albuminuria reduction, independent of BP reduction. Based on these results, optimal therapy for patients at risk for type 2 diabetic nephropathy should include BP reduction to <130/80 mm Hg, with the inclusion of a RAAS blocking agent (ie, an angiotensin II receptor blocker) to provide BP control and control of urinary albumin, which should be reduced to <500 mg/d.
C-reactive protein (CRP) and microalbuminuria (MA) have been identified as risk markers for cardiovascular disease (CVD). We questioned whether CRP and MA are similar markers of vascular disease in different regions of the vascular tree like the heart, kidneys and extremities or if they differ in their relationships with these vascular beds. Baseline levels of CRP and urinary albumin were measured in 6669 non-diabetic participants in the Prevention of Renal and Vascular ENdstage Disease (PREVEND) study, a Dutch cohort derived from the general population. We defined three domains of vascular disease; coronary heart disease (myocardial infarction or infarct pattern on the ECG), renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance <60 ml min(-1)) and peripheral artery disease (ankle brachial index <0.9 or lower limb revascularisation). The prevalence of an elevated CRP (27.7 vs. 17.9%) and MA (17.5 vs. 10.4%) were increased in subjects with vascular disease as compared with subjects without CVD. The prevalence of an elevated CRP was equal in subjects with either coronary heart disease, renal insufficiency or peripheral artery disease (28.4 vs. 29.5 vs. 26.0%, NS), whereas MA was most prevalent in subjects with coronary heart disease (22.5 vs. 12.8 vs. 14.9%, P<0.05). Using multivariate analyses, CRP was independently associated with all three domains of vascular disease, whereas MA was independently associated with coronary heart disease only. In addition, we found synergistic contributions of an elevated CRP and older age to the risk of vascular disease in all three domains. Thus, CRP and MA are risk markers for vascular disease, each showing a different risk profiling for different vascular beds.
OBJECTIVE: To identify telmisartan doses that are more effective than placebo and non-inferior to hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg, and are well tolerated, in lowering systolic blood pressure (SBP) in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 2-4-week single-blind placebo run-in was followed by randomization of 1039 patients (age 36-84 years) with ISH [seated SBP 150-179 mmHg and seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 90 mmHg] to once-daily double-blind treatment with telmisartan 20, 40 or 80 mg, HCTZ 12.5 mg, or placebo. The change in seated trough SBP after 6 weeks compared with baseline was the primary end point. Secondary end points were the percentage achieving the target fall in SBP and the change from baseline in seated trough DBP. Incidence and severity of adverse events and physical examination and laboratory parameters were monitored for the safety evaluation. RESULTS: Baseline demographics in telmisartan 20 mg (n = 206), 40 mg (n = 210), 80 mg (n = 207), HCTZ 12.5 mg (n = 205) and placebo (n = 211) treatment groups were comparable: (mean +/- SD) age, 63.0 +/- 10.9 years; SBP, 162.9 +/- 8.1 mmHg; and DBP 83.4 +/- 5.0 mmHg. No previous antihypertensive therapy had been received by 66% of the patients. Mean reductions in seated trough SBP (adjusted for baseline and country) were: telmisartan 20 mg, 15.6 mmHg (n = 204); 40 mg, 17.9 mmHg (n = 209); and 80 mg, 16.9 mmHg (n = 205), compared with placebo, 11.4 mmHg (n = 208), and HCTZ 12.5 mg, 15.7 mmHg (n = 204). The target fall in seated trough SBP (< or =140 mmHg or reduction by > or =20 mmHg) was achieved in 46.6% (telmisartan 20 mg), 51.7% (telmisartan 40 mg), 53.9% (telmisartan 80 mg), 27.4% (placebo) and 42.7% (HCTZ 12.5 mg); the response rate was significantly higher for telmisartan 80 mg than for HCTZ 12.5 mg (P = 0.03). All-causality adverse events occurred in 19.9, 17.6 and 20.3% receiving telmisartan 20, 40 and 80 mg, respectively; 20.9% receiving placebo and 22.0% receiving HCTZ 12.5 mg. No drug-related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: All doses of telmisartan (20-80 mg) were significantly superior to placebo in reducing SBP in patients with ISH and clinically comparable to HCTZ 12.5 mg. Tolerability of telmisartan was similar to that of placebo.
