PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Dirk J Gouma

Publications and source records attributed to Dirk J Gouma.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Variables associated with positive findings at relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis.

OBJECTIVE: The decision whether and when to perform a relaparotomy in secondary peritonitis is largely subjective and based on professional experience. No existing scoring system aids in this decisional process. Our aim was to search for variables that could predict positive findings at relaparotomy. DESIGN: Retrospective, clinical study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred and nineteen patients of a consecutive series who underwent an emergency laparotomy for secondary peritonitis. INTERVENTIONS: None. Sequential prediction models were constructed by accumulation of clinical information in chronological order using logistic regression to determine the strength of association between predictive variables and positive findings at relaparotomy outcome. Positive findings were defined as persistent peritonitis or a new infectious focus at relaparotomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Relaparotomy (planned or on demand) for secondary peritonitis was performed in 117 of 219 patients (53%), yielding either positive (n=62) or negative (n=55) findings. Discriminatory power for positive findings at relaparotomy improved in the successive (multivariate) models: general patient characteristics (area under the curve, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.68), adding peritonitis-related variables (area under the curve, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.80), adding operation-related variables (area under the curve, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.81), and adding postoperative variables (area under the curve, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.92). Bootstrap resampling reduced the areas under the curve of the subsequent models only slightly. Sensitivity and specificity of the final model were 82% and 76%, respectively, at a total error rate of 16%. One preoperative predictor and five postoperative predictors significantly increased the need for relaparotomy: younger age, decreased hemoglobin levels, temperature>39 degrees C, lower Pao2/Fio2 ratio, increased heart rate, and increased sodium levels. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the causes of secondary peritonitis and findings at emergency laparotomy for peritonitis are poor indicators for whether patients will need a relaparotomy. Factors indicative of progressive or persistent organ failure during early postoperative follow-up are the best indicators for ongoing infection and associated positive findings at relaparotomy.

Female↗

Steatosis as a risk factor in liver surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To review present knowledge of the influence of hepatic steatosis in liver surgery as derived from experimental and clinical studies. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Hepatic steatosis is the most common chronic liver disease in the Western world, and it is associated with obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Fatty accumulation affects hepatocyte homeostasis and potentially impairs recovery of steatotic livers after resection. This is reflected clinically in increased mortality and morbidity after liver resection in patients with any grade of steatosis. Because of the epidemic increase of obesity, hepatic steatosis will play an even more significant role in liver surgery. METHODS: A literature review was performed using MEDLINE and key words related to experimental and clinical studies concerning steatosis. RESULTS: Experimental studies show the increased vulnerability of steatotic livers to various insults, attributed to underlying metabolic and pathologic derangements induced by fatty accumulation. In clinical studies, the severity of steatosis has an important impact on patient outcome and mortality. Even the mildest form of steatosis increases the risk of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic steatosis is a major factor determining patient outcome after surgery. Further research is needed to clarify the clinical relevance of all forms and severity grades of steatosis for patient outcome. Standardized grading and diagnostic methods need to be used in future clinical trials to be able to compare outcomes of different studies.

Fatty Liver↗

Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: No consensus exists whether ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease (CD) should be carried out by a laparoscopic or open approach. A systematic review was conducted to assess the evidence for short-term advantages of laparoscopic compared to open resection for ileocolic CD. METHODS: The literature search was conducted over the period 01/1991 to 02/2006. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs), clinical controlled trials and comparative studies comparing laparoscopic with open resection for ileocolic CD were included. A quality assessment was performed for all retrieved articles. The main outcome parameters were operating times, conversion rates, major and minor morbidity and hospital stays. RESULTS: 14 publications encompassing 729 patients were included - 2 were RCTs, 12 were non-RCTs of which 2 were case-matched studies. Although pooling data of operating times was statistically not possible, they were longer for the laparoscopic procedure in the individual studies ranging from 75 to 185 min. Conversions varied between 0 and 16.7%. Postoperative complications requiring reoperation or reported overall morbidity were not different (risk difference -0.01 and -0.05, respectively). Hospital stay after the laparoscopic procedure was 1.90 days shorter (95% CI: 0.83-2.97). CONCLUSION: There is evidence that laparoscopic ileocolic resection for CD is associated with shorter hospital stay compared to open ileocolic resection, while morbidity rates are equal and conversion rates are acceptable.

