PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Dorcas E Beaton

Publications and source records attributed to Dorcas E Beaton.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Eight predictive factors associated with response patterns during physiotherapy for soft tissue shoulder disorders were identified.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Combining information on initial and final state with information on speed of response may reflect the clinical reality of the course of recovery from soft tissue shoulder disorders. The purpose was to identify baseline factors that predict patterns of response to physiotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective cohort of consecutive clients (n=361) with soft tissue shoulder disorders attending physiotherapy. A previous study identified four typical patterns of response such that each individual was assigned to one of four clusters (dependent outcome). Independent predictors (n=28) included demographics, disorder-related and disability measures, treatment factors, clinical findings, and expectations for recovery. Multivariable multinomial logistic regression techniques were used. RESULTS: Predictors differentiating patterns of response were: Age (by decade), duration of current shoulder problem, worker's compensation claim, client's global rating of problem, Physical Component Score (SF-36), Mental Component Score (SF-36), over the counter medication use, and therapist prediction of client to return to usual activity. CONCLUSION: Using a clinically sensible outcome, we have identified several predictors that can be used by clinicians in clinical decision making.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment for patients with a fragility fracture in an orthopaedic environment.

BACKGROUND: Fragility fractures resulting from osteoporosis are common injuries. However, the identification and treatment of osteoporosis in these high-risk patients are widely reported to be inadequate. The goals of this study were to determine how many patients receiving inpatient or outpatient treatment for a fragility fracture could be identified and enrolled in a program for osteoporosis education, investigation, and treatment and receive appropriate osteoporosis care within the program. METHODS: An Osteoporosis Exemplary Care Program was implemented to identify, educate, evaluate, refer, and treat patients considered to be at risk for osteoporosis because of a typical fragility fracture. System modifications included coordination among the orthopaedic unit, Metabolic Bone Disease Clinic, and nuclear medicine unit to provide a continuum of care for these patients. Barriers were addressed through ongoing education of physicians, staff, and patients to increase knowledge and awareness of osteoporosis. The percentages of patients previously diagnosed and treated for osteoporosis, referred for investigation of osteoporosis, treated by the orthopaedic team, and receiving appropriate attention for osteoporosis were calculated. Risk factors for osteoporosis were also assessed. RESULTS: Three hundred and forty-nine patients with a fragility fracture (221 outpatients and 128 inpatients) who met the inclusion criteria and an additional eighty-one patients with a fracture (fifty-five outpatients and twenty-six inpatients) who did not meet the inclusion criteria but were suspected by their orthopaedic surgeons of having underlying osteoporosis were enrolled in the Osteoporosis Exemplary Care Program. More than 96% (414) of these 430 patients received appropriate attention for osteoporosis. Approximately one-third (146) of the 430 patients had been diagnosed and treated for osteoporosis before the time of recruitment. Two hundred and twenty-two of the remaining patients were referred to the Metabolic Bone Disease Clinic or to their family physician for further investigation and treatment for osteoporosis. Treatment was initiated by the orthopaedic team for another twenty-three patients. Many patients had risk factors for osteoporosis in addition to the fragility fracture; these included a previous fracture (forty-nine of 187; 26%), a mother who had had a fragility fracture (forty-two of 188; 22%), or a history of smoking (105 of 188; 56%). CONCLUSIONS: In a coordinated post-fracture osteoporosis education and treatment program directed at patients with a fragility fracture and their caregivers, >95% of patients were appropriately diagnosed, treated, or referred for osteoporosis care. To accomplish this, a dedicated coordinator and the full cooperation of orthopaedic surgeons and residents, orthopaedic technologists, allied health-care professionals (nurses, physical and occupational therapists, and social workers), and administrative staff were required.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗
PubMed2006

