Biomedical subjects

Dirk Schnapauff

Publications and source records attributed to Dirk Schnapauff.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Multislice computed tomography: angiographic emulation versus standard assessment for detection of coronary stenoses.

The present study investigated angiographic emulation of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) (catheter-like visualization) as an alternative approach of analyzing and visualizing findings in comparison with standard assessment. Thirty patients (120 coronary arteries) were randomly selected from 90 prospectively investigated patients with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent MSCT (16-slice scanner, 0.5 mm collimation, 400 ms rotation time) prior to conventional coronary angiography for comparison of both approaches. Sensitivity and specificity of angiographic emulation [81% (26/32) and 93% (82/88)] were not significantly different from those of standard assessment [88% (28/32) and 99% (87/88)], while the per-case analysis time was significantly shorter for angiographic emulation than for standard assessment (3.4 +/- 1.5 vs 7.0 +/- 2.5 min, P < 0.001). Both interventional and referring cardiologists preferred angiographic emulation over standard curved multiplanar reformations of MSCT coronary angiography for illustration, mainly because of improved overall lucidity and depiction of sidebranches (P < 0.001). In conclusion, angiographic emulation of MSCT reduces analysis time, yields a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of standard assessment, and is preferred by cardiologists for visualization of results.

Aged↗

PubMed2007

Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Reliable noninvasive detection of stenoses with multislice computed tomography (MSCT) is feasible. This study's aim was to analyze the agreement, correlation, and reliability of MSCT with conventional coronary angiography as the reference standard for quantification of coronary artery stenoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 118 significant (at least 50%) coronary artery stenoses with a reference vessel diameter of at least 1.5 mm in 62 patients were analyzed by MSCT using 16 detector rows (Aquilion, Toshiba, Otawara, Japan), multisegment reconstruction, and voxel sizes of 0.35x0.35x0.5 mm. The degree of stenosis on MSCT and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was measured by correlating the difference between the reference vessel diameter (average of 2 measurements directly proximal and distal to the stenosis) and the stenotic vessel diameter to the reference vessel diameter. RESULTS: Correlation between the percent diameter stenosis determined by MSCT (78.2+/-13.6%) and QCA (76.0+/-14.8%) was significant (P<0.001) but only moderately so (R=0.51). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no systematic under- or overestimation with MSCT but large limits of agreements (+/-27.6%). Also the limits of agreement for interobserver agreement (reliability) of MSCT data were considerably large (+/-24.8%). Among the 27 coronary artery stenoses with a reference diameter of at least 3.5 mm, there was improved correlation (R=0.80) and the limits of agreement between MSCT and QCA were significantly smaller (+/-17.3%, P<0.008). The agreement between MSCT and QCA was not significantly different for stenoses with no calcification or only calcium spots (+/-28.2%) as compared with those with moderate-or-severe calcifications (+/-27.3%; P=0.8). MSCT allowed correct classification of coronary stenoses into low-grade (below 75%) and high-grade stenoses (at least 75%), in 62% (73 of 118). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and reliability of coronary artery stenosis quantification with MSCT using isotropic voxel sizes and multisegment reconstruction is still too low to recommend routine clinical application because of rather low agreement, correlation, and reliability. Despite these limitations, the current results demonstrate the potential of MSCT for reliable and accurate quantification of coronary artery stenoses in the near future provided that further improvements in spatial and temporal resolution will be achieved.

Anatomy, Cross-Sectional↗

PubMed2006

Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare left ventricular (LV) function assessed with multislice computed tomography (MSCT), biplane cineventriculography (CVG), and transthoracic echocardiography (Echo), with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference standard. BACKGROUND: With the same data as acquired for noninvasive coronary angiography, MSCT enables registration of myocardial function. METHODS: A total of 88 patients (64 men and 24 women) underwent MSCT with 16 x 0.5 mm detector collimation, CVG, and MRI, whereas Echo was retrospectively analyzed in a subset of 30 patients. RESULTS: Regarding the ejection fraction, the agreement was significantly superior for MSCT than for CVG (+/- 10.2% vs. +/- 16.8%; p < 0.001) and Echo (+/- 11.0% vs. +/- 21.2%; p < 0.001). For the end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, the limits of agreement with CVG (p < 0.001) and Echo (p < 0.001 and p < 0.02, respectively) were also significantly larger than with MSCT. In comparison with MSCT, CVG significantly overestimated the end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (p < 0.001). Intraobserver analysis of MSCT yielded limits of agreement for ejection fraction (+/- 4.8%), end-diastolic volume (+/- 15.6 ml) and end-systolic volume (+/- 8.0 ml), and myocardial mass (+/- 18.2 g). The accuracy in identifying patients and myocardial segments with abnormal regional function was significantly higher with MSCT (84% and 95%) than with CVG (63% and 90%; p < 0.002 and p < 0.001), whereas MSCT and Echo were not significantly different in identifying patients with abnormal regional function. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the assessment of global and regional LV function with MSCT is more accurate than with CVG, whereas MSCT is superior to Echo for global function. This suggests that MSCT allows reliable evaluation of global and regional LV function.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Multislice computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the main candidates for noninvasive coronary angiography; however, multislice CT, unlike MRI, exposes patients to radiation and an iodinated intravenous contrast agent. OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of multislice CT and MRI for noninvasive detection of clinically significant coronary stenoses (> or =50%). DESIGN: Prospective intention-to-diagnose study. SETTING: Single tertiary referral center, Berlin, Germany. PATIENTS: 129 consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease. INTERVENTIONS: Multislice CT and MRI were both performed within a median of 1 day before conventional coronary angiography, which served as the reference standard. MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic performance of multislice CT and MRI. RESULTS: 129 patients completed the study. Altogether, 108 patients with 430 vessels could be examined with both multislice CT and MRI and were used for analysis. In the per-patient analysis, the sensitivity of multislice CT (92% [95% CI, 82% to 96%]) was significantly higher than that of MRI (74% [CI, 61% to 83%]; P = 0.013). The sensitivity for detecting clinically significant stenoses was 82% for multislice CT and 54% for MRI (P < 0.001). Specificity and negative predictive value of multislice CT and MRI in the per-vessel analysis were 90% versus 87% (P = 0.73) and 95% versus 90% (P = 0.032), respectively. The effective radiation dose used with multislice CT (mean, 12.3 mSv [SD, 1.4]) in a consecutive subgroup of 73 patients was not significantly different from that used with diagnostic cardiac catheterization (11.4 mSv [SD, 4.8]) (P = 0.169). Most patients (74%) indicated that they would prefer multislice CT for future diagnostic imaging (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study with 129 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients referred for conventional coronary angiography, multislice CT compares favorably with MRI for noninvasive detection of coronary stenoses.

