The Trivacan study.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗
Biomedical subjects
Diego Ripamonti
Publications and source records attributed to Diego Ripamonti.
Switch strategies in patients on effective HAART.
To provide the best possible long-term outcomes for patients, a number of strategies have been proposed based on the possibility to switch from a successful protease inhibitor (PI)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to another antiretroviral regimen. The available evidence from clinical trials in virologically controlled patients demonstrates that switching the PI-based HAART to a simplified regimen is safe. However, abacavir-based simplified therapies should be limited to patients with a known drug history who have not undergone prior mono or dual nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) therapy. Triple NRTI regimens that do not include a thymidine analogue have not been adequately tested so far and are not recommended. The switch strategy may enhance long-term adherence and induce a moderate reduction in cholesterol or amelioration of the total/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio that might be particularly relevant for patients presenting other risks for coronary heart disease. Simplified regimens are not associated with a clinically relevant improvement in the redistribution of body fat. Thus, if such a therapeutic strategy is considered, it should be preferably implemented to prevent or delay lipodystrophy. As the therapeutic scenario is significantly changing, in the future, convenience and metabolic alterations will be less of an issue in the decision to use a PI-switch strategy. Future switch strategies may involve NRTIs. Among NRTIs, thymidine analogues and particularly stavudine appear to be most associated with lipoatrophy. NRTI switches may also be beneficial in reducing the risk of lactate level elevation, mitochondrial toxicity, insufficient immunological response to HAART and of selecting class-inducing resistance mutations.
Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active↗
Similar adherence rates favor different virologic outcomes for patients treated with nonnucleoside analogues or protease inhibitors.
BACKGROUND: This prospective study verified the effect of adherence on the risk of virologic failure. METHODS: At enrollment in the study, a total of 543 patients who were following a steady (duration, >or=6 months) and effective (viral load, <50 human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] RNA copies/mL) regimen of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) completed a self-reported questionnaire derived from the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group Adherence Follow-up Questionnaire. Patients were followed up for the subsequent 6 months to document virologic failure, which was defined as 2 consecutive viral load measurements of >500 HIV RNA copies/mL. RESULTS: Only the type of treatment and the adherence rate at baseline were significantly associated with the virologic end point. Among patients who reported an adherence rate of 95%. When analysis was adjusted according to the type of regimen received, patients who were receiving protease inhibitor (PI)-based HAART and who had an adherence rate of up to 85% had a virologic failure rate of >20%, whereas, only for patients who were receiving nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based HAART and who had an adherence rate of 10%. For the comparison of NNRTI-treated patients and PI-treated patients with an adherence rate of 75%-95%, the odds ratio was 0.157 (95% confidence interval, 0.029-0.852). The number of pills and daily doses received correlated with the reported adherence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving NNRTIs report a higher rate of adherence than do patients receiving PIs. Adherence is significantly influenced by the number of pills and daily doses received. Low adherence is a major determinant of virologic failure; however, different therapies have different cutoff values for adherence that determine a significant increment of risk.
Adult↗
New times for an old disease: intracranial mass lesions caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 5 HIV-negative African immigrants.
BACKGROUND: The tuberculosis epidemic is still a global emergency, and its spread in the past 20 years has been fueled by the acquired immune deficiency syndrome pandemic and increasing drug resistance. International travel and migration may increase the incidence of tuberculosis in industrialized countries. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical charts of patients admitted to the infectious diseases unit of Ospedali Riuniti (Bergamo, Italy) to identify patients with intracranial mass lesions caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. RESULTS: During the past 6.5 years, 5 of 30 patients with a mass of infectious origin in the brain had tuberculous brain lesions diagnosed. All 5 were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative adults and African immigrants. No patient had concomitant meningitis, 1 had a concomitant pulmonary disease, and 3 subjects reported a past history of tuberculosis. At presentation, no patient had fever and 3 had seizures. Examination of cerebrospinal fluid revealed normal findings for 4 of 4 subjects, and neuroimaging showed multiple intracranial mass lesions in 4 of 5 patients. The diagnosis was definite for 2 subjects (based on analysis of brain specimens) and presumptive for 3 subjects (1 had concomitant pulmonary tuberculosis, and 2 had clinical response to therapy). Results of susceptibility tests for M. tuberculosis were available for 2 patients: both isolates were resistant to isoniazid, and 1 was also resistant to streptomycin. Duration of medical treatment ranged from 11 to 23 months, and 2 subjects underwent surgical procedures at the time of diagnosis. All 5 patients recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians in western countries should consider the possible role of tuberculosis in causing mass lesions in the brain, particularly in immigrants from regions where tuberculosis is endemic.
