PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Dominic P Behan

Publications and source records attributed to Dominic P Behan.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Langerhans cells release prostaglandin D2 in response to nicotinic acid.

Nicotinic acid, used for atherosclerosis treatment, has an adverse effect of skin flushing. The flushing mechanism, thought to be caused by the release of prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2)), is not well understood. We aimed to identify which cells mediate the flushing effect. Nicotinic acid receptor (GPR109A) gene expression was assessed in various tissues and cell lines. Cells expressing GPR109A mRNA were further assayed for PGD(2) release in response to nicotinic acid. Of all samples, only skin was able to release PGD(2) upon stimulation with nicotinic acid. The responsive cells were localized to the epidermis, and immunocytochemical studies revealed the presence of GPR109A on epidermal Langerhans cells. CD34+ cells isolated from human blood and differentiated into Langerhans cells (hLC-L) also showed GPR109A expression. IFNgamma treatment increased both mRNA and plasma membrane expression of GPR109A. IFNgamma-stimulated hLC-Ls released PGD(2) in response to nicotinic acid in a dose-dependant manner (effector concentration for half-maximum response=1.2 mM+/-0.7). Acifran, a structurally distinct GPR109A ligand, also increased PGD(2) release, whereas isonicotinic acid, a nicotinic acid analog with low affinity for GPR109A, had no effect. These results suggest that nicotinic acid mediates its flushing side effect by interacting with GPR109A on skin Langerhans cells, resulting in release of PGD(2).

Animals↗

Neurotransmission- and cellular stress-related gene expression associated with prepulse inhibition in mice.

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) is a cross-species measure of sensorimotor gating. PPI deficits have been associated with a number of neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia. Differential PPI has been demonstrated also across various inbred mouse strains; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying these differences in sensorimotor gating remain unclear. Here, we sought to identify gene expression in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of mice associated with PPI using a laser microdissection and microarray analysis-based approach. C57BL/6 mouse substrains were used for the study as they have dramatically different PPI. Transcriptional analysis of closely related substrains was predicted to reduce the detection of genetic variation incidental to the phenotype. Microarray analysis comparing the mPFC of C57BL/6J to C57BL/6NHsd mice revealed neurotransmission- and cellular stress-related transcriptional responses associated with lower PPI. Down-regulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5, phospholipase C, and inositol monophosphatase 1 gene expression suggest altered phosphoinositide signaling, while decreased expression of a gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA)A receptor subunit implies changes in GABAergic signaling. Genes involved in neuronal excitation and protection were also differentially expressed, including up-regulation of five immediate early genes and anti-apoptotic/survival factors as Bcl2-associated athanogene 3 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor. These data support previous findings of genetic influences on PPI, and provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms regulating sensorimotor gating.

Animals↗

Orphan GPCR target validation.

Nearly half of the identified non-olfactory G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have no identified cognate ligand. These 'orphan' receptors are likely to have important physiological roles that could potentially be exploited therapeutically. However, by definition, such receptors are not immediately open for pharmacological investigation of their function. Here we summarize several strategic approaches to facilitate the discovery of orphan GPCR biology.

Animals↗

Global analysis of G-protein-coupled receptor signaling in human tissues.

The G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family mediates a host of cell-cell communications upon activation by diverse ligands. Numerous GPCRs have been shown to display anatomically selective patterns of gene expression, however, our understanding of the complexity of GPCR signaling within human tissues remains unclear. In an effort to characterize global patterns of GPCR signaling in the human body, microarray analysis was performed on a large panel of tissues to monitor the gene expression levels of the receptors as well as related signaling and regulatory molecules. Analysis of the data revealed complex signaling networks in many tissue types, with tissue-specific patterns of gene expression observed for the majority of the receptors and a number of components and regulators of GPCR signaling.

Animals↗

Ligand specific up-regulation of a Renilla reniformis luciferase-tagged, structurally unstable muscarinic M3 chimeric G protein-coupled receptor.

The rat muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype 3 was modified by swapping the third intracellular loop with the corresponding region of a constitutively active mutant human beta2-adrenergic receptor and attaching Renilla reniformis luciferase to its C terminus. The chimeric fusion receptor displayed constitutive Gq- and Gs-coupled activity as demonstrated in nuclear factor of activated T cell and cAMP response element reporter gene assays. The chimeric receptor displayed a pharmacological binding profile comparable with that of the wild-type receptor for agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists but showed a large decrease in expression in both human embryonic kidney 293 and COS-7 cells. Long-term treatment of cells expressing the chimeric receptor with agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists resulted in a concentration-dependent up-regulation in the steady-state levels that was not observed for the wild-type receptor. The EC50 of neutral antagonists and inverse agonists was significantly correlated to their binding affinities at the wild-type receptor, whereas agonists demonstrated greater EC50 values for the chimeric receptor. To validate the approach as a means of discovering novel receptor modulators, a cell-based, high-throughput screening assay was developed and used to screen a small molecule compound collection against the chimeric fusion receptor. Several novel hits were identified and confirmed by ligand binding assay and functional assays using the wild-type rat muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype 3.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The use of constitutively active GPCRs in drug discovery and functional genomics.

The complete sequencing of the human genome has afforded researchers the opportunity to identify novel G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are expressed in human tissues. The successful identification of hundreds of GPCRs represents the single greatest opportunity for novel drug development today. However, the lack of identified ligands for these GPCRs has limited their utility for traditional drug discovery approaches that focus on ligand-based assay methods to discover and pharmacologically characterize drug candidates. Here, we review the use of constitutively activated GPCRs in the discovery pathway, both as a means to overcome the limitations of traditional drug discovery at novel GPCRs and as a tool to investigate the functionality of these receptors.

Animals↗

Constitutively activated G protein-coupled receptors: a novel approach to CNS drug discovery.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a major class of signal transduction proteins that modulate various biological functions. GPCRs are one of the most common targets for drug development-currently, 39 of the top 100 marketed drugs in use act directly or indirectly through activation or blockade of GPCR-mediated receptors. Nearly 160 GPCRs have been identified based on their gene sequence and their ability to interact with known endogenous ligands. However, an estimated 500-800 additional GPCRs have been classified as "orphan" receptors (oGPCRs) because their endogenous ligands have not yet been identified. Given that known GPCRs have proven to be such clinically useful drug targets, these oGPCRs represent a rich group of receptor targets for the development of novel and improved medicines. To develop ligands for these potential drug targets requires the ability to identify groups or pools of GPCRs that are likely to be involved in a specific disease process (obesity, schizophrenia, depression, etc.) and to dissect out the pharmacological and signal transduction differences between these GPCR subtypes. It also requires the development of assays to detect ligands of GPCRs even when the endogenous ligands are unidentified. This paper will review novel strategies to identify clinically interesting oGPCRs and to screen for small molecules that act as ligands without prior knowledge of endogenous ligands. This involves the use of constitutively activated GPCRs, a technology that provides a unique opportunity to identify several classes of pharmacological agents, including agonists, inverse agonists and allosteric modulators.

Animals↗