Prognosis in soft tissue disorders of the shoulder: predicting both change in disability and level of disability after treatment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinicians often are faced with questions about prognosis and outcome of shoulder disorders. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of both change in disability and level of disability following physical therapy treatment. SUBJECTS: The subjects were consecutive patients (n=361) who were receiving physical therapy for soft tissue shoulder disorders. METHODS: Clinical response to physical therapy, which was measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) measure, was assessed over 12 weeks. The 28 independent baseline predictors included demographics, disorder-related and disability measures, medication use, clinical findings, and expectations for recovery. Multiple linear regression techniques were used. RESULTS: Predictors of greater disability at discharge were: higher initial disability, therapist prediction of restricted activities at discharge, workers' compensation claim, older age, and being female. Predictors of greater improvement in disability were: shoulder surgery, higher pain intensity, shorter duration of symptoms, younger age, and poorer general physical health (measured using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey [SF-36]). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic factors differ depending on the format of the outcome. Only age was significant in both models.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Beyond return to work: testing a measure of at-work disability in workers with musculoskeletal pain.

BACKGROUND: There are a limited number of validated measures of a patient's perception of the level of difficulty that they are having at their job. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the 16-item Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ-16). METHODS: A sample of 42 workers reporting to a workplace occupational health unit with upper limb or low back pain were enrolled in an observational study. Participants were assessed at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks post reporting. Psychometric testing (distributions, Cronbach's alpha, construct validity and responsiveness to change in problem and pain) was done using the baseline and 12-week data. RESULTS: The WLQ-16 had evidence of internal consistency, construct validity and responsiveness. Some ceiling effect was found in the domains of mental-interpersonal and output demands. Physical demands suffered from missing values in 18/42 due to not-applicable content. Construct validity revealed that there was less discrimination at the higher (less limited) end of the scale. Responsiveness was present, though less than found with other measures of function and pain. CONCLUSIONS: The WLQ-16 shows promise as a measure of at-work disability. Further testing to evaluate the ceiling effect and responsiveness to constructs of change more closely related to work disability is recommended.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A study compared nine patient-specific indices for musculoskeletal disorders.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patient-specific quality of life indices show great potential, but certain conceptual and methodological concerns have yet to be fully addressed. The present study reviewed nine patient-specific instruments used in musculoskeletal disorders: the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Juvenile Arthritis Quality of life Questionnaire (JAQQ), McMaster-Toronto Arthritis questionnaire (MACTAR), Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP), Patient-Specific Index (PASI) for total hip arthroplasty, Problem Elicitation Technique (PET), Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life, Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), and Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Each tool was evaluated for purpose, content validity, face validity, feasibility, psychometric properties, and responsiveness. RESULTS: This critical appraisal revealed important differences in terms of the concept underlying these indices, the domains covered, the item-generation techniques and the scoring (response scale, methods) in each scale. The nine indices would generate different responses and likely scores for the same patient, despite the fact that they all include patient-generated items. CONCLUSION: Although the value of these indices in treatment planning and monitoring at an individual level is strong, more studies are needed to improve our understanding of how to interpret the numeric scores of patient-specific indices at both an individual and a group level.

Health Status Indicators↗
PubMed2005

Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop a short, reliable, and valid measure of physical function and symptoms related to upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders by shortening the full, thirty-item DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Outcome Measure. METHODS: Three item-reduction techniques were used on the cross-sectional field-testing data derived from a study of 407 patients with various upper-limb conditions. These techniques were the concept-retention method, the equidiscriminative item-total correlation, and the item response theory (Rasch modeling). Three eleven-item scales were created. Data from a longitudinal cohort study in which the DASH questionnaire was administered to 200 patients with shoulder and wrist/hand disorders were then used to assess the reliability (Cronbach alpha and test-retest reliability) and validity (cross-sectional and longitudinal construct) of the three scales. Results were compared with those derived with the full DASH. RESULTS: The three versions were comparable with regard to their measurement properties. All had a Cronbach alpha of > or = 0.92 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of > or = 0.94. Evidence of construct validity was established (r > or = 0.64 with single-item indices of pain and function). The concept-retention method, the most subjective of the approaches to item reduction, ranked highest in terms of its similarity to the original DASH. CONCLUSIONS: The concept-retention version is named the QuickDASH. It contains eleven items and is similar with regard to scores and properties to the full DASH. A comparison of item-reduction approaches suggested that the retention of clinically sensible and important content produced a comparable, if not slightly better, instrument than did more statistically driven approaches.

