PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Dilip K Sengupta

Publications and source records attributed to Dilip K Sengupta.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Outcome of local bone versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft in the instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative study of clinical and radiologic outcome with independent, blinded observer. OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical and radiologic outcome of instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using local bone versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no published report of outcome of posterolateral spinal fusion using local bone alone for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six cases (male 26, female 50) of spinal stenosis, operated during 1996 and 1997 by the senior author, were reviewed. All the cases had decompression and posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation. Forty cases had only local bone graft obtained from decompression, morselized in a bone mill, and 36 cases had autogenous ICBG. Mean age was 60 years (range, 27-83 years). Fusion was performed at one level in 51 (67%), two levels in 16 (21%), three levels in 5 (7%), and four or more levels in 4 cases (5%). Minimum follow-up was 2-years (mean, 28 years; range, 24-72 months). An independent, blinded radiologist rated plain radiographs as fused, indeterminate, or nonunion. RESULTS: There was no difference in age, sex, and diagnosis between the two groups. Overall fusion rate was higher in the ICBG group (75%, 27 of 36) compared with the local bone group (65%, 26 of 40) but not significantly different (P = 0.391). Analyzed separately according to the number of fusion levels, the local bone group achieved similar fusion rate ( approximately 80%) in single-level fusion but a much smaller fusion rate in multilevel fusion (20% vs. 66%, P = 0.029) compared with the ICBG group. Mean improvement in the Oswestry Disability Inventory was 36% in the local bone group and 32% in the ICBG group. There was no significant difference in overall clinical outcome between the two groups. There was no correlation between fusion status and clinical outcome. Blood loss and hospital stay were significantly less in the local bone group; however, blood losswas more significantly related to the sum total number of segments undergoing decompression and fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Use of local bone graft alone achieved a similar fusion rate in single-level fusion but a much smaller fusion rate in multilevel fusion compared with the ICBG group. Local bone graft alone achieved a similar clinical outcome but less morbidity irrespective of number of fusion level.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Fulcrum assisted soft stabilization system: a new concept in the surgical treatment of degenerative low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: An experimental study on cadaver spine and spine model for biomechanical evaluation of a novel dynamic stabilization device. OBJECTIVES: First, to test the hypothesis that in dynamic stabilization of a lumbar spine using pedicle screws and ligament, addition of a fulcrum in front of the ligament can unload the disc. Second, to determine the relationship between the length and stiffness of the fulcrum and the ligament on disc unloading, lordosis and motion preservation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Activity related low back pain may be attributable to abnormal disc loading or abnormal movement. Spinal fusion addresses both the mechanisms, but it has limitations. Soft stabilization with Graf ligament restricts abnormal movement but increases the disc pressure. The Dynesys system uses a plastic cylinder around the ligament to prevent overloading the disc, but it restricts extension and loses lordosis. METHODS: A novel dynamic stabilization system (fulcrum assisted soft stabilization or FASS) was developed in which a flexible fulcrum was placed in front of a ligament between the pedicle screws. It was hypothesized that the fulcrum should transform the compressive force of a ligament behind into a distraction force in front and unload the disc. Three spine models were developed using wooden blocks for vertebral bodies and neoprene rubber of different hardness for disc. Their load-deformation character was tested and compared with that of the cadaver spine in a spine tester. The spine model with the closest load-deformation property to cadaver spine was then tested for the effect of a FASS system, consisting of high density polythene rod as fulcrums and rubber "O" rings as ligaments. The disc pressure in the spine models were recorded with strain gauge in the center. RESULTS: Application of ligaments alone across the pedicle screws increased the disc pressure, produced a lordosis, and reduced the range of motion. Application of fulcrums reduced the disc pressure and maintained the lordosis. Increasing the fulcrum length resulted in progressive unloading of the disc but increased stiffness of the motion segment. As the fulcrum length approximated the height of the motion segment, the lordosis was lost, and the disc was completely unloaded. Decreasing the lateral bending stiffness of the fulcrum had minimal effect on disc unloading and motion-segment stiffness. CONCLUSION: The novel FASS system can unload the disc, control the range of motion, and maintain lordosis. These parameters may be controlled with a suitable combination of ligament and fulcrum system. The study provides an indication toward the desirable biomechanical properties of the fulcrum and ligament for future development of a clinically applicable prototype.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Degenerative spondylolisthesis: review of current trends and controversies.

