Anesthesia and adult congenital heart disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Dominique A Bettex.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To prospectively determine if retrospectively electrocardiographic (ECG)-gated multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) with a 16-detector row CT scanner can depict mitral regurgitation and enable quantification of the severity of the disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study had institutional review board approval, and patients gave informed consent. Nineteen patients with mitral regurgitation (10 men, nine women; mean age, 66 years +/- 9 [standard deviation]; range, 41-83 years) and 25 patients without mitral regurgitation (14 men, 11 women; mean age, 68 years +/- 9; range, 43-83 years) as determined with transesophageal color Doppler echocardiography and ventriculography underwent retrospectively ECG-gated 16-detector row CT. Twenty CT data sets covering the entire mitral valve apparatus were reconstructed in 5% steps of the R-R interval for each patient, and data analysis was performed with four-dimensional software. Using planimetry, two readers measured in consensus the area of the regurgitant orifice during systole. These measurements were compared with semiquantitative data from transesophageal echocardiography and ventriculography by using Spearman rank order correlation coefficients. RESULTS: In the 25 patients without mitral regurgitation, no regurgitant orifice during systole could be detected with multi-detector row CT. In the 19 patients with mitral regurgitation, a regurgitant orifice could be visualized in all cases. The mean regurgitant orifice area at CT-45 mm(2) +/- 34 (range, 10-148 mm(2))-correlated significantly with the results at transesophageal echocardiography (r = 0.807, P < .001) and ventriculography (r = 0.922, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Planimetric measurements of the regurgitant orifice area at retrospectively ECG-gated 16-detector row CT enable quantification of mitral regurgitation.
The beneficial effect of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) on medical and surgical treatment of children with congenital heart disease has been established. Its cost-effectiveness, however, has not been extensively studied. We analyzed reports of 580 routine TEE examinations performed in our institution between January 1994 and December 2003 in patients younger than 17 yr who required congenital cardiac surgery. After excluding patients who died immediately postoperatively, we identified 33 patients (5.7%) who required a second bypass run on clear-cut indication, i.e., surgical reoperation, and who clearly benefited from TEE findings. An estimate of both fixed and variable costs revealed a savings of 850 to 2655 Swiss francs (CHF) ($690 to $2130 US) per child. This figure undoubtedly underestimates the true cost-effectiveness of routine intraoperative TEE in this setting because we used mostly conservative estimates of the benefits and liberal estimates of the costs. The potential benefits of TEE in hemodynamic monitoring and medical management, in reduction of postoperative morbidity, and in improvement in the quality of life are intangible and were not considered. Although benefits and costs vary according to market conditions, patient populations, surgical practice, and technical expertise with TEE, our analysis demonstrates substantial cost-effectiveness in the use of routine TEE during pediatric cardiac surgery.
UNLABELLED: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a monitoring and diagnostic tool for the care of children undergoing cardiac surgery. We analyzed reports from 865 routine TEE examinations performed between January 1994 and March 2002 in patients younger than 17-yr-old who were undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. Patients' median age was 36 mo (range, 1 day-16 yr). The primary end-point of the study was the incidence of surgical and medical management decisions changed as a result of TEE findings; secondary end-points were diagnostic impact (diagnostic exclusions and new diagnoses) and surgical outcome. Fifty percent of the examinations were performed by anesthesiologists with an advanced level of training in perioperative TEE; all of the examiners had an experience of >or=>500 TEE examinations. Supervision by an anesthesiologist with an advanced level of training was requested in 36.7% of cases; supervision by a cardiologist was requested in 3.8%. Surgical alterations of management were reported in 12.7% of cases and included the need for a repeat bypass run in 7.3%; medical alterations of management were required in 19.4% of cases. We observed a diagnostic impact of TEE in 18.5% of cases and a suboptimal but acceptable surgical outcome in 27.6%; TEE findings predicted postoperative difficulties in 4.0%. Our results confirm the utility of routine TEE to assess repair of congenital heart defects. Furthermore, this service was competently performed by a regular team of cardiac anesthesiologists appropriately trained in TEE. IMPLICATIONS: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is an essential monitoring and diagnostic device for the care of children undergoing cardiac surgery. The surgical and medical impact of TEE is demonstrated in a large series of patients. This service can be performed by appropriately trained cardiac anesthesiologists.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To compare the effect of combined intrathecal morphine and sufentanil with low-dose iv sufentanil during propofol anesthesia for fast-track cardiac surgery. METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients with normal cardiopulmonary function who were scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were randomized to receive either a continuous iv infusion of sufentanil 0.9 to 1.8 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (13 patients), or a single lumbar intrathecal dose of sufentanil 50 micro g and morphine 500 micro g (11 patients). We prospectively studied perioperative analgesia, time to extubation and early postoperative maximal inspiratory capacity in the two groups. In the intensive care unit, the medical and nursing staff were blinded to the analgesic technique. RESULTS: Intrathecal sufentanil morphine allowed a shorter duration of intubation (104 +/- 56.5 min vs 213 +/- 104 min; P = 0.01), reduced the need for postoperative analgesia with nicomorphine (equipotent to morphine) (0.7 +/- 0.4 mg x hr(-1) vs 1.2 +/- 0.4 mg x hr(-1); P = 0.008) and improved postoperative maximal inspiratory capacity (53.4 +/- 16.1 vs 38.4 +/- 12.5% of the norm; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In low-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft or valve surgery, combined intrathecal sufentanil and morphine with a target-controlled infusion of propofol satisfies the goals of fast-track cardiac surgery.