PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Donald D Harrison

Publications and source records attributed to Donald D Harrison.

27 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

How do anterior/posterior translations of the thoracic cage affect the sagittal lumbar spine, pelvic tilt, and thoracic kyphosis?

Anterior and posterior thoracic cage translations in the sagittal plane have not been reported for their range of motion and effects on the lumbar spine and pelvis. Twenty subjects volunteered for full-spine radiography in neutral, anterior, and posterior thoracic cage translation postures in a standing position. While grasping an anterior vertical pole, with hands at elbow level, subjects were instructed on how to translate their thoracic cage without any flexion/extension, utilizing a full-length mirror. On the radiographs, all four vertebral body corners of T1 through S1 and the superior margin of the acetabulum were digitized. Segmental and global angles of thoracic kyphosis, sagittal lumbar curvature, and pelvic flexion/extension in translation postures were compared to alignment in the neutral posture. Using the femur heads as an origin, the mean range of thoracic cage translation, measured as horizontal movement of T12 from neutral posture, was found to be 85.1 mm anterior and 73 mm posterior. In anterior translation, the thoracic kyphosis is hypokyphotic (Cobb T1-T12 reduced by 16 degrees). In posterior translation, the segmental angles at T12-L1 and L1-L2 flexed, creating an "S" shape in the sagittal lumbar spine, while the thoracic kyphosis increased by 10 degrees. Using posterior tangents from L1 to L5 and T12 to S1, and Cobb angles at T12-S1, the lumbar curve reduced slightly (by less than 3.3 degrees for all global angle measurements) in anterior translation and reduced by 7.4 degrees, 5.7 degrees, and 8.1 degrees respectively in posterior thoracic translation. The angle of pelvic tilt (measured as the angle of intersection of a line through posterior-inferior S1 to the superior acetabulum and the horizontal) reduced by a mean of 15.9 degrees, and Ferguson's sacral base angle to horizontal reduced by a mean of 13.1 degrees in posterior translation. In anterior translation, pelvic tilt and Ferguson's sacral base angle increased by 15.1 degrees and 12.8 degrees, respectively. The findings of this study show that thoracic cage anterior/posterior translations cause significant changes in thoracic kyphosis (26 degrees ), lumbar curve, and pelvic tilt. An understanding of this main motion and consequent coupled movements might aid the understanding of spinal injury kinematics and spinal displacement analysis on full spine lateral radiographs of low back pain and spinal disorder populations.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Conservative treatment of a patient with previously unresponsive whiplash-associated disorders using clinical biomechanics of posture rehabilitation methods.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the treatment of a patient with chronic whiplash-associated disorders (WADs) previously unresponsive to multiple physical therapy and chiropractic treatments, which resolved following Clinical Biomechanics of Posture (CBP) rehabilitation methods. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 40-year-old man involved in a high-speed rear-impact collision developed chronic WADs including cervicothoracic, shoulder, and arm pain and headache. The patient was diagnosed with a confirmed chip fracture of the C5 vertebra and cervical and thoracic disk herniations. He was treated with traditional chiropractic and physical therapy modalities but experienced only temporary symptomatic reduction and was later given a whole body permanent impairment rating of 33% by an orthopedic surgeon. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: The patient was treated with CBP mirror-image cervical spine adjustments, exercise, and traction to reduce forward head posture and cervical kyphosis. A presentation of abnormal head protrusion resolved and cervical kyphosis returned to lordosis posttreatment. His initial neck disability index was 46% and 0% at the end of care. Verbal pain rating scales also improved for neck pain (from 5/10 to 0/10). CONCLUSION: A patient with chronic WADs and abnormal head protrusion, cervical kyphosis, and disk herniation experienced an improvement in symptoms and function after the use of CBP rehabilitation protocols when other traditional chiropractic and physical therapy procedures showed little or no lasting improvement.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of mechanical force of manually assisted chiropractic adjusting instruments.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the force-time and force-delivery characteristics of six commonly used handheld chiropractic adjusting devices. METHODS: Four spring-loaded instruments, the Activator Adjusting Instrument; Activator II Adjusting Instrument, Activator III Adjusting Instrument, and Activator IV Adjusting Instrument, and two electromechanical devices, the Harrison Handheld Adjusting Instrument and Neuromechanical Impulse Adjusting Instrument, were applied to a dynamic load cell. A total of 10 force-time histories were obtained at each of three force excursion settings (minimum to maximum) for each of the six adjusting instruments at preload of approximately 20 N. RESULTS: The minimum-to-maximum force excursion settings for the spring-loaded mechanical adjusting instruments produced similar minimum-to-maximum peak forces that were not appreciably different for most excursion settings. The electromechanical adjusting instruments produced short duration ( approximately 2-4 ms), with more linear minimum-to-maximum peak forces. The force-time profile of the electromechanical devices resulted in a more uniform and greater energy dynamic frequency response in comparison to the spring-loaded mechanical adjusting instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The handheld, electromechanical instruments produced substantially larger peak forces and ranges of forces in comparison to the handheld, spring-loaded mechanical devices. The electromechanical instruments produced greater dynamic frequency area ratios than their mechanical counterparts. Knowledge of the force-time history and force-frequency response characteristics of spinal manipulative instruments may provide basic benchmarks and may assist in understanding mechanical responses in the clinical setting.