STUDY DESIGN: A literature-based review. OBJECTIVES: To review management and controversies and to present authors recommendations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is considerable controversy regarding indication for surgery, role for decompression alone, and decompression with fusion with or without instrumentation. METHODS: Review of English language medical literature. RESULTS: The condition may stabilize itself with the collapse of the disc spaces and osteophytes but may continue to progress in nearly a third of the cases. It may cause predominantly back pain due to segmental instability, or radicular pain/neurogenic claudication secondary to root entrapment or spinal stenosis. When conservative treatment fails, the mainstay of surgical treatment is decompressive laminectomy and fusion, with or without instrumentation. CONCLUSIONS: Decompression primarily relieves radicular symptoms and neurogenic claudication whereas fusion primarily relieves back pain by elimination of instability. The goals for instrumentation are to promote fusion and to correct deformity. Fusion has a better long-term outcome than decompression alone. There is evidence that instrumentation improves fusion rate but does not improve clinical outcome in a relatively short-term follow-up. However, outcome of pseudarthrosis cases deteriorates over time and solid fusion produces better long-term outcome. The benefit of instrumentation comes with a price of higher postoperative morbidity and complication rate. Bone morphogenetic proteins are being tried to increase the rate of fusion, without increasing the complication rate, but the cost is prohibitive. More recently, dynamic stabilization with instrumentation but without fusion has been introduced as an alternative treatment. The current trends of surgical treatment and controversies are discussed.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Neglected spinal injuries.

Neglected spinal injuries secondary to overlooked diagnosis may result in serious medical and medicolegal problems. These are not uncommon but are reported infrequently in the medical literature. I studied the incidence, causes, and consequences of neglected spinal injuries and recommendations for prevention and treatment by reviewing the literature found in a Medline search. Overlooked spinal injuries are most frequently seen in unconscious or intoxicated patients and in polytrauma patients with distracting remote injuries. These are 4.5 times more frequent in the cervical spine compared with the thoracolumbar spine. The most common cause is failure to obtain radiographs. Other causes include a failure to recognize the injury or the fact that the initial studies may fail to show the injuries. Use of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans as screening tests may be good ways to diagnose these injuries, but their use is limited by cost and availability. The most serious consequence of overlooked spinal injuries is progressive neural deficit. More frequently they result in progressive deformity and persistent pain requiring surgical intervention that most likely could have been avoidable, often with an unsatisfactory outcome. Untreated or inadequately treated spinal injuries with late presentation are more often seen in the developing world. Unfortunately, reports on these cases are published rarely. Their brief report in the current study is based on search of nonindexed medical journals using in Internet search engine and personal communications.

Cervical Vertebrae↗
PubMed2004

Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain.

Soft stabilization has an important role in the treatment of the degenerative lumbar spine. Fusion of one or two motion segments may not make a big difference in the total range of motion of the lumbar spine, but preserving flexibility of a motion segment may prevent adjacent segment disease and may permit disc replacement, even when facet joints need to be excised. If a favorable environment is created in the motion segment by unloading the disc and permitting near normal motion, the disc may be able to repair itself or may supplement the reparative potential of gene therapy. Although soft stabilization seems promising, one should take a cautious approach to any new implant system. An implant for fusion only has to serve a temporary stabilization until fusion has taken place; on the other hand, a soft stabilization system has to provide stability throughout its life. Implant loosening following fusion surgery is common in the presence of pseudarthrosis. After soft stabilization, the implant has to stay anchored to the bone despite allowing movement. This sounds like a daunting task. The flexibility of the implant system, however, should be able to protect it from loosening at the anchor point into the bone. Finally, the soft stabilization system is intended to load-share with the disc and the facet joint only partially and unloads the motion segment. Any mismatch between the kinematics of the implant system and the motion segment, in particular any discrepancy between their IAR, would result in the implant bearing unexpected load at certain ranges of motion. If that happens, it would guarantee an early implant failure or loosening. The need for strict bench testing in the laboratory, therefore, cannot be over-emphasized. The few soft stabilization systems that have had clinical applications so far have produced a clinical outcome comparable to that of fusion. No prospective randomized controlled trial has been reported yet, which is an essential requirement for practice of evidence-based medicine.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed2003

Lumbar spinal stenosis. Treatment strategies and indications for surgery.

Initially, all patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis should be treated conservatively. Rapid deterioration is unlikely. The majority of patients may either improve or remain stable over a long-term follow-up with nonoperative treatment. Surgery should be an elective decision by the patients who fail to improve after conservative treatment. Medical evaluation is mandatory in those elderly patients with frequent comorbidities. For central spinal stenosis, without significant grade I spondylolisthesis or deformity, decompression is the surgical treatment of choice. Iatrogenic instability must be avoided during decompression surgery by preserving the facet joint and the pars interarticularis. Limited decompression with laminotomy may be indicated for lateral canal stenosis. A limited decompression may avoid postoperative instability but is associated with more frequent neurologic sequelae. Postlaminectomy instability is uncommon, and too little decompression is a more frequent mistake than too much. Decompression is usually associated with good or excellent outcome in 80% of patients. Deterioration of initial post-operative improvement may occur over long-term follow-up. When spinal stenosis is associated with instability, degenerative spondylolisthesis, deformity, postoperative instability, or recurrent stenosis, fusion is often recommended. Instrumentation often improves the fusion rate but does not influence the clinical outcome. Generous decompression but selective fusion of the unstable segment only are preferable for degenerative spondylolisthesis and type I degenerative scoliosis with minimal rotation of the spine.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

Biomechanical evaluation of immediate stability with rectangular versus cylindrical interbody cages in stabilization of the lumbar spine.