Chi-Square Distribution↗

Current role of portosystemic shunt surgery in the management of hepatic venous outflow obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) is a rare disorder that occurs predominantly due to a hypercoagulable state. The syndrome may result from hepatic vein obstruction, inferior vena cava obstruction or a combination of both and manifests with post-sinusoidal portal hypertension. The presentation may be fulminant with poor prognosis or as either acute, subacute or chronic forms with relatively better prognosis. Portosystemic shunt surgery (PSS) has thus far been the mainstay of treatment for HVOO. However, over the last decade, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and liver transplantation have emerged as viable options. This review aims to evaluate the available treatment options and the current relevance of PSS for the management of HVOO. METHODS: A literature review on investigations and treatment was performed using Medline and additional library searches. RESULTS: Portosystemic shunts form the mainstay of treatment for patients with subacute presentation (preserved liver function) with medically intractable ascites or recurrent variceal hemorrhage. Excellent results with 5-year survival of more than 90% have been reported from specialized centers. The main limitation for PSS is the reported perioperative mortality of 10-20% and a declining technical expertise for such surgery. Liver transplantation with disease-specific 5-year survival between 50 and 95% is presently the treatment of choice for patients with fulminant presentation, end-stage liver disease (ESLD), unshuntable anatomy or decompensation after PSS. TIPS may be preferable for sick patients with acute presentation with isolated hepatic vein thrombosis or as a temporizing measure for those with ESLD awaiting transplantation. The drawback of TIPS is late shunt dysfunction that occurs in more than 50% of patients at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Due to rarity of the disorder there is a lack of trials comparing the different treatment modalities. Hence, the current treatment recommendations are based on retrospective studies. In a select group of HVOO patients (subacute presentation with preserved liver function), PSS remains the treatment of choice with excellent long-term results.

Budd-Chiari Syndrome↗

Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial).

BACKGROUND: Recent developments in large bowel surgery are the introduction of laparoscopic surgery and the implementation of multimodal fast track recovery programs. Both focus on a faster recovery and shorter hospital stay. The randomized controlled multicenter LAFA-trial (LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care) was conceived to determine whether laparoscopic surgery, fast track perioperative care or a combination of both is to be preferred over open surgery with standard care in patients having segmental colectomy for malignant disease. METHODS/DESIGN: The LAFA-trial is a double blinded, multicenter trial with a 2 x 2 balanced factorial design. Patients eligible for segmental colectomy for malignant colorectal disease i.e. right and left colectomy and anterior resection will be randomized to either open or laparoscopic colectomy, and to either standard care or the fast track program. This factorial design produces four treatment groups; open colectomy with standard care (a), open colectomy with fast track program (b), laparoscopic colectomy with standard care (c), and laparoscopic surgery with fast track program (d). Primary outcome parameter is postoperative hospital length of stay including readmission within 30 days. Secondary outcome parameters are quality of life two and four weeks after surgery, overall hospital costs, morbidity, patient satisfaction and readmission rate. Based on a mean postoperative hospital stay of 9 +/- 2.5 days a group size of 400 patients (100 each arm) can reliably detect a minimum difference of 1 day between the four arms (alfa = 0.95, beta = 0.8). With 100 patients in each arm a difference of 10% in subscales of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire and social functioning can be detected. DISCUSSION: The LAFA-trial is a randomized controlled multicenter trial that will provide evidence on the merits of fast track perioperative care and laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients having segmental colectomy for malignant disease.

Clinical Protocols↗

Early procoagulant shift in the bronchoalveolar compartment of patients with secondary peritonitis.

BACKGROUND: In acute respiratory distress syndrome or pneumonia, a procoagulant shift is observed in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). The effect of a primarily extrapulmonary infection on coagulation and fibrinolysis in the pulmonary compartment is unclear. METHODS: In 35 patients, 87 bronchoalveolar lavages were performed on the day of operation for secondary peritonitis (day 0) and on days 2 and 3 after surgery. Two noninfectious control groups were included: subjects undergoing bronchoalveolar lavage after elective surgery (n=8) and those undergoing long-term mechanical ventilation (n=10). RESULTS: In BALF from patients with peritonitis, a tissue factor (TF)/factor VIIa-mediated activation of coagulation was shown (high levels of thrombin-antithrombin complexes). Levels of fibrinolysis activators decreased rapidly after day 0, whereas levels of inhibitors increased. The net effect was reduced fibrinolysis (plasminogen activator activity). The sequential comparison of plasma levels of TF pathway inhibitor showed higher levels in patients who died (28-day mortality; P<.001). Sequential levels of TF in BALF were higher in patients with low PaO2 : FiO2 ratios (<200; P=.039). Differences between patients and control subjects were more pronounced in BALF than in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary peritonitis induces an early activation of the coagulation and inhibition of fibrinolysis in the systemic and bronchoalveolar compartments, possibly via a compartmentalized response. This imbalance may be associated with reduced oxygen delivery and an adverse outcome in secondary peritonitis.