Adult↗
HIV-1 and hepatitis B virus: time for a re-think?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Acute Disease↗
Effect of prolonged discontinuation of successful antiretroviral therapy on CD4 T cells: a controlled, prospective trial.
OBJECTIVE: To compare continuous highly active antiretroviral therapy with a CD4 cell count-driven structured treatment interruption (STI) strategy. The primary end-point was the proportion of subjects maintaining CD4 cell count > 400 x 10 cells/l. Secondary end-points were to identify the dynamic and predictive variables of CD4 cell loss. METHODS: The BASTA study is a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Patients with CD4 cell counts > 800 x 10 cells/l were enrolled and the immunological threshold to resume therapy was set to the lower normal limit of CD4 cells for HIV-uninfected adults. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were randomized and followed for 64 weeks. At baseline, all had undetectable plasma HIV RNA and their mean CD4 cell count was 1077 x 10 cells/l. None of the patients showed a disease progression or any AIDS-defining event. At each time point, the proportion of subjects in the STI group that had a CD4 cell count < 400 x 10 cells/l was not statistically different from the control group. In all cases, the 95% confidence interval for this difference was smaller than +/-10%. However, 57% of patients with nadir CD4 cell count 200-350 x 10 cells/l reached a CD4 cell count < 400 x 10 cells/l. This was statistically different (P = 0.02) from the nearly 90% of patients with a nadir CD4 cell count 350-500 x 10 cells/l who maintained a CD4 cell count of > 400 x 10 cells/l. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged STI in patients with fully suppressed virus and marked immune reconstitution is generally safe. The main predictor of CD4 cell decline is the nadir CD4 cell count. Pulse therapy warrants further careful prospective evaluation to investigate virological and clinical outcomes over a very long period.
Adult↗
Hepatitis C infection increases the risk of the modification of first highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients.
We assessed predictors of discontinuation or change of the first regimen of highly active antiretroviral therapy in 465 HIV-infected adults, in the first year. A total of 187 patients modified their regimen: 45 discontinuing and 142 changing because of clinical/virological failure, intolerance/toxicity or non-adherence. Predictors of modification of the regimen were hepatitis C seropositivity, liver cirrhosis, higher baseline viral load, sex (women had a lower risk) and calendar year (lower risk staring in 2000).
AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
Outcome of 2 simplification strategies for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection.
In a prospective, open-label, 104-week study, patients who were infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (virus load, <50 copies/mL) and who were receiving protease inhibitor-based therapy were randomly assigned to continue treatment with a protease inhibitor or to replace it with abacavir or efavirenz. Treatment failure, defined as virological failure (virus load, >500 copies/microL) or any clinical or biochemical adverse event with a grade of >or=3 (on the basis of the World Health Organization [WHO] or American Heart Association [AHA] scales), was the primary outcome measurement. Failure rates were more frequent in the group treated with protease inhibitors (P<.01), and there were no significant differences in the rate of treatment failure between the group treated with efavirenz and the group treated with abacavir. Tolerability was better in the groups treated with abacavir or with efavirenz versus those treated with protease inhibitors. Fewer patients who received efavirenz experienced viral rebound. Among all groups, the mean increase in the CD4 cell count was 131 cells/microL (P<.001), with no significant difference between groups. This switching strategy maintains optimal levels of virological suppression and may improve lipid profiles in most patients.
Adult↗
Severe hepatotoxicity during combination antiretroviral treatment: incidence, liver histology, and outcome.
OBJECTIVES: To assess incidence, risk factors, histology, and outcome of severe hepatotoxicity (SH) during antiretroviral treatment (ART). METHODS: Seven hundred fifty-five HIV-seropositive patients consecutively prescribed new ART were selected. Liver function tests were assessed at baseline, after 1 month, and every 4 months thereafter. Liver biopsy was recommended in case of SH (i.e., increase in liver enzymes >/=10 times the upper limit of normal or 5 times baseline if markedly abnormal). RESULTS: Twenty-six cases of SH were observed with an incidence of 4.2% person-years. Liver failure (LF) was rarely seen (1.1 per 100 person-years). Liver damage was invariably observed in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Liver histology showed exacerbation of viral hepatitis in all 16 patients for whom a liver biopsy was available at the time of SH. A direct correlation was found between alanine aminotransferase increase and increase in CD4 T-cell count in patients with SH (r = 0.53, p <.001). Death occurred during follow-up in 7 of 26 (27%) patients, all of whom showed LF and baseline CD4+ count less than 200 cells/mm(3) (7/7 patients = 100% vs. 8/19 patients without LF; p <.01). Relapse of SH was observed after ART was recommenced in 7 of 17 (41%) patients. Five of these 7 patients did not show further SH relapse after treatment with interferon. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides estimates of SH and LF in a large population-based setting where hepatitis C virus coinfection is highly prevalent and provides indications that liver damage may be caused by immune reconstitution and related exacerbation of viral hepatitis. A strict follow-up for hepatotoxicity is mandatory when ART is initiated in patients with <200 CD4+ T cells/mm(3). Antihepatitis pre- or comedication could be an effective preventive or curative measure.