BACKGROUND: Recent cadaver studies show stability against axial rotation with a cylindrical cage is marginally superior to a rectangular cage. The purpose of this biomechanical study in cadaver spine was to evaluate the stability of a new rectangular titanium cage design, which has teeth similar to the threads of cylindrical cages to engage the endplates. METHODS: Ten motion segments (five L2-3, five L4-5) were tested. From each cadaver spine, one motion segment was fixed with a pair of cylindrical cages (BAK, Sulzer Medica) and the other with paired rectangular cages (Rotafix, Corin Spinal). Each specimen was tested in an unconstrained state, after cage introduction and after additional posterior translaminar screw fixation. The range of motion (ROM) in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and rotation was tested in a materials testing machine, with +/- 5 Nm cyclical load over 10 sec per cycle; data from the third cycle was captured for analysis. RESULTS: ROM in all directions was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) with both types of cages. There was no significant difference in reduction of ROM in flexion-extension (p = 0.6) and rotation (p = 0.92) between the two cage groups, but stability in lateral bending was marginally superior with the rectangular cages (p = 0.11). Additional posterior fixation further reduced the ROM significantly (p < 0.05) in most directions in both cage groups, but did not show any difference between the cage groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in immediate stability in any direction between the threaded cylindrical cage and the new design of the rectangular cage with endplate teeth.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2002

Pelvic or lumbar fixation for the surgical management of scoliosis in duchenne muscular dystrophy.

STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study evaluates two groups of patients with scoliosis and Duchenne muscular dystrophy, treated with two different surgical stabilization methods. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether fixation to the sacropelvis is always necessary for adequate stabilization of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pelvic fixation is generally recommended for scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Recent studies describe a more selective approach toward lumbar or pelvic fixation. Pelvic fixation is reserved for larger curves and established pelvic tilt. METHODS: Fifty cases of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, operated in two different centers and followed up for a minimum of 3 years, were reviewed. In the first group (Oswestry), 31 patients had fixation to the pelvis, using standard Luque instrumentation and pelvic fixation. The Galveston technique was used in 9 cases and L-rod configuration in 22 cases. In the second group (Nottingham), 19 cases had fixation to L5 using pedicle screws in the lumbar spine and sublaminar wires in the thoracic spine. These cases were operated on early, usually shortly after becoming wheelchair dependent. RESULTS: In the pelvic fixation group, the mean age at the time of surgery was 14 years, and forced vital capacity was 44%. The mean Cobb angle and pelvic obliquity were 48 degrees and 19.8 degrees at the time of surgery, 16.7 degrees and 7.2 degrees immediately after surgery, and 22 degrees and 11.6 degrees at the final follow-up (mean 4.6 years), respectively. The mean blood loss was 4.1 L, and the average hospital stay was 17 days. There were five major complications, including a deep wound infection in one case, revision of instrumentation prominence at the proximal end in two cases, and loosening of pelvic fixation in two cases. In the lumbar fixation group, the mean age at the time of surgery was 11.7 years, and forced vital capacity was 58%. The mean Cobb angle and pelvic obliquity were 19.8 degrees and 9 degrees at the time of surgery, 3.2 degrees and 2.2 degrees immediately after surgery, and 5.2 degrees and 2.9 degrees at the final follow-up (mean 3.5 years), respectively. The mean estimated blood loss (3.3 L) and mean hospital stay (7.7 days) were much less compared with the pelvic fixation group. Pelvic obliquity was corrected and maintained below 10 degrees in all but two cases, who had an initial pelvic obliquity exceeding 20 degrees. One patient had instrumentation failure at the proximal end, and one had a deep wound infection. CONCLUSION: Lumbar fixation to L5 is adequate if the surgery is performed early, soon after becoming wheelchair bound, and with smaller curves and minimal pelvic obliquity. Use of pedicle screws in lumbar spine provides a solid foundation to maintain the correction over the period of relatively short life expectancy of these children. Pelvic fixation may be necessary in older children, who have larger curves and established pelvic obliquity. In the presence of deteriorating lung function, this is associated with a greater morbidity and higher complication rate.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization.

