PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Donald A Campbell

Publications and source records attributed to Donald A Campbell.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Sleepiness, sleep-disordered breathing, and accident risk factors in commercial vehicle drivers.

Sleep-disordered breathing and excessive sleepiness may be more common in commercial vehicle drivers than in the general population. The relative importance of factors causing excessive sleepiness and accidents in this population remains unclear. We measured the prevalence of excessive sleepiness and sleep-disordered breathing and assessed accident risk factors in 2,342 respondents to a questionnaire distributed to a random sample of 3,268 Australian commercial vehicle drivers and another 161 drivers among 244 invited to undergo polysomnography. More than half (59.6%) of drivers had sleep-disordered breathing and 15.8% had obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Twenty-four percent of drivers had excessive sleepiness. Increasing sleepiness was related to an increased accident risk. The sleepiest 5% of drivers on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire had an increased risk of an accident (odds ratio [OR] 1.91, p = 0.02 and OR 2.23, p < 0.01, respectively) and multiple accidents (OR 2.67, p < 0.01 and OR 2.39, p = 0.01), adjusted for established risk factors. There was an increased accident risk with narcotic analgesic use (OR 2.40, p < 0.01) and antihistamine use (OR 3.44, p = 0.04). Chronic excessive sleepiness and sleep-disordered breathing are common in Australian commercial vehicle drivers. Accident risk was related to increasing chronic sleepiness and antihistamine and narcotic analgesic use.

Accident Prevention↗

Short-stay units and observation medicine: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of how short-stay observation units (SOUs) affect the efficiency of healthcare delivery and the quality of services provided. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Best Evidence and The Cochrane Library were searched for the period 1 January 1960 to 31 July 2000. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were eligible if published in English and rated at National Health and Medical Research Council evidence levels I, II-1, II-2, or II-3; 12 comparative studies published between 1985 and 1998 met these criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Data pertaining to clinical outcomes, length of stay, re-presentation rates, emergency department efficiency and costs of care were extracted and evaluated independently. DATA SYNTHESIS: As there was considerable heterogeneity in the patient populations and outcomes, results were summarised rather than subjected to meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: SOUs have the potential to increase patient satisfaction, reduce length of stay, improve the efficiency of emergency departments and improve cost effectiveness. However, SOUs have commonly been implemented alongside new clinical protocols, and it is not possible to distinguish the relative benefits of each. As demand increases, providing effective and cost-efficient care will become increasingly important. SOUs may help organisations that are attempting to streamline patient care while maintaining their quality of service delivery.

Delivery of Health Care↗