PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Didier Noury

Publications and source records attributed to Didier Noury.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

A single solution for multiple organ procurement and preservation.

Two or three different solutions may be used to preserve thoracic and abdominal organs during a single procurement. The aim of this prospective, multi-center, noncomparative study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Celsior (study solution, solution S) as a flushing and cold storage solution for both thoracic and abdominal organs. Between August 1999 and July 2000, 72 consecutive multiple-organ procurements were performed using solution S as the sole solution for flushing out and cold-storing thoracic and abdominal grafts. Two hundred and sixty-four grafts were implanted into 245 recipients (131 kidneys, 9 kidney-pancreases, 69 livers, 34 hearts and 6 heart-lungs). The mean cold ischemia time was 21 h for kidneys (26%>24 h); 11 h 26 min for pancreases, 9 h 16 min for livers (23%>12 h), and 2 h 58 min for hearts and lungs. No cardiac failure or arrhythmia occurred on graft reperfusion. Fourteen percent of kidney recipients had delayed graft function. The mean serum creatinine level at 3 months was 123 +/- 41 micromol/l. All pancreas recipients were insulin-free at 3 months. Primary graft nonfunction occurred in one liver recipient. Complete hepatic artery thrombosis occurred in six liver recipients during the first month; four of these patients had a risk factor for thrombosis. All but three of the heart recipients were in sinus rhythm on day 1, and 65% were extubated on day 1. Inotropic drugs were necessary during the first 72 h in 25% of heart recipients. Twelve-month patient and graft survival rates were, respectively, 100% and 96% (kidney), 100% and 89% (pancreas), 88% and 83% (liver), 77.5% (heart) and 67% (heart-lung). These results suggest that Celsior, a ready-to-use solution, is safe and effective for multiple organ procurement and preservation.

Adolescent↗

[Factors associated with organ and tissue donation refusal. Prospective study in the West of France].

OBJECTIVE: The refusal to permit organ sampling is of around 30% and is one of the principle causes for the lack of sampling. This study was aimed at establishing the frequency of decisions taken with regard to donations and the factors associated with refusal. METHOD: A prospective study was conducted between April 2, 2000 and March 31, 2001 in hospitals authorised to perform organ sampling in the Western area of France. For each potential donor identified, a questionnaire was filled in after each interview. A logistical model was used in order to identify the independent and statistical factors associated with the refusal to allow sampling of an organ or tissue. RESULTS: Among the potentials donors, 265 brain dead donors, and 868 donors with ceased heart beats for tissue sampling, were included. The refusal rate was of respectively 32.8 and 45 %. Only 2.4% of potential donors carried cards identifying them as such. While living, the rate of refusal expressed by the two types of potential donors was similar (9%). The brain dead potential donors had more frequently expressed their consent for donation (20.7 vs. 9%). In the organ donors, the interviews were conducted by two persons in only 37.9% of cases, and in 2.4% of cases of potential tissue donors. In the potential organ donors, only those with a card identifying them as such and the hesitations of the family at the start of the interview were significantly associated with a lesser frequency of refusal. In potential tissue donors, the hesitations of the family reduced the refusal rate but age, religious beliefs, death etiology and the person conducting the interview increased it. CONCLUSION: The encouraging efforts made for the awareness of donation during a person's lifetime must continue and the use of a donor card extended. The development of co-ordination posters in the hospitals would enhance the development of binomial interviews with the families.

Adult↗