Benchmarking↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Conservative treatment of a patient with syringomyelia using chiropractic biophysics protocols.

OBJECTIVE: To present a case of a 41-year-old man with syringomyelia and intractable pain and the subsequent reduction of symptoms. CLINICAL FEATURES: This patient acquired a traumatically induced syrinx in his upper cervical spinal cord after he fell approximately 9 feet and landed on his head, upper back, and neck 9 years before presenting for care. He was diagnosed with a spinal cord cyst (syrinx), located at approximately C2 through C4 after magnetic resonance imaging. In 1995, the patient underwent occipitoatlantal decompression surgery, which improved his symptoms for a short time. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOMES: The patient was treated using Clinical Biomechanics of Posture protocol. The patient was seen 26 times over the course of 3 weeks. His scale for pain severity decreased 50% and other subjective complaints decreased. His posture improved based upon pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cervical radiographs, showing a change from a 10 degrees lordosis with midcervical kyphosis to a 30 degrees lordosis. One-year follow-up examination showed stable improvement in the cervical lordosis and pain intensity. CONCLUSION: This case represents a change in subjective and objective measurements after conservative chiropractic care. This case provides an example that structural rehabilitation may have a positive effect on symptoms of a patient with syringomyelia.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Three-dimensional vertebral motions produced by mechanical force spinal manipulation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the 3-dimensional intersegmental motion responses produced by 3 commonly used chiropractic adjusting instruments. METHODS: Six adolescent Merino sheep were examined at the Institute for Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, Australia. In all animals, triaxial accelerometers were attached to intraosseous pins rigidly fixed to the L1 and L2 spinous processes under fluoroscopic guidance. Three handheld mechanical force chiropractic adjusting instruments (Chiropractic Adjusting Tool [CAT], Activator Adjusting Instrument IV [Activator IV], and the Impulse Adjusting Instrument [Impulse]) were used to randomly apply posteroanterior (PA) spinal manipulative thrusts to the spinous process of T12. Three force settings (low, medium, and high) and a fourth setting (Activator IV only) were applied in a randomized repeated measures design. Acceleration responses in adjacent segments (L1 and L2) were recorded at 5 kHz. The multiaxial intersegmental (L1-L2) acceleration and displacement response at each force setting was computed and compared among the 3 devices using a repeated measures analysis of variance (alpha = .05). RESULTS: For all devices, intersegmental motion responses were greatest for axial, followed by PA and medial-lateral (ML) measurement axes for the data examined. Displacements ranged from 0.11 mm (ML axis, Activator IV low setting) to 1.76 mm (PA axis, Impulse high setting). Compared with the mechanical (spring) adjusting instruments (CAT, Activator IV), the electromechanical Impulse produced the most linear increase in both force and intersegmental motion response and resulted in the greatest acceleration and displacement responses (high setting). Significantly larger magnitude intersegmental motion responses were observed for Activator IV vs CAT at the medium and high settings (P < .05). Significantly larger-magnitude PA intersegmental acceleration and displacement responses were consistently observed for Impulse compared with Activator IV and CAT for the high force setting (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Larger-magnitude, 3D intersegmental displacement and acceleration responses were observed for spinal manipulative thrusts delivered with Impulse at most force settings and always at the high force setting. Our results indicate that the force-time characteristics of impulsive-type adjusting instruments significantly affects spinal motion and suggests that instruments can and should be tuned to provide optimal force delivery.