Aged↗

Obstructive jaundice due to hepatobiliary cystadenoma or cystadenocarcinoma.

Hepatobiliary cystadenomas (HBC) and cystadenocarcinomas are rare cystic lesions. Most patients with these lesions are asymptomatic, but presentation with obstructive jaundice may occur. The first patient presented with intermittent colicky pain and recurrent obstructive jaundice. Imaging studies revealed a polypoid lesion in the left hepatic duct. The second patient had recurrent jaundice and cholangitis. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) showed a cystic lesion at the confluence of the hepatic duct. In the third patient with intermittent jaundice and cholangitis, cholangioscopy revealed a papillomatous structure protruding into the left bile duct system. In the fourth patient with obstructive jaundice, CT-scan showed slight dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts and dilatation of the common bile duct of 3 cm. ERCP showed filling of a cystic lesion. All patients underwent partial liver resection, revealing HBC in the specimen. In the fifth patient presenting with obstructive jaundice, ultrasound examination showed a hyperechogenic cystic lesion centrally in the liver. The resection specimen revealed a hepatobiliary cystadenocarcinoma. HBC and cystadenocarcinoma may give rise to obstructive jaundice. Evaluation with cross-sectional imaging techniques is useful. ERCP is a useful tool to differentiate extraductal from intraductal obstruction.

Adult↗

Quality of life in newly diagnosed cancer patients waiting for surgery is seriously impaired.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Newly diagnosed cancer patients waiting for initial surgery experience a stressful time. Study objectives were (1) to examine the quality of life (QL) of these patients by comparing QL (a) between the four diagnostic groups included in this study, (b) to the QL of the general population, (2) to determine the factors that contribute most to patients' overall QL. METHODS: One hundred ninety six patients with lung, periampullary, oesophageal and cervical cancer completed questionnaires on generic QL (SF-36), overall QL, cancer-site specific symptoms (EORTC-modules), anxiety (STAI), health expectations, demographics and comorbidity. RESULTS: Between diagnostic groups no significant differences were found on generic QL. As compared to the general population, generic QL was impaired on all aspects except bodily pain. Using stepwise regression analysis, 46% of the variance in overall QL was explained with the SF-36 scales vitality (Beta = 0.43) and mental health (Beta = 0.23) being the most important predictors. CONCLUSIONS: The QL of these patients is seriously impaired. In this stage, not cancer-site specific aspects but fatigue and emotions colour their lives. It is recommended to keep the waiting period brief. In addition, suggestions are offered by which physicians might help their patients in alleviating the distress.

Adolescent↗

Improved outcome of resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor).

BACKGROUND: Treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumors) has changed in many aspects. A more extensive surgical approach, as proposed by Japanese surgeons, has been applied in our center over the last 5 years; it combines hilar resection with partial hepatectomy for most tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of a 15-year evolution in the surgical treatment of Klatskin tumors. METHODS: A total of 99 consecutive patients underwent resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma in three 5-year time periods: periods 1 (1988-1993; n=45), 2 (1993-1998; n=25), and 3 (1998-2003; n=29). Outcome was evaluated by assessment of completeness of resection, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and survival. RESULTS: The proportion of margin negative resections increased significantly from 13% in period 1 to 59% in period 3 (P<.05). Two-year survival increased significantly from 33%+/-7% and 39%+/-10% in periods 1 and 2 to 60%+/-11% in period 3 (P<.05). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were considerable but did not increase with this changed surgical strategy (68% and 10%, respectively, in period 3). Lymph node metastasis was, next to period of resection, also associated with survival in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Mainly in the last 5-year period (1998-2003), when the Japanese surgical approach was followed, more hilar resections were combined with partial liver resections that included segments 1 and 4, thus leading to more R0 resections. This, together with a decrease in lymph node metastases, resulted in improved survival without significantly affecting postoperative morbidity or mortality.

Adult↗

Minimally invasive 'step-up approach' versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotising pancreatitis (PANTER trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN13975868].