Adult↗
Modifications of health resource-use in Italy after the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Pharmaco-economic implications in a population-based setting.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) on health resource utilisation (HRU) and to estimate associated direct costs in a population based setting. DESIGN: Retrospective study of all patients in the Institute of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (Brescia, Northern Italy) during a 4 years period related to the prescription of HAART has been performed: from 1997 (before HAART) to 2000 (after substantial period of HAART prescription). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: HIV inpatient admissions (IA's) decreased from 506.8/1000 patients (pts) in 1997 to 246.3/1000 pts in the year 2000. Day care admissions (DCA's) also decreased from 1658.3/1000 pts to 942/1000 pts, while outpatient consultations (OC's) increased from 2046.9/1000 pts to 2590.6/1000 pts in the same years, respectively. By contrast, a relative increase of IA's and DCA's of patients whose serostatus was HIV-negative or unknown has been found. Cost of antiretroviral therapy increased by 2582 Euro (2272 US Dollars), while cost of HIV care (IA+DCA+OC) decreased by 1546 Euro (1360.4 US Dollars) per patient, resulting in a saving in direct cost equal to 60% of the increase in the expenditure for antiretroviral drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the shift of HIV care from inpatient to outpatient services that occurred after HAART had been introduced into clinical practice. Despite persisting clinical benefits, an increase in total direct cost for HIV pts has been seen for the first time during the HAART era in the year 2000, probably due to an over-prescription of HAART, according to actual Guideline for antiretroviral therapy use, to pts who were not at risk of clinical progression in the short term. Pharmacoeconomical surveillance of HAART is necessary while a favourable impact on the saving in cost is expected from the new treatment guidelines that suggest a relative delay in starting HAART.
Ambulatory Care↗
Salvage therapy with abacavir in HIV-1-infected patients with previously documented M184V mutation: a possibility of NRTI recycling.
We evaluated in an open-label, randomized, controlled, pilot trial if the re-emergence of previously selected resistant strains, harbouring M184V mutation, could be modulated by the use of different drug associations as components of the new antiretroviral regimens. In addition, we assessed the clinical relevance of this mutation on the management of heavily pretreated HIV-infected patients. The primary end-point of the study was the reselection of M184V mutation. Secondary end-points were the variation over time of HIV RNA plasma levels and CD4 cell counts and the progression of HIV disease. The primary population for efficacy analysis was the intention-to-treat exposed population. After a run-in phase consisting in a new treatment regimen excluding either lamivudine (3TC) or abacavir (ABC) so as to clear the previously documented M184V mutation, 18 patients with an HIV RNA plasma level greater than 10000 copies/ml were randomized to receive an antiretroviral drug regimen (at least three drugs) including either ABC or the association of ABC+3TC. All patients were naive to ABC. The M184V mutation reappeared in 1/9 patients in the ABC group and in 8/9 patients in the ABC+3TC group (P<0.003, 95% CI: 0.5-1). In the ABC group we observed a rapid decrement of viral load that was maintained throughout all the study period (P<0.05). On the contrary, in the ABC+3TC group, after a transient decrement at 2 months, a progressive increment towards baseline values was observed. The proportion of patients with a viral load reduction of at least 0.5 logs at 12 months was significantly higher in the ABC group: 8/9 patients vs 3/9 (P=0.05, 95% CI: 0.2-0.92). Similarly, from an immunological point-of-view, the increase at all time points (since randomization) in CD4 cell count was statistically significant in the ABC group (P<0.01), while no difference was observed in the ABC+3TC group. The possibility of a successful use of ABC in salvage regimens opens alternative therapeutic options for heavily pretreated patients with previously documented M184V mutation. Further studies should clarify whether this is true for other drugs of the nucleoside analogues class.
Adult↗
Once-a-day therapy for HIV infection: a controlled, randomized study in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients.