Acceleration↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Influence of spine morphology on intervertebral disc loads and stresses in asymptomatic adults: implications for the ideal spine.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Sagittal profiles of the spine have been hypothesized to influence spinal coupling and loads on spinal tissues. PURPOSE: To assess the relationship between thoracolumbar spine sagittal morphology and intervertebral disc loads and stresses. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study evaluating sagittal X-ray geometry and postural loading in asymptomatic men and women. PATIENT SAMPLE: Sixty-seven young and asymptomatic subjects (chiropractic students) formed the study group. OUTCOME MEASURES: Morphological data derived from radiographs (anatomic angles and sagittal balance parameters) and biomechanical parameters (intervertebral disc loads and stresses) derived from a postural loading model. METHODS: An anatomically accurate, sagittal plane, upright posture, quadrilateral element model of the anterior spinal column (C2-S1) was created by digitizing lateral full-spine X-rays of 67 human subjects (51 males, 16 females). Morphological measurements of sagittal curvature and balance were compared with intervertebral disc loads and stresses obtained using a quadrilateral element postural loading model. RESULTS: In this young (mean 26.7, SD 4.8 years), asymptomatic male and female population, the neutral posture spine was characterized by an average thoracic angle (T1-T12) = +43.7 degrees (SD 11.4 degrees ), lumbar angle (T12-S1) = -63.2 degrees (SD 10.0 degrees ), and pelvic angle = +49.4 degrees (SD 9.9 degrees ). Sagittal curvatures exhibited relatively broad frequency distributions, with the pelvic angle showing the least variance and the thoracic angle showing the greatest variance. Sagittal balance parameters, C7-S1 and T1-T12, showed the best average vertical alignment (5.3 mm and -0.04 mm, respectively). Anterior and posterior disc postural loads were balanced at T8-T9 and showed the greatest difference at L5-S1. Disc compressive stresses were greatest in the mid-thoracic region of the spine, whereas shear stresses were highest at L5-S1. Significant linear correlations (p < .001) were found between a number of biomechanical and morphological parameters. Notably, thoracic shear stresses and compressive stresses were correlated to T1-T12 and T4-hip axis (HA) sagittal balance, respectively, but not to sagittal angles. Lumbar shear stresses and body weight (BW) normalized shear loads were correlated with T12-S1 balance, lumbar angle, and sacral angle. BW normalized lumbar compressive loads were correlated with T12-S1 balance and sacral angle. BW normalized lumbar disc shear (compressive) loads increased (decreased) significantly with decreasing lumbar lordosis. Cervical compressive stresses and loads were correlated with all sagittal balance parameters except S1-HA and T12-S1. A neutral spine sagittal model was constructed from the 67 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses suggest that sagittal spine balance and curvature are important parameters for postural load balance in healthy male and female subjects. Morphological predictors of altered disc load outcomes were sagittal balance parameters in the thoracic spine and anatomic angles in the lumbar spine.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Increasing the cervical lordosis with chiropractic biophysics seated combined extension-compression and transverse load cervical traction with cervical manipulation: nonrandomized clinical control trial.

