PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Douglas M Potter

Publications and source records attributed to Douglas M Potter.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Systemic and tumor disposition of platinum after administration of cisplatin or STEALTH liposomal-cisplatin formulations (SPI-077 and SPI-077 B103) in a preclinical tumor model of melanoma.

PURPOSE: SPI-077 and SPI-077 B103 are formulations of cisplatin encapsulated in pegylated STEALTH liposomes that accumulate in tumors. However, the extent to which active platinum (Pt) is released from the liposome is unknown. Thus, we evaluated the disposition of encapsulated and released Pt in plasma and tumors after administration of STEALTH liposomal and nonliposomal cisplatin. METHODS: Cisplatin (10 mg/kg), SPI-077 (10 mg/kg), and SPI-077 B103 (5 mg/kg) were administered i.v. to mice bearing B16 murine melanoma tumors. Microdialysis probes were placed into the right and left sides of each tumor, and serial samples were collected from tumor extracellular fluid (ECF) after administration of each agent. After each microdialysis procedure, tumor samples were obtained at each probe site to measure total Pt and Pt-DNA adducts. In a separate study, serial plasma samples (three mice per time point) were obtained. Unbound Pt in tumor ECF and plasma, and total Pt in tumor homogenates were measured by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Area under the tumor ECF (AUC(ECF)) concentration versus time curves of unbound Pt were calculated. Intrastrand GG (Pt-GG) and AG (Pt-AG) Pt-DNA adducts were measured via (32)P-postlabeling. RESULTS: Mean+/-SD peak concentrations of total Pt in tumor homogenates after administration of cisplatin, SPI-077, and SPI-077 B-103 were 3.2+/-1.9, 11.9+/-3.0, and 3.5+/-0.3 microg/g, respectively. After cisplatin, mean+/-SD AUC(ECF) of unbound Pt was 0.72+/-0.46 microg/ml.h. There was no detectable unbound Pt in tumor ECF after SPI-077 or SPI-077 B-103 treatment. Mean+/-SD peak concentration of Pt-GG DNA adducts after administration of cisplatin, SPI-077, and SPI-077 B-103 were 13.1+/-3.3, 3.5+/-1.3, and 2.1+/-0.3 fmol Pt/microg DNA, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that more SPI-077 and SPI-077 B103 distribute into tumors, but release less Pt into tumor ECF, and form fewer Pt-DNA adducts than does cisplatin.

Animals↗

Randomized trial of influenza vaccine with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor or placebo in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To determine whether granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) would improve response to influenza vaccination in cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, patient-blinded, placebo-controlled trial carried out in 1997 to 2000, 133 patients were stratified into five groups of treatment and disease. Single doses of standard split trivalent influenza vaccine and either placebo or 250 micro g of GM-CSF were administered at the same time. Hemagglutination inhibition assay titers were measured before and 4 weeks after vaccination. RESULTS: Standard analyses, which define response as at least a four-fold increase in titers, detect no effect of GM-CSF for any of the three influenza subtypes in the trivalent vaccines (P >or=.12). Analysis that includes the magnitude of the change in titers and combines responses of the subtypes suggests that the placebo group had the greater response (P =.051), thus indicating that GM-CSF does not improve response. Ancillary analyses show that response declines both with increasing age and with higher initial titers. The fraction of patients with at least a four-fold increase in titers was 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.29 to 0.42) CONCLUSION: A single 250- micro g dose of GM-CSF administered with the influenza vaccine does not improve response to vaccination. Response in cancer patients is low and declines as age and initial titer increase.

Adult↗

Adaptive dose finding for phase I clinical trials of drugs used for chemotherapy of cancer.

