PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Djamel Messaad

Publications and source records attributed to Djamel Messaad.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Drug provocation tests in patients with a history suggesting an immediate drug hypersensitivity reaction.

BACKGROUND: Drug hypersensitivity reactions are common and can be life-threatening. Confirmation of the diagnosis should be rigorous and based on clinical history and a physical examination, possibly followed by skin tests and drug provocation tests. OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome of drug provocation tests in evaluating patients with histories suggesting drug allergy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of clinic case series. SETTING: The department for drug allergy at a university hospital. PATIENTS: 898 consecutive patients with suspected immediate drug allergy referred to the clinic between September 1996 and August 2001. Patients with severe skin reactions and those with positive results on skin tests for beta-lactams were excluded. INTERVENTION: Single-blinded administration of increasing doses of the suspected drug, up to the usual daily dose, under strict hospital surveillance. RESULTS: 1372 drug provocation tests were performed using various drugs, including beta-lactams (30.3%), aspirin (14.5%), other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (11.7%), paracetamol (8.9%), macrolides (7.4%), and quinolones (2.4%). There were 241 (17.6%) positive drug provocation test results. Drug provocation reproduced the same symptoms, albeit milder and of a shorter duration, in the following patients: 13 (5.4%) with a history of anaphylactic shock, 17 (7.0%) with a history of anaphylaxis without shock, 10 (4.1%) with a history of laryngeal edema, 19 (7.9%) with a history of bronchospasm, 160 (66.4%) with a history of urticaria, and 22 (9.1%) with a history of maculopapular eruption. All adverse reactions were completely reversed by prednisolone, H(1)-antihistamines, and epinephrine as needed. LIMITATIONS: Falsely negative results on drug provocation tests may have occurred because of loss of sensitization, rare cofactors not included in the diagnostic procedure, and tolerance induction during provocation. CONCLUSIONS: Drug provocation tests in individuals with suspected drug allergy performed in carefully controlled settings can confirm drug hypersensitivity.

Adolescent↗

[Hypersensitivity to insulin].

GREAT PROGRESS: The use of purified insulins obtained by genetics has dramatically lowered the frequency of insulin hypersensitivity. This frequency has decreased from 1 to 55% with non purified insulins and to 0.1 to 2% with newly generated insulins. DIAGNOSTIC MEASURES: The anamnesis should clarify the allergic background of the patient, previous treatments with insulin, their duration of use and any eventual reactions. Examination of the lesions must assess the type (papule, eczema, purpura), the localization and extent. The second step skin tests, when negative, eliminate the responsibility of the insulin tested. They also participate in the search for cross-reactions between the various insulines. Their positivity is not always synonymous of hypersensitivity. STRATEGY TO BE APPLIED: In the case of localised cutaneous reactions, spontaneous regression is generally observed, the association of an oral antihistamine and/or the fractioning of the dose and its injection on several different sites often leads to the disappearance of these reactions. If the reactions persist, topical or oral corticosteroids of short duration can be useful. Finally, the switch to another insulin or even a tolerance induction with the least skin test reactive insulin as a last resource. The most severe systemic reactions are an indication for tolerance induction.

Animals↗