BACKGROUND: Cervical lordosis has been shown to be an important outcome of care; however, few conservative methods of rehabilitating sagittal cervical alignment have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To study whether a seated, retracted, extended, and compressed position would cause tension in the anterior cervical ligament, anterior disk, and muscle structures, and thereby restore cervical lordosis or increase the curvature in patients with loss of the cervical lordosis. STUDY DESIGN: Nonrandomized, prospective, clinical control trial. METHODS: Thirty preselected patients, after diagnostic screening for tolerance to cervical extension with compression, were treated for the first 3 weeks of care using cervical manipulation and a new type of cervical extension-compression traction (vertical weight applied to the subject's forehead in the sitting position with a transverse load at the area of kyphosis). Pretreatment and posttreatment Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain ratings were compared along with pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cervical radiographs analyzed with the posterior tangent method for changes in alignment. Results are compared to a control group of 33 subjects receiving no treatment and matched for age, sex, weight, height, and pain. RESULTS: Control subjects reported no change in VAS pain ratings and had no statistical significant change in segmental or global cervical alignment on comparative lateral cervical radiographs (difference in all angle mean values < 1.3 degrees ) repeated an average of 8.5 months later. For the traction group, VAS ratings were 4.1 pretreatment and 1.1 posttreatment. On comparative lateral cervical radiographs repeated after an average of 38 visits over 14.6 weeks, 10 angles and 2 distances showed statistically significant improvements, including anterior head weight bearing (mean improvement of 11 mm), Cobb angle at C2-C7 (mean improvement of -13.6 degrees ), and the angle of intersection of the posterior tangents at C2-C7 (mean improvement of 17.9 degrees ). Twenty-one (70%) of the treatment group subjects were followed for an additional 14 months; improvements in cervical lordosis and anterior weight bearing were maintained. CONCLUSIONS: Chiropractic biophysics (CBP) technique's extension-compression 2-way cervical traction combined with spinal manipulation decreased chronic neck pain intensity and improved cervical lordosis in 38 visits over 14.6 weeks, as indicated by increases in segmental and global cervical alignment. Anterior head weight-bearing was reduced by 11 mm; Cobb angles averaged an increase of 13 degrees to 14 degrees; and the angle of intersection of posterior tangents on C2 and C7 averaged 17.9 degrees of improvement.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of axial and flexural stresses in the vertebral body cortex and trabecular bone in lordosis and two sagittal cervical translation configurations with an elliptical shell model.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis and spinal degeneration are factors in neck and back pain. Calculations of stress in clinically occurring configurations of the sagittal cervical spine are rare. OBJECTIVE: To calculate and compare combined axial and flexural stresses in lordosis versus cervical configurations in anterior and vertical sagittal head translated positions. DESIGN: Digitized measurements from lateral cervical radiographs of 3 different shapes were used to calculate axial loads and bending moments on the vertebral bodies of C2-C7. METHODS: An elliptical shell model was used to model horizontal cross-sections of the vertebral bodies of C2 through T1. Axial and flexural stresses were calculated with short compression block equations. Elliptical shell modeling permitted separation of stresses into cortical and inner medullary regions. Digitized radiographic points were used to create polynomials representing the shape of the sagittal cervical curvatures from C1 to T1. To calculate bending moments at each vertebral segment, moment arms from a vertical line through C1 were determined from digitizing. RESULTS: Compared with the normal lordosis, stresses on the anterior vertebral body cortical margins of C5-T1 in the sagittal translated postures are compression rather than tension. At the posterior vertebral bodies in the anteriorly translated position and vertically translated postures, the stresses change from compression to tension at C5 through T1. In absolute value (ABS) compared with values at the same segments in a normal lordosis, the magnitude of the combined anterior stresses in the sagittal postures are higher at C5-C7 (eg, ABS[sigma(straight)/sigma(normal)] approximately 1.25 to 4.25). CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral body stresses are reversed in direction at C5-T1 in sagittal translated postures compared to a normal lordosis. Stress analysis, with implications for bone remodeling, indicates that both sagittal head translation postures, anterior head carriage, and vertical head translation, are undesirable configurations in the cervical spine.

Adult↗