PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Donald R Lannin

Publications and source records attributed to Donald R Lannin.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Should all breast cancers be diagnosed by needle biopsy?

BACKGROUND: Although much data support the National Quality Forum recommendation that breast cancers should be diagnosed by needle biopsy before surgical resection, the exclusion criteria for those that may not be suitable have yet to be defined. METHODS: We reviewed all patients treated over the past 3 years at the Yale Breast Center to determine the percentage of patients not diagnosed by needle biopsy, and why. RESULTS: Reasons for the 17% of 630 patients who were not diagnosed by needle biopsy were as follows: inability to cooperate (1%); small or superficial lesion less than 1 cm that technically was easier to excise in the office (4%); bloody discharge without clinical or mammographic mass (1%); lesion adjacent to implant (.5%); a mammographic lesion that was too posterior, too superficial, or too faint to be performed stereotactically (5%); or patient preference (5%). CONCLUSIONS: Needle biopsy is the preferred method of diagnosis in most cases, but there are valid reasons why all breast cancers will not be diagnosed in this fashion.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy: outcomes of salvage mastectomy vs. salvage breast-conserving surgery and prognostic factors for salvage breast preservation.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of salvage mastectomy (SM) and salvage breast-conserving surgery (SBCS) and study the feasibility of SBCS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of 2,038 patients treated with breast-conserving therapy at Yale-New Haven Hospital before 1999, 166 sustained an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Outcomes and prognostic factors of patients treated with SM or SBCS were compared. Patients were considered amenable to SBCS if the recurrence was localized on mammogram and physical examination, and had pathologic size < 3 cm, confined to the biopsy site, without skin or lymphovascular invasion, and with < or = 3 positive nodes. RESULTS: Of the 146 patients definitively managed at IBTR, surgery was SM (n = 116) or SBCS (n = 30). The median length of follow-up after IBTR was 13.8 years. The SM and SBCS cohorts had no significant differences, except at IBTR the SM cohort had a greater tumor size (p = 0.049). Of the SM cohort, 65.5% were considered appropriate for SBCS, and a localized relapse was predicted by estrogen-receptor positive, diploid, and detection of recurrence by mammogram. Multicentric disease correlated with BRCA1/2 mutation, estrogen-receptor negative, lymph node positive at relapse, and detection of recurrence by physical examination. Survival after IBTR was 64.5% at 10 years, with no significant difference between SM (65.7%) and SBCS (58.0%). Only 2 patients in the SBCS cohort subsequently had a second IBTR, and were salvaged with mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS: While mastectomy is considered the standard surgical salvage of IBTR, SBCS is feasible and prognostic factors are related to favorable tumor biology and early detection. Patients with BRCA1/2 germline mutations may be less appropriate for SBCS, as multicentric disease was more prevalent. Patients who underwent SBCS had comparable outcomes as those who underwent SM, but remain at continued risk for IBTR. A prospective trial evaluating repeat lumpectomy and partial breast reirradiation is discussed.

Adult↗

Twenty-two year experience with recurring subareolar abscess andlactiferous duct fistula treated by a single breast surgeon.

BACKGROUND: Recurring subareolar abscess and lactiferous duct fistula are frequently difficult to manage. METHODS: Personal experience with 67 cases treated during the past 22 years is reviewed. RESULTS: There were 38 cases of subareolar abscess and 29 of lactiferous duct fistula. Thirty-three patients had resolution with antibiotics and needle aspiration or with incision and drainage,but 34 patients required definitive duct excision. Eight patients had duct excision through circumareolar incisions, and 5 of these had prolonged healing problems or recurrence within 1 year. Twenty-six patients had duct excision by placing a probe into the duct and radially excising an elliptical area of the nipple and areola like a "slice of pie," and these all healed primarily (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the patients with subareolar abscess can be managed medically, but the other half will require definitive duct excision. A radial elliptical incision with primary closure results in excellent cosmesis and low long-term recurrence rates.

Abscess↗

End results of salvage therapy after failure of breast-conservation surgery.