BACKGROUND: The initial treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis is conservative. Intervention is indicated in patients with (suspected) infected necrotizing pancreatitis. In the Netherlands, the standard intervention is necrosectomy by laparotomy followed by continuous postoperative lavage (CPL). In recent years several minimally invasive strategies have been introduced. So far, these strategies have never been compared in a randomised controlled trial. The PANTER study (PAncreatitis, Necrosectomy versus sTEp up appRoach) was conceived to yield the evidence needed for a considered policy decision. METHODS/DESIGN: 88 patients with (suspected) infected necrotizing pancreatitis will be randomly allocated to either group A) minimally invasive 'step-up approach' starting with drainage followed, if necessary, by videoscopic assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) or group B) maximal necrosectomy by laparotomy. Both procedures are followed by CPL. Patients will be recruited from 20 hospitals, including all Dutch university medical centres, over a 3-year period. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients suffering from postoperative major morbidity and mortality. Secondary endpoints are complications, new onset sepsis, length of hospital and intensive care stay, quality of life and total (direct and indirect) costs. To demonstrate that the 'step-up approach' can reduce the major morbidity and mortality rate from 45 to 16%, with 80% power at 5% alpha, a total sample size of 88 patients was calculated. DISCUSSION: The PANTER-study is a randomised controlled trial that will provide evidence on the merits of a minimally invasive 'step-up approach' in patients with (suspected) infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

Drainage↗

Clinical predictors of ongoing infection in secondary peritonitis: systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The decision to perform a relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis is based on "clinical judgment" with inherent variability among surgeons. Our objective was to review the literature on prognostic variables for ongoing abdominal infection. Predictive variables for positive findings at relaparotomy can generate more objective criteria to support the decision whether to perform a relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for studies assessing the prognostic value of clinical variables predicting outcome of relaparotomy or general outcome in patients with secondary peritonitis. Data on the methodologic quality of the study as well as statistical strength of predictors and validity of individual variables were extracted and scored. A cumulative score was calculated from these three scores, and the variables were ranked. RESULTS: A total of 37 of 197 retrieved articles were included for final assessment. The median score for methodologic quality of individual articles was 36 (range 19-54). After calculation of the combined scores, 76 individual variables (patient, peritonitis, surgery, clinical, and laboratory variables) were identified from which the top 10 were eventually selected. These variables were age, concomitant disease, upper gastrointestinal source of peritonitis, generalized peritonitis, elimination of the focus, bilirubin, creatinine, lactate, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and albumin. This set of variables proved to be moderately predictive for positive findings during relaparotomy in a retrospective cohort of 219 patients operated on for secondary peritonitis (receiver operator curve 0.75, with 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: This review generated a hierarchy (weighted ranking) of published variables that could play a role in the decision to perform a relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis. The top sixtile of ranked variables (10 variables) showed promising results in the discrimination between patients having a positive and negative relaparotomy when tested on a peritonitis patient database. This ranking of variables provides evidence for potential inclusion of variables in future predictive scores, although improvement in overall predictive strength of a set of variables in such a score is needed.

Humans↗

Laparoscopic-assisted versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for primary Crohn's disease in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized for laparoscopic-assisted or open surgery. Primary outcome parameter was postoperative quality of life (QoL) during 3 months of follow-up, measured by SF-36 and GIQLI questionnaire. Secondary parameters were operating time, morbidity, hospital stay, postoperative morphine requirement, pain, and costs. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were not different. Conversion rate was 10% (n=3). Median operating time was longer in laparoscopic compared with open surgery (115 versus 90 minutes; P<0.003). Hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group (5 versus 7 days; P=0.008). The number of patients with postoperative morbidity within the first 30 days differed between the laparoscopic and open group (10% versus 33%; P=0.028). There was no statistically significant difference in QoL between the groups during follow-up. Significant time effects were found on all scales of the SF-36 (P<0.001) and the GIQLI score (P<0.001). QoL declined in the first week, returned to baseline levels after 2 weeks, and was improved 4 weeks and 3 months after surgery. Median overall costs during the 3 months follow-up were significantly different: euro6412 for laparoscopic and euro8196 for open surgery (P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Although QoL measured by SF-36 and GIQLI questionnaires was not different for laparoscopic-assisted compared with the open ileocolic resection, morbidity, hospital stay, and costs were significantly lower.

