PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Doris Østergaard

Publications and source records attributed to Doris Østergaard.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mivacurium in patients phenotypically homozygous for the atypical plasma cholinesterase variant: effect of injection of human cholinesterase.

BACKGROUND: In patients homozygous for atypical plasma cholinesterase, mivacurium causes a long-lasting neuromuscular block, but injection of human cholinesterase has been proven effective in antagonizing the block. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of mivacurium in such patients, as well as the effect of cholinesterase injected early or late after mivacurium. METHODS: Eleven patients phenotypically homozygous for the atypical variant received 0.075 mg/kg (1 patient) or 0.15 mg/kg (10 patients) mivacurium. The neuromuscular block was monitored using train-of-four nerve stimulation and mechanomyography. Cholinesterase, 2.8-10.0 mg/kg, was administered approximately 30 or 120 min after mivacurium. The times to different levels of neuromuscular recovery and the venous concentrations of the isomers of mivacurium were measured. RESULTS: Injection of cholinesterase increased plasma cholinesterase activity to normal and the clearances of the active isomers and the elimination rate constants by a factor of 10-15. The first response was seen in 13.5 min (3.7-44.2 min). Time to a train-of-four ratio of 0.8 ranged from 30 to 60 min (n = 6). Neostigmine injected after cholinesterase shortened recovery further, and a train-of-four ratio of 0.8 was reached in 10-30 min. CONCLUSION: As expected, the duration of action of mivacurium is markedly prolonged in homozygous atypical patients. Injection of cholinesterase significantly increases the metabolism of mivacurium, leading to a shorter duration of action. Injection of neostigmine after the administration of cholinesterase speeds up recovery.

Adolescent↗

The effect of in-training assessment on clinical confidence in postgraduate education.

INTRODUCTION: The literature on how in-training assessment (ITA) works in practice and what educational outcomes can actually be achieved is limited. One of the aims of introducing ITA is to increase trainees' clinical confidence; this relies on the assumption that assessment drives learning through its content, format and programming. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of introducing a structured ITA programme on junior doctors' clinical confidence. The programme was aimed at first year trainees in anaesthesiology. METHODS: The study involved a nationwide survey of junior doctors' self-confidence in clinical performance before (in 2001) and 2 years after (in 2003) the introduction of an ITA programme. Respondents indicated confidence on a 155-item questionnaire related to performance of clinical skills and tasks reflecting broad aspects of competence. A total of 23 of these items related to the ITA programme. RESULTS: The response rate was 377/531 (71%) in 2001 and 344/521 (66%) in 2003. There were no statistically significant differences in mean levels of confidence before and 2 years after the introduction of the ITA programme - neither in aspects that were related to the programme nor in those that were unrelated to the programme. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates that the introduction of a structured ITA programme did not have any significant effect on trainees' mean level of confidence on a broad range of aspects of clinical competence. The importance of timeliness and rigorousness in the application of ITA is discussed.

Anesthesiology↗