About 10% to 15% of patients who undergo breast-conservation surgery and radiation therapy will subsequently develop ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). This paper reviews the biology, clinical management, and outcome of this entity. Risk factors for IBTR include young age, positive microscopic margins, gross multifocality, an extensive intraductal component, and lymphatic vessel invasion. The standard therapy following IBTR has been mastectomy, but interest in further breast-conservation approaches has recently arisen. Although the outcome following salvage therapy is quite good, the risk of distant metastases for patients with IBTR is three to five times greater than for those without recurrence. The reason for this association has been controversial, but it now appears that IBTR is both a marker of the underlying biologic aggressiveness of the tumor and a source for further tumor metastasis. Monitoring of patients following lumpectomy and radiation therapy, and aggressive therapy for IBTR when diagnosed, are clearly warranted. Prognostic factors at the time of IBTR and implications for local and systemic therapy are discussed.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Impacting cultural attitudes in African-American women to decrease breast cancer mortality.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade breast cancer mortality has decreased 1% or 2% per year in white women, but not in African-American women. The resulting "mortality gap" is a serious national problem, and it must be a high priority to understand the reasons for it and develop solutions. METHODS: The literature is reviewed to elucidate reasons for the mortality gap and the current status of possible solutions to the problem. In addition, new results of large population-based surveys in North Carolina are presented that may shed light on the problem. RESULTS: The most important reason for the mortality gap is that African-American women tend to be diagnosed with more advanced stage breast cancer than white women. This is due both to lower utilization of screening mammography and to delayed presentation for women with palpable lumps. This is related both to socioeconomic factors that influence access to medical care and to cultural factors that tend to discourage women from seeking care early for breast problems. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the cultural beliefs that influence patient behavior will greatly aid physicians in caring for their African-American patients, and ultimately may help reduce the racial gap in breast cancer mortality.

Adult↗

Religious beliefs and breast cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying a reported tendency for women who hold strong religious beliefs to seek medical help at more advanced stages of breast cancer are unknown. This study investigates further the effect of religious beliefs with other variables on breast cancer screening and the intended presentation of a self-discovered breast lump. METHODS: The study included 682 eastern North Carolina women aged 40 and over who were interviewed in their homes about religious and other beliefs about breast cancer, screening, and intended actions with a self-discovered breast lump. RESULTS: Principal components factor analysis results suggested that a majority of women believe that God works through doctors to cure breast cancer. We labeled this dimension "religious intervention with treatment." A minority believed that medical treatment was unnecessary because only God could cure breast cancer. We labeled this dimension "religious intervention in place of treatment." The first dimension correlated with self-reported mammography but not clinical breast examination or women's intention to delay presentation of a self-discovered breast lump. The second dimension, significantly more common in African American women who were less educated and older, correlated strongly with the intention to delay presentation of a self-discovered breast lump. CONCLUSIONS: Belief in "religious intervention in place of treatment" may help to explain why African American women delay presentation of palpable breast lumps, contributing to advanced-stage cancer diagnosis. We suggest that clinicians and clergy work together within the context of religious beliefs to enhance early detection and survival from breast cancer.

Adult↗

Communicating breast cancer risk: patient perceptions of provider discussions.

This study investigated the relationship between breast cancer risk communication delivered by providers and patient knowledge, perceptions, and screening practices. Telephone interviews were conducted with 141 African American (n = 71) and white (n = 70) first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients who received medical services at 2 university medical centers in North Carolina during 1994-95. Multiple items assessed subjects' reports of discussions with providers about family history and personal risk, knowledge of breast cancer risk factors, risk perceptions, breast cancer concerns, and screening practices. African American (AA) women were less likely than white women to report being informed of their increased personal risk of breast cancer because of family history. After controlling for education level, AA women aged > or = 50 years were less likely than white women to have ever had a mammogram. Both AA and white women who discussed family history and risk with their providers were significantly more likely to have had a mammogram within the past 2 years. Although these discussions seemed to increase participants' perceived risk of developing breast cancer, they did not promote knowledge of risk factors or increase levels of cancer concern. Study results indicate that provider discussions about family history and personal risk, accompanied by increases in risk perception, promote patient compliance with screening goals. Findings suggest that accurate knowledge about specific breast cancer risk factors may not be necessary to achieve screening compliance. However, additional studies are needed to investigate the relationship between knowledge of breast cancer risk factors and the adoption of behaviors associated with reducing breast cancer risk.

Black or African American↗