OBJECTIVE: Concerns exist about heavily prescribing of new drugs when the evidence on hard outcomes is still limited. This has been the case for the newer classes of antihypertensives, especially in hypertensive patients without additional comorbidity. The association between comorbidity and trends in prescribing of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) was examined for the period 1996-2000. DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the Integrated Primary Care Information database, which contains medical records from more than 100 general practitioners in the Netherlands. Prevalent drug use in hypertensive patients was determined per calendar year. As initial treatment, the first antihypertensive drug prescribed within 1 year after diagnosis of hypertension was considered. Logistic regression was used to estimate the likelihood of receiving either ACE-I or ARBs. RESULTS: The overall prevalent ACE-I use remained stable (31%), but it increased from 33 to 41% in hypertensive patients with diabetes, heart failure, proteinuria and/or renal insufficiency. ARB use increased significantly from 2 to 12%; this trend did not differ between patients with or without specific comorbidities. Initial ACE-I use slightly decreased (from 29% to 24%), whereas initial ARB use significantly increased (from 4% to 12%). ACE-I were more likely to be the first treatment in patients with diabetes [odds ratio (OR)=3.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-4.9] or hypercholesterolemia (OR=1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8). ARBs were more likely to be the initial treatment in patients with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR=1.6; 1.2-2.3), diabetes (OR=2.1; 1.5-2.9) or hypercholesterolemia (OR=1.7; 1.2-2.4). CONCLUSIONS: The increased use of ACE-I is mostly restricted to hypertensive patients with comorbidities for which their use has been recommended. Trends in prescribing of ARBs are not related to relevant comorbidities.
OBJECTIVE: The heptapeptide angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] has been identified as a versatile, endogenous inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). As the therapeutic response to exogenous RAS inhibitors, such as AT1 receptor antagonists, is altered by changes in salt intake, we investigated the effect of a low, normal and high sodium diet on the antagonism of Ang II by Ang-(1-7). The role of angiotensin receptor subtypes and the endothelium was assessed. METHODS: Male Wistar rats received a normal sodium (0.3% NaCl), high sodium (2.0% NaCl) or low sodium (0.05% NaCl) diet for 10 days. Vascular responses were assessed ex vivo in thoracic aortic rings in the presence of the nitric oxide (NO) inhibitor N-monomethyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA) to avoid aspecific vasodilator effects of Ang-(1-7). RESULTS: After a normal or high salt diet, Ang-(1-7) significantly decreased maximal Ang II-induced vascular constrictions by 40-50%. After a low salt diet this non-competitive antagonism disappeared. The AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 and the Ang-(1-7) receptor antagonist A779 attenuated the effect of Ang-(1-7) found in rats fed with a normal or high sodium diet. Further, removal of endothelium and pretreatment with the prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor indomethacin (10 mol/l) abolished the non-competitive antagonism by Ang-(1-7). CONCLUSION: Ang-(1-7) elicits a specific, endothelium-dependent and non-competitive antagonism of Ang II, which involves AT2 and Ang-(1-7) receptors but is independent of NO production. This non-competitive antagonism of Ang-(1-7) is abolished by a low sodium intake in normotensive rats, suggesting that it serves as a negative feedback towards Ang II in response to an altered sodium intake.