Phase I clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy drugs are intended to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD). Thestandard method employed is a rule-based dose-escalation scheme in which escalation depends on the number of patients at a dose level that have dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The MTD is thus defined in terms of the rules and a series of dose levels selected for sampling. For some trials it is desirable to have a more precise definition of the MTD, and to determine the MTD more accurately than possible with the rule-based schemes. Continuous reassessment methods (CRMs) define the MTD to be the dose at which a fixed fraction of patients experience DLT, and thus appear suited to these trials. It is shown, however, that these methods can have failure modes that in fact make them unattractive. An alternative data-driven dose-finding method is described that combines the robustness of the rule-based methods and with features of CRMs. The method has two stages. In the first stage, doses are escalated by a factor of 1.5. In the second stage, which begins at the first instance of DLT, a two-parameter logistic dose-response model estimates the MTD from the DLT experience of all patients. The model is initialized by setting the dose (d10) at which 10 per cent of patients would experience DLT to half the dose at which the first DLT was observed, and the dose (d90) at which 90 per cent would experience DLT to ten times d10. Weights are assigned such that the information at d10 and d90 is equivalent to that of one patient at each of the two doses. Cohorts of three patients are treated in both stages, and the dose for a new cohort in the second stage is the estimated MTD. The only prior information required to specify the design completely is the dose which will be given to the first cohort. Two stopping rules are investigated; among the requirements for these are that at least three (or four) DLTs be observed and at least nine patients be treated in the second stage. Simulations show that a coefficient of variation of approximately 0.4 on a target DLT probability of 0.3 is obtained over a wide variation in dose-response characteristics of the study drug. The performance of the new method is compared to that of rule-based methods.

Algorithms↗

Pharmacokinetics of high-dose oral calcitriol: results from a phase 1 trial of calcitriol and paclitaxel.

OBJECTIVES: The data reported are from a trial designed to determine, in patients with advanced cancer, the maximum tolerated dose and pharmacokinetics of calcitriol when administered with paclitaxel, an agent whose antitumor activity in in vitro and in vivo studies has been shown to be enhanced by calcitriol. An additional goal was to evaluate the relationship between calcitriol dose and hypercalcemia. METHODS: Calcitriol was given orally for 3 consecutive days each week, and paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) was given intravenously weekly. Thirty-six patients were treated in cohorts composed of 3 to 9 patients, at escalating dose levels of calcitriol. The starting dose of calcitriol was 4 microg for 3 consecutive days each week, and the maximum dose administered was 38 microg for 3 consecutive days each week. The preparation of calcitriol used in this trial was a commercially available caplet (0.5 microg per caplet). Serum calcitriol concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. Detailed assessments of calcitriol pharmacokinetics were performed in 26 patients. RESULTS: There was substantial interpatient variation in peak serum calcitriol concentrations (C(max)), time to reach C(max), and area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC). Serum calcitriol AUC was not proportional to calcitriol dose (P =.0014). AUC for the 24-hour period after calcitriol administration [AUC (0-24)] at 38 microg was only 4 times that at 4 microg, instead of the 9.5-fold increase expected for a proportional relationship. Calcitriol plasma concentrations of 600 to 1440 pg/mL were achieved. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred in this trial. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variability in absorption, very high doses of calcitriol can be safely administered with paclitaxel. The high calcitriol serum concentrations achieved in this study approach those that, both in vitro and in vivo, potentiate the cytotoxicity of taxanes and platinum analogs.

Administration, Oral↗

Inter- and intratumoral disposition of platinum in solid tumors after administration of cisplatin.

One possible explanation for variable tumor response within a single patient may be related to delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the tumors. Microdialysis was used to evaluate inter- and intratumoral disposition of unbound platinum (Pt) after cisplatin administration to mice bearing B16 murine melanoma tumors or H23 human NSCLC xenografts. Before i.v. dosing with cisplatin (3 or 10 mg/kg), microdialysis probes were placed into the right and left sides of each tumor, and serial extracellular fluid (ECF) samples were collected for 2 h. After microdialysis, tumor samples were obtained at each probe site to measure total Pt and Pt-DNA adducts. In a separate study, serial plasma samples (n = 3 mice/time point) were obtained between 5 min and 2 h. Unbound Pt in tumor ECF and plasma and total Pt in tumor homogenates were measured by flameless atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Pt-DNA adducts in tumor samples were measured via (32)P-postlabeling. Area under the plasma (AUC(P)) and tumor ECF (AUC(ECF)) concentration-time curves of unbound Pt were calculated. Factor VIII expression was measured by immunohistochemistry in tumor samples. After administration of 3 or 10 mg/kg of cisplatin to mice bearing B16 tumors, there was a proportional increase in AUC(PL) with dose; however, there was not a proportional increase in AUC(ECF). There was a relatively high (30-fold) inter- and low (2.5-fold) intratumoral variability in AUC(ECF). AUC(ECF) correlated better with Pt-DNA adduct formation than did total Pt concentration in tumors. There was no relationship between Factor VIII expression and Pt exposure in tumors. The variable penetration of Pt from plasma into tumor ECF may be associated with variable response of tumors.

Animals↗