Adolescent↗

Management of spontaneous haemorrhage and rupture of hepatocellular adenomas. A single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular adenomas (HCA) may present with spontaneous haemorrhage and rupture. The aim of this study was to assess management in 22 patients treated for haemorrhage and/or rupture of HCA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 1990 and July 2005, 22 female patients were diagnosed with acute haemorrhage and/or rupture of lesions highly suspicious of HCA. Preoperative imaging diagnostics and pathologic specimens were reviewed. RESULTS: Twelve haemodynamically stable and four unstable patients could be treated conservatively. One patient underwent acute partial liver resection, whereas four patients underwent laparotomy with initial packing of the liver. In one patient, selective embolisation of the left hepatic artery was performed. Fifteen patients eventually underwent resection after a mean time of 8 months after initial treatment. Six patients did not undergo resection and showed no complications or rebleeding after a mean follow-up of 24.6 months. Only in seven patients, histopathological examination showed HCA, and in one patient, HCA with focal nodular hyperplasia. CONCLUSION: HCA with haemorrhage and/or rupture does not necessarily require immediate liver resection. Conservative treatment is justified in stable patients. In case of an instable patient with or without hemoperitoneum, laparotomy with packing or selective embolisation can stop the bleeding.

Adenoma, Liver Cell↗

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with radiation and 5-fluorouracil: a first step to neoadjuvant treatment?

AIM OF THE STUDY: In two institutions, a retrospective analysis was performed on patients with histologically proven locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases. The aim of this analysis is to assess whether chemoradiotherapy provides survival benefit for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Forty-five patients from the Erasmus Medical Centre (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiotherapy and, 38 patients from the Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam (AMC) were offered the best supportive care. Radiotherapy consisted of 50 Gy external upper abdomen radiation in two courses, concomitant with intravenous 5-FU 25 mg/kg/ 24 h continuously on the first 4 days of each treatment course. RESULTS: The treatment protocol was completed in 38 of 45 patients (84%) without complications. Radiological response was evaluated in 38 patients. Ten patients (26%) showed a partial response, stable disease was seen in 6 (16%) patients and progressive disease in 22 (58%) patients. A second-look operation was performed in 8 of 10 patients (72%) showing a radiological response, in 3 patients the tumour could be resected. Median overall survival time for the Erasmus MC group (n = 45) was 9.8 months compared to 7.6 months when the best supportive care was given (AMC group, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Although overall survival remains poor, treatment with 5-FU and radiotherapy might benefit some patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Value of CT criteria in predicting survival in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic head carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Survival is often poor after resection of pancreatic tumors. We correlated the pre-operative CTs with survival to find criteria that have prognostic value. To establish the prognostic value of CT in patients with potentially resectable pancreatic head carcinoma. METHODS: In 71 consecutive patients with potentially resectable pancreatic head carcinoma, prognostic factors on CT were scored, for example, tumor size, peripancreatic infiltration, grades of vascular encasement, and local irresectability. All patients underwent surgical exploration. CT findings were compared with results of surgery and histopathology. Prognostic factors for resected and unresected tumors were analyzed using single and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Forty-one of 71 tumors were resected (24 radical). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of CT for surgical irresectability were 0.67, 0.63, and 0.57, respectively. For a non-radical resection, these were 0.62, 0.75, and 0.83, respectively. The median survival was 21 months for resectable tumors and 9.7 months for unresectable tumors. For resected tumors, a tumor diameter of > 3 cm (relative hazard 3.8) and CT signs of local unresectability showed a poor survival. The median survival of resected tumors <2 cm was nearly 30 months. CONCLUSION: CT signs of local irresectability and a tumor diameter of >3 cm predict a poor survival after resection.

Adult↗

Incidence and management of biliary leakage after hepaticojejunostomy.

This study analyzes the change in the management of biliary leakage after hepaticojejunostomy. Between 1993 and 2003 all patients (n = 1033) were studied with a hepaticojejunostomy as part of a pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 486), proximal bile duct resection (without liver resection) (n = 35), and biliodigestive bypass for malignant (n = 302) and benign (n = 210) disease. Biliary leakage was defined as the presence of bile-stained fluid (>50 mL) in the abdominal drain more than 24 hours after surgery, proven radiologically or at relaparotomy. The studied patients were divided into two equal periods to analyze the change in management. Overall, 24 of 1033 patients (2.3%) had biliary leakage. In multivariate analysis, a body mass index greater than 35 kg/m2 (P = .012), endoscopic biliary drainage (P = .044), and an anastomosis on the segmental bile ducts (P < .001) were independent predictors of leakage. Management in the first half of the study period (1993-1998) versus the second half (1999-2003) was maintenance of operatively placed drains (18% vs. 15%, respectively, P = 1.000), percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (18% vs. 69%, respectively, P = .012), surgical drainage (55% vs. 8%, respectively, P = .023), and re-hepaticojejunostomy (9% vs. 8%, respectively, P = 1.000). There was no mortality in the patients with biliary leakage. Leakage after a hepaticojejunostomy is a relatively rare complication without mortality and can safely be managed with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage.