BACKGROUND: Complex antiretroviral regimens require optimal adherence to maintain long-lasting effectiveness. Simpler regimens, possibly with easy schedule and low pill burden, are needed for the long-term treatment of HIV infection. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of a once-a-day highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) compared with two other conventional twice-a-day regimens. METHODS: In a prospective and randomized study, antiretroviral-naive patients received either EFV+ddl+3TC (once-a-day regimen; OD), or EFV+Combivir (twice-a-day and low-pill burden regimen; BID-low) or NFV+Combivir (twice-a-day and high-pill burden regimen; BID-high). Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with viral load <50 copies/ml at week 52 of follow-up. Results were evaluated according to intention-to-treat and on-treatment analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients in each arm were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar in the three groups. The proportion of patients with viral load <50 copies/ml at week 52 were 74.4, 74.4 and 50.0% for OD group, BID-low group and BID-high group, respectively (P=0.02, ITT analysis). According to on-treatment analysis, the same figures were 88.9, 85.7 and 60% (P<0.02). Overall, 26 (25.5%) patients discontinued treatment for different reasons and immune recovery was similar in all study arms. CONCLUSIONS: Once-a-day HAART with ddl+3TC+EFV is a safe and effective alternative to twice-a-day regimens. Once-a-day therapy, with its simple daily schedule, may be proposed as one of the first choice treatments in HIV infection.
Adult↗
Strategic selective treatment in highly pre-treated HIV patients harbouring multiply resistant viruses.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Discordant immunological response in HIV-positive patients on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Anti-HIV Agents↗
Cluster of African trypanosomiasis in travelers to Tanzanian national parks.
Game parks in Tanzania have long been considered to be at low risk for African trypanosomiasis; however, nine cases of the disease associated with these parks were recently reported. The outbreak was detected through TropNetEurop, a sentinel surveillance network of clinical sites throughout Europe.
Adult↗
African sleeping sickness in tourists returning from Tanzania: the first 2 Italian cases from a small outbreak among European travelers.
A recent cluster of cases of African trypanosomiasis in humans (HAT) has been reported in tourists (most of whom were European) returning from Tanzania; we describe the first 2 patients (both of whom were Italian travelers) with HAT, who have been treated successfully. Because neither vaccine nor drug prophylaxis is currently recommended and/or available for persons traveling to areas of endemicity, physicians should be alerted about this uncommon but potentially life-threatening disease.
Adult↗
Once-a-day HAART: dream or reality?
A constant and nearly absolute adherence is required to ensure a successful long-lasting outcome of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Pill burden and regimen complexity are important contributors to adherence problems. The most significant treatment-related strategy to improve adherence may be the reduction in the number and frequency of pills to be taken every day. If one accepts the concept that once-daily therapy is likely to benefit patients, then the issue turns to whether we have adequate drugs to implement once-daily HAART. There is quite a difference between using a once-a-day drug within an HAART regimen and designing an HAART regimen that is dosed once daily. To date, studies that explore the feasibility of once-a-day HAART regimens are still few, mostly exploratory, not controlled, and performed in a limited number of patients. However, most data are consistent one with the other, and evidence on the utility of such regimens is growing. Once-daily therapy cannot be the answer to all the questions that complex and life-long therapies give rise to, but it could be a further choice that can meet the needs of many patients. The range of once-daily options is expanding rapidly, and the patients' request for easier therapies that are respectful of their lifestyle could be fulfilled.
Anti-HIV Agents↗
Factors associated with the failure of HIV-positive persons to return for scheduled medical visits.
PURPOSE: To assess in an HIV-positive cohort the cumulative probability of failing to return for scheduled medical visits and to address the factors associated with follow-up discontinuation. METHOD: This was a hospital-based cohort study conducted from January 1985 through September 1999. Out of 3,300 HIV-1 infected patients, 1,680 patients with CD4 count <500 cells/mL or with AIDS diagnosis were included in the analysis because they received scheduled medical visits for follow-up at our center. Baseline visit was the first visit when patients met the criteria for enrollment. The main outcome measure was failure to return for scheduled medical visits for at least 12 consecutive months. RESULTS: The probability of returning decreased rapidly in the first months after the baseline visit. After 1 year since enrollment, 25% of patients failed to return and after 2 years 34% of patients failed to return. Most patients who failed to return for visits (78%) discontinued their follow-up within 6 months since enrollment. In multivariate analysis, patients in the intravenous drug use (IDU) category were most likely to fail to return for scheduled appointments, as were patients with higher CD4 count (CD4 >50 cells/microL) or patients without AIDS diagnosis. Patients with shorter follow-up had a higher risk of failing to return (odds ratio [OR]: 0.12, 0.36, 0.45, and 0.74 for >36, 24-36, 12-24, and 6-12 months of follow-up respectively vs. <6 months). Patients who were enrolled in more recent years had a higher compliance to follow-up visits (OR: 0.33, 0.63, and 0.61 for > or = 1997, 1995-1996, and 1988-1994 vs. <1988). CONCLUSION: Patients in the IDU category, patients without AIDS diagnosis, or patients with higher CD4 counts are more likely to miss medical appointments and discontinue their follow-up. More recently enrolled patients have a lower risk of failing to return. It is possible that the recent and more effective anti-HIV treatment played a major role in increasing adherence to follow-up.
Adolescent↗