BACKGROUND: We previously showed that the renal vasodilator response to a D1-like receptor agonist is blunted in conscious SHR compared with WKY rats. The mechanism of this impaired dopaminergic responsiveness in SHR is unclear. An altered balance between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the dopaminergic system may be involved. To determine the interaction between the RAAS and the dopaminergic system in the blunted D1-like responsiveness in SHR, we studied the renal vasodilator response to the D1-like receptor agonist fenoldopam before and after 7 days of pretreatment with the AT1-receptor antagonist (AT1-A) L158,809 in conscious SHR and WKY rats. METHODS: Effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) was measured by the clearance of I-hippuran. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured via an intraarterial catheter. RESULTS: Without pretreatment, MAP was reduced to comparable degrees by fenoldopam in WKY (-7 +/- 4%, ns) and SHR (-6 +/- 1%, P < 0.05). However, ERPF was significantly more increased (P < 0.006) by fenoldopam in WKY (+26 +/- 2%, P < 0.0001) than in SHR (+2 +/- 2%, ns). AT1-A treatment reduced MAP and increased ERPF and glomerular filtration rate significantly in both strains. Pretreatment with AT1-A significantly potentiated the fenoldopam-induced rise in ERPF in SHR, but not in WKY, without affecting the blood pressure responses in either strain. As a result, during pretreatment with an AT1-A, the rise in ERPF by fenoldopam was similar in both strains (SHR +25 +/- 2%, P < 0.0001; WKY +33 +/- 2%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the RAAS accounts for the blunted renal vasodilator response to a D1-like receptor agonist in SHR. A dysbalance between the dopaminergic system and the RAAS may be involved in the abnormal renal hemodynamic regulation in SHR.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Studied were the effects of myocardial infarction (MI) on mild renal function loss in unilateral nephrectomized (UnX) rats. UnX was performed, followed after 1 wk by a variable MI (UnX + MI; n = 24). Rats with only UnX (n = 15) or MI (n = 9) and double sham animals (CON, n = 15) served as controls. Renal outcome was measured by proteinuria and plasma creatinine. Focal glomerulosclerosis (FGS) incidence was evaluated by renal histology. Cardiac function and systolic BP were measured. A division into small and large infarcts after UnX was made a priori, resulting in two groups, one with a mild MI (<20%; n = 15) and one with a moderate MI (>20%; n = 9). Mild proteinuria up to 55.5 mg/d was observed in the UnX + mild MI group, whereas proteinuria rose significantly higher to 124.5 mg/d in the UnX + moderate MI group. Incidence of FGS was significantly increased in both UnX + MI groups compared with all other groups. The average MI size was 18%, 17%, and 25% in the MI, UnX + mild MI, and UnX + moderate MI group, respectively. LVP in both UnX + MI groups was correlated with proteinuria, indicative of a cardio-renal interaction. Clinically, these data imply that more patients are at risk for cardiovascular events and that after such an event, their chance of more renal function loss increases. Finding the underlying mechanism will enable improved protection for both kidneys and heart.
Renin angiotensin system inhibitor therapy is seldom offered to individuals who have diabetes and advanced chronic kidney disease because of safety concerns. In this post hoc, secondary analysis of the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) trial, angiotensin antagonism risk/benefit profile was assessed in 1513 individuals with type 2 diabetes and overt nephropathy. Incidence of ESRD, hospitalizations for heart failure, withdrawals for adverse events, and proteinuria during losartan or conventional treatment were compared within three tertiles of baseline serum creatinine concentration (highest, 2.1 to 3.6 mg/dl; middle, 1.6 to 2.0 mg/dl; lowest, 0.9 to 1.6 mg/dl). Losartan decreased the risk of ESRD by 24.6, 26.3, and 35.3% in highest, middle, and lowest tertiles, respectively. For every 100 patients with serum creatinine >2.0, 1.6 to 2.0, or <1.6 mg/dl, respectively, 4 yr of losartan therapy was estimated to save 18.9, 8.4, and 2.9 ESRD events and US$1,502,855, US$1,021,770, and US$528,591 costs for renal replacement therapy. Losartan also decreased the hospitalizations for heart failure by 50.2 and 45.1, in the highest and middle tertile, respectively. Withdrawals for adverse events other than heart failure were comparable between tertiles and treatment groups. Proteinuria decreased more on losartan than on placebo in all tertiles (highest, 24 versus -8%; middle, 16 versus -8%; lowest, 15 versus -10%). In proteinuric individuals with type 2 diabetes, losartan therapy reduced ESRD and hospitalizations for heart failure and was well tolerated at all levels of renal function. Angiotensin II antagonism is a suitable and well-tolerated treatment for individuals with type 2 diabetes even with GFR levels approaching renal replacement therapy.