Biliary Tract Diseases↗

Delayed massive hemorrhage after pancreatic and biliary surgery: embolization or surgery?

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the management of delayed massive hemorrhage (DMH) after major pancreatic and biliary surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Despite a decreased mortality rate for pancreatic and biliary surgery, DMH is still an important cause of postoperative mortality. The aim of the present study was to analyze the management of DMH after pancreatic and biliary surgery, and specifically to assess the role of embolization and surgical intervention. METHODS: The study group (SG) consisted of 1010 patients from 1994 to 2002 who underwent pancreatic or biliary surgery (cholecystectomy excluded). Patients from a previous study (1983-1993, n = 686) were used as a historical control group (HCG). RESULTS: The incidence of DMH (SG 2.3% vs. HCG 3.2%) declined somewhat but did not differ significantly between both periods. The number of patients with a septic complication (SG 74% vs. HCG 50%) and a sentinel bleed (SG 78% vs. HCG 100%) before the onset of DMH did not differ significantly. Embolization (SG 2 of 2 patients vs. HCG 0 of 2 patients) was not used frequently. Successful outcome after surgical intervention (SG 14 of 16 patients vs. HCG 8 of 14 patients) and the surgical procedures performed to obtain hemostasis were comparable and overall mortality (SG 22% vs. HCG 29%) was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of DMH declined somewhat from 3.2% to 2.3% over the past years. Most patients present with septic complications and a sentinel bleed before onset of DMH. Despite general acceptance of embolization in our unit, it was used infrequently in patients with DMH. Aggressive surgical intervention was the treatment of choice in patients with DMH after pancreatic or biliary surgery.

Adult↗

Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection: a systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the best available evidence on volume-outcome effect of pancreatic surgery by a systematic review of the existing data and to determine the impact of the ongoing plea for centralization in The Netherlands. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Centralization of pancreatic resection (PR) is still under debate. The reported impact of hospital volume on the mortality rate after PR varies. Since 1994, there has been a continuous plea for centralization of PR in The Netherlands, based on repetitive analysis of the volume-outcome effect. METHODS: A systematic search for studies comparing hospital mortality rates after PR between high- and low-volume hospitals was used. Studies were reviewed independently for design features, inclusion and exclusion criteria, cutoff values for high and low volume, and outcome. Primary outcome measure was hospital or 30-day mortality. Data were obtained from the Dutch nationwide registry on the outcome of PR from 1994 to 2004. Hospitals were divided into 4 volume categories based on the number of PRs performed per year. Interventions and their effect on mortality rates and centralization were analyzed. RESULTS: Twelve observational studies with a total of 19,688 patients were included. The studies were too heterogeneous to allow a meta-analysis; therefore, a qualitative analysis was performed. The relative risk of dying in a high-volume hospital compared with a low-volume hospital was between 0.07 and 0.76, and was inversely proportional to the volume cutoff values arbitrarily defined. In 5 evaluations within a decade, hospital mortality rates were between 13.8% and 16.5% in hospitals with less than 5 PRs per year, whereas hospital mortality rates were between 0% and 3.5% in hospitals with more than 24 PRs per year. Despite the repetitive plea for centralization, no effect was seen. During 2001, 2002, and 2003, 454 of 792 (57.3%) patients underwent surgery in hospitals with a volume of less than 10 PRs per year, compared with 280 of 428 (65.4%) patients between 1994 and 1996. CONCLUSIONS: The data on hospital volume and mortality after PR are too heterogeneous to perform a meta-analysis, but a systematic review shows convincing evidence of an inverse relation between hospital volume and mortality and enforces the plea for centralization. The 10-year lasting plea for centralization among the surgical community did not result in a reduction of the mortality rate after PR or change in the referral pattern in The Netherlands.

Chi-Square Distribution↗