Bilateral thalamic infarction after reinfusion of DMSO-preserved autologous stem-cells.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Dietrich Braumann.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Unpredictable and severe diarrhea (NCI grade > or =3) remains a life-threatening adverse event in patients treated with irinotecan (CPT-11). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered budesonide for prevention of CPT-11-induced delayed diarrhea in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 56 patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving CPT-11 therapy (125 mg/m2 once weekly) were enrolled in this multicenter trial. Patients were randomly treated with 3 mg budesonide orally 3 times daily versus placebo. Detailed assessment of diarrhea by monitoring stool frequency, stool consistency and loperamide rescue medication was made by keeping a diary. RESULTS: Diarrhea, defined as number of stools >4 occurring on a single day during the study period, could be prevented in 58.3% of the budesonide-treated patients compared to 38.5% of the patients under placebo. Patients in the budesonide group had less episodes (0.7 vs. 2.2 episodes) and a considerably shorter total duration of diarrhea (1.8 vs. 4.2 days) episodes than patients in the placebo group. Loperamide use was more frequent in the placebo than in the budesonide arm (55.6 vs. 41.7%). Also, exposure to rescue medication of loperamide was higher for placebo (36.2 capsules) than for budesonide (24.9 capsules). A superior prevention of diarrhea was observed for budesonide compared to placebo in the first cycle (14 vs. 10; p = 0.257), with more failures observed in the placebo group (16 vs. 10). CONCLUSION: This double-blind randomized trial failed to show that budesonide has a significant benefit in preventing CPT-11-induced diarrhea. While a trend exists, further trials are warranted.
The aim of this study was to test and establish the accuracy and reliability of lymphoma classification in bone marrow trephines according to the new World Health Organization (WHO) classification by considering predominantly the morphology and immunophenotype. Therefore, we retrospectively compared lymphoma diagnoses, rendered exclusively on bone marrow trephines without knowledge of lymph node diagnosis in 124 patients, with the results of the reference centres that had reviewed lymph node (n = 90) or extranodal biopsies (n = 34). The overall concordance rate was higher than 85% and 91%, respectively, when patients with discordant malignancy grades were excluded. The concordance rate for low-grade B-cell lymphomas was 93% and for high-grade B-cell lymphomas 84%. The main reasons for discordant diagnoses were divergent immunophenotypes among low-grade B-cell lymphomas (6 out of 81, i.e. 7.4%) and discrepant malignancy grades within high-grade B-cell lymphomas (6 out of 31, i.e. 19.4%). No relationship between discordant diagnoses and chemotherapy given during the course of the disease with the site of biopsy (i.e. lymph nodes, extranodal sites) was noted. We conclude from our results that bone marrow trephines are a reliable tool, not only for establishing bone marrow infiltration, but also for the subtyping of lymphomas.