PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Douglas P Sinn

Publications and source records attributed to Douglas P Sinn.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Experience with cranial implant-based prosthetic reconstruction.

Reconstruction of acquired or congenitally absent facial structures is a challenging task for the reconstructive surgeon. Often inadequate soft tissue, cartilaginous, or osseous support exists for a reconstruction which is functional, aesthetic, and achieved with a reasonable effort on the part of the surgeon and patient. Prosthetic reconstruction of these structures utilizing cranial implants is a viable option which offers several advantages when compared to traditional reconstructive techniques. We present our experience with 114 cranial implants in 32 patients for craniofacial reconstruction. One hundred fourteen cranial implants were placed in a total of 32 patients for reconstruction of facial structures. Indications for cranial implants with prosthetic reconstruction were lack of adequate tissue for reconstruction, failed reconstructive attempts, and selection of the technique by the patient. Seventy-two implants were placed in the mastoid region, 31 within the orbit, 7 within the nasal cavity, with four additional implants for the reconstruction of eyebrows. Cranial implants were followed by clinical and radiographic examination at intervals ranging from 3-46 months (mean 15.3 months). Patient records were retrospectively reviewed for surgical complications, soft tissue reactions, infections, and implant failures. The total success rate of cranial implantation in the study group was 92.9% (106/114). Surgical complications occurred in three of the 32 patients (9.3%). All cranial implants were successfully reconstructed after integration. Seven percent of the implants failed after initial integration was successful. The rate of significant soft tissue reactions or frank infection observed among the implanted patients was 6.1%. Titanium cranial implants coupled with custom prosthetic reconstruction offer an excellent alternative to traditional surgical techniques in the reconstruction of acquired or congenitally absent facial structures. Predictability, prosthetic adaptability, as well as superior aesthetics are major advantages to this technique when compared to traditional surgical reconstructive techniques.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Stereolithography for craniofacial surgery.

Advances in computer technology have aided in the diagnostic and clinical management of complex congenital craniofacial deformities. The use of stereolithographic models has begun to replace traditional milled models in the treatment of craniofacial deformities. Research has shown that stereolithography models are highly accurate and provide added information in treatment planning for the correction of craniofacial deformities. These include the added visualization of the complex craniofacial anatomy and preoperative surgical planning with a highly accurate three-dimensional model. While the stereolithographic process has had a beneficial impact on the field of craniofacial surgery, the added cost of the procedure continues to be a hindrance to its widespread acceptance in clinical practice. With improved technology and accessibility the utilization of stereolithography in craniofacial surgery is expected to increase. This review will highlight the development and current usage of stereolithography in craniofacial surgery and provide illustration of it use.

Child↗
PubMed2005

Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques.

PURPOSE: Using finite element (FE) computer model simulation, we compared the mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) through the use of 2 different techniques to stabilize the osteotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the reconstructed geometry from computed tomography scans of dry adult skull with a mandibular deformity requiring surgical correction, we developed 3-dimensional FE models that simulate BSSRO with 2 different techniques to stabilize the osteotomy. Technique 1 uses 3 bicortical titanium screws. Technique 2 uses a curved titanium plate with 4 monocortical screws. Five different load cases were applied to the mandible after the simulated BSSRO with the mandible being constrained at both temporomandibular joints. To evaluate the efficacy of these 2 stabilization techniques, we compared 1) the resulting deflections at the central incisor, 2) the mechanical stresses developed in the bone in the vicinity of the stabilizing implants, and 3) the mechanical stresses developed within the screw/plating system themselves. RESULTS: Technique 1, using 3 bicortical titanium screws, leads to smaller deflections at the central incisor for all 5 load cases, suggesting higher mechanical stability. Technique 1 also leads to lower mechanical stresses in the bone and in the implanted screws, whereas technique 2 is associated with higher values in each of these quantities. CONCLUSIONS: To stabilize osteotomies after a 3-dimensional simulated BSSRO, 3 bicortical screws forming an inverted-L configuration are shown to offer more effective load transmission in the mandibular construct. This technique, when examined in an FE model, leads to higher stability with lower mechanical stresses in the bone near the bicortical screws.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Management of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.

In approximately 1 in 1000 live births in the United States, an infant has some variant of a facial, skeletal, or craniofacial deformity. If cleft lip and palate deformities are included, the incidence is greater. Timing of the surgical management of these patients has been advocated from the first few weeks after birth until well into the second decade. Many of these patients require multiple, staged procedures that involve movements of the bone and soft tissue from the intracranial and extracranial approaches. The surgical approach to most of these congenital deformities was radically changed by techniques introduced to the United States by Paul Tessier of France in 1967. From his imaginative intracranial and extracranial approaches, numerous advances have been made that facilitate the care of most of these children. More recently, additional advances in pediatric anesthesia and biodegradable plating systems have improved the management of these complex craniomaxillofacial deformities.

Absorbable Implants↗
PubMed2002

Management of syndromic craniosynostosis.

Normalization of craniofacial malformation in syndromic craniosynostosis patients is an extended process. The care starts at birth and ends in adolescence. Multiple surgeries may be required for each deformity. The relationship among patient, family, and doctor team is important because they must understand the complete processes of management. Psychologists provide an important support mechanism.

Adolescent↗