Arm↗
PubMed2004

Osteoporosis health belief scale: minor changes were required after telephone administration among women.

OBJECTIVE: The Osteoporosis Health Belief Scale (OHBS) is a 42-item scale designed to measure general health motivation, perceived susceptibility to and seriousness of osteoporosis, and beliefs about calcium intake and exercise in preventing and treating osteoporosis. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the OHBS by telephone administration among older women. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A convenience sample of 425 women aged 61-93 years participating in a longitudinal arthritis study was recruited by telephone. Item clarity was evaluated and 22 additional items (6 reworded, 16 from other questionnaires) were considered to supplement or replace existing scale items. Multitrait scaling techniques and exploratory factor analysis were used to test scale structure. Construct validity was tested based on theoretical hypothesis between OHBS subscale scores and participant characteristics. RESULTS: A few modifications to the OHBS scale were suggested, reducing the scale by five items (two redundant, three did not load), rewording one item and moving on item to a different subscale. The modified 37-item OHBS had a seven-factor uncorrelated solution explaining 48% of the model variance with internal consistency ranging from 0.73 to 0.88. CONCLUSION: Relatively minor changes to the OHBS results in reduced redundancy and improved internal structure of the scale for telephone administration among women over 60 years of age. Further examination is recommended to confirm these findings.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Questioning the stability of sense of coherence--the impact of socio-economic status and working conditions in the Canadian population.

BACKGROUND: Much debate exists about the stability of the sense of coherence measure. This study examined changes in sense of coherence (SOC), and the variables associated with these changes, over a 4-year period, in a representative sample of the Canadian labour force (n=6,790). METHODS: Two methods were used to assess change in SOC: (1) Change outside of that which could be considered as indistinguishable from measurement error, and (2) Change of more than 10%, which was originally proposed by Antonovksy, the scales designer. RESULTS: Over the study period, 35.4% of the population reported changes in SOC outside the range we consider possible due to measurement error, with 58% reporting change greater than 10%. Unskilled occupations were associated with declines in SOC, with household income demonstrating a curvilinear relationship with decline in SOC in the female population only. None of the variables used predicted increases in SOC. CONCLUSIONS: Given the degree of change in SOC, and the representativeness of the study sample, we suggest that SOC has a large state component. Given this lack of stability, we recommend caution if using the SOC to represent a stable global orientation within a causal context.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function.

Outcome measures may be seen as windows, each of which provides a different perspective on a single view, the impact of a disease or disorder on the patient concerned. A comparison of the orthopaedic literature in 1991 with that in 2001 suggests that the intervening decade saw an increasing interest in the use of patient-based measures in clinical outcome studies, particularly randomized controlled trials. The tool most commonly used to determine the patient's point of view was the generic Short Form-36 (SF-36). Other measures included regional assessments such as the Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, or the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand. The Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (hip and knee), the Simple Shoulder Test (shoulder) and the Roland-Morris Questionnaire or Oswestry Disability Index (low back) were the most common joint-specific measures. Each of the questionnaires reported was supported by evidence of reliability and validity, and in most cases one or more studies had shown responsiveness in at least musculoskeletal disorders. We provide a brief description of the most common tools, and review the evidence that orthopaedic research is making increased use of measures of health status and function.

Disability Evaluation↗
PubMed2002

Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research.

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for an instrument is a much sought after, but elusive figure. In this review we will highlight new findings in this area, including taxonomy of MCID, methods used to ascertain MCID, the perspective taken for evaluating importance, and other sources of variation for MCID values. In the end we believe the MCID will be a context-specific value rather than a fixed number. The review highlights the need to do methodological research in this area, especially concurrent comparisons between approaches, or across different patient groups. There are many faces to the MCID, it is not a simple concept, nor simple to calculate.

Clinical Medicine↗