Coronary Angiography↗

PubMed2006

Combination of free-breathing and breathhold steady-state free precession magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery stenoses.

PURPOSE: To analyze the incremental diagnostic value of a combination of two approaches (free-breathing and breathhold) vs. the sole free-breathing approach to coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) for detection of significant stenoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were consecutively included in this prospective trial. CMRA was performed on a 1.5-T MR scanner (Magnetom Sonata, Siemens) using a balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence during free-breathing (2.4 x 0.9 x 0.7 mm3). Breathholding acquisitions (3.0 x 1.5 x 0.7 mm3) were only performed in cases in which the quality of free-breathing CMRA precluded assessment. Patients with contraindications to CMRA, claustrophobia, or nonassessable images were not excluded from the assessment of diagnostic accuracy (intention-to-diagnose design). RESULTS: In 60% of all free-breathing coronary acquisitions the image quality was adequate for diagnostic assessment. For the remaining 40% of the cases, breathhold acquisitions were obtained. The sensitivity, specificity, nonassessable rate, and accuracy in identifying main coronary branches with significant stenoses using the combination of both breathing approaches and the free-breathing approach alone were 65% vs. 32%, 73% vs. 53%, 24% vs. 52%, and 71% vs. 46%, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this consecutive cohort of patients, the combination of free-breathing and breathhold CMRA significantly improved diagnostic accuracy. Nevertheless, even this combination did not reach accuracies sufficient for routine clinical application.

Cohort Studies↗

PubMed2006

Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for assessment of regional and global left ventricular myocardial function.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We sought to prospectively compare multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography (CT) for the assessment of regional and global left ventricular myocardial function with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients underwent CT with 16 x 0.5-mm detector collimation. Electrocardiogram-gated reconstructions were generated with multisegment reconstruction (using up to 4 segments correlated with the raw data of up to 4 heartbeats) and standard halfscan reconstruction. Steady-state free-precession cine MRI was acquired within 24 hours. RESULTS: More normal myocardial segments were identified correctly with multisegment (95%, 620/656) compared with halfscan reconstruction (88%, 582/656) of CT (P < 0.001). Also, the accuracy (92% [657/714] vs. 87% [620/714]) and rate of nondiagnostic segments (0% vs. 5% [33/714]) were significantly better when using multisegment reconstruction (P < 0.001). The image quality with multisegment reconstruction was significantly superior to that achieved with halfscan reconstruction (P < 0.001). In the assessment of global left ventricular function, multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of CT showed high correlations for all parameters with MRI, whereas Bland-Altman analysis revealed smaller limits of agreement for assessment of myocardial mass with multisegment reconstruction (P = 0.025), but no significant differences between both reconstruction techniques in the measurement of left ventricular volumes as compared with MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Multisegment reconstruction of 16-detector row CT improves image quality and assessment of regional wall motion compared with standard halfscan reconstruction.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of 2 reconstruction algorithms (multisegment and halfscan) for computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography in patients without beta-blocker medication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with 42 significant coronary stenoses in 136 main coronary branches were examined using a 16-slice CT scanner (Aquilion, Toshiba, Otawara, Japan). Twenty-seven patients (79%) had heart rates above 65 beats/min. RESULTS: Without exclusion of branches the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and rate of nonassessable segments with multisegment versus halfscan reconstruction were 88 versus 74%, 91 versus 71%, 90 versus 72%, and 2 versus 21% (P < 0.01), respectively. Multisegment reconstruction improved the average vessel length free of motion artifacts by 56% compared with halfscan reconstruction (P < 0.01). Image quality in terms of vessel continuity and visibility of side branches (P < 0.005) was significantly better using multisegment reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Multisegment reconstruction has superior diagnostic accuracy and image quality compared with halfscan reconstruction in patients with normal heart rates.

Adult↗