The apparent clinical success of spinal stabilization methods that restrict rather than abolish movement in relieving mechanical back pain indicates that the concept of the aetiology of back pain should be reviewed. Further understanding of how degeneration affects disc biomechanics, and an understanding of how current soft stabilization systems alters them, may allow us to define more precisely what are the essential requirements of an ideal soft stabilization system. It appears that abnormal patterns of loading rather than abnormal movement are the reason that disc degeneration causes back pain in some patients. Abnormal load transmission is the principal cause of pain in osteoarthritic joints, and both osteotomy and, indeed, joint replacement succeed because they alter the load transmission across the joint. This concept is supported by the fact that abnormal patterns of stress distribution measured across the disc correlate with painful discs on discography. Clinically, it is often noted that back pain is primarily related to position or posture, rather than movement of the lumbar spine. Clinical success after solid fusion is unpredictable because it does not necessarily prevent painful loading across the disc, and also it may interfere with maintenance of sagittal balance in varying postures. The Graf ligament restricted flexion, and was modestly successful. It unfortunately increased the load over the posterior annulus. The Dynesys system reduces movement both in flexion and extension, and appears to be more successful. However, often it also unloads the disc to a degree that is unpredictable. The authors believe that this unloading of the disc is an important feature of a flexible stabilization system. A new a design of a flexible stabilization system has recently been described in an in vitro study, which unloads the disc by introduction of a load-sharing fulcrum near the axis of movement together with an elastic posterior ligament. This design produces maximal unloading of the disc, whilst allowing a restricted range of movement, which serves the important purpose of allowing the patient to maintain sagittal balance in varying postures.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

Functional anatomy of the deer spine: an appropriate biomechanical model for the human spine?

The object of this study was to create a database for the biomechanical and certain functional anatomical parameters of the deer spine, for comparison with the human spine. This was done with a view toward using the deer spine as an alternative model for various biomechanical experiments, as it is difficult to procure nonembalmed, fresh human spine specimens. Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) and its human variant, Creutzfeld Jakob disease (CJD), prevent us from using bovine and sheep spine. There is a risk of transmission of disease through direct inoculation to the researcher working with infected bovine or sheep spine, and a theoretical possibility of transmission through the food chain if proper precautions for specimen disposal are not taken. We chose deer spine as an alternative for testing nonembalmed fresh human spine because, to date, there have been no reported cases of deer being carriers of prion diseases. Fifteen deer spine specimens were sectioned appropriately to obtain six functional spinal units for each level in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Each unit was tested in a Dartec materials testing machine (Dartec Ltd., Stourbridge, UK) under pure moments in three main anatomical planes. The range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), and stiffness parameters of the functional unit were determined in flexion-extension, right/left lateral bending, and axial rotation. The data obtained were compared with the corresponding human spine data in the literature. Deer spine specimens were also studied for bone mineral density (BMD) using a DEXA scan. The results revealed the overall ROM was greater for deer spine compared to the human spine in the upper thoracic region, but less compared to human spine in the lower lumbar spine region. The only comparable region for ROM was in the lower thoracic/upper lumbar region. The stiffness coefficients were also comparable in this region. The BMD was also comparable in the two species. We conclude that the lower thoracic/upper lumbar region in the deer spine can be used as a model for some human biomechanical experiments because of its biomechanical and material similarities to the human spine of the corresponding region.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed1997

Colonial opacity variations among the choleragenic vibrios.

Cultures of Vibrio cholerae 01, biotype El Tor, from the current epidemic of cholera in the Western Hemisphere, and of the new V. cholerae serogroup O139, from the current outbreak in India and Bangladesh, revealed marked colonial heterogeneity when received by the authors. By comparison with reference colony types, using a stereoscope and transmitted oblique illumination, colonies of approximately 10 different degrees of opacity could be distinguished. In contrast, strains freshly isolated from patients and rapidly and carefully preserved were more homogeneous although still differentiable by this technique. These (and older) observations prompted the questions: (1) why is a V. cholerae colony opaque or translucent? and (2) what benefit is it to the vibrios to vary their colonial appearance? The observed changes in colonial opacity, which are reversible, are sometimes (rarely) accompanied by changes in virulence for infant rabbits and, more frequently, by other phenotypic variations including the ability to produce poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate inclusion bodies on glycerol-containing medium, the degree of encapsulation in 0139, changes in outer-membrane proteins, alteration in lipopolysaccharide structure, changes in expression of glycolytic pathways, and differences in ability to survive under adverse conditions. Colonial variations in choleragenic vibrios are phenotypically multifactorial. The genetic mechanisms(s) underlying the observed phenotypic changes remain to be defined.

Americas↗